Cases from cite.case.law:

L. DEMINGS, v. ORANGE COUNTY CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD,, 15 So. 3d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 30.53, Florida Statutes, also preserves the Sheriff’s independence in selecting, retaining, or . . .

J. MORIARTY, v. B. MUZYKA,, 379 F. Supp. 2d 935 (N.D. Ill. 2005)

. . . findings in Audit Report $65,886.03 $26,165.35 $605.43 Interest January 2003 — July 2005 7,814.10 2,997.68 30.53 . . .

ABUSAID, Jr. a. k. a. v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, s a s, 405 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 30.53. . . . Stat. § 30.53); see also Blackburn, 70 So.2d at 298 (“It is essential to law enforcement in the various . . .

J. SAVAGO, v. VILLAGE OF NEW PALTZ,, 214 F. Supp. 2d 252 (N.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . THE ORDINANCE The Village’s sign regulation scheme is set forth in section 30.53 of the Village zoning . . . Section 30.53(B)(3) sets forth the procedure for issuance of a permit: a. . . . Section 30.53(F)(1) provides: 1. . . . .” (§ 30.53(C)). 2. . . . Also, section 30.53(F)(7) sets forth requirements applicable in all districts. . . .

SAMARCO, v. NEUMANN,, 44 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (S.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . See § 30.53, Fla.Stat.; Brevard County v. . . . VIII, § 1(d); §§ 30.073, 30.079, 30.15, 30.53, Fla.Stat. . . . .

MORLEY S AUTO BODY, INC. a d b a s d b a s Ap- v. HUNTER, L. a s s, 70 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 1995)

. . . The plaintiffs rely on Fla.Stat.Ann. sections 30.15, 30.53, and 316.640 as support for the proposition . . . Section 30.53 preserves the independence of sheriffs “concerning the purchase of supplies and equipment . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 30.53 (West 1988). . . .

CAPSALIS, v. H. WORCH, Jr. v. CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 902 F. Supp. 227 (M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . Upon further review of Florida Statute § 30.53, additional case law, and Special Law 89-508, the Court . . . In fact, Florida Statute § 30.53 specifically grants sheriffs independence in the hiring and firing of . . . Fla.Stat. 30.53 (1991). . . . of independence of the Sheriff clearly established by the Florida Legislature in Florida Statute § 30.53 . . . arise if the legislature, by general or special law, creates a career service system pursuant to § 30.53 . . .

D. McRAE, v. DOUGLAS,, 644 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 30.53, Florida Statutes, provides: The independence of the sheriffs shall be preserved concerning . . . Ill of the Constitution of Florida, provided, further that nothing contained in § 30.48-30.53 shall be . . . the legislature establishes a career service system for employees of the sheriff pursuant to section 30.53 . . .

M. O LOUGHLIN, v. PINCHBACK,, 579 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 30.53, Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: The independence of the sheriffs shall be . . .

J. HUFFORD, A. a v. RODGERS,, 912 F.2d 1338 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . See e.g., § 30.53, Fla.Stat. (1987) (statute preserves the independence of sheriffs in matters “concerning . . .

DAINES, v. CITY OF MANKATO,, 754 F. Supp. 681 (D. Minn. 1990)

. . . Actual Actual is the Following Number of Standard Deviations from Expected United States, All Executives 30.53% . . .

LUCAS, v. O LOUGHLIN, St. St. s St., 831 F.2d 232 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . Section 30.53, Fla.Stat. (1985) provides in pertinent part as follows: The independence of the sheriffs . . .

WILKERSON, v. A. BUTTERWORTH, C. Jr., 492 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 30.53, Florida Statutes (1981); Tanner v. . . .

FLORIDA WATERWORKS ASSOCIATION, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,, 473 So. 2d 237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Rules 25-30.53 and 25-30.545 (collection of expenses and recovery of costs). . . .

UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN THE U. S. A. v. REAGAN,, 738 F.2d 1375 (D.C. Cir. 1984)

. . . Epstein, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 30.53[5] (2d ed. 1983), the district court was reasonable in concluding . . .

