Cases from cite.case.law:

MCGINNIS, v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING INC., 240 F. Supp. 3d 1337 (M.D. Ga. 2017)

. . . 2004)) (reducing the punitive award from $1,000,000 to $250,000 when compensatory damages amounted to $115.05 . . .

FLYING FISH BIKES, INC. v. GIANT BICYCLE, INC., 181 F. Supp. 3d 957 (M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . compensatory damages is “relatively small” because, although an individual patron of AT&T expended only $115.05 . . . Also, Kemp, 393 F.3d at 1364, determines that a single-digit multiple of $115.05— “little more than a . . . state Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations acts) and despite a 2,173-to-l ratio ($250,000 to $115.05 . . .

DETROIT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE COMPANY, v. GOVERNMENT OF CANADA,, 53 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 115.05 (emphasis added). . . . The parties dispute the meaning and scope of 33 C.F.R. § 115.05. . . . Regulation 115.05 was not adopted in isolation. . . . The Coast Guard relied on 33 C.F.R. § 115.05 to support this action. D. . . . . § 115.05. . . .

CORYN GROUP II, LLC, v. O. C. SEACRETS, INC., 868 F. Supp. 2d 468 (D. Md. 2012)

. . . Co., 393 F.3d 1354, 1364-65 (11th Cir.2004) (affirming $250,000 punitive award accompanying $115.05 compensatory . . .

ARIZONA, DEPARTMENT OF LAW, CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION, v. ASARCO, L. L. C. a, 798 F. Supp. 2d 1023 (D. Ariz. 2011)

. . . Co., 393 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir.2004), a RICO case in which the plaintiff received $115.05 in actual damages . . .

SEPULVEDA, v. W. BURNSIDE,, 432 F. App'x 860 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . reducing a punitive damage award from $1,000,000 to $250,000 when compensatory damages amounted to $115.05 . . .

BRIM, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., 795 F. Supp. 2d 1255 (N.D. Ala. 2011)

. . . .2004) (reducing the punitive award from $1,000,000 to $250,000 when compensatory damages amounted to $115.05 . . .

MYERS, v. CENTRAL FLORIDA INVESTMENTS, INC., 592 F.3d 1201 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . .2004) (reducing the punitive award from $1,000,000 to $250,000 when compensatory damages amounted to $115.05 . . .

A. LAYMON, v. LOBBY HOUSE, INC. a, 613 F. Supp. 2d 504 (D. Del. 2009)

. . . In Kemp, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a ratio of 2,173:1 based on an award of $115.05 in compensatory . . .

UNITED STATES v. GARCIA,, 282 F. App'x 14 (2d Cir. 2008)

. . . court’s failure to charge the jury on the elements of criminal facilitation under New York Penal Law 115.05 . . .

SAUNDERS, v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, LLC LLC,, 526 F.3d 142 (4th Cir. 2008)

. . . (11th Cir.2004) (allowing punitive damages award of $250,000 accompanying compensatory damages of $115.05 . . .

KHULUMANI, Z. P. M. B. A. v. BARCLAY NATIONAL BANK LTD. PLC, AG, AG, AG, J. P. UBS AG, AEG AG, AEG AG, F. J. P. J. H. v. PLC, PLC, UBS AG, AG, AG, AG, J. P. Co. Co. Co. E. I. IBM, N. A. Co. S. A. USA, AG, AG, AG, P. L. C. AG, ICL, RAJ, AG, AG, Co. PLC Co., 504 F.3d 254 (2d Cir. 2007)

. . . Penal Code § 115.05 (criminal facilitation). . . .

MIZRAHI, v. R. GONZALES,, 492 F.3d 156 (2d Cir. 2007)

. . . Penal Law § 115.05 (McKinney 1987), did not qualify as a "controlled substance offense” under the federal . . .

UNITED STATES v. EPPOLITO, 436 F. Supp. 2d 532 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . murder of Nicholas Guido, date of birth February 2, 1960, in violation of New York Penal Law Sections 115.05 . . . wit: the October 8, 1987 murder of John “Otto” Heidel, in violation of New York Penal Law Sections 115.05 . . . to wit: the February 4, 1990 murder of Anthony Dilapi, in violation of New York Penal Law Sections 115.05 . . . , to wit: the August 30, 1990 murder of Bruno Facciola, in violation of New York Penal Law Sections 115.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. TREJO- PALACIOS, 418 F. Supp. 2d 915 (S.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . Penal Law § 115.05, Practice Commentaries). . . . Penal Law § 115.05 (McKinney 1987)). . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. SAWYERS,, 409 F.3d 732 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . Penal Law § 115.05). . . . .

