The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . As to whether future lost wages, (ie., -“front pay”) are awardable in a jury trial pursuant to F.S. 448.103 . . . As to whether emotional damages are awardable in a jury trial pursuant to F.S. 448.103(2), see McIntyre . . . March 23, 2007) (damages for emotional distress recoverable in whistle-blower action pursuant to F.S. 448.103 . . .
. . . . § 448.103, the doctrine is not applicable here because it applies where the statutes "relate to the . . . Stat. § 448.103 (HCFA); 62 Pa Cons. Stat, § 1401-C (eHealth Partnership Program); and 63 Pa. Cons. . . .
. . . . §§ 448.102(1), 448.103(l)(c). . . . .
. . . As his prayer for relief, Aery tracked the language of Section 448.103(2), and requested, among other . . . wages, benefits, and other remuneration” and “[a]ny other compensatory damages allowable at law.” § 448.103 . . . The plain and unambiguous language of section 448.103(2)(e) “authorizes the court to award compensatory . . . FWA’s liberal construction, damages in the form of emotional distress are recoverable under section 448.103 . . .
. . . This instruction is based on F.S. 448.102 and 448.103(c). 2. . . . As to whether future lost wages, (i.e., “front pay”) are awardable in a .jury trial pursuant to F.S. 448.103 . . . As to whether emotional damages are awardable in a jury trial pursuant to F.S. 448.103(2), see Mcintyre . . . March 23, 2007) (damages for emotional distress recoverable in whistle-blower action pursuant to F.S. 448.103 . . .
. . . Fla.Stat § 448.103(l)(c). . . .
. . . . §§ 448.102-448.103, and state law breach of contract. . . .
. . . Most, courts that considered the question of the right to a jury trial under section 448.103, Florida . . . wages, benefits, and other remuneration” and “[a]ny other compensatory damages allowable at law.” § 448.103 . . . view that the ''[cjompensation for lost wages, benefits, and other remuneration,” mentioned in section 448.103 . . . contrary, the private-sector act’s provision for "[a]ny other compensatory damages allowable at law,” § 448.103 . . .
. . . . § 448.103(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .
. . . See § 448.103, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . See §§ 448.103; 760.11, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .
. . . .” § 448.103(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .
. . . . §§ 112.3187(8)(a), 448.103 (2003) (whistle-blower actions); Ga. . . .
. . . Appellees assert that Howard’s FWA claims are barred by the two-year statute of limitations set forth in § 448.103 . . . Specifically, § 448.103(1)(a) states: An employee who has been the object of a retaliatory personnel . . . Ann. § 448.103(l)(a) (emphasis added). . . . Ann. § 448.103(l)(a). . . .
. . . Section 448.103(l)(c), Fla. Stat., provides. . . .
. . . The remedies available under section 448.103(2) are similar to those available under section 112.3187 . . .
. . . Patricia Bosner and Roberta James, who filed a whistle-blower action against Blake pursuant to section 448.103 . . . their supervisors, the Plaintiffs retained counsel to file a whistleblower action pursuant to section 448.103 . . . See § 448.103(l)(a). . . .
. . . language only lists “compensatory” damages and that the “use of the word ‘compensatory’ in Section 448.103 . . .
. . . Jenkins, 752 So.2d 561, 565-66 (Fla. 2000) (holding that any ambiguities in paragraph 448.103(l)(c), . . .
. . . Stat. § 448.103(2). . . . Section 448.103(2) states that: [i]n any action brought pursuant to subsection (1), the court may order . . . No court has yet construed the availability of punitive damages under Section 448.103(2). . . . are available because Section 448.103(2) does not explicitly preclude punitive damages as a remedy. . . . Stat. § 448.103(2)(e). . . .
. . . Act of 1992, Chapter 760, Florida Statutes and the Florida Whistleblower Act, sections 448.102(3) and 448.103 . . .
. . . Stat. 448.103(l)(a) ("An employee who has been the object of a retaliatory personnel action in violation . . .
. . . complaint was filed within the two-year limitations period for the private-sector whistleblower statute, § 448.103 . . .
. . . applying different standards to prevailing plaintiffs and defendants apply to cases brought under section 448.103 . . .
. . . . § 448.103(l)(a) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . See § 448.103, Fla.Stat. . . .
. . . . § 448.103(1)(c). The Court applies the state’s substantive law in this diversity case. . . .
. . . Section 448.103(l)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that an employee subjected to retaliatory personnel . . .
. . . Scott Ridener brought a whistle-blower claim against his former employer pursuant to section 448.103, . . .
