The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 114
VACATING OFFICE

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 114

VACATING OFFICE

114.01 Office deemed vacant in certain cases.

114.02 Absence from state of certain officers.

114.03 Certain executive officers not to absent themselves from the state.

114.04 Filling vacancies.

114.05 Issuance of letter of appointment; confirmation by the Senate; refusal or failure to confirm.

114.01 Office deemed vacant in certain cases.—

(1) A vacancy in office shall occur:

(a) Upon creation of an office.

(b) Upon the death of the incumbent officer.

(d) Upon the resignation of the officer and acceptance thereof by the Governor.

(e) Upon the succession of the officer to another office.

(f) Upon the officer’s unexplained absence for 60 consecutive days.

(g) Upon the officer’s failure to maintain the residence required of him or her by law.

(h) Upon the failure of a person elected or appointed to office to qualify for office within 30 days from the commencement of the term of office.

(i) Upon the refusal of the person elected or appointed to accept the office.

(j) Upon the conviction of the officer of a felony as defined in s. 10, Art. X of the State Constitution.

(k) Upon final adjudication, in this state or in any other state, of the officer to be mentally incompetent.

(l) Upon the rendition of a final judgment of a circuit court of this state declaring void the election or appointment of the incumbent to office.

(2) With respect to paragraphs (b) and (f)-(k) of subsection (1), the Governor shall file an executive order with the Secretary of State setting forth the facts which give rise to the vacancy, and he or she shall include in such order the title of the office, the name of the incumbent officer or person who held the office, and the date on which the vacancy in office occurred. The office shall be considered vacant as of the date specified in the executive order or, in absence of such a date, as of the date the executive order is filed with the Secretary of State.

History.—s. 1, ch. 1633, 1868; RS 214; GS 298; RGS 396; CGL 461; s. 25, ch. 71-355; s. 1, ch. 77-235; s. 728, ch. 95-147.

114.02 Absence from state of certain officers.—When any officer of the executive branch other than a Cabinet officer desires to be absent from the state for a period of 60 consecutive days or more, he or she shall be permitted to do so upon notifying the Governor in writing of this intention, but the officer shall return to the state and to the performance of his or her duties whenever requested by the Governor to do so, and upon the officer’s failure so to do the Governor may declare the office vacant pursuant to s. 114.01.

History.—ch. 1749, 1870; RS 215; GS 299; RGS 397; CGL 462; s. 2, ch. 77-235; s. 729, ch. 95-147.

114.03 Certain executive officers not to absent themselves from the state.—The Attorney General, Chief Financial Officer, and Commissioner of Agriculture shall reside at the capital, and no member of the Cabinet shall absent himself or herself from the state for a period of 60 consecutive days or more without the consent of the Governor and a majority of the Cabinet. If a Cabinet officer should refuse or fail to comply with and observe the requirements of this section, his or her office may be deemed vacant pursuant to paragraph (f) or paragraph (g) of s. 114.01(1), as appropriate.

History.—ch. 1845, 1871; RS 216; GS 300; RGS 398; CGL 463; s. 1, ch. 69-300; s. 2, ch. 77-235; s. 730, ch. 95-147; s. 5, ch. 2003-6.

114.04 Filling vacancies.—Except as otherwise provided in the State Constitution, the Governor shall fill by appointment any vacancy in a state, district, or county office, other than a member or officer of the Legislature, for the remainder of the term of an appointive officer and for the remainder of the term of an elective office, if there is less than 28 months remaining in the term; otherwise, until the first Tuesday after the first Monday following the next general election. With respect to any office which requires confirmation by the Senate, the person so appointed may hold an ad interim term of office subject to the provisions of s. 114.05. Each secretary or division director of a department of the executive branch, or the State Surgeon General, who is required by law to be appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor, unless otherwise provided by law, and the appointment of such person shall run concurrently with the term of the Governor making the appointment. In the event a Governor is elected to a second term of office pursuant to s. 5, Art. IV of the State Constitution, each secretary or division director, or the State Surgeon General, so appointed shall be reappointed or, at the discretion of the Governor, replaced by a new appointee. Reappointments to the same office shall be subject to confirmation by the Senate as provided in s. 114.05.

History.—s. 2, ch. 1633, 1868; RS 217; GS 301; RGS 399; CGL 464; s. 1, ch. 70-385; s. 2, ch. 77-235; s. 68, ch. 79-400; s. 8, ch. 2008-6.