KEMP, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH COMPANY,, 393 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . The jury awarded Kemp $115.05 in actual damages, the costs of playing the game, which were then trebled . . .

UNITED STATES v. PIMENTEL, La, 346 F.3d 285 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . Santiago,” in violation of New York Penal Law §§ 125.25 and 115.05, as well as 18 U.S.C. § 1959(a)(1) . . .

MCKENZIE, Jr. v. CITY OF DETROIT,, 74 F. App'x 553 (6th Cir. 2003)

. . . McKenzie cursorily claims that Michigan Standard Jury Instruction 2d 115.05 renders self-defense an affirmative . . .

JIMENEZ, v. WALKER,, 166 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . in the Third Degree (Penal Law § 265.02(4)), Criminal Facilitation in the Second Degree (Penal Law § 115.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MILLER, C- CJ., 116 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1997)

. . . August 6, 1987 murder of Isaac Bolden, a/k/a “Just Me”, in violation of New York Penal Law Sections 115.05 . . . The New York Penal Law provisions cited in the racketeering act 10 allegation against Miller are §§ 115.05 . . . Section 115.05 provides that a defendant is guilty of criminal facilitation, a Class C felony, “when, . . . L. § 115.05 (McKinney 1987). . . . district court noted the substantive difference between criminal facilitation, described in New York’s § 115.05 . . .

In A. DRINKWATER, In GUZMAN,, 178 B.R. 590 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1995)

. . . serves as the Chapter 13 Trustee in approximately 818 cases and currently holds approximately $867,-115.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. P. PAZZANESE,, 982 F.2d 251 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . N.Y.Penal Law § 115.05. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLANKENSHIP E., 970 F.2d 283 (7th Cir. 1992)

. . . E.g., N.Y.Penal Code § 115.05. . . .

CARVER, v. CARVER, L. III, W. III, L., 954 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir. 1992)

. . . See Collier Family Law 115.05[2], Therefore, debtors may generally recover damages for violations of . . .

UNITED STATES v. LIRANZO,, 944 F.2d 73 (2d Cir. 1991)

. . . Penal Law § 115.05 (McKinney 1987) — the court concluded that facilitation was sufficiently akin to “ . . . Penal Law § 115.05 (McKinney 1987). . . . Penal Law § 115.05, Practice Commentaries (quoting Staff Notes of the Commission on Revision of the Penal . . .

LEVERNIER CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 21 Cl. Ct. 683 (Ct. Cl. 1990)

. . . JCB 16.0 hrs $75/hr 1,200.00 16.0 hrs $88.50/hr 1416.00 LHV 6.8 hrs $75/hr 510.00 1.3 hrs $88.50/hr 115.05 . . . Paralegals CRH 3.9 hrs $25/hr 97.50 3.9 hrs $29.50/hr 115.05 RMV 3.5 hrs $25/hr 87.50 3.1 hrs $29.50 . . .

CITIZENS ACTION LEAGUE, a v. KIZER, R., 670 F. Supp. 874 (N.D. Cal. 1987)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise 115.05, at 315 (1958). . . .

HOLLAND, v. J. SCULLY,, 797 F.2d 57 (2d Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 115.05. . . . the eléments of the lesser crimes of criminal facilitation or hindering prosecution, see N.Y.P.L. §§ 115.05 . . .

In MID- ATLANTIC TOYOTA ANTITRUST LITIGATION. STATE OF MARYLAND SACHS v. MID- ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC. STATE OF DELAWARE GEBELEIN v. MID- ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA BROWNING v. MID- ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROGERS v. MID- ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MID- ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. MID- ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC. E. GOLUB, v. MID- ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC. H. JOHNSTON, Jr. v. MID- ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC., 560 F. Supp. 760 (D. Md. 1983)

. . . under the private action statute, see 15 J. von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulations § 115.05 . . .

In MORGAN,, 668 F.2d 261 (7th Cir. 1981)

. . . See also 1A Collier on Bankruptcy 115.05-15.07 (14th ed. 1978). . . .

v., 69 T.C. 723 (T.C. 1978)

. . . .$29.49 Message units.10.37 Calls outside local area and telegrams. 75.19 Total charges.115.05 Of the . . .

UNITED STATES v. RESERVE MINING COMPANY, 543 F.2d 1210 (8th Cir. 1976)

. . . .-07(4a) and 115.05 (Supp.1974). . . .