The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 30
SHERIFFS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 30.50

30.50 Payment of salaries and expenses.—

(1) The sheriff shall requisition and the board of county commissioners shall pay him or her, at the first meeting in October of each year, and each month thereafter, one-twelfth of the total amount budgeted for the office; provided, that at the first meeting in January of each year, the board shall, at the request of the sheriff, pay one-sixth of the total appropriated, and one-twelfth each month thereafter, which payments shall be not more than the total appropriation. Provided further that any part of the amount budgeted for equipment shall be paid at any time during the year upon the request of the sheriff.

(2) The sheriff shall deposit the county warrant or warrants in his or her official bank account as provided in s. 30.51(3) and draw his or her own checks thereon in payment of the salaries of the sheriff and his or her deputies, clerks, and employees and the expenses of office. All salaries paid shall be supported by payrolls, and all expenses paid shall be supported by approved bills; provided, that the sheriff may draw a check to himself or herself for the expense of an investigation, and may note on the voucher only the information that he or she may consider proper to divulge.

(3) The sheriff may set up a revolving fund for payment in cash of small items. The revolving fund shall be reimbursed from time to time by payment of the vouchers representing the cash payments.

(4) The sheriff shall keep necessary budget accounts and records, and shall charge all paid bills and payrolls to the proper budget accounts. The reserve for contingencies, or any part thereof, may be transferred to any of the budget appropriations, in the discretion of the sheriff. With the approval of the board of county commissioners, or of the budget commission if there is a budget commission in the county, the budget may be amended as provided for county budgets in s. 129.06(2).

(5) All expenses incurred in the fiscal year for which the budget is made shall be vouchered and charged to the budget for that year, and to carry out this purpose the books may be held open for 30 days after the end of the year.

(6) All unexpended balances at the end of each fiscal year shall be refunded to the board of county commissioners, and deposited to the county fund or funds from which payment was originally made.

History.—s. 4, ch. 57-368; s. 189, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 30.50 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.50 on Casetext

Amendments to 30.50

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 30.50

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 30.50.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DECATUR HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, v. AETNA HEALTH, INCORPORATED,, 854 F.3d 292 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . 812 (7th Cir. 2015); see also 14C Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice & Procedure § 3740 n. 30.50 . . .

IN RE REXFORD PROPERTIES, LLC,, 557 B.R. 788 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . beneficiaries of the Trust and (ii) co-trustees of the Richard Ehrlich Q-Tip Trust (“Q-Tip Trust”), which is a 30.50 . . . As Table 1 indicates, the Q-Tip Trust is a 30.50% interest holder in the Debtor. . . . Lisa is co-trustee of the Q-Tip Trust, which holds a 30.50% interest in Rexford and is an affiliate of . . . is the general partner of Lurline and holder of a 49% interest in Lurline, (ii) the Q-Tip Trust is a 30.50% . . .

IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION. To Co. v. No. SC v. No. SC v. No. SC v. No. SC, 27 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . 1999 Notes”) at CHU00029179.02E (confirming that Defendant had raised CRT prices from USD 29.50 to USD 30.50 . . . 1999 Notes at CHU00029179.02E (confirming that Defendant had raised CRT prices from USD 29.50 to USD 30.50 . . .

INLAND MORTGAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, v. CHIVAS RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC,, 841 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (N.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . distance of 10.61 feet to a point; THENCE South 35 degrees 04 minutes 35 seconds East for a distance of 30.50 . . .

GRANT, v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE, 727 F. Supp. 2d 677 (M.D. Tenn. 2010)

. . . The percentages ranged from 30.50% to 39.20% for black employees, compared to 12.80%) to 18.70%) for . . .

SANCHEZ, v. UNITED STATES, 707 F. Supp. 2d 216 (D.P.R. 2010)

. . . report of depleted uranium recovery operations to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 CFR 30.50 . . .

In NUTRISYSTEM, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 666 F. Supp. 2d 501 (E.D. Pa. 2009)

. . . Over the next three months, the company purchased 800,000 shares at an average price per share of $30.50 . . .

In COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 554 F. Supp. 2d 1044 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . Countrywide’s stock dropped 10% on that day to $30.50. Id. . . .

WARD, v. AVAYA, INC., 487 F. Supp. 2d 467 (D.N.J. 2007)

. . . Lucent’s stock continued a downward trend that year, and it was trading at $30.50 per share on September . . .

