The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 711
FLORIDA UNIFORM TRANSFER-ON-DEATH SECURITY REGISTRATION ACT

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 711

FLORIDA UNIFORM TRANSFER-ON-DEATH SECURITY REGISTRATION ACT

711.50 Short title.

711.501 Definitions.

711.502 Registration in beneficiary form; sole or joint tenancy ownership.

711.503 Registration in beneficiary form; applicable law.

711.504 Origination of registration in beneficiary form.

711.505 Form of registration in beneficiary form.

711.506 Effect of registration in beneficiary form.

711.507 Ownership on death of owner.

711.508 Protection of registering entity.

711.509 Nontestamentary transfer on death.

711.51 Terms, conditions, and forms for registration.

711.511 Rules of construction.

711.512 Application of ss. 711.50-711.512.

711.50 Short title.—Sections 711.50-711.512 may be cited as the “Florida Uniform Transfer-on-Death Security Registration Act.”

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.501 Definitions.—In ss. 711.50-711.512, unless the context otherwise requires, the term:

(1) “Beneficiary form” means a registration of a security which indicates the present owner of the security and the intention of the owner regarding the person who will become the owner of the security upon the death of the owner.

(2) “Devisee” means any person designated in a will to receive a disposition of real or personal property.

(3) “Heirs” means those persons, including the surviving spouse, who are entitled under the statutes of intestate succession to the property of a decedent.

(4) “Person” means an individual, a corporation, an organization, or other legal entity.

(5) “Personal representative” includes an executor, administrator, successor personal representative, special administrator, and persons who perform substantially the same function under the law governing their status.

(6) “Property” includes both real and personal property or any interest therein and means anything that may be the subject of ownership.

(7) “Register,” including its derivatives, means to issue a certificate showing the ownership of a certificated security or, in the case of an uncertificated security, to initiate or transfer an account showing ownership of securities.

(8) “Registering entity” means a person who originates or transfers a security title by registration, and includes a broker maintaining security accounts for customers and a transfer agent or other person acting for or as an issuer of securities.

(9) “Security” means a share, participation, or other interest in property, in a business, or in an obligation of an enterprise or other issuer, and includes a certificated security, an uncertificated security, and a security account.

(10) “Security account” means:

(a) A reinvestment account associated with a security, a securities account with a broker, a cash balance in a brokerage account, cash, interest, earnings, or dividends earned or declared on a security in an account, a reinvestment account, or a brokerage account, whether or not credited to the account before the owner’s death;

(b) An investment management account, investment advisory account, investment agency account, custody account, or any other type of account with a bank or trust company, including the securities in the account, the cash balance in the account, and cash equivalents, and any interest, earnings, or dividends earned or declared on a security in the account, whether or not credited to the account before the owner’s death; or

(c) A cash balance or other property held for or due to the owner of a security as a replacement for or product of an account security, whether or not credited to the account before the owner’s death.

(11) “State” includes any state of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession subject to the legislative authority of the United States.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216; s. 1, ch. 2005-85.

711.502 Registration in beneficiary form; sole or joint tenancy ownership.—Only individuals whose registration of a security shows sole ownership by one individual or multiple ownership by two or more with right of survivorship, rather than as tenants in common, may obtain registration in beneficiary form. Multiple owners of a security registered in beneficiary form hold as joint tenants with right of survivorship, as tenants by the entireties, or as owners of community property held in survivorship form, and not as tenants in common.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.503 Registration in beneficiary form; applicable law.—A security may be registered in beneficiary form if the form is authorized by this or a similar statute of the state of organization of the issuer or registering entity, the location of the registering entity’s principal office, the office of its transfer agent or its office making the registration, or by this or a similar statute of the law of the state listed as the owner’s address at the time of registration. A registration governed by the law of a jurisdiction in which this or similar legislation is not in force or was not in force when a registration in beneficiary form was made is nevertheless presumed to be valid and authorized as a matter of contract law.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.504 Origination of registration in beneficiary form.—A security, whether evidenced by certificate or account, is registered in beneficiary form when the registration includes a designation of a beneficiary to take the ownership at the death of the owner or the deaths of all multiple owners.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.505 Form of registration in beneficiary form.—Registration in beneficiary form may be shown by the words “transfer on death” or the abbreviation “TOD,” or by the words “pay on death” or the abbreviation “POD,” after the name of the registered owner and before the name of a beneficiary.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.506 Effect of registration in beneficiary form.—The designation of a transfer-on-death beneficiary on a registration in beneficiary form has no effect on ownership until the owner’s death. A registration of a security in beneficiary form may be canceled or changed at any time by the sole owner or all then-surviving owners without the consent of the beneficiary.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.507 Ownership on death of owner.—On death of a sole owner or the last to die of all multiple owners, ownership of securities registered in beneficiary form passes to the beneficiary or beneficiaries who survive all owners. On proof of death of all owners and compliance with any applicable requirements of the registering entity, a security registered in beneficiary form may be reregistered in the name of the beneficiary or beneficiaries who survived the death of all owners. Until division of the security after the death of all owners, multiple beneficiaries surviving the death of all owners hold their interests as tenants in common. If no beneficiary survives the death of all owners, the security belongs to the estate of the deceased sole owner or the estate of the last to die of all multiple owners.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.508 Protection of registering entity.—

