The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XVIII
PUBLIC LANDS AND PROPERTY

Chapter 274
TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 274.10

274.10 Initiation of act.—This act shall govern the administration of the property of each governmental unit from the beginning of such governmental unit’s fiscal year next succeeding May 28, 1959.

History.—s. 11, ch. 59-163.

F.S. 274.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 274.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 274.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 274.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 274.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BRIGGINS, v. ELWOOD TRI, INC. LLC,, 3 F. Supp. 3d 1277 (N.D. Ala. 2014)

. . . relative to each collection of cases: Attorney Briggins Group Burroughs Group Total Robert Wiggins 389.10 274.10 . . .

FLORES, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 857 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . Challenges to Time Charges Defendant claims that some of the hours billed by Plaintiffs counsel [valued at $274.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HASSAN,, 211 F.3d 380 (7th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 2016(b) (emphasis added); see also 7 CFR § 274.10(a) (1985). . . .

v., 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 707 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”) in favor of classification as a calendar under Item 274.10 . . .

MEAD CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 17 F. Supp. 2d 1004 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”) in favor of classification as a calendar under Item 274.10 . . .

GETE, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, USA,, 121 F.3d 1285 (9th Cir. 1997)

. . . . §§ 274.10, 274.12. . Id. § 274.11. . M§§ 274.15, 274.16. . . . . Id. at 763. .Id. at 763-64. . 8 C.F.R. § 274.10(b). . Id. at 1103. . Id. at 1093-94. . . . . . §§ 274.10, 274.12. . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 274.10(c) (“The filing of a claim and a bond does not entitle the claimant to possession . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 274.10. . . . The minimum bond is $250 and the maximum is $5000. 8 C.F.R. § 274.10(a)(3). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. BARNES,, 117 F.3d 328 (7th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 2016(b) (emphasis added); see also 7 CFR § 274.10(a) (1985). . . .

UNITED STATES v. JACKSON, R., 95 F.3d 500 (7th Cir. 1996)

. . . J.Z. eventually agreed to send Midwest a check for $274.10 to cover taxes and the cost of shipping the . . .

UNITED STATES v. REAL PROPERTY AND RESIDENCE LOCATED AT ROUTE BOX FIRETOWER ROAD, SEMMES, MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA,, 920 F.2d 788 (11th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 274.10 (1988). See also Gonzales v. . . .

GARCIA- RUBIO, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,, 703 F. Supp. 859 (S.D. Cal. 1989)

. . . . § 274.10(a); see 19 U.S.C. § 1608. . . . . §§ 274.10(a), 103.7(c)(1). . . . Buried within 8 C.F.R. § 274.10(a) is the statement, “The regional commissioner may waive the bond requirement . . .

GONZALES, v. A. RIVKIND,, 858 F.2d 657 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . See 8 C.F.R. 274.10 and 274.12 (1982). . . . Compare 8 C.F.R. secs. 274.10 and 274.12 (1982) with same sections (1988). . . . See 8 C.F.R. sec. 274.10(a). . . . .

T. YSASI, v. RIVKIND,, 856 F.2d 1520 (Fed. Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 274.10 (1983). On October 31, 1983, General Motors Acceptance Corp. . . . He also argues that the INS should have initiated judicial forfeiture proceedings. 8 C.F.R. § 274.10 . . . approved, and as [Ysasi] abandoned his direct challenges to the forfeiture, Adams’ actions under § 274.10 . . . Under 8 C.F.R. § 274.10(a), the regional commissioner of INS may, in his discretion, waive the bond requirement . . . According to 8 C.F.R. 274.10(c), the filing of a claim and the posting of bond does not entitle the claimant . . .

T. YSASI, v. RIVKIND,, 856 F.2d 1520 (Fed. Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 274.10 (1983). On October 31, 1983, General Motors Acceptance Corp. . . . He also argues that the INS should have initiated judicial forfeiture proceedings. 8 C.F.R. § 274.10 . . . approved, and as [Ysasi] abandoned his direct challenges to the forfeiture, Adams’ actions under § 274.10 . . . Under 8- C.F.R. § 274.10(a), the regional commissioner of INS may, in his discretion, waive the bond . . . According to 8 C.F.R. 274.10(c), the filing of a claim and the posting of bond does not entitle the claimant . . .

