The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Chapter 609
COMMON-LAW DECLARATIONS OF TRUST

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 609.02

609.02 Filing a declaration of trust.—Every such organization organized for the purpose of transacting business in this state, or organized in this state for the purpose of transacting business elsewhere, which intends to sell or offer for sale any units, shares, contracts, notes, bonds, mortgages, oil or mineral leases or other security of such association shall, prior to transacting any such business, file with the Department of State a true and correct copy of the declaration of trust under which the association proposes to conduct its business, which copy shall be sworn to, as being a true and correct copy, by the chair of the board of trustees named in such declaration of trust. When such copy shall have been filed with the Department of State it shall constitute public notice as to the purposes and manner of the business to be engaged in by such association. The Department of State, prior to the issuance of the certificate by it, shall collect from the said association a filing fee of $350, which fee shall be paid by it into the general fund of the state.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 9125, 1923; s. 1, ch. 11995, 1927; CGL 7091, 7092; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 12, ch. 71-114; s. 67, ch. 90-132; s. 68, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 609.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 609.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 609.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 609.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S609.02 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - VIOLATION IN FILING DECLARATION OF TRUST - F: T

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. VEDEROFF,, 914 F.3d 1238 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . . §§ 609.02, 609.221, 609.222, 609.223, 609.2233 ; Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-7 ; Mo. Rev. . . .

BELTRAN- AGUILAR, v. G. WHITAKER,, 912 F.3d 420 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 609.02 Subd. 7. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PERRY,, 908 F.3d 1126 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 609.02, subdiv. 16. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCHNEIDER, 905 F.3d 1088 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 609.02, 609.221 ; Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-7(2)(a)(i) ; Mont. Code Ann. § 45-5-202(1) ; Neb. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WADENA,, 895 F.3d 1075 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 609.02, subdiv. 10-is the exact same for each. As such, Lindsey controls. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PENDLETON,, 894 F.3d 978 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 609.02, subdiv. 10 (1997) ; Minn. Stat. § 609.02, subdiv. 10 (1989). . . . Stat. § 609.02, subdiv. 7 (1997) ; Minn Stat. § 609.02, subdiv. 7 (1989). . . .

MINNESOTA VOTERS ALLIANCE, v. MANSKY,, 138 S. Ct. 1876 (U.S. 2018)

. . . . §§ 211B.11(4) (Supp. 2017), 211B.35(2) (2014), 609.02(4a) (2016). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DELEON, a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. Ru a. k. a., 308 F. Supp. 3d 1229 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . Saltzburg et al., Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 609.02[1] (11th ed. 2017). . . . Saltzburg et al., Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 609.02[6]. See United States v. . . . Saltzburg et al., supra § 609.02[4] ("We believe that, while it is important for the jury to get a sense . . .

ONDUSO, v. B. SESSIONS, III, v. B. III,, 877 F.3d 1073 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 7. . . .

TELESCOPE MEDIA GROUP, a v. LINDSEY,, 271 F. Supp. 3d 1090 (D. Minn. 2017)

. . . . § 609.02,, subd. 3. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERRERA- SERRANO,, 703 F. App'x 342 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 10. . . . Stat. § 609.02, subd. 8. . . . Stat. § 609.02, subd. 9(3), (4). . . .

UNITED STATES v. JENNINGS,, 860 F.3d 450 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 7. . . . Stat. § 609.02, subd. 7. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TOWNSEND, a k a, 224 F. Supp. 3d 816 (D. Minn. 2016)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 7 (2004). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HEADBIRD,, 832 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 10. . . . Stat. § 609.02, subd. 10(1). . . . Stat. § 609.02, subd. 6. . . . Stat. § 609.02, subd. 6, which lists the types of weapons which qualify as dangerous. . . . Stat. § 609.222, subd. 1, and that the separate definition of “dangerous weapon” in § 609.02, subd. 6 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LINDSEY,, 827 F.3d 733 (8th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 609.02 subd. 6. . . . Stat. § 609.02 subd. 10. . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. MAXWELL,, 823 F.3d 1057 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 609.02 subd. 7. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HARVEY,, 642 F. App'x 650 (8th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 10. . . . We see no basis to treat the virtually identical language in Minnesota Statutes § 609.02, subd. 10(1) . . .

UNITED STATES v. SAM,, 171 F. Supp. 3d 883 (D. Minn. 2016)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 7. . . . Stat. § 609.02, subd. 10. . . .

ESCO CORPORATION v. CASHMAN EQUIPMENT COMPANY, 158 F. Supp. 3d 1051 (D. Nev. 2016)

. . . MPEP § 609.02. . . . In light of § 609.02, the Federal Circuit has held that “it can not be inequitable conduct for an applicant . . . MPEP § 609.02. . . . MPEP § 609.02. Conformity with this rule does not support an inequitable conduct claim. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GARCIA- JIMENEZ,, 807 F.3d 1079 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 609.02, 609.221; Mo.Rev.Stat. § 565.050; Mont.Code Ann. § 45-5-202; Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-308; Nev. . . . Laws Ann. § 750.84; Minn.Stat. §§ 609.02, 609.221; Mont.Code Ann. § 45-5-202; Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-308; . . .