(1) A registering entity is not required to offer or to accept a request for security registration in beneficiary form. If a registration in beneficiary form is offered by a registering entity, the owner requesting registration in beneficiary form assents to the protections given to the registering entity by ss. 711.50-711.512.

(2) By accepting a request for registration of a security in beneficiary form, the registering entity agrees that the registration will be implemented on death of the deceased owner as provided in ss. 711.50-711.512.

(3) A registering entity is discharged from all claims to a security by the estate, creditors, heirs, or devisees of a deceased owner if it registers a transfer of the security in accordance with s. 711.507 and does so in good faith reliance on the registration, on ss. 711.50-711.512, and on information provided to it by affidavit of the personal representative of the deceased owner, or by the surviving beneficiary or by the surviving beneficiary’s representatives, or other information available to the registering entity. The protections of ss. 711.50-711.512 do not extend to a reregistration or payment made after a registering entity has received written notice from any claimant to any interest in the security objecting to implementation of a registration in beneficiary form. No other notice or other information available to the registering entity affects its right to protection under ss. 711.50-711.512.

(4) The protection provided by ss. 711.50-711.512 to the registering entity of a security does not affect the rights of beneficiaries in disputes between themselves and other claimants to ownership of the security transferred or its value or proceeds.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.509 Nontestamentary transfer on death.—

(1) A transfer on death resulting from a registration in beneficiary form is effective by reason of the contract regarding the registration between the owner and the registering entity and ss. 711.50-711.512 and is not testamentary.

(2) Sections 711.50-711.512 do not limit the rights of creditors of security owners against beneficiaries and other transferees under other laws of this state.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.51 Terms, conditions, and forms for registration.—

(1) A registering entity offering to accept registrations in beneficiary form may establish the terms and conditions under which it will receive requests for registrations in beneficiary form, and requests for implementation of registrations in beneficiary form, including requests for cancellation of previously registered transfer-on-death beneficiary designations and requests for reregistration to effect a change of beneficiary. The terms and conditions so established may provide for proving death, avoiding or resolving any problems concerning fractional shares, designating primary and contingent beneficiaries, and substituting a named beneficiary’s descendants to take in the place of the named beneficiary in the event of the beneficiary’s death. Substitution may be indicated by appending to the name of the primary beneficiary the letters “LDPS,” standing for “lineal descendants per stirpes.” This designation substitutes a deceased beneficiary’s descendants who survive the owner for a beneficiary who fails to so survive, the descendants to be identified and to share in accordance with the law of the beneficiary’s domicile at the owner’s death governing inheritance by descendants of an intestate. Other forms of identifying beneficiaries who are to take on one or more contingencies, and rules for providing proofs and assurances needed to satisfy reasonable concerns by registering entities regarding conditions and identities relevant to accurate implementation of registrations in beneficiary form, may be contained in a registering entity’s terms and conditions.

(2) The following are illustrations of registrations in beneficiary form which a registering entity may authorize:

(a) Sole owner-sole beneficiary: John S Brown TOD (or POD) John S Brown Jr.

(b) Multiple owners-sole beneficiary: John S Brown Mary B Brown JT TEN TOD John S Brown Jr.

1. John S Brown Mary B Brown JT TEN TOD John S Brown Jr SUB BENE Peter Q Brown; or

2. John S Brown Mary B Brown JT TEN TOD John S Brown Jr LDPS.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.511 Rules of construction.—

(1) Sections 711.50-711.512 shall be liberally construed and applied to promote their underlying purposes and policy and to make uniform the laws with respect to the subject of these sections among states enacting them.

(2) Unless displaced by the particular provisions of ss. 711.50-711.512, the principles of law and equity supplement the provisions of these sections.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

711.512 Application of ss. 711.50-711.512.—Sections 711.50-711.512 apply to registrations of securities in beneficiary form made before, on, or after January 1, 1995, by decedents dying on or after January 1, 1995.