PLASMART, INC. v. WINCELL INTERNATIONAL INC., 442 F. Supp. 2d 53 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Nov.26, 1985); cf. 5 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 30.50 (2006) (“In a trademark case . . .

L. SHORT, v. WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA, N. A. a M., 401 F. Supp. 2d 549 (S.D.W. Va. 2005)

. . . Recording fees were $30.50. Lowes/MCCBG received $536.00. . . .

ABUSAID, Jr. a. k. a. v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, s a s, 405 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 30.50(1). . . . Id. § 30.50(6). . . .

NATIONAL- BEN FRANKLIN INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, v. LEVERNIER,, 280 F. Supp. 2d 851 (E.D. Wis. 2003)

. . . . § 30.50. . . . Stat. § 30.50(8r). . . . Stat. § 30.50(8) defines “operate” as “to navigate or otherwise employ.” . . . Stat. §§ 30.50(8) and 30.50(8g) respectively. . . . Stat. § 30.50(8g). . . .

PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION, v. A CARGO OF M T OF HEAVY STEEL SCRAP, D, 159 F. Supp. 2d 942 (S.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . . §§ 30.50 and 30.55(h)(1). . . .

HALL, v. NOBLE DRILLING U. S. INC. v. U. S., 242 F.3d 582 (5th Cir. 2001)

. . . The district court awarded maintenance of $30.50 to Stuart and $31.50 to Hall, based in part on the costs . . . The judge then awarded Stuart a maintenance rate of $30.50 per day and awarded Hall a maintenance rate . . . the district court to have concluded that Stuart’s actual maintenance expenses were approximately $30.50 . . . Second, there is an evidentiary basis for the district court’s conclusion that awards of $30.50 and $31.50 . . .

In NICE SYSTEMS SECURITIES LITIGATION, 188 F.R.D. 206 (D.N.J. 1999)

. . . 1998 50 $40.88 2 June 1998 200 $35.25 2 June 1998 100 $34.94 4 June 1998 25 $34.50 27 August 1998 100 $30.50 . . .

M. SCHWARTZ, s v. CELESTIAL SEASONINGS, INC. Mo V. B. D. P. J. S. O L. M., 178 F.R.D. 545 (D. Colo. 1998)

. . . Schwartz, PC, Employees Pension Trust,” bought 500 shares of Celestial stock on July 21, 1993 at $30.50 . . .

PINE RIDGE RECYCLING, INC. v. BUTTS COUNTY, GA,, 864 F. Supp. 1338 (M.D. Ga. 1994)

. . . Griffin, Georgia, receives waste trader contract from Spalding County and charges between $25.06 and $30.50 . . .

LITWIN, v. UNITED STATES, 983 F.2d 997 (10th Cir. 1993)

. . . Doheny, Mertens Law of Federal Inoome Tax, § 30.50 (1982) (searched on WEST-LAW as “Mertens s 30.50”) . . .

WATKINS, v. FORDICE, In As In As, 807 F. Supp. 406 (S.D. Miss. 1992)

. . . Reproduction 1,607.98 Video Tape 14.05 Secretarial Contract Service 125.00 Travel, meals and lodging 30.50 . . .

BIG CHIEF DRILLING COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 26 Cl. Ct. 1276 (Cl. Ct. 1992)

. . . total of $2,882.25, calculated as follows: 3 joints X 31.5 feet per joint = 94.5 feet 94.5 feet X $30.50 . . .

R. DERRER, v. W. SULLIVAN,, 768 F. Supp. 765 (D. Colo. 1991)

. . . is my opinion that the surface acres described above (the property at issue) would have a value of $30.50 . . .

In WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM SECURITIES LITIGATION, 779 F. Supp. 1063 (D. Ariz. 1990)

. . . 11,615.00 11,298.75 Mellieker 39.25 39.25 5,298.75 5,298.75 Domow 31.00 4.00 4,340.00 560.00 Meagher 30.50 . . .

J. HUFFORD, A. a v. RODGERS,, 912 F.2d 1338 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . See §§ 30.49, 30.50, Fla.Stat. (1987). The county also pays the sheriffs salary. . . . See § 30.50, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

In CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS SECURITIES LITIGATION, 750 F. Supp. 868 (N.D. Ill. 1990)

. . . Category 4 Motion for Class Certification and Related Issues This claim is for the 30.50 hours ($5,583.75 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCHIEMAN,, 894 F.2d 909 (7th Cir. 1990)

. . . In the phone booth, Sandell found two brown paper sacks containing $30.50, including two rolls of pennies . . .

