Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 504 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 504 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 504

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 504
SPECIALIZED AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT LABELING
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 504
CHAPTER 504
SPECIALIZED AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT LABELING
504.011 Short title.
504.012 Label marking permitted; removal prohibited.
504.013 Penalties.
504.014 Enforcement.
504.011 Short title.This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Produce Labeling Act of 1979.”
History.s. 1, ch. 79-121; s. 2, ch. 90-322; s. 91, ch. 2004-5.
504.012 Label marking permitted; removal prohibited.
(1) All producers, growers, and shippers of fresh fruits and vegetables and bee pollen and honey in this state shall be permitted to mark each individual fruit or vegetable, package of bee pollen, or package of honey in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the fruit or vegetable, package of bee pollen, or package of honey will permit, in such manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser that the product was produced in Florida. Any fresh fruit or vegetable, package of bee pollen, or package of honey, including any package containing foreign honey blended with domestic honey, produced in any country other than the United States and offered for retail sale in Florida shall be marked individually in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the fruit or vegetable, package of bee pollen, or package of honey will permit, in such manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser the country of origin. Markings shall be done prior to delivery into Florida.
(2) All retail vendors engaged in the business of selling products labeled or identified as to origin shall be prohibited from willfully and knowingly removing such labels or identifying marks.
History.ss. 2, 3, ch. 79-121; s. 387, ch. 81-259; s. 2, ch. 83-14.
504.013 Penalties.Any person, firm, or corporation engaged in the business of the retail vending of fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, bee pollen, or honey who willfully and knowingly removes any labels or identifying marks from fruits, vegetables, bee pollen, or honey so labeled is guilty of a noncriminal violation as defined in s. 775.08(3) and upon conviction shall be punished as provided in s. 775.082(5) by a civil fine of not more than $500.
History.s. 4, ch. 79-121; s. 3, ch. 83-14.
504.014 Enforcement.The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services shall be responsible for enforcing the provisions of this chapter.
History.s. 5, ch. 79-121; s. 3, ch. 90-322; s. 92, ch. 2004-5.

F.S. 504 on Google Scholar

F.S. 504 on Casetext

Amendments to 504


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 504
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S39.504 - OBSTRUCT - FTC W INJUNCT TO PREVENT CHILD ABUSE - M: F
S39.504 6 - OBSTRUCT - FTC W INJUNCT TO PREVENT CHILD ABUSE - M: F
S504.25 1 - FOOD-HEALTH OR SAFETY - REPEALED 2001-279 - M: S
S504.25 2 - FOOD-MISBRANDED - REPEALED 2001-279 - M: S
S504.25 3 - FOOD-HEALTH OR SAFETY - REPEALED 2001-279 - M: S
S504.25 4 - FOOD-HEALTH OR SAFETY - REPEALED 2001-279 - M: S
S504.35 - FOOD-HEALTH OR SAFETY - REPEALED 2001-279 - M: S
S817.504 1 - FRAUD - OFFER AD FALSE MISLEAD INFO VACCINE DEFRAUD - F: T
S817.504 1 - FRAUD - OFFER AD FALSE INFO VACCINE DEFRAUD 2ND SUB - F: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Arnett , 412 U.S. 481, 504, n. 22, 93 S.Ct. 2245, 37 L.Ed.2d 92 (1973). . . . Curtis Act of 1898, § 28, 30 Stat. 504-505. . . . Curtis Act of 1898, § 28, 30 Stat. 504-505. . . . Curtis Act, § 28, 30 Stat. 504-505. . . . Act of June 27, 1898 (Curtis Act), § 28, id., at 504-505. . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Board of Ed. of Ewing , 330 U.S. 1, 16, 67 S.Ct. 504, 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) ). . . . Id. , at 68-69, 67 S.Ct. 504. . . . Id. , at 69, 67 S.Ct. 504. . . . Church & St. 427, 436 (1983); Everson , 330 U.S. at 12, 67 S.Ct. 504. . . . Memorial and Remonstrance, reprinted in Everson , 330 U.S. at 69, 67 S.Ct. 504. . . . Board of Ed. of Ewing , 330 U.S. 1, 16, 67 S.Ct. 504, 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) (a State "cannot exclude individual . . . Board of Ed. of Ewing , 330 U.S. 1, 15, 67 S.Ct. 504, 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) ; see also post , at 2282 - . . . Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, Art. 4, reprinted in Everson , 330 U.S. at 66, 67 S.Ct. 504 . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Williams , 504 U.S. 36, 41, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992). . . . Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) ). . . . Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) (explaining that the . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . The Scott Act, ch. 1064, 25 Stat. 504, enacted in 1888, forbade reentry of Chinese laborers who had left . . . White , 256 U.S. 399, 41 S.Ct. 504, 65 L.Ed. 1012 (1921) (habeas petition filed on behalf of noncitizen . . . White , 256 U.S. 399, 41 S.Ct. 504, 65 L.Ed. 1012 (1921) ; Tod v. . . .