114.05 Issuance of letter of appointment; confirmation by the Senate; refusal or failure to confirm.—

(1) When a vacancy in office is filled by appointment which requires confirmation by the Senate:

(a) The Governor shall issue and transmit to the Secretary of State for filing a letter of appointment. The letter shall contain the legal authority under which the appointment is made; the proper designation of the office; the full name and address of the appointee; the term of office to which the appointment is made; and the effective date of the appointment, which date shall be on or after the date of recording of the letter of appointment. The Secretary of State shall promptly file the letter and transmit to the appointee an oath of office, questionnaire for executive appointment, and bond form when required. Upon receipt of the questionnaire, oath of office, and bond if required, the Secretary of State shall transmit to the appointee a certificate of appointment, under seal, certifying that the appointment was made of the appointee to the office, for the term indicated in the letter of appointment. The certificate shall also provide that the appointment is subject to confirmation by the Senate at the next regular session of the Legislature following the effective date of the appointment.

(b) The Department of State shall distribute and cause to be prepared and submitted by each appointee a biographical questionnaire, verified under oath or affirmation, in the form prescribed by the President of the Senate. The department shall transmit the completed questionnaire and a copy of the certificate of appointment to the President of the Senate or his or her designee within 30 days from the receipt by the department of the letter of appointment. Upon receipt of the certificate, the President of the Senate shall lay the appointment before the Senate for confirmation in accordance with this section and the applicable Senate rules.

(c) If the Senate confirms the appointment, the fact of such confirmation shall be spread upon the pages of the Journal of the Senate; and thereafter a certificate of Senate confirmation shall be issued by the President of the Senate and attested to by the Secretary of the Senate. A true copy of this certificate shall be filed with the Secretary of State, and the original thereof shall be delivered to the appointee. Upon receipt by him or her of the certificate of Senate confirmation, the Secretary of State shall cause a commission to be prepared and transmitted to the Governor for signature. After the commission has been duly signed, countersigned, and sealed, it shall be delivered to the appointee. The commission shall specify, among the other things prescribed in paragraph (a), the date on which the appointment was confirmed and the expiration date of the term of office.

(d) If the Senate refuses to confirm the appointment, the fact of such refusal or rejection shall be spread upon the pages of the Journal of the Senate; and thereafter a certificate of refusal to confirm shall be issued, attested, filed, and delivered in accordance with paragraph (c). Unless an earlier date is specified in the motion to refuse to confirm, the ad interim term of the appointee whose appointment has been rejected by the Senate shall end at the adjournment of the session of the Senate at which the vote on his or her confirmation was taken. An appointee whose appointment to office has been rejected by the Senate shall hold over until his or her successor is appointed and qualified, but the period of such holdover shall not exceed 30 days from the adjournment of the session of the Senate. No person whose appointment to office has been rejected by the Senate shall be eligible for appointment to the same office for 1 year after the date of filing of the certificate of refusal to confirm.

(e) If the Senate votes to take no action or if for any other reason it fails to consider an appointment during the regular session immediately following the effective date of the appointment, the failure to act shall be noted in the pages of the Journal of the Senate; and thereafter a certificate, stating that the Senate voted to take no action or failed to consider the appointment, shall be issued, attested, filed, and delivered in accordance with paragraph (c). With respect to appointments on which the Senate fails to act during the regular session of the Legislature immediately following the effective date of the appointment, a vacancy in office shall exist upon the adjournment sine die of the Legislature. The appointee shall hold over until his or her successor is appointed and qualified; however, such period of holding over shall not exceed 45 days. The appointee may be reappointed.

(f) If the Senate voted to take no action or for any other reason failed to consider an appointment during the regular session immediately following the effective date of the appointment and the appointee was thereupon reappointed to the same office, and if the Senate votes to take no action or for any other reason fails to consider the reappointment of the same person to the same office during the regular session immediately following the effective date of the reappointment, the reappointment of such person to such office shall be deemed to have been rejected; the office shall become vacant upon the adjournment sine die of the regular session immediately following the effective date of the reappointment; and the appointee shall not hold over in that office or be eligible for reappointment in that office for 1 year thereafter.

(2) Upon request, any agency of government in this state is authorized to provide information to the Senate or the appropriate Senate standing or select committee or subcommittee thereof. Upon request of the President of the Senate or the appropriate Senate standing or select committee or subcommittee thereof, the Department of Law Enforcement shall make and cause to be furnished to the President of the Senate or the appropriate Senate standing or select committee or subcommittee thereof the results of an inquiry or investigation involving the criminal history relating to any person whose appointment to office is subject to Senate confirmation.

