Cases from cite.case.law:

BARTON, v. METROJAX PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, a LLC, a v. a, 207 So.3d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The City’s and the trial court’s rebanee on section 701.02(1) is misplaced. In JP Morgan Chase v. . . . The trial court also determined that BB & T was protected by section 701.02 because it is a subsequent . . . In doing so, the Second District held that section 701.02(1) only applies to estop an earlier purchaser . . . (In re Halabi), 184 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir.1999), which held that section “701.02’s recording requirement . . . (citing § 701.02, Fla. Stat. (2013); JP Morgan, 6 So.3d at 684-86). . . .

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, v. L. HAGSTROM R., 203 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Moreover, section 701.02(4) specifically states that chapters 670-680 of the UCC “govern the attachment . . .

HSBC BANK USA, N. A. v. PEREZ, G. N. A. U. S. N. A. N. A. N. A. WMALT, 165 So. 3d 696 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . To resolve the dispute, the circuit court applied section 701.02, Florida Statutes (2008), the recording . . . Bank’s argument that section 701.02 compels a result in its favor. . . . Both the Plain Language of Section 701.02(1) and the 2005 Amendment Contained in Section 701.02(4-) Demonstrate . . . Three years after Garrett, the Florida Legislature enacted section 701.02. . . . when the Legislature added section 701.02(4). . . .

C. BRANDENBURG v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC., 137 So. 3d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See generally § 701.02, Fla. Stat. (2013); JP Morgan Chase v. . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NCI NCI, v. BUSQUETS, 135 So. 3d 488 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See generally §§ 701.02, 702.09, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

FIDELITY LAND TRUST COMPANY, LLC No. v. SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE COMPANY,, 905 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . unrecorded assignment or transfer of the Subject Mortgage pursuant to Florida Statutes §§ 695.01 and 701.02 . . .

FIDELITY LAND TRUST COMPANY, LLC No. v. CENTEX HOME EQUITY COMPANY, LLC, n k a LLC,, 903 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . § 695.01 (Count I); discharging an unrecorded assignment of mortgage pursuant to Florida Statute § 701.02 . . . Stat. § 701.02. . . .

MONTOYA v. SHELDON, a a, 286 F.R.D. 602 (D.N.M. 2012)

. . . Capra, Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 701.02[7], at 701-17 (9th ed.2006). Dr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ALBERTELLI, v. v. v. a k a, 687 F.3d 439 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . Weinstein & Berger, supra, § 701.02; see also FecLR.Evid. 701 advisory committee note. . . .

FULLER, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. MERSCORP INC., 888 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . Section 701.02(1), Florida Statutes provides that a mortgage assignment is not effective in providing . . .

In AUM SHREE OF TAMPA, LLC, d b a LLC, d b a v. HSBC USA, HSBC USA, v. LLC, d b a HSBC USA, v., 449 B.R. 584 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 701.02 and avoidance of the alleged liens pursuant to Section 544; Count III — to avoid the alleged . . . Stat. § 701.02. (Count II) As to Count II, the Debtor raised the issue of HSBC’s violation of Fla. . . . . § 701.02. . . . Stat. § 701.02’s recording requirements are applicable only, and enforceable only, by competing creditors . . . Stat. § 701.02, the Eleventh Circuit stated, From the point of view of the mortgagor or someone standing . . .

In SUPERTRAIL MANUFACTURING CO. INC. v. Co., 383 F. App'x 475 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 701.02(1) (2009): An assignment of a mortgage upon real property or of any interest therein, is not . . .

In SUPERTRAIL MANUFACTURING CO. INC. v. Co., 383 F. App'x 475 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 701.02(1) (2009): An assignment of a mortgage upon real property or of any interest therein, is not . . .

JP MORGAN CHASE, v. NEW MILLENNIAL, LC W. No. No. a, 6 So. 3d 681 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The Assignments were not recorded in accordance with § 701.02, Florida Statutes. 2. . . . Accordingly, pursuant to section 701.02, Florida Statutes, the mortgages at issue are not effective or . . . Section 701.02 provides, in relevant part: Assignment not effectual against creditors unless recorded . . . JP Morgan first argues that the trial court misapplied section 701.02 when it held that New Millennial . . . JP Morgan’s position is that section 701.02(1) only applies to estop an earlier purchaser/assignee of . . .

In WILLIAMS, R. v. N. A., 395 B.R. 33 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2008)

. . . . § 701.02. 4. . . . Stat. § 701.02. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. KAPLAN, 490 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2007)

. . . Berger, Wein-stein’s Federal Evidence § 701.02 (Joseph M. McLaughlin ed., 2d ed.2004). . . .

