Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 43.30 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 43.30 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 43.30

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 43
COURTS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 43.30
43.30 Divisions of court.All courts except the Supreme Court may sit in divisions as may be established by local rule approved by the Supreme Court.
History.s. 25, ch. 72-404.

F.S. 43.30 on Google Scholar

F.S. 43.30 on Casetext

Amendments to 43.30


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 43.30
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 43.30.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SANTANA, v. CAPRA,, 284 F. Supp. 3d 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . ECF No. 43; Video 40 at 2:43.30-2:43.36. . . . Video 40 at 2:43.30-2:43.36. . . .

JONES, D. T. a v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 153 F. Supp. 3d 114 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . plaintiffs fee petition in federal court, including: (1) $9,993.50 for attorney’s fees, representing 43.30 . . . In fact, total fees for 43.30 hours charged at $230.00 per hour equates to $9,959.00. . . . .

MALAVE, v. MALAVE,, 178 So. 3d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .; § 43.30, Fla. Stat. (2015); Williams v. State, 737 So.2d 1141, 1141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). . . .

RACK ROOM SHOES, SKIZ LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 856 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . fibers, Other, Other, Containing 36 percent or more by weight of wool or fine animal hair_ Subheading: 43.30 . . .

JINAN YIPIN CORPORATION, LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 774 F. Supp. 2d 1238 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2011)

. . . Trade and Developing Company (“Shandong”), a Chinese exporter of the subject merchandise, a margin of 43.30% . . .

v. L. L. C., 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 934 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . Trade and Developing Company (“Shandong”), a Chinese exporter of the subject merchandise, a margin of 43.30% . . .

JINAN YIPIN CORPORATION, LTD. v. UNITED STATES, L. L. C., 637 F. Supp. 2d 1183 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . Trade and Developing Company (“Shandong”), a Chinese exporter of the subject merchandise, a margin of 43.30% . . . contested the Final Results, the Remand Redetermination assigns to Shandong an unchanged margin of 43.30% . . .

v. L. L. C., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 1901 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . Commerce calculated a weighted average percentage antidumping duty margin of 43.30 percent for Shandong . . .

JINAN YIPIN CORPORATION, LTD. v. UNITED STATES, L. L. C., 526 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . Commerce calculated a weighted average percentage antidumping duty margin of 43.30 percent for Shandong . . .

ABLE SALES COMPANY, INC. v. COMPA A DE AZ CAR DE PUERTO RICO,, 406 F.3d 56 (1st Cir. 2005)

. . . At the end of April 2002, CAPR again reduced its price to wholesalers, this time to $43.30 per hundredweight . . .

PHYSICIANS HEALTHCARE PLANS, INC. v. PFEIFLER, M. D. v., 846 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 2003)

. . . .; § 43.30, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . Section 43.30, Florida Statutes (2001), provides that divisions may be created by a local rule which . . .

T. GREENWAY, v. BUFFALO HILTON HOTEL,, 951 F. Supp. 1039 (W.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Difference is ten percent reduction of 43.30 hours. . . .

In ASSIGNMENT OF CASES TO COURT DIVISIONS, 695 So. 2d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Pursuant to Section 43.30, Florida Statutes, and the affirmative vote of a majority . . .

PEOPLE v. B. CRUZ,, 67 F.3d 176 (9th Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 13.30, 43.30(b); (2) two counts of attempted theft, in violation of 9 Guam Code Ann. §§ 13.10, 43.30 . . . immovable property or any interest therein with intent to deprive him thereof.” 9 Guam Code Ann. § 43.30 . . .

PEOPLE OF TERRITORY OF GUAM, v. L. GILL,, 61 F.3d 688 (9th Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 13.10, 43.30(b), one count of conspiracy to commit theft, 9 Guam Code Ann. §§ 13.30, 43.30(b), and . . . the existence of Guam’s land registration system precludes the government’s use of 9 Guam Code Ann. § 43.30 . . . Section 43.30(b) criminalizes behavior where the actor “unlawfully transfers immovable property of another . . . However, commentary to Model Penal Code (“MPC”) § 223.2, the provision upon which 9 Guam Code Ann. § 43.30 . . . First, section 43.30(b) requires only that the land subject to the theft be property of another. . . .

HARTLEY, v. STATE, 650 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Both article V, section 20(c)(10), Florida Constitution and section 43.30, Florida Statutes (1991), provide . . . matter-related division of the trial courts which, under article V, section 7, Florida Constitution, and section 43.30 . . .

