Cases from cite.case.law:

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, v. HALL- EDWARDS,, 21 So. 3d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . quashing an interlocutory circuit court “Order Determining Public Hazard Pursuant to Florida Statute § 69.081 . . . The respondent filed a “Notice of Public Hazard Pursuant to § 69.081 and Motion to Prevent the Court . . . Analysis First, Florida’s Sunshine in Litigation Act, § 69.081, Fla. . . . See id. § 69.081(3); Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jones, 929 So.2d 1081, 1084 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). . . . The respondent’s motion under section 69.081 should have been summarily denied. . . .

CORDIS CORPORATION d b a v. O SHEA,, 988 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Respondent has not invoked application of the Sunshine in Litigation Act, section 69.081, Florida Statutes . . . confidential business information and other information confidential under state or federal law, § 69.081 . . .

BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC, v. GARCIA, TRW TRW U. S. LLC, TRW v. a v. LLC, v. a a a, 991 So. 2d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Two of the cases pleaded claims under section 69.081, Florida Statutes, commonly known as Florida’s Sunshine . . .

GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER COMPANY, v. H. SCHALMO, J. a R. V. a a a, 987 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 69.081(3), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . . § 69.081(2). . . . members of the public in protecting themselves from injury which may result from a public hazard.” § 69.081 . . . tires and the information sought by the Schalmos and McClintocks fell 'within the purview of sections 69.081 . . . See § 69.081(7). . . .

TRW AUTOMOTIVE U. S. LLC, TRW n k a TRW a TRW f k a TRW a v. PAPANDOPOLES, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. Jr. a a v. Jr. a, 949 So. 2d 297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . declaratory relief against Ford for violation of Florida’s Sunshine in Litigation Act, codified at section 69.081 . . .

GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER COMPANY, v. JONES, 929 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .’ § 69.081(3), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . . § 69.081(5), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . portion of the information or materials necessary or useful to the public regarding the public hazard. § 69.081 . . . Sunshine in Litigation Act prohibits a court from entering an order which conceals a public hazard. § 69.081 . . . See § 69.081(3), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

JONES v. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER COMPANY,, 871 So. 2d 899 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Jones argues that this order should be vacated as it is violative of section 69.081(3), Florida Statutes . . . members of the public in protecting themselves from injury which may result from the public hazard. § 69.081 . . . device, instrument, person, procedure or product, that has caused and is likely to cause injury. § 69.081 . . . Thus, pursuant to section 69.081(2), no order can be entered which would conceal information regarding . . .

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, v. SOSNOWSKI,, 830 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . argued that the protective order was void under the Sunshine in Litigation Act, specifically section 69.081 . . . Financial practices that constitute economic fraud are not a “public hazard” under section 69.081(3), . . . DCA 2000), rev. dismissed, 790 So.2d 1108 (Fla.2001), the term “public hazard” as defined in section 69.081 . . . Section 69.081(2) defines "public hazard" as "an instrumentality, including but not limited to any device . . .

NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION f k a a v. CARNOTO, M. D. M. D. P. A. s OB GYN M. D., 798 So. 2d 22 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . court referred issues pertaining to the Sunshine in Litigation Act [Sunshine Act], specifically Section 69.081 . . .

STIVERS, v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY,, 777 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . financing practice that causes only monetary injury is a public hazard within the meaning of section 69.081 . . . We hold that such a practice is not a “public hazard” within the meaning of section 69.081(2) and affirm . . . Ultimately, the trial court granted FMCC’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that section 69.081 did . . . Stivers contends that the settlement agreement is unenforceable under section 69.081(4), which provides . . . None of the cases citing section 69.081 are helpful here. . . .

J. SMITH, v. TIB BANK OF THE KEYS,, 687 So. 2d 895 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . In resolving the instant controversy, we do not construe in any way section 69.081, Florida Statutes . . .

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, v. DICKERSON,, 654 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . There was some argument initially in the trial court as to whether section 69.081, Florida Statutes, . . .

E. I. DuPONT DE NEMOURS COMPANY, v. W. LAMBERT P. a, 654 So. 2d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Ledger (Ledger), filed motions pursuant to the Sunshine in Litigation Act (Sunshine Act),' section 69.081 . . . Based upon allegations that Ben-late was a public hazard pursuant to section 69.081, the motions sought . . .

INC. v. ASKEW, Sr., 597 So. 2d 895 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Respondents also brought the attention of the lower tribunal to section 69.081, Florida Statutes (Supp . . .

ARLINGTON TRUST COMPANY, INCORPORATED, ASSIGNEE OF LEYDE LEYDE, A PARTNERSHIP v. THE UNITED STATES GLEN W. LEYDE v. THE UNITED STATES BERKELEY STEEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT, 134 Ct. Cl. 251 (Ct. Cl. 1956)

. . . allo-cable to the aforementioned terminated prime contracts (prorated between the two claims on'the basis of 69.081 . . .