Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 115.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 115.08 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 115.08

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 115
LEAVES OF ABSENCE TO OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 115.08
115.08 Definitions.
(1) The term “active military service” as used in this chapter shall signify active duty in the Florida defense force or federal service in training or on active duty with any branch of the Armed Forces or Reservists of the Armed Forces, the Florida National Guard, the Coast Guard of the United States, and service of all officers of the United States Public Health Service detailed by proper authority for duty with the Armed Forces, and shall include the period during which a person in military service is absent from duty on account of sickness, wounds, leave, or other lawful cause.
(2) The term “period of active military service” as used in this chapter shall begin with the date of entering upon active military service, and shall terminate with death or a date 30 days immediately next succeeding the date of release or discharge from active military service, or upon return from active military service, whichever shall occur first.
(3) The term “servicemember” as used in this chapter shall have the same meaning as provided in s. 250.01.
History.s. 2, ch. 20718, 1941; s. 7, ch. 2003-72.

F.S. 115.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 115.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 115.08


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 115.08
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 115.08.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CORPORATION, a v. DAKOTA MISSOURI VALLEY AND WESTERN RAILROAD, INC. a a v. Fe a, 347 F. Supp. 2d 708 (D.S.D. 2004)

. . . the rail line and rail corridor ownership interests in portions of the Britton Line (between milepost 115.08 . . . the transfer the “interchange access line” in Aberdeen, which includes the tracks between milepost 115.08 . . . freight cars and equipment, over BNSF’s rail line at or near Aberdeen, South Dakota, between Milepost 115.08 . . . 65.60 on the Rail Line, where such traffic originates or terminates on the Rail Line between Mileposts 115.08 . . . interchange access line, which includes the tracks on the Britton Line between mileposts 118.6 and 115.08 . . .

TSOMBANIDIS, v. CITY OF WEST HAVEN, CONNECTICUT,, 208 F. Supp. 2d 263 (D. Conn. 2002)

. . . These figures were calculated as follows: City: 12.3 hours Allocated by Attorney Orleans 115.08 hours . . .

INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. v. E. WOOLEY, 204 F.3d 616 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . The ALJ divided the total earnings by 256 days to arrive at a daily wage of $115.08, which he multiplied . . . day 32 hours 01/01/93 1 day 48 hours 12/20/92 1 day 16 hours total: 4 days 120 hours . $29,462.10 = $115.08 . . .

SNYDER, v. BAUMECKER C., 708 F. Supp. 1451 (D.N.J. 1989)

. . . Anchor Motor Freight Co., 428 F.Supp. 21, 22 (M.D.Pa.1976), quoting 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 115.08 . . .

C. McDERMOTT v. BISCARDI, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF BOSTON, 550 F. Supp. 106 (D.R.I. 1982)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 115.08(7) at 15-127 (2d ed. 1982) (an amended pleading that is complete . . .

In D. H. OVERMYER TELECASTING CO. INC. HADAR LEASING INTERNATIONAL CO. INC. v. D. H. OVERMYER TELECASTING CO. INC., 23 B.R. 823 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . thence following the following courses and distances, S. 67° 00' 00' E. 40.81 feet, S. 8° 25' 50' W. 115.08 . . .

HEYL PATTERSON INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, v. F. D. RICH HOUSING OF VIRGIN ISLANDS, INCORPORATED F. D. F. D. RICH HOUSING OF VIRGIN ISLANDS, INCORPORATED, F. D. v. GOVERNMENT OF VIRGIN ISLANDS,, 663 F.2d 419 (3d Cir. 1981)

. . . shown a strong liberality . . . in allowing amendments under Rule 15(a),” 3 Moore’s Federal Practice 115.08 . . .

SHOWS, v. S. HARBER S. O. G., 575 F.2d 1253 (8th Cir. 1978)

. . . L.Ed.2d 222 (1962), and the trend is to allow amendments dropping parties. 3 Moore, Federal Practice, 115.08 . . .

CORNELL AND COMPANY, INC. v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION, 573 F.2d 820 (3d Cir. 1978)

. . . Inland Marine Products Corp., 542 F.2d 1010,1012 (8th Cir. 1976); Moore 115.08[4], at 901; Wright & Miller . . .

W. J. USERY, Jr. v. MARQUETTE CEMENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY,, 568 F.2d 902 (2d Cir. 1977)

. . . Foman, supra, 371 U.S. at 182; see Moore, supra, 115.08[2], at 874-75. . . .

HOLCOMB v. HOLCOMB, 209 F.2d 794 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

. . . part of August, 1945, in the meantime having made payments on the first trust note which aggregated $115.08 . . . Julia should recover of him the sum of $115.08, the amount she paid in 1945 on the first trust indebtedness . . .

ROYAL MFG. CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 139 F.2d 958 (3d Cir. 1943)

. . . balance of $19,864.72; on December 29, 1936, the day the checks were drawn, endorsed and deposited, $45,-115.08 . . .

In JOHNSON, 176 F. 591 (D. Minn. 1910)

. . . The cash surrender value of the policy is $115.08. . . . The referee held that the bankrupt must pay the trustee the cash surrender value, to wit, $115.08, before . . .