P. GRACE III, v. PERCEPTION TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, W. A. J. Jr. L., 128 F.R.D. 165 (D. Mass. 1989)

. . . The Company’s stock price has declined from $30.50 in March to $3.00 today, although the Company has . . .

NEWELL CO. a v. VERMONT AMERICAN CORPORATION, a B. Jr., 725 F. Supp. 351 (N.D. Ill. 1989)

. . . tender offer to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares or approximately 10% of Vermont American stock at $30.50 . . . The company’s investment banker, Jeffrey Bloomberg, gave his opinion that the offering price of $30.50 . . . According to the Board, Newell’s offer was: 1) coercive; 2) inadequate because although $30.50 per share . . .

AMANDA ACQUISITION CORPORATION, v. UNIVERSAL FOODS CORPORATION,, 877 F.2d 496 (7th Cir. 1989)

. . . On December 1 Amanda commenced a tender offer at $30.50, to be effective if at least 75% of the stock . . .

AMANDA ACQUISITION CORPORATION, v. UNIVERSAL FOODS CORPORATION, R. E. Dr. D. Dr. I. T. L. S. R. L. Dr. S. A. E. E. UNIVERSAL FOODS CORPORATION, v. AMANDA ACQUISITION CORPORATION, L. P. S. S. W. PLC,, 708 F. Supp. 984 (E.D. Wis. 1989)

. . . Amanda announced a tender offer to acquire all shares and rights of Universal Foods at a price of $30.50 . . . the Universal board of directors voted to recommend that its shareholders reject the offer at the $30.50 . . . The offer initially was $30.50 per share for all shares of Universal common stock and included a number . . . business plans and the future of the company to know without an investment banker’s opinion that the $30.50 . . . The Universal board determined that the initial offer of $30.50 was inadequate, and I do not find that . . .

STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP OF NEW JERSEY, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, 721 F. Supp. 604 (D.N.J. 1989)

. . . Millian 1987 1-3 yrs 7.25 95 688.75 77.50 561.88 Black 1983 1984 1985 1985 7-10 yrs 26.50 7-10 yrs 30.50 . . .

PROCTOR, v. GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH- DAY ADVENTISTS,, 651 F. Supp. 1505 (N.D. Ill. 1986)

. . . Proctor was paying $30.50. The regular price to ABCs was $34.75. . . . YSH told Proctor that it would not be able to sell to him at $30.50 per book after April 12, 1980. . . . On February 26, 1980 and April 1, 1980, YSH sold individual cassette books to Proctor for $30.50 per . . .

WEST LANCASTER CORP. v. MAIN LINE RESTAURANT, INC., 614 F. Supp. 202 (E.D. Pa. 1985)

. . . From this fund, 21 West was awarded costs of $30.50. . . .

G. M. SHUPE, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 5 Cl. Ct. 662 (Cl. Ct. 1984)

. . . Plaintiff uses a $104.40 operating cost per hour figure while defendant uses a $30.50 per hour operating . . . Accordingly, the court finds that the operating cost of the batch plant was $30.50 per hour and that . . .

W. RANK, v. C. BALSHY, B., 590 F. Supp. 787 (M.D. Pa. 1984)

. . . exercise of discretion: Abramson’s and Blackman’s hotel accommodations for Oct. 12, 13, 14, 1982 ($30.50 . . . 4)= 154.00 Abramson’s accommodations for Oct. 24, 25, 26, 27, 31, 1982 and Nov. 1, 2, 3, 4, 1982 ($30.50 . . . x 9)= 274.50 Abramson's accommodations for Nov. 8 and 9, 1982 ($30.50 x 2)= 61.00 Blackman’s accommodations . . . 18, 19, 20, 21, 1982 ($38.50 x 4)= 154.00 Blackman’s accommodations for Oct. 24, 25, 26, 27, 1982 ($30.50 . . . x 4)= Valenza's accommodations for Nov. 2, 1982 ($30.50 x 1)= 30.50 Subtotal= $887.50 Plus 6% Sales . . .

TANGFELDT WOOD PRODUCTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 733 F.2d 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1984)

. . . Tangfeldt had felled, bucked, yarded and decked some 500 Thousand Board Feet (MBF) of timber at a cost of $30.50 . . .