L. BAXTER v. BRACEY,, 140 S. Ct. 1862 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Economou , 438 U.S. 478, 504, 98 S.Ct. 2894, 57 L.Ed.2d 895 (1978) ). . . .

J. LOMAX, v. ORTIZ- MARQUEZ,, 140 S. Ct. 1721 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 34, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 118 L.Ed.2d 340 (1992). . . .

J. THOLE, v. U. S. BANK N. A, 140 S. Ct. 1615 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560-561, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . E.g. , In re Detroit , 504 B.R. 97 (Bkrtcy. Ct. . . .

BANISTER, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1698 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Anderson , 749 F.3d 499, 504-505 (CA6 2014) (seeking to raise claims that former counsel had neglected . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United Technologies Corp. , 487 U.S. 500, 504, 108 S.Ct. 2510, 101 L.Ed.2d 442 (1988) ; see also Testan . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016) ; Obergefell v. Hodges , 576 U. . . .

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE,, 140 S. Ct. 1205 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Takushi , 504 U.S. 428, 434, 112 S.Ct. 2059, 119 L.Ed.2d 245 (1992) ; Anderson v. . . .

COMCAST CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN- OWNED MEDIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1009 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 561, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) ; Dura Pharmaceuticals . . .

DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Griffiths , 504 Fed.Appx. 122, 126-127 (CA3 2012) ; United States v. . . .

MCKINNEY, v. ARIZONA, 140 S. Ct. 702 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). . . . Florida , 577 U.S. ----, ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 619, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016) ("The Sixth Amendment requires . . .

RITZEN GROUP, INC. v. JACKSON MASONRY, LLC, 140 S. Ct. 582 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Bullard , 575 U.S. at 504, 135 S.Ct. 1686. . . .

BOWES, v. MELITO,, 140 S. Ct. 677 (U.S. 2019)

. . . No. 19-504 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

SPARKS v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 6 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Williams , 425 U.S. 501, 504-505, 96 S.Ct. 1691, 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976). . . .

EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT, v. BARR,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 974 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . County of Los Angeles , 978 F.2d 504, 507 (9th Cir. 1992), as amended (Feb. 12, 1993)) (quotation marks . . .

ELHADY, v. H. KABLE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560-61, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) (internal citations . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) ). . . . general allegations embrace those specific facts that are necessary to support the claim.' " Lujan , 504 . . . Ct. at 1548 (quoting Lujan , 504 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130 ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. LILLARD,, 935 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Thompson/Center Arms Co ., 504 U.S. 505, 517-518, 518 n.10, 112 S.Ct. 2102, 119 L.Ed.2d 308 (1992) (plurality . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERRING,, 935 F.3d 1102 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States, 504 F.3d 1203, 1207 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding in case where the defendant entered a guilty . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Atkins, 504 U.S. at 321, 112 S.Ct. 1904. . . . Ct. 504, 506, 202 L.Ed.2d 461 (2019) (per curiam) (quotation omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. TOWN OF COLORADO CITY,, 935 F.3d 804 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . In Bonner , for example, we held that respondeat superior liability applies to claims pursuant to § 504 . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . County of Los Angeles , 978 F.2d 504, 511 (9th Cir. 1992) ; Chalk v. U.S. Dist. Ct. Cent. . . . Int'l Hotels Co. , 656 F.2d 502, 504 n.6 (9th Cir. 1981) (citing Curtis v. . . .

