Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 383.19 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 383.19 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 383.19

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH
Chapter 383
MATERNAL AND INFANT HEALTH CARE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 383.19
383.19 Standards; funding; ineligibility.
(1) The department shall adopt rules that specify standards for development and operation of a center which include, but are not limited to:
(a) The need to provide services through a regional perinatal intensive care center and the requirements of the population to be served.
(b) Equipment.
(c) Facilities.
(d) Staffing and qualifications of personnel.
(e) Transportation services.
(f) Data collection.
(g) Definitions of terms.
(2) The department shall designate at least one center to serve a geographic area representing each region of the state in which at least 10,000 live births occur per year, but in no case may there be more than 11 regional perinatal intensive care centers established unless specifically authorized in the appropriations act or in this subsection. Medicaid reimbursement shall be made for services provided to patients who are Medicaid recipients. Medicaid reimbursement for in-center obstetrical physician services shall be based upon the obstetrical care group payment system. Medicaid reimbursement for in-center neonatal physician services shall be based upon the neonatal care group payment system. These prospective payment systems, developed by the department, must place patients into homogeneous groups based on clinical factors, severity of illness, and intensity of care. Outpatient obstetrical services and other related services, such as consultations, shall be reimbursed based on the usual Medicaid method of payment for outpatient medical services.
(3) Failure to comply with the standards established under this section constitutes grounds for terminating the contract.
(4) The department shall give priority to establishing centers in hospitals that demonstrate an interest in perinatal intensive care by meeting program standards.
(5) A private, for-profit hospital that does not accept county, state, or federal funds or indigent patients is not eligible to participate under ss. 383.15-383.19.
(6) Each hospital that contracts with the department to provide services under the terms of ss. 383.15-383.19 shall prepare and submit to the department an annual report that includes, but is not limited to, the number of clients served and the costs of services in the center. The department shall annually conduct a programmatic and financial evaluation of each center.
History.s. 5, ch. 76-54; s. 1, ch. 77-171; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 2, ch. 79-351; s. 152, ch. 79-400; s. 5, ch. 80-177; s. 2, ch. 82-209; s. 5, ch. 85-225; s. 5, ch. 94-140; s. 19, ch. 2000-242; s. 97, ch. 2010-102; s. 88, ch. 2014-17.

F.S. 383.19 on Google Scholar

F.S. 383.19 on Casetext

Amendments to 383.19


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 383.19
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 383.19.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

THEODORE, By THEODORE, a v. GRAHAM, M. D. M. D. P. A. P. A. P. A. P. A. s P. A., 733 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 383.19 provides that HRS shall adopt rules specifying standards for the development and operation . . . Failure to comply with the standards established under section 383.19 constitutes grounds for terminating . . . See ยง 383.19(3). . . . Pursuant to section 383.19, HRS enacted administrative rules to govern regional perinatal intensive care . . .

ALL CHILDREN S HOSPITAL v. HOSPITAL COST CONTAINMENT BOARD, 28 Fla. Supp. 2d 196 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1988)

. . . See sections 383.17-383.19, Fla. Stat. (1987). . . .

SOCARRAS v. YAQUE, 452 So. 2d 992 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . The testimony further shows that at the closing the Yaques paid the remaining balance owing of $383.19 . . .