Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 43.18 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 43.18 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 43.18

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 43
COURTS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 43.18
43.18 Money paid into court; withdrawal.No moneys deposited as provided in 1s. 43.17, shall be withdrawn except on the voucher or check signed by the clerk of the court if the court has an authorized clerk and if not, by the judge. Every voucher or check shall state the cause in or on account of which it is drawn.
History.s. 2, ch. 15996, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 4355(2); s. 1, ch. 29655, 1955; s. 44, ch. 67-254.
1Note.Repealed by s. 2, ch. 73-282.
Note.Former s. 54.05.

F.S. 43.18 on Google Scholar

F.S. 43.18 on Casetext

Amendments to 43.18


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 43.18
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 43.18.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

Jo BONDI, v. BRITO H. v. H. v. C. Jr. E. H. v. Ra L. Sr. L. Jr., 159 So. 3d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . chapter shall not repeal, but shall be additional and supplemental to the existing provisions of ss. 43.18 . . .

In WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., 461 B.R. 200 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . Compare 442 B.R. at 365 with D 255 at §§ 3.2, 32.12 & 43.18. . . .

MANGANARO CORPORATION, v. HITT CONTRACTING, INC., 193 F. Supp. 2d 88 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . Lord, Williston on Contracts § 43.18 at 12 (4th ed.2000); 2 E. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TICCHIARELLI,, 943 F. Supp. 77 (D. Me. 1996)

. . . analyzed through September 1988 by the University of Mississippi, the highest concentration of THC was 43.18 . . .

TRAVIS, F. v. KING, P. E. K. S. A. M. D. W. V. HAWAII COUNTY COMMITTEE, Sr. v. KING,, 552 F. Supp. 554 (D. Haw. 1982)

. . . The result is a maximum deviation of 43.18% between the state’s most underrepresented and overrepresented . . . In the senate, the maximum range would be 37.67% not 43.18%. . . . for the state senate, we find that the total deviation present in the redistricting of the senate, 43.18% . . . set by the Supreme Court in Mahan, the state concedes that “at first glance” the total deviation of 43.18% . . .

F. SMITH, v. PIEDMONT AVIATION, INC., 567 F.2d 290 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . The other, for $43.18, was compensation for denied boarding. . . .

HYSELL v. IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, v. SIMPSON, F., 559 F.2d 468 (8th Cir. 1977)

. . . There was evidence that this attendant care could currently be obtained at a cost of $43.18 per day. . . .

HYSELL v. IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, v. SIMPSON F., 534 F.2d 775 (8th Cir. 1976)

. . . The expense of future medical care and full-time attendants at the Hysell home was said to total $43.18 . . . Linke, an economist at the University of Illinois, calculated that the present value of the estimated $43.18 . . .

F. WRIGHT, v. UNITED STATES, 482 F.2d 600 (8th Cir. 1973)

. . . Contrary to the majority’s assertion that the “dissident minority” interest was the 43.18 percent shareholder . . . than 50 per cent direct ownership, and a dissident minority interest increased from 36.7 per cent to 43.18 . . .

CRUM, v. CITY OF ORLANDO,, 313 F. Supp. 585 (M.D. Fla. 1970)

. . . , it appears that petitioner is in the custody of the city for violations of Sections 43.09, 43.13, 43.18 . . . He was apprehended and charged with escape, a violation of Section 43.18. . . . The Code of the City of Orlando, Florida, §§ 1.08, 43.09, 43.12, 43.18, 43.52, 43.56-1. . . . Section 43.18 provides for a term of imprisonment of not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days. . . .

H. v., 35 T.C. 950 (T.C. 1961)

. . . was held by Otto Schilling, and it rose from 36.70 percent before the redemptions in controversy to 43.18 . . .

In INDIA WHARF BREWERY,, 96 F.2d 710 (2d Cir. 1938)

. . . . $ 591.54 $ 131.64 $ 65.82 Trustee’s “ 194.04 43.18 21.59 Trustee’s atty. 1200.00 267.01 137.83 (8.66 . . .

ROBERTSON v. ROUTZAHN,, 75 F.2d 537 (6th Cir. 1935)

. . . District Court found that the stock had a fair market value as of March 1, 1913, of not to exceed $43.18 . . .