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the Senate may, upon the affirmative vote of a majority of those present, consider an appointment at any time it is in session.

History.—s. 3, ch. 77-235; s. 10, ch. 79-8; s. 56, ch. 81-259; s. 731, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 114 on Google Scholar

F.S. 114 on Casetext

Amendments to 114

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 114

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S554.114 - HEALTH-SAFETY - REMOVED - M: S

S554.114 1a - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: S

S554.114 1b - FRAUD - REMOVED - M: S

S554.114 1c - FRAUD - REMOVED - M: S

S554.114 1d - HEALTH-SAFETY - REMOVED - M: S

S554.114 1e - FRAUD - REMOVED - M: S

S554.114 1f - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BARNES, v. AHLMAN,, 140 S. Ct. 2620 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994). . . . , Supreme Court Practice § 5.12(c)(3), p. 5-45 (11th ed. 2019); see also Farmer , 511 U.S., at 842, 114 . . . officials" must " 'take reasonable measures to guarantee the[ir] safety.' " Farmer , 511 U.S., at 832-833, 114 . . .

LITTLE, v. RECLAIM IDAHO,, 140 S. Ct. 2616 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Legalization Assistance Project of Los Angeles County Federation of Labor , 510 U.S. 1301, 1304, 114 . . . Senate Select Comm. on Ethics , 510 U.S. 1319, 1320, 114 S.Ct. 1036, 127 L.Ed.2d 530 (1994) (Rehnquist . . . Senate Select Comm. on Ethics , 510 U.S. 1319, 1320, 114 S.Ct. 1036, 127 L.Ed.2d 530 (1994) (Rehnquist . . .

CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY v. SISOLAK,, 140 S. Ct. 2603 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Grumet , 512 U.S. 687, 722, 114 S.Ct. 2481, 129 L.Ed.2d 546 (1994) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment . . .

P. BARR, v. PURKEY, 140 S. Ct. 2594 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Senate Select Comm. on Ethics , 510 U.S. 1319, 1320, 114 S.Ct. 1036, 127 L.Ed.2d 530 (1994) (Rehnquist . . . justification for staying or vacating the District Court's preliminary injunction, Packwood , 510 U.S. at 1320, 114 . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Utah , 510 U.S. 399, 412, 114 S.Ct. 958, 127 L.Ed.2d 252 (1994) (emphasis deleted). . . . Utah , 510 U.S. 399, 410-411, 114 S.Ct. 958, 127 L.Ed.2d 252 (1994). . . . (quoting Hagen , 510 U.S., at 411, 114 S.Ct. 958 ). . . . Hagen , 510 U.S., at 412, 114 S.Ct. 958 (emphasis added). . . . Hagen , 510 U.S., at 411, 114 S.Ct. 958. . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Women's Health Center, Inc. , 512 U.S. 753, 765, 114 S.Ct. 2516, 129 L.Ed.2d 593 (1994) ). . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . FCC , 512 U.S. 622, 658, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 129 L.Ed.2d 497 (1994) ). . . . Gilleo , 512 U.S. 43, 52, 114 S.Ct. 2038, 129 L.Ed.2d 36 (1994). . . . Gilleo , 512 U.S. 43, 51-53, 114 S.Ct. 2038, 129 L.Ed.2d 36 (1994) (explaining that an appropriate "solution . . . Gilleo , 512 U.S. 43, 52, 114 S.Ct. 2038, 129 L.Ed.2d 36 (1994). . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Gilleo , 512 U.S. 43, 60, 114 S.Ct. 2038, 129 L.Ed.2d 36 (1994) (O'Connor, J., concurring), thus tending . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Sullivan , 500 U.S. 173, 196-198, 111 S.Ct. 1759, 114 L.Ed.2d 233 (1991) (similar). . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . B. , 511 U.S. 127, 129, 114 S.Ct. 1419, 128 L.Ed.2d 89 (1994). . . . Ante, at 2118 - 2119, 114 S.Ct. 1419 (citing Craig v. . . . Kansas City , 176 U.S. 114, 118, 20 S.Ct. 284, 44 L.Ed. 392 (1900) ). . . . See id ., at 81-82 ; App. 113-114. . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . remove officers appointed by the President and the Senate vested in the President alone," id. , at 114 . . . See, well, Kagan, Presidential Administration, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 2245, 2331-2346 (2001). . . . In the academic literature, compare, e.g., Kagan, Presidential Administration, 114 Harv. L. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Uhl , 239 U.S. 3, 36 S.Ct. 2, 60 L.Ed. 114 (1915), for example, the Court observed that Ekiu decided . . . violated the terms of an extradition treaty with Great Britain); In re Washburn , 4 Johns.Ch. 106, 114 . . . Uhl , 239 U.S. 3, 36 S.Ct. 2, 60 L.Ed. 114 (1915), left no doubt. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Act are "eligible for deferred action"); Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, 114 . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 511 U.S. 485, 491-493, 114 S.Ct. 1732, 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994) ; West Virginia Univ. . . . First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. , 511 U.S. 164, 186-188, 114 S.Ct. 1439, 128 L.Ed.2d 119 (1994) . . . B. , 511 U.S. 127, 136-137, 114 S.Ct. 1419, 128 L.Ed.2d 89 (1994) ; Craig v. . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See §§ 5(a)(2), 8(c)(2), 114 Stat. 2529, 2533; Pub. . . .