IN RE BOWLES,, 935 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). . . . Ct. 504, 508, 202 L.Ed.2d 461 (2019) ("While Atkins noted that standard definitions of mental retardation . . .

BOWLES, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 935 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). . . .

UNITED STATES v. V. GILLIAM,, 934 F.3d 854 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Battle , 774 F.3d 504, 511 (8th Cir. 2014). . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) ). . . . Ct. 1540, 1548, 194 L.Ed.2d 635 (2016) (quoting Lujan , 504 U.S. at 560 n.1, 112 S.Ct. 2130 ). ii. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEGAY,, 934 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Brock-Davis , 504 F.3d 991, 996 (9th Cir. 2007) ). . . .

BOWLES, v. DESANTIS,, 934 F.3d 1230 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). See Bowles v. State, 235 So. 3d 292, 292-93 (Fla. 2018). . . .

BIONDO, v. KALEDIA HEALTH, d b a, 935 F.3d 68 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Biondo has alleged violations of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (the "RA"), Title III of the Americans . . . The Rehabilitation Act Section 504 of the RA prohibits a program or activity receiving federal funds . . .

S. BLEDSOE, v. VANDERBILT,, 934 F.3d 1112 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Regents, 159 F.3d 504, 515-16 (10th Cir. 1998) ). . . .

TIJERINO v. STETSON DESERT PROJECT, LLC, L J., 934 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 504, 126 S.Ct. 1235 ("Y & H asserted that it had fewer than 15 employees on its payroll and therefore . . .

PASSARO, Jr. v. VIRGINIA, 935 F.3d 243 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Tazewell Nat'l Bank , 256 Va. 250, 504 S.E.2d 854, 856 (1998) (discussing waiver doctrine). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CLARK,, 935 F.3d 558 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 504 In United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCANZANI,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 210 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Arias , 848 F.3d 504, 511 (1st Cir. 2017) (internal quotations omitted). . . . Weikert , 504 F.3d 1, 7 & n.4 (1st Cir. 2007) (acknowledging that the Supreme Court has analyzed the . . .

PIZZUTO, Jr. v. BLADES,, 933 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 504, 202 L.Ed.2d 461 (2019) (per curiam), the Court "consider[ed] what was clearly established regarding . . .

SANOFI- AVENTIS U. S. LLC, IP, v. DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES, INC. Dr. s USA, LLC, LLC, LLC,, 933 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) (quoting Whitmore v. . . . Ct. 1540, 1548, 194 L.Ed.2d 635 (2016) (quoting Lujan , 504 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130 ). . . .

IN RE JOHNSON, v., 935 F.3d 284 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 504, 507-08, 202 L.Ed.2d 461 (2019) (per curiam)." . . .

EFFEX CAPITAL, LLC, v. NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION,, 933 F.3d 882 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Liggett Group, Inc. , 505 U.S. 504, 112 S.Ct. 2608, 120 L.Ed.2d 407 (1992), to reject the proposition . . .

KELSAY, v. ERNST,, 933 F.3d 975 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. at 504 (ellipsis in original) (quoting Wesby , 138 S. Ct. at 590 ). . . . Ct. at 504 (quotation omitted), that made it sufficiently clear at the time of the incident to warn a . . .

IN RE DEEPWATER HORIZON v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. M. a v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. v. BP v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. In v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. M. a v. v. Jr. Sr. M. a v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. v. BP v. v. Jr. Sr. In v. L. L. C., 934 F.3d 434 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SAINZ,, 933 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Burke , 504 U.S. 229, 246, 112 S.Ct. 1867, 119 L.Ed.2d 34 (1992), superseded by statute on other grounds . . .

PAUL G. a BY AND THROUGH STEVE G. v. MONTEREY PENINSULA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 933 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . They filed this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation . . . The Eleventh Circuit concluded the gravamen of the student's § 504 and ADA claims in the district court . . . sister circuits, we conclude Paul was required to exhaust the IDEA procedural process because his § 504 . . .

DINAPLES, v. MRS BPO, LLC MRS BPO, LLC,, 934 F.3d 275 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) ). . . .

MARTINEAU, v. WIER, 934 F.3d 385 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) )). . . .

DEAR, v. Q CLUB HOTEL, LLC, v. Q LLC,, 933 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 384, 112 S.Ct. 2031, 119 L.Ed.2d 157 (1992) ) ("[I]t is a commonplace . . .