BREVARD COUNTY, v. W. MILLER, W. S. R. F., 452 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 30.53, Florida Statutes (1981); Tanner v. . . .

P. BERRY, v. J. BAILEY,, 726 F.2d 670 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . . §§ 30.07 and 30.53 (1983). . . . .

X. McLAUGHLIN, v. McPHAIL, Sr. In WINTHROP LAWRENCE CORP. X. McLAUGHLIN, v. WINTHROP LAWRENCE CORP. Sr. T., 707 F.2d 800 (4th Cir. 1983)

. . . Epstein, Moore’s Federal Practice U 30.53[5] (2d ed. 1982), this was not such a case. . . .

X. McLAUGHLIN, v. McPHAIL, Sr. In WINTHROP LAWRENCE CORP. X. McLAUGHLIN, v. WINTHROP LAWRENCE CORP. Sr. T., 707 F.2d 800 (4th Cir. 1983)

. . . Epstein, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 30.53[5] (2d ed. 1982), this was not such a case. . . .

SZELL, v. L. LAMAR,, 414 So. 2d 276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 30.53, Florida Statutes (1981); Tanner v. . . .

F. ISON, v. W. ZIMMERMAN,, 372 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1979)

. . . Section 30.53, Florida Statutes (1977), reads: Independence of sheriffs shall be preserved concerning . . . Article III, of the Constitution of Florida, provided further that nothing contained in sections 30.48-30.53 . . . establishment of civil service for “employees and officers,” and (2) the clear legislative intent in section 30.53 . . .

DiCESARE- ENGLER PRODUCTIONS, INC. a v. MAINMAN LTD. a, 81 F.R.D. 703 (W.D. Pa. 1979)

. . . Smith, Kline & French Lab., 384 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1967) (per curiam); 4A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 30.53 . . .

In W. GROSE, 592 F.2d 1161 (C.C.P.A. 1979)

. . . 27.08 3.293 17 M 27.53 3.240 12 w 28.73 3.107 5 vw 29.08 3.071 17 M 29.86 2.992 25 s 30.16 2.963 15 M 30.53 . . .

L. M. v., 63 T.C. 695 (T.C. 1975)

. . . Net monthly payments to the investors under the arrangement were to be a minimum of $30.53 for the first . . . of the “take or pay” and lease contracts (450 barrels @ $2 = $900 x .75 = $675-($488.47 + $156) = $30.53 . . .

R. W. WEITZENFELD, v. D. DIERKS, 312 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1975)

. . . Section 30.53 and, in practical effect, gain nothing for the county. Accordingly, F.S. . . .

R. M. CLARK, AN INDIVIDUAL DOING BUSINESS AS LENOIR CITY- ALCOA BUS LINES v. THE UNITED STATES, 167 Ct. Cl. 197 (Ct. Cl. 1964)

. . . Audited cost- 27. 51 27.51' Profit factor_ 2.32 1. 66 Management salary- .70 .70 Rates (cents per mile)_ 30.53 . . . rates for plaintiff for the second 6-month period are as follows: P0 Q 0 (Cents) First period rates- 30.53 . . . Audited cost_ 27. 51 27. 51 Profit factor_ 2. 32 1. 66 Management salary_ .70 .70 Bates (cents per mile)_ 30.53 . . . Z/U/U-8/H/H P.O. 60,369.8 miles @ 30.53<¿_$18,430. 90 G.O. 241,319.1 miles @ 29.87$! . . .

DONEGHY v. ALEXANDER, SAME v. JONES,, 118 F.2d 521 (10th Cir. 1941)

. . . sold to his nephew for $62,500 an undivided one-fourth interest in the trust which was approximately 30.53 . . .

a B. v. a B. B. Jr. v., 39 B.T.A. 29 (B.T.A. 1939)

. . . The same is true in the trust for Anthony Newton Duke, where we find (except for $30.53 taxed in the . . .

In CELOTEX CO., 13 F. Supp. 1011 (D. Del. 1936)

. . . Bell $1,-000; Richards, Layton & Finger $2,500; and $30.53 expenses; Monroe & Lemann $2,500. 7. . . .