MANFREDINI, v. RUTH, a, 624 F. Supp. 793 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . . § 274.10 (1984); 50 Fed. Reg. 7575 (1985). . . . complaint, plaintiff asserts that this action was brought under 8 U.S.C. § 1324(b)(3) (1982) and 8 C.F.R. § 274.10 . . . If a vehicle owner files a claim and bond under 8 C.F.R. § 274.10, the vehicle is protected from summary . . . Attorney must initiate judicial forfeiture proceedings “in the manner prescribed by law.” 8 C.F.R. § 274.10 . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 274.10 (1984); 50 Fed.Reg. 7575 (1985). . . . .

BAZALDUA, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE H. INS,, 776 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir. 1985)

. . . . §§ 274.10(a) (1985). . . .

A. SHAW, Jr. v. UNITED STATES, 8 Cl. Ct. 796 (Ct. Cl. 1985)

. . . * steps are being taken to forfeit this property [the boat] pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1324(b) and 8 CFR 274.10 . . .

LIPAROTA v. UNITED STATES, 471 U.S. 419 (U.S. 1985)

. . . For example, food stamps cannot be used to purchase tobacco. 7 CFR §§271.2, 274.10(a), 278.2(a) (1985 . . . The regulation referred to by the majority, 7 CFR § 274.10(a) (1985), states that “coupons may be used . . . . § 2016(b) (emphasis added); see also 7 CFR § 274.10(a) (1985). . . .

JOHNS, III, v. E. McKINLEY, INS C. INS, J. INS,, 753 F.2d 1195 (2d Cir. 1985)

. . . $10,000], and filed with the Attorney General if the conveyance is subject to judicial forfeiture under § 274.10 . . .

CLOW, v. C. NELSON, INS E. INS J. INS, 579 F. Supp. 981 (W.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . forfeit the seized property; subsection 274.9 explaining the claim and bond requirements; subsection 274.10 . . . been summarily forfeited due to plaintiff’s failure to file a claim and bond under 8 C.F.R. §§ 274.9 & 274.10 . . . See C.F.R. §§ 274.9, 274.10 & 274.14(a). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SALAZAR,, 720 F.2d 1482 (10th Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 274.10(a). . . .

CHARLES SCRIBNER S SONS, v. UNITED STATES,, 574 F. Supp. 1058 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983)

. . . protests this classification and contends that the merchandise is properly classifiable under Item 274.10 . . . If the imported “Engagement Calendar” is not a calendar within 274.10, then the court must determine . . . this court that the imported articles are properly classifiable as calendars within the scope of Item 274.10 . . . Plaintiff further contends that the calendar classification, Item 274.10 of Part 5, TSUS, is a more specific . . . together with the testimony of the witnesses, clearly establish the proper classification under Item 274.10 . . .

s v., 6 Ct. Int'l Trade 168 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983)

. . . protests this classification and contends that the merchandise is properly classifiable under Item 274.10 . . . Claimed by plaintiff under: 274.10 Calendars of paper: Printed on paper in whole or in part by a lithographic . . . If the imported “Engagement Calendar” is not a calendar within 274.10, then the court must determine . . . this court that the imported articles are properly classifiable as calendars within the scope of Item 274.10 . . . Plaintiff also contends, in the alternative, that even if the court finds Item 274.10 inapplicable, a . . .

FALK, v. FALK CORPORATION, a H. n k a H. S. Jr., 390 F. Supp. 1276 (E.D. Wis. 1975)

. . . Stats, sec. 274.10 (1971), which provides that: “Any judgment within section 274.-09 or any order defined . . . that a person might be a ‘party aggrieved’ by a judgment or order and entitled to appeal under see. 274.10 . . .

CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a M. v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 357 F. Supp. 399 (W.D. Wis. 1972)

. . . . § 274.10; on April 7, 1969, the attempted appeal was dismissed by an order without opinion of the Wisconsin . . .

v., 57 Cust. Ct. 384 (Cust. Ct. 1966)

. . . in schedule 2, part 5, differentiate between lithographic and other printing: items 273.90, 273.95, 274.10 . . .

ABRAMS, v. B. GRESHAM s a, 136 So. 2d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . Judgment 107.90 Original and copy of trial transcript 129.20 Cost of Certifying Record 8.50 Total $274.10 . . .