Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 217.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 217.12 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 217.12

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 217
SURPLUS PROPERTY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 217.12
217.12 Departmental authority relative to additional restrictions.The department, when deemed necessary, may impose additional state restrictions on any equipment or surplus property other than the federal restrictions imposed under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-173; ss. 22, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 217.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 217.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 217.12


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 217.12
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 217.12.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LOUIS LEUSTEK SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 41 Fed. Cl. 657 (Fed. Cl. 1998)

. . . . § 217.12. . . . See 36 C.F.R. § 217.12. . . .

STRAHAN, v. L. LINNON, E. D., 967 F. Supp. 581 (D. Mass. 1997)

. . . . § 217.12; Defs. Mem. Supp. Mot. Summ. Judgment, Ex. . . . Section 217.12 defines an "authorized officer" who can enforce the ESA and the Fish and Wildlife Act . . .

UNITED STATES v. NGUYEN,, 847 F. Supp. 496 (S.D. Miss. 1994)

. . . Section 217.12. . . . Section 217.12. . . .

STATE OF LOUISIANA, J. GUSTE, Jr. v. C. VERITY, Jr., 853 F.2d 322 (5th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 217.12 (1987). . See also Mathews v. . . .

AMERICAN MOTOR INNS OF FLORIDA, INC. v. BELL ELECTRIC CO. a a, 260 So. 2d 276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . The parties agreed before the trial court that the lienor’s claim be reduced by the sum of $1,-217.12 . . .

H. v., 35 T.C. 454 (T.C. 1960)

. . . Each of the Farwell brothers deducted one-third of the amount, or $217.12, in his income tax return for . . . disallowed the claimed deduction in the case of each petitioner with the following statement: The amount of $217.12 . . . The next question is whether each of the Farwell brothers is entitled to a deduction of $217.12 for the . . .