M. MEREDITH, v. BEAR, STEARNS COMPANY, R., 99 F.R.D. 629 (D.D.C. 1983)

. . . The defendants further admit that the stock was purchased in April, 1981 for prices ranging between $30.50 . . .

B. MORRISSEY, Jr. v. COUNTY TOWER CORP., 559 F. Supp. 1115 (E.D. Mo. 1983)

. . . The present over-the-counter market price is approximately $30.50 per share. . . .

SAN FRANCISCO REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, v. REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF AMERICA, SAN FRANCISCO REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, v. REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF AMERICA,, 701 F.2d 1000 (1st Cir. 1983)

. . . In the spring of 1982 SFREI acquired 6.3% of REITA’s shares (102,400), all purchased at a price of $30.50 . . .

In THREE MILE ISLAND LITIGATION, 557 F. Supp. 96 (M.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . 56.75 ------ Jurisdiction 13.25 ------ Investigation & Research 146.00 ------ Notice & Claim Forms 30.50 . . . 80 9-80 to 6-81 Richard Eppinger Class Action Proceedings 27.00 34.00 Investigation & Research 14.75 30.50 . . . Fishbein Pleadings 11.0 Class Action Proceedings 7.75 Investigation & Research 1.75 Case Planning 10.0 30.50 . . . Fishbein 30.50 90.00 2.745.00 Josephine B. Stamm 223.75 75.00 16,781.25 Arline J. . . .

WUNSCHEL SMALL, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 1 Cl. Ct. 485 (Ct. Cl. 1982)

. . . Equipment cost per day 30.50 x 8 hrs = 244.00 d. . . .

In HURRICANE ELKHORN COAL CORP. II,, 15 B.R. 990 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1981)

. . . other cost components) increased from $28.75 to $29.75, the base price of $29.50 would be raised to $30.50 . . .

UNITED STATES v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION,, 90 F.R.D. 377 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . See 4A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 30.50, at 30-35 (2d ed. 1981) (unnecessary for rule to state that depositions . . .

In MORWELD STEEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a, 8 B.R. 946 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1981)

. . . As an inducement for the loan, Mor-weld agreed to reduce its charge for a unit price to $30.50 or a $6,710.00 . . .

BULLOCK, v. ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF P. KIRCHER, B. W. H. J. G. Jr. L. K. W. Jr. E. H. G. Jr. J. Jr. F., 84 F.R.D. 1 (D.N.J. 1979)

. . . FRUTKIN 75 30.50 2,287.50 4,117.50 P. . . .

J. B. TAYLOR v. E. P. PERINI,, 477 F. Supp. 1289 (N.D. Ohio 1979)

. . . 12.24 4D Dormitory 21.75 41.75 34.25 65.75 8.30 6 Dormitory 40.75 22.50 64.43 35.57 21.88 6F Dormitory 30.50 . . .

In ANTHRACITE COAL ANTITRUST LITIGATION. No., 81 F.R.D. 499 (M.D. Pa. 1979)

. . . Paralegals: Barbara Levin 544.00 hours Arthur DiTullio 30.50 hours Morton Medvene 21.00 hours Louis Parise . . .

BUGHER v. SOUTHLAND FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC., 452 F. Supp. 870 (W.D. La. 1978)

. . . Jenkins - 27 8.10 13.50 Clarence Gray 10 ~_ 1.50 2,50 10 . 27 9.60 16.00 March. 1974: Tommy Jenkins 120 30.50 . . . Smith 100 48.00 25.00 5.00 Hours S/T_O/T Pension Welfare Apprenticeship November. 1975: Mike 122 58.56 30.50 . . . difference) 54.72 28.50 5.70 January, 1976: Gary Davis 132 63.36 33.00 6.60 Donald Combs (T) 122 58.56 30.50 . . .

III v., 68 T.C. 544 (T.C. 1977)

. . . The fair market value of Kidde stock at the time of this distribution was $30.50 per share. . . .

SCHRANK, v. BLISS,, 412 F. Supp. 28 (M.D. Fla. 1976)

. . . Secs. 30.49(2)(b) and 30.50(2). . . .

LEWIS, v. L. VARNES,, 505 F.2d 785 (2d Cir. 1974)

. . . he purchased a total of 21,400 shares of Lilly common stock at option prices which ranged between $30.50 . . .

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, a v. E. A. HENDRY,, 301 So. 2d 483 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . A. 30.50(4) and F.S.A. 129.06. . . .