L. BAXTER v. BRACEY,, 140 S. Ct. 1862 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Reed , 500 U.S. 478, 489-492, 111 S.Ct. 1934, 114 L.Ed.2d 547 (1991). . . .

J. LOMAX, v. ORTIZ- MARQUEZ,, 140 S. Ct. 1721 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), which holds that a claim challenging . . . U.S.C. § 1983 "does not accrue until the conviction or sentence has been invalidated." 512 U.S. at 490, 114 . . .

GE ENERGY POWER CONVERSION FRANCE SAS, CORP. SAS, v. OUTOKUMPU STAINLESS USA, LLC,, 140 S. Ct. 1637 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Lynchburg College , 535 U.S. 106, 114-115, n. 8, 122 S.Ct. 1145, 152 L.Ed.2d 188 (2002) ("[T]here is . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 511 U.S. 368, 371, 114 S.Ct. 1669, 128 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994) ("That several items in a list . . .

NASRALLAH, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 1683 (U.S. 2020)

. . . S. 114. . . . S. 114. . . .

OPATI, v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1601 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See id., at 266-267, 114 S.Ct. 1483. . . . See id., at 266, 114 S.Ct. 1483. . . . Id., at 272, 114 S.Ct. 1483. . . . See Landgraf , 511 U.S., at 281, 114 S.Ct. 1483. . . . See id ., at 272-273, 114 S.Ct. 1483. . . .

VALENTINE, v. COLLIER,, 140 S. Ct. 1598 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 842, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (noting that deliberate indifference . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Kansas City , 176 U.S. 114, 118, 20 S.Ct. 284, 44 L.Ed. 392 (1900) ; Owings v. . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Testan , 424 U.S. 392, 96 S.Ct. 948, 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976), the Court simply lifted the language in question . . . Testan , 424 U.S. 392, 400, 96 S.Ct. 948, 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976), which also directed that the "grant . . . L. 114-113, § 225, 129 Stat. 2624 (providing for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016). . . . formula, and "shall pay" insurers for losses exceeding the statutory threshold. §§ 1342(a), (b)(1), 114 . . . USI Film Products , 511 U.S. 244, 265-266, 280, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994) ; see also GAO . . . Testan , 424 U.S. 392, 404, 96 S.Ct. 948, 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976) (suggesting that the Back Pay Act, 5 . . .

COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND,, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Illinois , 451 U.S. 304, 310-311, 101 S.Ct. 1784, 68 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981). . . . USI Film Products , 511 U.S. 244, 262, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994). . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . South Carolina , 512 U.S. 154, 114 S.Ct. 2187, 129 L.Ed.2d 133 (1994) ); Lambrix v. . . . United States , 511 U.S. 738, 745-746, 114 S.Ct. 1921, 128 L.Ed.2d 745 (1994) (analyzing Baldasar v. . . .

COMCAST CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN- OWNED MEDIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1009 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Roadway Express, Inc. , 511 U.S. 298, 302, 114 S.Ct. 1510, 128 L.Ed.2d 274 (1994). See also H. R. . . .

INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, v. M. SULYMA, 140 S. Ct. 768 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Resolution Trust Corporation , 511 U.S. 531, 537, 114 S.Ct. 1757, 128 L.Ed.2d 556 (1994) (internal quotation . . . Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 842, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994). . . . United States , 511 U.S. 600, 615-616, n. 11, 114 S.Ct. 1793, 128 L.Ed.2d 608 (1994) ("[K]nowledge can . . .

