Cases from cite.case.law:

ECKERD CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES,, 37 Fed. Cl. 713 (Fed. Cl. 1997)

. . . See Jack Crestol, et al, The Consolidated Tax Return 114.02[4][f] (5th ed. 1993) (“[T]he exception [to . . .

In PARK FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. PARK FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 197 B.R. 388 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . (Debtors’ Joint Plan 114.02(4).) . . .

In PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS REFERRAL SERVICES, INC. a, 142 B.R. 424 (Bankr. D. Colo. 1992)

. . . Charged at Orly Fashion, Los Angeles (03/02/91); $156.61 Charged at Lerner, Boulder, CO (03/16/91); $114.02 . . .

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. v. MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., 798 F. Supp. 50 (D. Me. 1992)

. . . follow-up action, constitutes “willful misconduct” within the meaning of the MCI Tariff, Section B, 114.02 . . .

UNITED STATES No. v. SANTTINI, a k a UNITED STATES No. v. SANTTINI, R., 963 F.2d 585 (3d Cir. 1992)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, 114.02 (1989) (Rule 4 provides that if there is probable cause to believe . . .

In A. BUTLER,, 101 B.R. 566 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1989)

. . . First National 8,509.96 II 4.03 Internal Revenue Service 3.346.33 ¶ 4.02 State of Arkansas 1.333.33 114.02 . . .

LUBRIZOL CORPORATION, v. EXXON CORPORATION, R. D. GATES a, 871 F.2d 1279 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . Of course, had Lubrizol and Exxon so chosen, 114.02 would have been the vehicle for expressly reserving . . .

POINT LANDING, INC. v. OMNI CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL, LTD. v. RUDOLF WOLFF CO. LTD. S. SMITH, Jr. M. OMNI CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL, LTD. v. RUDOLF WOLFF CO. LTD. J. GEORGE A. v. OMNI CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL, LTD. v. RUDOLF WOLFF CO. LTD. M. ROSENBERG v. OMNI CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL, LTD. v. RUDOLF WOLFF CO. LTD., 795 F.2d 415 (5th Cir. 1986)

. . . Thompson, Moore’s Federal Practice 114.02[3] at 4-45 to 46 (footnotes omitted). . . .

L. TURLINGTON, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY,, 795 F.2d 434 (5th Cir. 1986)

. . . Restatement section 324 and extend liability for negligent undertakings to third parties); see also Sales, 114.02 . . .

BUTCHER S UNION LOCAL NO. UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS AFL- CIO AFL- CIO v. SDC INVESTMENT, INC., 788 F.2d 535 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . See 2 Moore’s Federal Practice 114.02[1] at 4-44.17. . . .

A. M. SEAMON v. UPHAM,, 536 F. Supp. 931 (E.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . , 72, 83, 84, 85, 90.01, 90.02, 91.01, 91.02, 92.01, 92.02, 93.01, 93.03, 93.04, 98.01, 98.02, 100, 114.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STIRLING, Jr. G. M. J. L., 571 F.2d 708 (2d Cir. 1978)

. . . judicial discretion at the trial level, and is virtually unreviewable.” 8 Moore’s Federal Practice 114.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN LANDS IN TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, N. Y., 49 F. Supp. 962 (S.D.N.Y. 1943)

. . . 1,266.86 Interest & Penalties due to the date hereof. 5% first month, plus %% per month until paid. 114.02 . . .

KIRK COAL CO., 3 B.T.A. 755 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . The iron pipe was acquired at a cost of $114.02 for the purpose of pumping drainage water from the mines . . .