In AMERICAN EQUITY CORPORATION OF PINELLAS,, 332 B.R. 645 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Under Florida Statute 701.02, an assignment is effective if it indicates that it is an assignment of . . .

UNITED STATES v. AWADALLAH,, 401 F. Supp. 2d 308 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 701.02 (2005) (approving testimony that a person was "lucid” or . . .

SLACHTER, v. A. SWANSON,, 826 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . On the other hand, Swanson argues that he is protected by section 701.02, Florida Statutes (1995), as . . .

IN RE HALABI a. k. a. R. v., 184 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 701.02 provides: (1) No assignment of a mortgage upon real property or of any interest therein, shall . . . Stat. § 701.02’s recording requirement is applicable only to (and enforceable by) competing creditors . . . Stat. § 701.02 accords with common sense. . . . Stat. § 701.02 applied only to creditors or subsequent purchasers of a mortgagee. . . . Stat. § 701.02 to prevail against improperly recorded assignments of a duly recorded mortgage, we endorse . . .

IN RE HALABI a. k. a. R. v., 184 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 701.02 provides: (1) No assignment of a mortgage upon real property or of any interest therein, shall . . . Stat. § 701.02’s recording requirement is applicable only to (and enforceable by) competing creditors . . . Stat. § 701.02 accords with common sense. . . . Stat. § 701.02 applied only to creditors or subsequent purchasers of a mortgagee. . . . Stat. § 701.02 to prevail against improperly recorded assignments of a duly recorded mortgage, we endorse . . .

A. VALK, v. J. E. M. DISTRIBUTORS OF TAMPA BAY, INC. KWPH,, 700 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . In. the next paragraph of the order the court quoted section 701.02, Florida Statutes (1995), subsection . . .

UNITED STATES v. MICHAEL R., 90 F.3d 340 (9th Cir. 1996)

. . . rationalizes the stop under Arizona traffic laws for (a) a speed violation, see Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 28-701.02 . . .

In HALABI a k a R. KAPILA, v. FARRAGUT MORTGAGE CO. INC. a a V., 196 B.R. 631 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . . § 701.02 and 11 U.S.C. §§ 544 and 549. . . . . § 701.02: (1) No assignment of a mortgage upon real property or of any interest therein, shall be good . . . While Fla.Stat. § 701.02 requires the recording of an assignment of a mortgage for the assignment to . . . The recording requirement of Fla.Stat. § 701.02 relates only to competing creditors’ interest or bona . . . Since the requirements of Fla.Stat. § 701.02 do not apply to competing interests between mortgagors or . . .

H. SMITH, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a, 61 F.3d 1552 (11th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 701.02(1) (West 1994). . . . Stat.Ann. § 701.02(1). B. . . . is at that moment that one must also be “without notice” to gain the protection of Fla.Stat.Ann. § 701.02 . . . See, e.g., In re Lakeside I Corp., 120 B.R. 213 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1990) (§ 701.02(1) applies to third party . . . , for valuable consideration” under § 701.02(1) (emphasis added). . . . .

In H. MINER, Sr. H. MINER, Sr. E. v. BAY BANK TRUST COMPANY,, 185 B.R. 362 (N.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . . § 701.02(1), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

In KAVOLCHYCK BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N. A. v. S. WEITZNER,, 164 B.R. 1018 (S.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . . §§ 695.01 and 701.02. . . . interest in the Debtors’ leasehold interests in 1986 by recording pursuant to Fla.Stat. §§ 697.01 and 701.02 . . .

STRYKOWSKI, v. NORTHEAST ILLINOIS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP. d b a METRA METRA, 827 F. Supp. 468 (N.D. Ill. 1993)

. . . Ch. 111⅔, Para. 701.02(c). . . .

In KAVOLCHYCK S. WEITZNER, v. GOLDMAN, 154 B.R. 793 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . Subsection (1) of section 701.02, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: 701.02 Assignment not effectual . . . However, Section 2 of Fla.Law ch. 89-41 did change the wording of § 701.02(1), Fla. . . . Documents such as those referred to in § 701.02(1) are recorded in the public records of the applicable . . . Since the actual document assigning a leasehold mortgage must be filed pursuant to §§ 701.02 and 695.01 . . . Therefore, by combining the reenactment of § 679.104(10) together with the amendment of § 701.02, the . . .