SHULAR, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 779 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 511 U.S. 600, 619, n. 17, 114 S.Ct. 1793, 128 L.Ed.2d 608 (1994) ; Chapman v. . . . United States , 500 U.S. 453, 463, 111 S.Ct. 1919, 114 L.Ed.2d 524 (1991) ; Huddleston v. . . . See American Heritage Dictionary 114 (def. 7a) (1981) ("To equal in meaning or identity"). . . .

MCKINNEY, v. ARIZONA, 140 S. Ct. 702 (U.S. 2020)

. . . California , 512 U.S. 967, 114 S.Ct. 2630, 129 L.Ed.2d 750 (1994) ; Zant v. . . . Id., at 113-114, 102 S.Ct. 869. McKinney's case then returned to the Arizona Supreme Court. . . . Oklahoma , 455 U.S. 104, 113-114, 102 S.Ct. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982), refused to consider as mitigating . . . Id. , at 113-114, 102 S.Ct. 869. . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Meyer , 510 U.S. 471, 114 S.Ct. 996, 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994) ; Schweiker v. . . . Meyer , 510 U.S. 471, 114 S.Ct. 996, 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994) ; Schweiker v. . . .

L. BALDWIN, Et Ux. v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 690 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Mortgage Bankers Assn. , 575 U.S. 92, 114, n. 1, 135 S.Ct. 1199, 191 L.Ed.2d 186 (2015) (opinion concurring . . .

WOLF, v. COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS,, 140 S. Ct. 681 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Senate Select Comm. on Ethics , 510 U.S. 1319, 1320, 114 S.Ct. 1036, 127 L.Ed.2d 530 (1994) (Rehnquist . . .

RITZEN GROUP, INC. v. JACKSON MASONRY, LLC, 140 S. Ct. 582 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Desktop Direct, Inc. , 511 U.S. 863, 868, 114 S.Ct. 1992, 128 L.Ed.2d 842 (1994) (addressing collateral . . .

PETER, v. NANTKWEST, INC., 140 S. Ct. 365 (U.S. 2019)

. . . United States , 511 U.S. 809, 815, 114 S.Ct. 1960, 128 L.Ed.2d 797 (1994), Congress must provide a sufficiently . . .

W. PAUL v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 342 (U.S. 2019)

. . . American Telephone & Telegraph Co. , 512 U.S. 218, 114 S.Ct. 2223, 129 L.Ed.2d 182 (1994) ; Breyer, Judicial . . .

R. ISOM v. ARKANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 342 (U.S. 2019)

. . . United States , 510 U.S. 540, 555, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994). . . . Id. , at 562, 114 S.Ct. 1147 (Kennedy, J., concurring). . . .

P. BARR, v. EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT,, 140 S. Ct. 3 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Senate Select Comm. on Ethics , 510 U.S. 1319, 1320, 114 S.Ct. 1036, 127 L.Ed.2d 530 (1994) (Rehnquist . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . No. 114-185, 130 Stat. 538 (2016). . . . No. 114-4, at 2 (2015), as reprinted in 2016 U.S.C.C.A.N. 321, 322 (identifying increasing requests and . . .

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST. LOUIS REGION, INC. P. D. O. M. S. C. I. F. A. C. O. G, v. L. PARSON,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 631 (W.D. Mo. 2019)

. . . Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 114 (8th Cir. 1981). . . .

BIRD, v. i DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DHS, R., 935 F.3d 738 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Morgan , 536 U.S. 101, 114, 122 S.Ct. 2061, 153 L.Ed.2d 106 (2002) (" Morgan II "). . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 835, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) ("ordinary lack of due care" is insufficient . . . Farmer , 511 U.S. at 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970. The State urges that neither Dr. . . . 726 F.3d 1062, 1074 (9th Cir. 2013) (alterations in original) (quoting Farmer , 511 U.S. at 837, 842, 114 . . .

SEMPLE, a a k a a v. GRISWOLD, Be USA A., 934 F.3d 1134 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . App. at 114-15. . . .

DIVERSE POWER, INC. v. CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA,, 934 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Desktop Direct, Inc. , 511 U.S. 863, 114 S. . . .

RAWA, A. W. Jr. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, v., 934 F.3d 862 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Int'l House of Pancakes , 513 F.2d 114, 127 n.13 (8th Cir. 1975). . . .

SCRIMO, v. LEE,, 935 F.3d 103 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Sam's Club, 145 F.3d 114, 117 (2d Cir. 1998) ("Issues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered . . .

WOLFINGTON, v. RECONSTRUCTIVE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES II PC, a k a, 935 F.3d 187 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Litig. , 114 F.3d 1410, 1426 (3d Cir. 1997) ). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(d). Rose v. . . . Corp. , 512 U.S. 79, 85, 114 S.Ct. 2048, 129 L.Ed.2d 67 (1994) ("Nor would we adopt a court-made rule . . .

PARKER, v. LANDRY,, 935 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (quoting Rhodes v. . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 828, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) ; see also Estelle , 429 U.S. at . . . Saiz , 427 F.3d 745, 753 (10th Cir. 2005) (quoting Farmer , 511 U.S. at 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970 ). . . . Farmer , 511 U.S. at 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970. . . . Farmer , 511 U.S. at 842, 114 S.Ct. 1970. . . . United States , 510 U.S. 540, 558, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994) (Kennedy, J., concurring in . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEGAY,, 934 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . .**, 111 S.Ct. 1854, 114 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991) ("Although a murder may be committed without an intent to . . .

BOWLES, v. DESANTIS,, 934 F.3d 1230 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 859, 114 S.Ct. 2568, 129 L.Ed.2d 666 (1994) (explaining that (1) criminal defendants . . . Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 855-57, 114 S.Ct. 2568, 129 L.Ed.2d 666 (1994) (holding that the right to appointed . . .

REGAN v. CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANA,, 934 F.3d 700 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Town of Clarkstown, N.Y. , 511 U.S. 383, 393, 114 S. Ct. 1677, 1683, 128 L.Ed.2d 399 (1994). . . . Quality of State of Or. , 511 U.S. 93, 100-01, 114 S. Ct. 1345, 1351, 128 L.Ed.2d 13 (1994). . . .

TURCO v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, NEW JERSEY,, 935 F.3d 155 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Women's Health Ctr., Inc. , 512 U.S. 753, 764, 114 S.Ct. 2516, 129 L.Ed.2d 593 (1994) ). . . . Id. at 715, 120 S.Ct. 2480 (citation omitted) (citing Madsen , 512 U.S. at 753, 114 S.Ct. 2516 ). . . .

BIONDO, v. KALEDIA HEALTH, d b a, 935 F.3d 68 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . P. 56(a) ; see Nick's Garage, 875 F.3d at 113-114. . . .

BENTLEY, v. AUTOZONERS, LLC, LLC,, 935 F.3d 76 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Carlone , 770 F.3d 97, 114 (2d Cir. 2014) (quoting Harris v. . . . Forklift Sys., Inc ., 510 U.S. 17, 21, 114 S.Ct. 367, 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993) ). . . . Carlone , 770 F.3d at 114 (internal quotation marks omitted), the record evidence would not permit it . . .

S. BLEDSOE, v. VANDERBILT,, 934 F.3d 1112 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Reed, 500 U.S. 478, 486, 111 S.Ct. 1934, 114 L.Ed.2d 547 (1991), wherein they examine the "nature of . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. of Sacramento Cty. , 11 Cal. 3d 574, 581-82, 114 Cal.Rptr. 106, 522 P.2d 666 (1974). . . . Hurtado , 11 Cal. 3d at 579, 114 Cal.Rptr. 106, 522 P.2d 666. . . . Superior Court , 11 Cal.3d 574, 114 Cal.Rptr. 106, 522 P.2d 666 (1974). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CRUM,, 934 F.3d 963 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 511 U.S. 485, 114 S.Ct. 1732, 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994), to reject the Sixth and D.C. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN,, 935 F.3d 43 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . We also remanded for resentencing in Lake , 419 F.3d at 114, in the situation, similar to Crosby , 397 . . .

BAUGHMAN, v. HICKMAN K. M., 935 F.3d 302 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCANZANI,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 210 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . to a warrantless search at any time by any probation officer or law enforcement officer. 534 U.S. at 114 . . .

MAMMANA, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, 934 F.3d 368 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994). Id. . . . Farmer , 511 U.S. at 832, 114 S.Ct. 1970. Id. at 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970 (citing Helling v. . . . Farmer , 511 U.S. at 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970 (quoting Wilson , 501 U.S. at 297, 111 S.Ct. 2321 ). Id. . . . Farmer , 511 U.S. at 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970. . . .