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, v. HOSPIRA, INC. v. Dr. s Dr. s, 933 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Paddock Labs., Inc. , 504 F.3d 1371, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2007). . . . Amendments are not construed to cede only that which is necessary to overcome the prior art, see Schwarz , 504 . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 504 U.S. 255, 260, 269, 112 S.Ct. 1881, 119 L.Ed.2d 57 (1992) ). . . .

LAVALLEE, v. MED- SOLUTIONS, LLC,, 932 F.3d 1049 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560-61, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) ). . . .

E. ANDREWS, v. SIRIUS XM RADIO INC., 932 F.3d 1253 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Trans World Airlines, Inc. , 504 U.S. 374, 384, 112 S.Ct. 2031, 119 L.Ed.2d 157 (1992). . . .

PATEL, v. FACEBOOK, INC., 932 F.3d 1264 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 561, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). . . .

PILLAR DYNASTY LLC, v. NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., 933 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 504(c) : a plaintiff must show "(1) that the defendant was actually aware of the infringing activity . . .

FURGESS, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 933 F.3d 285 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Department of Corrections (PDOC) under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 . . . this action against the PDOC, alleging it violated his rights under Title II of the ADA and Section 504 . . . Looking first to the statutory language, Section 504 of the RA defines a "program or activity" quite . . . this Court have recognized that Title II provides at least the same degree of protection as Section 504 . . . the phrase "service, program, or activity" under Title II, like "program or activity" under Section 504 . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. HODGE, 933 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kahlon , 873 F.3d 500, 504 (5th Cir. 2017). . . .

PARENT PROFESSIONAL ADVOCACY LEAGUE M. W. a F. D. S. S. a S. Y. v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS J., 934 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . policy or practice which affects them all" (first alteration in original) (quoting Jamie S., 668 F.3d at 504 . . . Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 559-60, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). . . . The Frys brought suit under Title II of the ADA and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, . . .

BRENDA L. v. SAUL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 858 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1148, 1154, 203 L.Ed.2d 504 (2019) ("... the threshold for such evidentiary sufficiency is not high . . . Ct. 1148, 1162, 203 L.Ed.2d 504 (2019). . . .

T. SCHMITT v. LAROSE,, 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Takushi , 504 U.S. 428, 112 S.Ct. 2059, 119 L.Ed.2d 245 (1992), the district court determined that the . . . Cities Area New Party , 520 U.S. 351, 363, 117 S.Ct. 1364, 137 L.Ed.2d 589 (1997) (citing Burdick , 504 . . . Takushi , 504 U.S. 428, 112 S.Ct. 2059, 119 L.Ed.2d 245 (1992), though concerning election regulation . . . file statements of candidacy by March to appear on November ballot was unconstitutional); Burdick , 504 . . .

KORTRIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, TY v. INVESTCORP INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Garda USA Inc., 146 A.D.3d 504, 45 N.Y.S.3d 410, 413 (2017) ("[A] plaintiff alleging fraudulent inducement . . .

AJINOMOTO CO. INC. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, CJ CJ PT CJ CJ PT v. Co., 932 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Paddock Labs., Inc. , 504 F.3d 1371, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2007). . . .

In MATTER OF SHERWIN ALUMINA COMPANY, L. L. C. v. L. L. C. INC., 932 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Louisiana , 134 U.S. 1, 15, 10 S.Ct. 504, 33 L.Ed. 842 (1890) ). Id. U.S. Const . art. . . .

TEXAS, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION EEOC P. U. S., 933 F.3d 433 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 561, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) ). . . . (quoting Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. at 561, 112 S.Ct. 2130 ). . . . Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. at 561-62, 112 S.Ct. 2130 ; see also Contender Farms, L.L.P. v. U.S. . . .

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS,, 933 F.3d 605 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . McDonald , 804 F.3d 497, 504-05 (1st Cir. 2015) ; United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DANIELS,, 932 F.3d 1120 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Battle, 774 F.3d 504, 512 (8th Cir. 2014) (citing Fed. R. Evid. 404(b)(2) ). . . .