In ASCOT MORTGAGE, INC. W. H. WILLSON, Jr. v. MLA, INC., 153 B.R. 1002 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1993)

. . . . § 701.02(1), which provides that “[no] assignment of a mortgage upon real property or of any interest . . . Ann. § 701.02 pertains to contests between the mortgagor (or his successor) and a mortgagee’s successor . . . Thus, as between a mortgagee and the mortgagee’s successor, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 701.02 has no application . . . Stat.Ann. § 701.02, a judgment creditor would not prevail over the right of the Defendant to the Florida . . . Even if Fla.Stat.Ann. § 701.02 were somehow found to be applicable, constructive knowledge would be imputed . . .

AMERICAN BANK OF THE SOUTH, v. ROTHENBERG,, 598 So. 2d 289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Rothenberg argued that pursuant to section 701.02(1), Florida Statutes (1991), American Bank’s failure . . . The confusion in this case arises from the failure of both parties to recognize that section 701.02, . . . Section 701.02 was enacted to protect a creditor or subsequent purchaser of land who has relied on the . . . Section 701.02 provides: (1) No assignment of a mortgage upon real property or of any interest therein . . .

LLOYD v. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 576 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . encumbrances or assignment and, for that reason, it is entitled to the protection afforded by section 701.02 . . . Section 701.02(1), Florida Statutes (1987), relied upon by Chicago Title, provides: No assignment of . . .

In LAKESIDE I CORPORATION, C. LAKESIDE I CORPORATION, C. v. CITIBANK FLORIDA N. A., 120 B.R. 213 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . (3), they occupy the position of a bona fide purchaser of real property thus by virtue of Fla.Stat. 701.02 . . . Fla.Stat. 701.02 entitled “Assignment not effectual against creditors unless recorded” provides (1) No . . .

In LAKESIDE I. CORPORATION,, 104 B.R. 468 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . . § 701.02 as a condition to the enforceability of a mortgage against subsequent creditors or purchasers . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. FREY, 708 F. Supp. 310 (D. Kan. 1988)

. . . $95,935.67 was due and owing on the principal of the note and guaranty, plus accrued interest of $109,-701.02 . . .

E. DELOZIER, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GATLINBURG,, 113 F.R.D. 522 (E.D. Tenn. 1986)

. . . The oft noted “illusory quality of ... a fact-opinion distinction,” 11 Moore, Federal Practice § 701.02 . . .

In FIDELITY STANDARD MORTGAGE CORP. f k a S. B. I. COLIN, v. FIDELITY STANDARD MORTGAGE CORP. BLIER, v. FIDELITY STANDARD MORTGAGE CORP. PRYOR, v. FIDELITY STANDARD MORTGAGE CORP., 36 B.R. 496 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . Fla.Stats., § 701.02(1), provides: No assignment of a mortgage upon real property or of any interest . . . The language of § 701.02(1) is about as clear as the legislature could make it that no unrecorded assignment . . . mortgage market would be jeopardized by the enforcement in bankruptcy of statutes such as Fla.Stats., § 701.02 . . .

JOY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a No. v. SOLA BASIC INDUSTRIES, INC. a a a No., 697 F.2d 104 (3d Cir. 1982)

. . . Moore, supra, § 701.02; 3 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 701[01] (1981). . . .

MARTIN, v. S. WEAVER, 666 F.2d 1013 (6th Cir. 1981)

. . . Code § 701.02; and (2) that James Martin was guilty of contributory negligence. . . . because Officer Weaver was “responding to an emergency call” within the meaning of Ohio Rev.Code § 701.02 . . . Section 701.02 provides, in pertinent part: Any municipal corporation shall be liable in damages for . . . Code § 701.02. . . . However, section 701.02’s preservation and grant of municipal and personal immunity is not absolute. . . . and the City defended on the ground of the exemption from liability provided by Ohio Revised Code § 701.02 . . .

PARRATT v. TAYLOR, 451 U.S. 527 (U.S. 1981)

. . . Code §701.02 (1976), for acts while responding to an emergency call. . . .

A. EVERHART v. DRAKE MANAGEMENT, INC. UNION COMMERCE, v. FIREMAN S FUND INSURANCE CO., 627 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 701.02 which requires mortgage assignments be placed of record to be effective against creditors. . . .

In FRANKLIN NATIONAL BANK SECURITIES LITIGATION, 478 F. Supp. 577 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . acknowledged “the illusory quality of such a fact-opinion distinction.” 11 Moore, Federal Practice § 701.02 . . .

RUCKER v. STATE EXCHANGE BANK, a, 355 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . interest in a real estate mortgage is protected by recording the assignment as' required by Section 701.02 . . .