History.—s. 3, ch. 94-216.

F.S. 711 on Google Scholar

F.S. 711 on Casetext

Amendments to 711

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 711

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S627.711 3 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - RENUMBERED. SEE REC #7117 - M: F

S627.711 7 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 7780 - M: F

S627.711 8 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - PROVIDE UTTER FALSE MITIGATION VERIFICATION - M: F

S985.711 1a1 - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - FOOD OR CLOTHING TO JUVENILE FACILITY - F: T

S985.711 1a2 - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - INTOXICATING BEVERAGE TO JUVENILE FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1a3 - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - MARIJUANA JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1a3 - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - HEMP INTO JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1a3 - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - INDUSTRIAL HEMP JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1a3 - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - HYPNOTIC STIMULANT DEPRESS DRUG JUV DET FACIL - F: S

S985.711 1a3 - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - CTRL SUBSTANCE s.893.02(4) JUVENILE FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1a4 - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - FIREARM WEAPON EXPLOSIVE JUVENILE FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1a5 - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - CELL PHONE/COMM DEVICE JUV DETENTION FACILITY - M: F

S985.711 1a6 - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - VAPOR-GENERATE ELEC DEVICE JUV DETENTION FACIL - M: F

S985.711 1b - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - TRANSMIT CELL PHONE/COMM DEVICE JUV DET FACIL - M: F

S985.711 1b - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - TRANSMIT VAPOR-GENERATE E-DEVICE JUV DET FACIL - M: F

S985.711 1b - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - TRANSMIT FOOD/CLOTHING JUV DETENTION FACILITY - F: T

S985.711 1b - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - TRANSMIT INTOX BEVERAGE JUV DETENTION FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1b - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - TRANSMIT CTRL SUB s.893.02(4) JUV DETENT FACIL - F: S

S985.711 1b - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - TRANSMIT MARIJUANA JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1b - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - TRANSMIT HEMP JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1b - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - TRANSMIT INDUSTRIAL HEMP JUV DETENTION FACIL - F: S

S985.711 1b - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - TRANS HYPNOTIC STIMUL DEPRESS DRUG JUV DET FAC - F: S

S985.711 1b - SMUGGLE CONTRABAND - TRANSMIT FIREARM/WEAPON/EXPLOSIVE JUV DET FAC - F: S

S985.711 1c - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - POSSESS CELL PHONE/COMM DEVICE JUV DET FACIL - M: F

S985.711 1c - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - POSSESS VAPOR-GENERATE E-DEVICE JUV DET FACIL - M: F

S985.711 1c - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - POSSESS FOOD/CLOTHING JUV DETENTION FACILITY - F: T

S985.711 1c - DRUGS-POSSESS - POSSESS CTRL SUB s.893.02(4) JUV DETENT FACIL - F: S

S985.711 1c - DRUGS-POSSESS - POSSESS MARIJUANA JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1c - DRUGS-POSSESS - POSSESS HEMP JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1c - DRUGS-POSSESS - POSSESS INDUSTRIAL HEMP JUV DETENTION FACIL - F: S

S985.711 1c - DRUGS-POSSESS - POSS HYPNOTIC STIMUL DEPRESS DRUG JUV DET FAC - F: S

S985.711 1c - LIQUOR-POSSESS - POSSESS INTOX BEVERAGE JUV DETENTION FACILITY - F: S

S985.711 1c - POSSESSION OF WEAPON - POSSESS FIREARM/WEAPON/EXPLOSIVE JUV DET FAC - F: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 9 Pet. 711, 734, 9 L.Ed. 283 (1835) ; e.g. , 1856 Treaty, Art. I, 11 Stat. 699. . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Board of Ed. of Ewing , 330 U.S. 1, 16, 67 S.Ct. 504, 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) (a State "cannot exclude individual . . . Board of Ed. of Ewing , 330 U.S. 1, 15, 67 S.Ct. 504, 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) ; see also post , at 2282 - . . . Caldor, Inc. , 472 U.S. 703, 709-711, 105 S.Ct. 2914, 86 L.Ed.2d 557 (1985). . . . Board of Ed. of Ewing , 330 U.S. 1, 16, 67 S.Ct. 504, 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) ). . . . Board of Ed. of Ewing , 330 U.S. 1, 69, 67 S.Ct. 504, 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) (appendix to dissent of Rutledge . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act, known as the Leadership Act. 117 Stat. 711 . . . is the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003. 117 Stat. 711 . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Code Ann., Tit. 19, § 711 (2018 Cum. Supp.) . . . Id. , at 711, 98 S.Ct. 1370. In Oncale v. . . .