KODIAK OIL GAS USA INC. HRC LLC v. BURR S. EOG S., 932 F.3d 1125 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Shalala , 512 U.S. 504, 512, 114 S.Ct. 2381, 129 L.Ed.2d 405 (1994) )). . . .

WALLER, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a, 932 F.3d 1277 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . McKinley Cty. , 504 F. App'x 715, 719 (10th Cir. 2012) ; see also Martin v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRADO,, 933 F.3d 121 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Trans World Airlines, Inc. , 504 U.S. 374, 384, 112 S.Ct. 2031, 119 L.Ed.2d 157 (1992) (observing that . . .

GGNSC LOUISVILLE HILLCREEK, LLC GGNSC LLC GGNSC LLC, v. ESTATE OF C. BRAMER, BY AND THROUGH A. BRAMER, A., 932 F.3d 480 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bollman , 505 F.3d 498, 504 (6th Cir. 2007) ; 4 Am. . . .

SINKLER, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 932 F.3d 83 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Barnhart , 450 F.3d at 504. Instead, it derives a "reasonableness" standard from language in Fed. . . . Barnhart , 450 F.3d at 504-05 (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. LAUREANO- SALGADO, a k a L. a k a, 933 F.3d 20 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Mathur, 624 F.3d 498, 504 (1st Cir. 2010) (emphasis and alteration in original) (quoting Kyles v. . . . See, e.g., Connolly, 504 F.3d at 211-12. . . . See Mathur, 624 F.3d at 504 (emphasis added). . . . Connolly, 504 F.3d 206, 220 (1st Cir. 2007) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. RIVERA- CARRASQUILLO, a k a KX, a k a a k a a k a n V a k a, 933 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Mathur, 624 F.3d 498, 504 (1st Cir. 2010) (emphasis and alteration in original) (quoting Kyles v. . . . Connolly, 504 F.3d 206, 211-12 (1st Cir. 2007). Back to our case. . . .

CORDEIRO, v. M. SAUL,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 170 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1148, 1154, 203 L.Ed.2d 504 (2019) (quoting Consol. Edison Co. v. . . .

JONES, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 831 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1148, 1154, 203 L.Ed.2d 504 (2019). . . .

VIRNETX INC. v. APPLE INC., 931 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Patent Nos. 7,418,504 ("the '504 patent") and 7,921,211 ("the '211 patent") are unpatentable as anticipated . . . VirnetX alleged infringement of four patents, including the '504 and '211 patents. . . . In October 2011, Apple filed requests for inter partes reexamination of the '504 and '211 patents with . . . The Board affirmed the Examiner's rejection of all claims of the '504 and '211 patents. . . . Patent Nos. 7,418,504 ("the '504 patent") and 7,921,211 ("the '211 patent"). . . .

HENDRICKSON USA, LLC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 932 F.3d 465 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1148, 1154, 203 L.Ed.2d 504 (2019) (quotations omitted). . . .

D. LEISER, v. KLOTH,, 933 F.3d 696 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Neenah , 895 F.3d 504, 507-08 (7th Cir. 2018). . . .

VIEIRA, v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC LLC LLC, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1117 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Liggett Group, Inc. , 505 U.S. 504, 112 S.Ct. 2608, 120 L.Ed.2d 407 (1992) (quoting Jones v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MATHIS, a k a a k a a k a D- v. a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a v. a k a a k a K. a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a a k a, 932 F.3d 242 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 504 U.S. 255, 257, 112 S.Ct. 1881, 119 L.Ed.2d 57 (1992). . . .

BRAKEBILL v. JAEGER,, 932 F.3d 671 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560, 561, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). . . . Takushi, 504 U.S. 428, 112 S.Ct. 2059, 119 L.Ed.2d 245 (1992). . . .

UNITED STATES v. KRAEMER,, 933 F.3d 675 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Trans World Airlines, Inc. , 504 U.S. 374, 383, 112 S.Ct. 2031, 119 L.Ed.2d 157 (1992) (quoting Black's . . . Ct. 1190, 1197, 197 L.Ed.2d 572 (2017) (quoting Morales , 504 U.S. at 384, 112 S.Ct. 2031 ). . . . Sinerius , 504 F.3d 737, 743 (9th Cir. 2007) (observing that "§ 2252A(b) treats federal offenses located . . .