. . . the district courts regarding the extent of the written notice requirement of sections 448.102 and 448.103 . . . unlawful activity, the employee is not required to comply with the written notice requirement of section 448.103 . . .
. . . the majority’s resolution of this case because I am concerned that their interpretation of section 448.103 . . . This subsection is section 448.103(1), and is applicable to all causes of action, whether the action . . . when an action is brought pursuant to section 448.102(1) renders meaningless the language of section 448.103 . . . As the Second District said: Section 448.103(l)(a) provides a civil cause of action to employees who . . . I believe that section 448.103(l)(c) makes the notice requirement applicable to all subsections of section . . . . 2d DCA 1996), regarding the interpretation of the notice provisions found in sections 448.102 and 448.103 . . . The next section, section 448.103, entitled “[ejmployee’s remedy; relief,” provides a cause of action . . . BACKGROUND Martin Jenkins brought a whistle-blower claim under section 448.103 against his employer, . . . Sections 448.102 and 448.103 are closely related. . . . In fact, subsection 448.103(1)(c) specifically incorporates the written notice provision of subsection . . .
. . . he sent to his supervisor, prior to his termination, satisfied the notice requirement of subsection 448.103 . . . This court has interpreted subsection 448.103(1)(e) to mean that the notice requirement of subsection . . . We reaffirm this court’s interpretation of subsection 448.103(1)(c) and certify conflict with the third . . . Thus, the memoranda are insufficient to satisfy the notice requirement under subsection 448.103(1)(e) . . . See § 448.103(1)(c); see also Schultz v. Tampa Elec. . . .
. . . . §§ 448.103, 448.704(b). . . .
. . . There is no question that some ambiguity exists between sections 448.102 and 448.103 concerning the necessity . . .
. . . . § 448.103(2). . . . Fla.Stat. § 448.103(1)(c). . . . See Fla.Stat. § 448.103(1)(c). . . .
. . . Janelle Baker sued Mariner Health Care for retaliatory discharge under section 448.103, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Ch. 448.103(l)-(2) (1997). . . .
. . . However, subsection 448.103(1), setting forth an employee’s remedy for being the victim of retaliatory . . . Paragraph (c) of subsection 448.103(1) provides that an employee may not recover in any action if he . . . Id. § 448.103(l)(c) [emphasis in original] [footnote omitted]. . . . The second district rejected this argument: Section 448.103(1) affords a remedy to employees who have . . . This remedy is only available, however, if the employee has complied with section 448.103(l)(c). . . .
. . . . § 448.103 (1997). . . . Under section 448.103(2): In any action brought pursuant to subsection (1), the court may order relief . . . Stat. § 448.103. . . .
. . . Defendant challenges Plaintiffs Count II complaint of a violation of the Florida Whistleblower’s Act, § 448.103 . . . Section 448.103(1) of the Florida Statute states that “retaliatory personnel action” includes not only . . .
. . . complaint for retaliatory firing based on the employee’s failure to give the notice required in section 448.103 . . .
. . . vacate the award against NationsSe-eurities, his employer and the only entity that can be liable under § 448.103 . . . Moreover, Defendants point the court to § 448.103(2), Florida Statutes, which expressly provides for . . . See § 448.103(2), Florida Statutes. . . . One of the remedies for violation the whistleblower’s act provided in § 448.103(2), Florida Statutes, . . .
. . . action because PSE was not given written notice of any alleged illegal activity pursuant to section 448.103 . . . Section 448.103(1) affords a remedy to employees who have been retaliated against for actions they have . . . This remedy is only available, however, if the employee has complied with section 448.103(l)(c). . . . We read section 448.103(l)(c) to provide that an employee may not recover in any action brought pursuant . . . to section 448.103(1) if he fails to notify the employer about the illegal activity, policy, or practice . . .
. . . We note that, in enacting section 448.103, Florida Statutes (1995), the legislature expressly provided . . .
. . . . § 448.103(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1995). Reversed. . . .
. . . . §§ 448.101(5), 448.103; see also Forrester v. John H. . . . 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993), Baiton asserts that his allegations state a cause of action under section 448.103 . . . activity, policy, or practice of the employer which is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation. 448.103 . . . Id. § 448.103(l)(e) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Section 448.103, Florida Statutes (1993), provides: Employee’s remedy; relief— (1)(a) An employee who . . .
. . . . § 448.103. These people may not necessarily object to new health care services. . . . . § 448.103, of which plaintiffs and consumers of health care would also be part of, but whose rights . . .
. . . in which A & H claims that the 189,996 board feet of guatambu evidenced by the bills of lading equal 448.103 . . .