Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 136.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 136.01 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 136.01

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 136
COUNTY DEPOSITORIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 136.01
136.01 County depositories.Each county depository shall be a qualified public depository as defined in s. 280.02 for the following funds: county funds; funds of all county officers, including constitutional officers; funds of the school board; and funds of the community college district board of trustees. This enumeration of funds is made not by way of limitation, but of illustration; and it is the intent hereof that all funds of the county, the board of county commissioners or the several county officers, the school board, or the community college district board of trustees be included.
History.s. 2, ch. 6932, 1915; RGS 1559; s. 1, ch. 8527, 1921; CGL 2404; s. 1, ch. 14691, 1931; s. 1, ch. 19549, 1939; s. 7, ch. 24337, 1947; s. 10, ch. 26484, 1951; s. 1, ch. 59-23; s. 1, ch. 69-300; s. 1, ch. 80-151; s. 4, ch. 81-285; s. 5, ch. 98-409.

F.S. 136.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 136.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 136.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 136.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 136.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. MURRAY,, 298 F. Supp. 3d 859 (S.D. W.Va. 2018)

. . . Defendant avers that he should only be attributed 136.01 grams of heroin yielding a marijuana equivalency . . . of 136.01 kilograms. . . .

R. BERTHA, v. REMY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 414 F. Supp. 2d 869 (E.D. Wis. 2006)

. . . The word “business” is not fully defined in sec. 136.01, but it is not a synonym for the word “corporation . . . specific definition of a business opportunity broker, and now denominated as a real estate broker in sec. 136.01 . . .

GREAT RIVERS COOPERATIVE OF SOUTHEASTERN IOWA v. FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. H., 198 F.3d 685 (8th Cir. 1999)

. . . Harl, Agricultural Law § 136.01[3] at 136-14 to 136-15 (2d ed. 1991)(“A cooperative that distributes . . .

E. NELSON, v. D. BUTLER R. P. A., 929 F. Supp. 1252 (D. Minn. 1996)

. . . Citing Rule 136.01, Subdivision 1(b), Minnesota Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, the Court of Appeals . . . Of course, Rule 136.01, Subdivision 1(b), goes on to expressly allow the citation of a decision as precedent . . .

GRAVES v. BARNES REGESTER v. BULLOCK MARRIOTT v. SMITH, ARCHER v. SMITH A. ESCALANTE v. WHITE GASKIN v. WHITE L. CHAPMAN v. W. WHITE, Jr., 446 F. Supp. 560 (W.D. Tex. 1977)

. . . , that part of census tract 65.05 East of the Handley-Ederville Road, and that part of census tract 136.01 . . . 50.03, 66, 67, 101,102,104.01,104.02,105,132.01,138,139, 140.01, 140.02, and that part of census tract 136.01 . . .

R. C. SCHOENFELD, v. SILVER MOON SPRINGS, INC. a P., 325 F. Supp. 199 (E.D. Wis. 1971)

. . . In addition, § 136.01 [now § 452.01, Wis.Stats. (1969)], Wis.Stats. (1967), says, in part: “136.01 Definitions . . . Section 136.01(2) (b), Wis. Stats. (1967). . . .

GAHAGAN, v. S. PATTERSON,, 316 F. Supp. 1099 (D. Minn. 1970)

. . . . § 136.01. This statute has been construed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Kemmerer v. . . . See Minn.Stat.Ann. § 82.-02 and Wis.Stat. 136.01(6). . . .

J. SCHALLER, v. LITTON INDUSTRIES, INC. a, 307 F. Supp. 126 (E.D. Wis. 1969)

. . . proving that he was a duly licensed broker or salesman at the time the alleged cause of action arose.” “136.01 . . .

A. GOLDSMITH, v. WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a, 295 F. Supp. 1037 (E.D. Wis. 1969)

. . . proving that he was a duly licensed broker or salesman at the time the alleged cause of action arose.” “136.01 . . .

MONEY, J. K. Sr. B. J. Sr. v. STATE FLORIDA FIRST NATIONAL BANK AT PORT ST. JOE, a, 206 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Of paramount importance are the following sections: Section 136.01 provides: “[I]t being the intent hereof . . .

E. COURTRIGHT v. UNITED STATES v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY,, 276 F. Supp. 489 (D. Colo. 1967)

. . . Courtright has expended the sum of $1,-136.01 for medical treatment, X-rays, physical therapy and medication . . .

GEORGE NANGEN CO. v. KENOSHA AUTO TRANSPORT CORPORATION,, 238 F. Supp. 157 (E.D. Wis. 1965)

. . . proving that he was a duly licensed broker or salesman at the time the alleged cause of action arose.” “136.01 . . . to negotiate a sale and brings plaintiff within the definition of a real estate broker under Section 136.01 . . .

v., 144 Fla. 791 (Fla. 1940)

. . . plaintiff for principal and interest on account of its tax deed being foreclosed herein the sum of $136.01 . . .