IN RE WASHINGTON, v. N. A., 602 B.R. 710 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Healthcentral.com (In re Healthcentral.com) , 504 F.3d 775, 784 (9th Cir. 2007) ; Steinacher v. . . .

CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, a v. WELLS FARGO CO. N. A., 931 F.3d 1274 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) (citations and internal . . . requires, among other things, that the plaintiff establish an injury in fact and causation, Lujan , 504 . . . Lujan , 504 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). . . . Lujan , 504 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130 (alterations adopted) (citations and internal quotation marks . . .

CELGENE CORPORATION, v. A. PETER, v. A., 931 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1148, 1154, 203 L.Ed.2d 504 (2019) (quoting Consol. Edison Co. v. . . .

HESS, III v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY,, 931 F.3d 198 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1148, 1157, 203 L.Ed.2d 504 (2019) ("Where Biestek goes wrong, at bottom, is in pressing for a categorical . . .

M. REAVES, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, O MHM, 392 F. Supp. 3d 195 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Coughlin , 76 F.3d 504, 506 (2d Cir. 1996) ("[A] transfer from a prison facility moots an action for . . .

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION, 392 F. Supp. 3d 410 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Weltover, 504 U.S. 607, 611, 112 S.Ct. 2160, 119 L.Ed.2d 394 (1992) (The FSIA "provides the 'sole basis . . . Weltover, 504 U.S. at 614, 112 S.Ct. 2160 ("[T]he issue is whether the particular actions that the foreign . . . See Weltover, 504 U.S. at 614, 112 S.Ct. 2160 (quotation marks omitted). . . . Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). . . .

ALEXIS BAILLY VINEYARD, INC. a LLC, a v. HARRINGTON, s, 931 F.3d 774 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 561-62, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). . . . Lujan , 504 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130. . . .

CRYSTALLEX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA De S. A. D. C. In De S. A., 932 F.3d 126 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Weltover, Inc. , 504 U.S. 607, 613, 112 S.Ct. 2160, 119 L.Ed.2d 394 (1992), stated that the phrase "commercial . . .

UNITED STATES v. GALECKI, v., 932 F.3d 176 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Soriano-Jarquin , 492 F.3d 495, 504 (4th Cir. 2007), but criminal defendants may seek such agency employees . . .

GENETIC VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC. v. LABOKLIN GMBH CO. KG,, 933 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Weltover, Inc ., 504 U.S. 607, 614, 112 S.Ct. 2160, 119 L.Ed.2d 394 (1992) (determining that a district . . .

MCCOTTRELL S. v. WHITE, 933 F.3d 651 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Page , 358 F.3d 496, 504 (7th Cir. 2004) (same). . . . insulate from review actions taken in bad faith and for no legitimate purpose); Fillmore , 358 F.3d at 504 . . . See Fillmore , 358 F.3d at 504. . . . five factors as the means of determining the officers' intent and purpose in such a case. 358 F.3d at 504 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MASSIMINO, 389 F. Supp. 3d 357 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . United States, 538 U.S. 500, 504, 123 S.Ct. 1690, 155 L.Ed.2d 714 (2003). . . .

IN RE SCHATZ, v., 602 B.R. 411 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2019)

. . . In re Ablavsky, 504 B.R. at 718. . . . In re Ablavsky, 504 B.R. at 719 (quoting Long v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. . . . (In re Ablavsky), 504 B.R. 709, 719 (Bankr. D. . . .

STEPP, v. COVANCE CENTRAL LABORATORY SERVICES, INC., 931 F.3d 632 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Brennan , 817 F.3d 503, 512 (7th Cir. 2016) ; United States v. 5443 Suffield Terrace , 607 F.3d 504, . . .

TRACIE H. v. SAUL,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 990 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Barnhart , 390 F.3d 500, 504 (7th Cir. 2004) ("Thus, although the ALJ did not explicitly consider [plaintiff's . . . Astrue , 499 Fed.Appx. 598, 600 (7th Cir.2013) ; Skarbek , 390 F.3d at 504. . . .

DEXTER, a k a v. DEALOGIC, LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 233 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Town of Somerset, 458 Mass. 504, 939 N.E.2d 717, 731 n.32 (2010) (quoting Cuddyer v. . . .