BARNES, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, a USA, N. A. a JP Co. a IBM a, 934 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . See In re Bestrom , 114 F.3d 741, 744-46 (8th Cir. 1997) (holding that TILA right of rescission did not . . .

IN RE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE S SUNDAY TICKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Jr. v. LLC LLC NFL LLC LLC LP LLC LLC NFL LP LLC LP LLC LP Co. LLC LP LLC, 933 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . NCAA , 468 U.S. at 114 n.53, 104 S.Ct. 2948 (quoting the district court, Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Oklahoma . . . F.C.C. , 512 U.S. 622, 627, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 129 L.Ed.2d 497 (1994). . . . Id. at 628, 114 S.Ct. 2445. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLAIR,, 933 F.3d 1271 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Miller , 665 F.3d 114, 133-34 (5th Cir. 2011) ; United States v. Love , 593 F.3d 1, 12 (D.C. . . .

SMITH, OSF v. OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,, 933 F.3d 859 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 849 & n.10, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (noting that district court . . .

GREYER, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v., 933 F.3d 871 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994) ; Preiser v. . . .

EFFEX CAPITAL, LLC, v. NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION,, 933 F.3d 882 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . No. 106-554, 114 Stat. 2763 (2000) (among other things, renewing the Commission's mandate, clarifying . . . Meyer , 510 U.S. 471, 473-74, 114 S.Ct. 996, 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994) ; a procedural due process suit against . . . See In re Series 7 Broker Qualification Exam Scoring Litig ., 548 F.3d 110, 114 (D.C. . . . See In re Series 7 Broker Qualification Exam Scoring Litig ., 548 F.3d at 114 (noting that, although . . .

HIGGS, v. UNITED STATES PARK POLICE,, 933 F.3d 897 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Federal Labor Relations Auth. , 510 U.S. 487, 495, 114 S.Ct. 1006, 127 L.Ed.2d 325 (1994). . . .

HARDEMAN, v. CURRAN,, 933 F.3d 816 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994),] and the more general standards of dignity . . . Farmer , 511 U.S. at 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970. . . . civilized measure of life's necessities.' " Budd , 711 F.3d at 842 (quoting Farmer , 511 U.S. at 834, 114 . . . Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994). . . . Id. at 832, 114 S.Ct. 1970. . . .

NAUMOVSKI, v. NORRIS, 934 F.3d 200 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Raspardo, 770 F.3d at 114 (internal quotation marks omitted). See, e.g. , Patterson v. . . . See Raspardo , 770 F.3d at 114-15 ; Vasquez v. . . . incorporates agency principles to determine when an employer is liable for its agents. 770 F.3d 97, 114 . . . Forklift Sys., Inc ., 510 U.S. 17, 21, 114 S. Ct. 367, 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993) ). Sp. . . .

BASTARDO- VALE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 934 F.3d 255 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . See In re Grossman's Inc., 607 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 2010) (en banc). . . .

HILLOCKS, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 934 F.3d 332 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Att'y Gen. , 543 F.3d 114, 123-24 (3d Cir. 2008). Rojas , 728 F.3d at 216. Id . 135 S. . . .

MARTIN, v. MARINEZ,, 934 F.3d 594 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 483, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994) (quoting Stachura , 477 U.S. at . . . Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 484, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994) ) (available damages for false arrest . . .

IN RE MIAMI METALS I, INC., 603 B.R. 727 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . First Nat'l Bank , 114 So. 2d 431, 434 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1959). . . .

COEUR D ALENE TRIBE, a v. W. HAWKS A., 933 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. of Am. , 511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994). . . .

RILEY, v. FILSON D., 933 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Riley I , 786 F.3d at 723-24 (quoting Powell , 838 P.2d at 927, vacated on other grounds , 511 U.S. 79, 114 . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. PAUP,, 933 F.3d 1226 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Tulsiram , 815 F.3d 114, 119 (2d Cir. 2016) ("[W]e have no difficulty in reaching our holding today: . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Vance , 893 F.3d 101, 114 (2d Cir. 2018) (noting that whether "ordinary person" has sufficient notice . . . United States , 500 U.S. 257, 273, 111 S.Ct. 1807, 114 L.Ed.2d 307 (1991) (holding that elected official . . . United States , 512 U.S. 573, 583, 114 S.Ct. 2419, 129 L.Ed.2d 459 (1994) ; accord United States v. . . .

REYES, v. FISCHER, J. X., 934 F.3d 97 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Oliver, 510 U.S. 266, 275, 114 S.Ct. 807, 127 L.Ed.2d 114 (1994) (Scalia, J., concurring) (stating that . . .

AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, N. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 932 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . No. 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312. . . .

PILLAR DYNASTY LLC, v. NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., 933 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517, 534 n.19, 114 S.Ct. 1023, 127 L.Ed.2d 455 (1994) ). . . .

SIEGEL, s s v. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC. HSBC USA, N. A. HBUS,, 933 F.3d 217 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . regulators," TAC ¶¶ 65-66, and thereby "provided nearly $1 billion in U.S. dollars to [ARB]," id. at ¶ 114 . . .

PARENT PROFESSIONAL ADVOCACY LEAGUE M. W. a F. D. S. S. a S. Y. v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS J., 934 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Sch., 386 F.3d 107, 114 (2d Cir. 2004) ; cf. Christopher W. v. Portsmouth Sch. . . . Family Dollar Stores, Inc., 733 F.3d 105, 114 (4th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 573 U.S. 954, 134 S. . . .

EVANS, v. GRIFFIN,, 932 F.3d 1043 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rauland Corp. , 21 F.R.D. 113, 114-15 (N.D. . . .

CHAVEZ, De E. De De De v. OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a, 933 F.3d 186 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . In July 1977, Occidental allegedly discovered that 35 of 114 workers at its Lathrop, California manufacturing . . . Bank of China Ltd. , 740 F.3d 108, 114 (2d Cir. 2014) (certifying questions permitted "where the New . . . Co. v. 633 Third Assocs. , 14 F.3d 114, 119 (2d Cir. 1994) )). We do not think that we can. . . .

LOCAL COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL- CIO v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 392 F. Supp. 3d 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . to "[c]alendar upcoming dates" (see, e.g. , Healey-Kagan Decl., Ex. 3, ECF No. 131-3, at 104, 108, 114 . . . (See, e.g. , id. at 114, 117, 119 ("Strategy meeting regarding matter"); 116, 118, 120 ("Attorney meeting . . .

KORTRIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, TY v. INVESTCORP INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . (Trial Tr. at 114-16 (Taylor); Trial Tr. at 1235-37 (Popplewell).) . . . (See P-114.) . . . Merrill Lynch & Co., 690 F.3d 98, 114 (2d Cir. 2012) ; accord Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. . . .

MORALES- MORALES, v. P. BARR, U. S., 933 F.3d 456 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . No. 100-20 (1988), 1465 U.N.T.S. 85, 114. . . .

KELLER LOGISTICS GROUP, INC. v. NAVISTAR, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 774 (N.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . Co. of Am. , 511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994). . . .

KODIAK OIL GAS USA INC. HRC LLC v. BURR S. EOG S., 932 F.3d 1125 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Shalala , 512 U.S. 504, 512, 114 S.Ct. 2381, 129 L.Ed.2d 405 (1994) )). . . .

WALLER, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a, 932 F.3d 1277 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . (Appellant's App. at 114-15.) These allegations fail to state a plausible claim for relief. . . .

IN RE N. JAFFE,, 932 F.3d 602 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cottrell , 298 Ill.App. 434, 19 N.E.2d 111, 114 (2d Dist. 1939) ("At common law, land was subject neither . . .

UNITED STATES v. HUNTER, 932 F.3d 610 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . New York , 500 U.S. 352, 359, 111 S.Ct. 1859, 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991) ). . . .

CANT v. M. MOODY S. S., 933 F.3d 414 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Meyer , 510 U.S. 471, 484 n.9, 114 S.Ct. 996, 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994). Here's an example. . . . Oliver , 510 U.S. 266, 271, 114 S.Ct. 807, 127 L.Ed.2d 114 (1994) (plurality opinion); see also Castellano . . .

UNITED STATES v. BANYAN, 933 F.3d 548 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 510 U.S. 135, 147-48, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994). . . .

COFFEY, v. CARROLL, 933 F.3d 577 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 484, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). . . .

BENAVIDEZ v. HOWARD,, 931 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Reed , 500 U.S. 478, 493, 111 S.Ct. 1934, 114 L.Ed.2d 547 (1991) (citation omitted). . . .

GOODRICH, v. TONELLI S PIZZA PUB,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 523 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Id. at 113:20-24, 114:18-24. . . .

UNITED STATES v. COLLIER,, 932 F.3d 1067 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . parties, or their cases, ordinarily do not support a bias or partiality challenge." 510 U.S. 540, 555, 114 . . . Id. at 555-56, 114 S.Ct. 1147. . . .