TRANS OCEAN VAN SERVICE v. THE UNITED STATES, 200 Ct. Cl. 122 (Ct. Cl. 1972)

. . . rate of $3 per hundredweight at a minimum weight of 1,000 pounds for the first 50 mites and a rate of $30.50 . . . Arkansas), the plaintiff is entitled to a line-haul charge of $242.48 (based on the single-factor rate of $30.50 . . .

M. L. R. v., 58 T.C. 699 (T.C. 1972)

. . . Estate: 8000 shares GMO common stock_ 396, 000. 00 2174 shares GMO common stock_ 107, 613. 00 Cash _ 30.50 . . .

BACHE CO. INCORPORATED, v. INTERNATIONAL CONTROLS CORPORATION,, 339 F. Supp. 341 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)

. . . October 3, 1968 the closing market price on the New York Stock Exchange for the ELS common stock was $30.50 . . . for each share resold by November 1, 1968 = $ 10,119.37 (b) 14,586 shares: $39 (tender price) minus $30.50 . . . resold after November 1, 1968: 14,586 x $8.50 = $123,981.00 (2) 7,100 shares: $39 (tender price) minus $30.50 . . . ELS share: $39 x 103 = $ 4,017.00 (b) Equivalent of 300 resold ELS shares $39 (tender price) minus $30.50 . . . the difference between the tender price, $39, and the market price at the time and place for tender, $30.50 . . .

WEBB v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 394 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1968)

. . . on all of Webb’s most popular brands in all sizes was computed to be 34.25% over cost for 1959 and 30.50% . . . a reasonable one: 1959 1960 All Sales Half-Pints All Sales Half-Pints At Shelf Prices 34.28% 36.68% 30.50% . . .

CINCINNATI GAS ELECTRIC COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, OHIO FUEL GAS COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 389 F.2d 272 (6th Cir. 1968)

. . . The last one for continuing service was $2.03 demand and 30.50 per Mcf commodity. . . .

HARDIN, MAYOR OF TAZEWELL, v. KENTUCKY UTILITIES CO., 390 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1968)

. . . For the owner of an electrically heated home, TVA power might cost $30.50 for a winter month as against . . .

RICHLAND, M. v. R. CRANDALL, 262 F. Supp. 538 (S.D.N.Y. 1967)

. . . During 1963 the stock had ranged from $30.50 to $36.50 per share, and in 1964 from $29 to $37.75 per . . .

AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, BRISTOL- MYERS COMPANY v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, CHAS. PFIZER CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, OLIN MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORPORATION, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, UPJOHN COMPANY, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 363 F.2d 757 (6th Cir. 1966)

. . . previously your wholesaler got 16% plus 5, as his margin, and then when the retailer purchased at $30.50 . . .

W. VAN KEPPEL v. UNITED STATES, 206 F. Supp. 42 (D. Kan. 1962)

. . . The plaintiffs’ return, filed February 18, 1956 (Exhibit 1), claimed a deduction of $30.50 for safe deposit . . .

GOLDSMITH, v. ST. LOUIS- SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY,, 201 F. Supp. 867 (W.D.N.C. 1962)

. . . purchase the stock of the Central of Georgia Railway Company, that the stock was then selling for $30.50 . . .

LAS VEGAS HACIENDA, INC. F. v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD,, 298 F.2d 430 (9th Cir. 1962)

. . . transportation between Las Vegas and the Los Angeles area by certified carrier was $39.20 first class, $30.50 . . .

A. WHITESIDE, v. SHERMAN, A. V. ABBOTT, v. SHERMAN,, 122 So. 2d 799 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . date total $25,988.67 plus interest of $2,296.68 making a total of $28,285.53 due plaintiff, plus $30.50 . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. INTERNATIONAL WOODWORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION NO. AFL- CIO,, 264 F.2d 649 (9th Cir. 1959)

. . . Hatfield’s attorney sent the Union a check for $30.50 to cover Hatfield’s initiation fees, plus dues . . .

ESTATE IVERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, DAVISON, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ESTATE IVERSON, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, MYERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 255 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1958)

. . . Mardrid Davison......... 36,467.48 17,848.18 48.94% 1948 John and Alvilda Iverson .. 175,184.19 52,520.80 30.50% . . .