In REPORT OF COMMISSION ON FAMILY COURTS, 646 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 1994)

. . . violence “division” in violation of article V, section 7, of the Florida Constitution, and section 43.30 . . . Section 43.30 states that “[a]ll courts except the supreme court may sit in divisions as may be established . . . Clearly, section 43.30 requires that divisions of Florida courts are to be established through local . . . We find, however, that the legislature effectively preempted section 43.30 and the local rule requirement . . .

In COURT DIVISIONS, 648 So. 2d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Pursuant to section 43.30, Florida Statutes (1993), and the . . .

GARCIA v. RIVKIND,, 639 So. 2d 177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . matter-related division of the trial courts which, under article V, section 7, Florida Constitution, and section 43.30 . . .

BASKERVILLE, v. STATE, 606 So. 2d 509 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . of the Florida Constitution, or Article V, Section 7 of the Florida Constitution, as well as section 43.30 . . .

WILLIE, v. STATE, 600 So. 2d 479 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 43.30, Florida Statutes (1989), stated that “[a]ll courts except the Supreme Court may sit in . . .

NORWOOD, v. CHARLOTTE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER,, 720 F. Supp. 543 (W.D.N.C. 1989)

. . . 9.75 -.98 = 8.77 $180 1,578.60 Attorney Fees April 21, 1986 — July 31, 1986: Attorney Hours Fee Wallas 43.30 . . .

POVERTY FLATS LAND CATTLE CO. a v. UNITED STATES, 788 F.2d 676 (10th Cir. 1986)

. . . In the Sales Contract between the BLM and Oilfield the BLM was paid $43.30 for “restoration.” . . . The $43.30 would accomplish nothing according to the remarks of the trial court. . . .

In DELTA SMELTING REFINING ALASKA, INC., 53 B.R. 877 (Bankr. D. Alaska 1985)

. . . considered interchangeable. 1 Swearingen, Fletcher Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations, § 43.30 . . .

In C. LILLEY, M., 29 B.R. 442 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 1983)

. . . to a case under Chapter 13, alleging that their schedules understated their net monthly income by $43.30 . . .

SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY,, 556 F. Supp. 825 (D.D.C. 1982)

. . . The channel terminals were continually increased to a high of $43.30 per month ($86.60 for the two ends . . .

In THREE MILE ISLAND LITIGATION, 557 F. Supp. 96 (M.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . 1.50 Case Planning 3.50 Settlement Administration ,30 5.30 Richard Lippes Class Action Proceedings 43.30 . . .

Ma- v., 70 T.C. 158 (T.C. 1978)

. . . .$1,669.70 $279.75 House . 702,40 43.30 2,372.10 323.05 Fiscal 1973 Huffaker.0 0 House . 903.41 0 903.41 . . .

v., 61 Cust. Ct. 473 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . invoice unit prices plus $1,000 for art work less the ocean freight of $1,838.55 and the insurance of $43.30 . . . invoice unit price, plus $1,000 for art work, less the ocean freight of $1,838.55 and the insurance of $43.30 . . .

O GRADY v. DADE COUNTY,, 21 Fla. Supp. 89 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1963)

. . . Menford Wooten and service costs, $7.30; court reporter’s charges for final hearing, $15.00; totaling $43.30 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN BOONE AND CARROLL COUNTIES, ARKANSAS,, 172 F. Supp. 108 (W.D. Ark. 1959)

. . . for the fee simple title to the 35 acre tract and for the easement on the four tracts amounting to 43.30 . . . The easement that was imposed upon the four tracts aggregating 43.30 acres provided that the plaintiff . . . after the taking of the 35 acres in fee simple and the imposition of the easement on the four tracts of 43.30 . . .

E. W. v., 22 T.C. 728 (T.C. 1954)

. . . stock for the years indicated below was as follows: 1939, $38.24; 1940, $39.02; 1941, $41.30; 1942, $43.30 . . .

D AQUILLA v. PRYOR, 122 F. Supp. 346 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)

. . . The plane did not lack any equipment required by Section 43.30 of the Civil Air Regulations of the United . . .

VEATCH v. WAGNER, 116 F. Supp. 904 (D. Alaska 1953)

. . . . § 45(a); 2 Toulmin’s Anti-trust Laws, Sec. 43.1-43.30. . . .

GLADSTONE v. GALTON, 145 F.2d 742 (9th Cir. 1944)

. . . The ordinance approved October 3, 1932, and now appearing as section 43.30 and 43.31 of Chapter 4, Article . . . 3, of the Municipal Code of the City of Los Angeles, State of California, reads: “Sec. 43.30 — Fortune . . . It is not claimed that section 43.30 against fortune telling is unconstitutional, but that the exemptions . . . Examination of sections 43.30 and 43.31 discloses that no discrimination can exist. . . . Section 43.30 prohibits anyone from engaging in the business of fortune telling. . . .