B. CAMPBELL, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 126 F. Supp. 3d 141 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . See Termination letter of June 11, 2012, Pk’s Ex. 2, ECF No. 25-2; see also D.C.Code § 1-609.02 (describing . . .

UNITED STATES v. UCLES,, 619 F. App'x 295 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 6. . . . Compare Minn.Stat. § 609.02, subd. 6 (“'Dangerous weapon’ means any ... device or instrumentality that . . . Ann. § 609.02, subd. 10 (defining ‘'[a]ssault” as "(1) an act done with intent to cause fear in another . . .

UNITED STATES v. WELLER,, 102 F. Supp. 3d 1065 (N.D. Iowa 2015)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 3. However, the elements of these crimes are completely different. . . .

VIRGINIA INNOVATION SCIENCES, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., 11 F. Supp. 3d 622 (E.D. Va. 2014)

. . . VIS asserts that, consistent with M.P.E.P. § 609.02, “it was Dr. . . . M.P.E.P. § 609.02 (8th ed. rev. 9 August 2012). . . . A reading of M.P.E.P. §§ 609.02 and 2001.06 together supports this conclusion. . . . Thus, M.P.E.P. § 609.02’s removal of the duty to disclose prior art references previously cited in a . . . allegations, it is only necessary to look to M.P.E.P. § 609.02 when analyzing Samsung’s '398 patent . . .

M. ROBERTS, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 745 F.3d 928 (8th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 609.02 subd. 10. Our decision in United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. RUACHO,, 746 F.3d 850 (8th Cir. 2014)

. . . Although petty misdemeanors are not considered “crimes” in Minnesota, see Minnesota Statutes § 609.02 . . . See Minn.Stat. § 609.72; Minn.Stat. § 609.02, subd. 3. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN,, 734 F.3d 824 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 609.02(9) (1997). . . .

UNITED STATES v. FOOTE,, 705 F.3d 305 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 4a, but “how a state views an offense does not determine how the United States Sentencing . . . the person is not subject to imprisonment but shall be punished by a fine of not more than $300.”); § 609.02 . . .

BINION, v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, a A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, W. St., 788 F. Supp. 2d 935 (D. Minn. 2011)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 2 (defining "felony” as "a crime for which a sentence of imprisonment for more than . . .

CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. L. L. C. v. LEAR CORPORATION,, 756 F. Supp. 2d 938 (N.D. Ill. 2010)

. . . MPEP § 609.02 (emphasis in original). . . .

JACOBSON, v. MOTT,, 623 F.3d 537 (8th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 609.02 subd. 4 (defining gross misdemeanor). . . . Id. § 609.50 subd. 2(3); see also id. § 609.02 subd. 3 (defining misdemeanor). . . .

S. O. I. TEC SILICON ON INSULATOR TECHNOLOGIES, S. A. a L v. MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC., 745 F. Supp. 2d 489 (D. Del. 2010)

. . . conduct requires that the patentee withheld material information from the examiner); see also MPEP § 609.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SALEAN,, 583 F.3d 1059 (8th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 609.02 (1994). . . .

O HANLON, v. G. HERNDON,, 5 So. 3d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . because Habitat Trust never filed a Declaration of Trust with the Secretary of State pursuant to section 609.02 . . . Whether section 609.02 applies in this case and what the penalty or remedy might be for noncompliance . . .

UNITED STATES v. COLLIER,, 527 F.3d 695 (8th Cir. 2008)

. . . Capra, Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 609.02[4] (LexisNexis 9th ed.2006). . . . (b), always admissible; there is no balancing to be done.”)); Federal Rules of Evidence Manual at § 609.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARAGON- RUIZ,, 551 F. Supp. 2d 904 (D. Minn. 2008)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 10. . . . Assault, as it is defined in § 609.02, subd. 10, is not a crime of accident or negligence. . . .

PINOS- GONZALEZ, v. B. MUKASEY,, 519 F.3d 436 (8th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 4a. . . .

BROWN, v. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, 534 F. Supp. 2d 984 (D. Minn. 2008)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 10. Battery is “an intentional unpermitted offensive contact with another.” . . .

ABDULLAH, v. MINNESOTA, A., 261 F. App'x 926 (8th Cir. 2008)

. . . subd. 4 (person who unlawfully possesses small amount of marijuana is guilty of petty misdemeanor), 609.02 . . .

ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. v. MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC. USA,, 485 F. Supp. 2d 538 (D. Del. 2007)

. . . MPEP § 609.02 (Revision 5, Aug. 2006). . . .

In O. OLSON, M. v. O., 333 B.R. 835 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2005)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 10. . . .

THOMSEN v. ROSS,, 368 F. Supp. 2d 961 (D. Minn. 2005)

. . . . §§ 609.02, subd. 3 and 4; see Minnesota v. Girouard, SIP No. 04010080, at 2 (4th Dist. . . .

WHITE, v. COPLAN,, 399 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2005)

. . . See generally 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, supra, §§ 608.02[3], 609.02. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TSE,, 375 F.3d 148 (1st Cir. 2004)

. . . See Wein-stein, supra, § 609.02 (“If the witness to be impeached is the accused in a criminal case, the . . .

SOB, INC. v. COUNTY OF BENTON,, 317 F.3d 856 (8th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 609.02, Subd. 3. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON,, 45 F. App'x 549 (8th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 10(1). . . .

OMAR, INS v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE MN, INS U. S., 298 F.3d 710 (8th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 2. . . .

UNITED STATES v. KIND,, 194 F.3d 900 (8th Cir. 1999)

. . . . §§ 609.02, subd. 2; 609.10, subd. 1; 609.749, subd. 3(3); ch. 244 App. § IV & § V, category IV (1999 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LEWIS,, 183 F.3d 791 (8th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 609.02. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HOOD,, 183 F.3d 744 (8th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 609.02 subd. 3. . . .

VUE, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, R., 92 F.3d 696 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 609.02(6) (West 1991). . . .

H. BLOOM, M. D. S. M. D. W. M. D. J. D. D. S. v. Jo O BRIEN, J., 841 F. Supp. 277 (D. Minn. 1993)

. . . . § 609.02, subd. 3. . . .

In MOHAN KUTTY TRUST,, 134 B.R. 987 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . . § 609.02. It is undisputed in this case that the Trust has no trust instrument on record. . . .

GREEN v. BOCK LAUNDRY MACHINE CO., 490 U.S. 504 (U.S. 1989)

. . . Bendix, Moore’s Federal Practice § 609.02, pp. . . . See, e. g., Moore §609.02, at VI-134; E. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MATTER,, 818 F.2d 653 (8th Cir. 1987)

. . . Minnesota Statutes section 609.02(2) defines felony as a crime “for which a sentence of imprisonment . . .

ROSHAN, a k a v. FARD,, 705 F.2d 102 (4th Cir. 1983)

. . . criminal conviction as a means of attacking the credibility of a witness. 10 Moore’s Federal Practice § 609.02 . . . See 10 Moore’s Federal Practice § 609.02, at VI-135 (2d ed. 1982). . . .

F. TUSSEL, v. WITCO CHEMICAL CORPORATION,, 555 F. Supp. 979 (W.D. Pa. 1983)

. . . Bendix, supra note 1, at § 609.02. We express no opinion on this issue. . Conf.R. . . .

SCOTT v. ILLINOIS, 440 U.S. 367 (U.S. 1979)

. . . . §§ 609.02, 611.14 (1978) (felonies and “gross misdemeanors”; statute defines “petty” misdemeanors as . . .

UNITED STATES v. NORD,, 586 F.2d 1288 (8th Cir. 1978)

. . . imposed is within the limits provided by law for a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor as defined in section 609.02 . . .

YOUR CONSTRUCTION CENTER, INC. v. DOMINION MORTGAGE REALTY TRUST DOMINION a R., 402 F. Supp. 757 (S.D. Fla. 1975)

. . . . § 609.02 Filing a declaration of trust. . . .

BOYD v. BOULEVARD NATIONAL BANK, a, 306 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . The Massachusetts Business Trust, First Mortgage Investors, was shown to have complied with §. 609.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. PEDERSON,, 359 F. Supp. 1151 (D. Minn. 1973)

. . . . § 609.02(2)-(4). . . .

UNITED STATES v. GLASGOW,, 478 F.2d 850 (8th Cir. 1973)

. . . . § 609.02(2)-(4). . . .

PISTORINO COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 350 F. Supp. 1392 (Cust. Ct. 1972)

. . . This would be true for strip per se as provided for in items 609.02 through 609.08, Tariff Schedules . . .

v., 69 Cust. Ct. 48 (Cust. Ct. 1972)

. . . This would be true for strip per se as provided for in items 609.02 through 609.08, Tariff Schedules . . .

MARCIANO, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,, 450 F.2d 1022 (8th Cir. 1971)

. . . . § 609.02 entitled “Definitions” at Subd. 9(6) provides: “Criminal intent does not require proof of . . . At the close of its opinion, the Court states: “There may be cases where an application of Minn.St. 609.02 . . . As we there noted, circumstances may occur where the application of § 609.02, subd. 9(6), brings about . . .