J. v., 28 T.C. 1317 (T.C. 1957)

. . . share of $13.25 during May 1945, of $14.38 during June 1945, of $19.25 during January 1946, and of $30.50 . . .

v., 27 Cust. Ct. 463 (Cust. Ct. 1951)

. . . Thése silver fox skins were invoiced and entered at $30.50 Canadian currency, per skin, and were appraised . . . bought the skins, after examining them, from the sellers, Bercovitz Bros., at an average price of $30.50 . . . And in examining them, how did you arrive at the price $30.50 per skin? . . . Tbat tbe merchandise was entered at $30.50 Canadian currency, per skin, and was appraised at $38 Canadian . . .

v., 26 Cust. Ct. 543 (Cust. Ct. 1951)

. . . They were invoiced and entered at $30.50 Canadian currency per skin, and appraised at $38 Canadian currency . . . bought the skins, after examining them, from the sellers, Bercovitz Bros., at an average price of $30.50 . . .

EASTERN TRANSP. CO. v. THE NANCY MORAN GREENPOINT COAL DOCKS, v. EASTERN TRANSP. CO. THE JOAN KUNKEL, 78 F. Supp. 646 (E.D.N.Y. 1948)

. . . 15 Elbow of the Ledge Light, the wind was fresh southeast, and the sky partly cloudy; the barometer 30.50 . . .

NEW YORK CENT. R. CO. v. ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION, 77 F. Supp. 520 (N.D. Ill. 1948)

. . . to intrastate traffic the proportion of the carload revenue received by plaintiff is reduced from $30.50 . . .

In PORTLAND ELECTRIC POWER CO., 97 F. Supp. 903 (D. Or. 1947)

. . . by the sale of the stock (for the purposes of the reorganization proceeding, the stock is valued at $30.50 . . . Commission which have ruled, adversely on these points. (2) In Guaranty’s opinion the valuation of $30.50 . . .

PORTER v. CHATTANOOGA BOX LUMBER CO., 68 F. Supp. 676 (E.D. Tenn. 1946)

. . . a contract with the defendant to “cut, log, saw, and haul” said pine timber for a consideration of $30.50 . . .

SCHUMACHER v. LAWRENCE, 108 F.2d 576 (6th Cir. 1940)

. . . certificate of abstract, $1.50 for recording the mortgage, and $5.00 for attorney’s fee, or a total of $30.50 . . .

E. v., 39 B.T.A. 387 (B.T.A. 1939)

. . . supra, the optionee could purchase only when the stock, which was at the time of option selling from $30.50 . . .

In BERGMAN, 25 F. Supp. 694 (E.D.N.Y. 1938)

. . . Superior Fuel Company, for fuel oil, $30.50. . . .

UNITED STATES v. OREGON, 295 U.S. 701 (U.S. 1935)

. . . .; Thence, in T. 26 S., R. 29 E., N. 57° E. 30.50 chs.; N. 52° E. 25.50 chs.; North 20.35 chs.; Thence . . .

D. v., 31 B.T.A. 857 (B.T.A. 1934)

. . . During that month the stock sold as high as $45 per share and as low as $30.50 The petitioner was not . . .

W. v., 28 B.T.A. 461 (B.T.A. 1933)

. . . Gower Street Company on the transaction of October 9, 1928, had a fair market value on that date of $30.50 . . .

THE HA HA, 195 F. 1013 (S.D. Ala. 1912)

. . . My opinion is that the libelant is entitled to a decree for $30.50, the amount of his bill. . . .

SCHROEDER v. YOUNG, 161 U.S. 334 (U.S. 1896)

. . . 28, an alias execution issued from the said court in such action for the full sum of $1673.36, and $30.50 . . . execution of July 28 was not only issued for the full amount of the original judgment, $1673.36 and $30.50 . . .

HITCH v. UNITED STATES, 66 F. 937 (S.D. Ill. 1895)

. . . ; for November, 189Í, $11.50»; for January, 1892, $5; for February, 1892, $51.50; for March. 1892, $30.50 . . .

JAMES D. BITTING, H. v. THE UNITED STATES, 25 Ct. Cl. 502 (Ct. Cl. 1890)

. . . cost the contractors $500 to repair the damages their own plant had suffered during the exposure and $30.50 . . .

CHAPMAN v. LUCERNE, 5 F. Cas. 481 (S.D.N.Y. 1858)

. . . Chapman against the bark Lucerne] to recover the sum of $30.50, alleged to be due the libel-ant as pilotage . . .

v. v., 51 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1850)

. . . Prairie. 30.50 Small branch runs northwest. 80.00 Set cast-iron monument, facing as before. . . .