J. THOLE, v. U. S. BANK N. A, 140 S. Ct. 1615 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id ., at 711, 133 S.Ct. 2652 (distinguishing assignee and next-friend standing). . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Twohig ed. 1987); 33 Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789, p. 711 (R. Hill ed. 1936). . . .

ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1492 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Safe-Cabinet Co. , 110 Ohio St. 609, 617, 144 N.E. 711, 713 (1924) ("By the great weight of authority . . .

COMCAST CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN- OWNED MEDIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1009 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Manhart , 435 U.S. 702, 711, 98 S.Ct. 1370, 55 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978) ). . . . Aikens , 460 U.S. 711, 715-716, 103 S.Ct. 1478, 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). . . .

AVERY v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1080 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 711 F.3d 315 (CA2 2013) ; United States v. . . .

MISSOURI, EX REL. LAMASA, v. WRIGHT,, 140 S. Ct. 1110 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-711 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

RITZEN GROUP, INC. v. JACKSON MASONRY, LLC, 140 S. Ct. 582 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See In re Saco Local Development Corp. , 711 F.2d 441, 443 (C.A.1 1983) (Breyer, J.) . . . 651, 657, n. 3, 126 S.Ct. 2105, 165 L.Ed.2d 110 (2006) ); see In re Saco Local Development Corp. , 711 . . .

ELHADY, v. H. KABLE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Davis , 424 U.S. 693, 711, 96 S.Ct. 1155, 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976). . . .

TIMS, v. LGE COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION,, 935 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . State , 309 Ga.App. 338, 711 S.E.2d 314, 317 (2011) (quoting Martinez v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TOWN OF COLORADO CITY,, 935 F.3d 804 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. , 711 F.2d 1431, 1438 (9th Cir. 1983) (quoting 9 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Frank , 711 F. Supp. 2d 874, 905 (E.D. Wis. 2010). . . .

IN RE BOWLES,, 935 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Hall 572 U.S. at 711, 134 S.Ct. 1986. . . .

NICHOLSON J. H. a J. N. G. a v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES a a, 935 F.3d 685 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wright , 430 U.S. 651, 673-74, 97 S.Ct. 1401, 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977). . . .

RAWA, A. W. Jr. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, v., 934 F.3d 862 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . EPA , 711 F.3d 844, 869 (8th Cir. 2013) (internal quotation omitted). . . .

PARKER, v. LANDRY,, 935 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Molina-Rodríguez, 711 F.3d 49, 53 (1st Cir. 2013). . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 711 F.3d 1165, 1172 (10th Cir. 2013) (quotations omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. JONES,, 934 F.3d 842 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Weeks , 711 F.3d 1255, 1259 (11th Cir. 2013) (per curiam); United States v. . . .

BRAND v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, 934 F.3d 799 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lotus/East, Inc., 506 F.2d 709, 711 (6th Cir. 1974) ). . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Food Express , Inc. , 159 Wash.2d 700, 709-711, 153 P.3d 846 (Wash. 2007) (en banc). . . .

MEJIA- RAMOS, v. P. BARR,, 934 F.3d 789 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder, 685 F.3d 707, 711 (8th Cir. 2012) (quoting Al Yatim, 531 F.3d at 587 ). . . .

HAWKINS v. I- TV DIGITALIS TAVKOZLESI ZRT. f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V. v. i- TV f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V., 935 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . MacKay , 763 F.2d 711 (5th Cir. 1985), is the seminal authority advancing this theory. . . .

MAO- MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, L., 935 F.3d 573 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . PWG-17-711, 2018 WL 999920 (D. Md. Feb. 21, 2018) ; MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC v. Am. Family Mut. . . .

EFFEX CAPITAL, LLC, v. NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION,, 933 F.3d 882 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Whiting Paper Co. , 768 F.3d 682, 711-12 (7th Cir. 2014). In Freightliner Corp. v. . . .

HIGGS, v. UNITED STATES PARK POLICE,, 933 F.3d 897 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 2255, 711 F. Supp. 2d 479 (D. . . . of the Maryland district court on this very argument, first in the proceedings under section 2255, 711 . . .

MCMICHAEL, v. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INCORPORATED RIGP DCL, L. L. C. USA,, 934 F.3d 447 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 711, 715 (5th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (unpublished) (holding that "mere disagreement with [the . . .

HARDEMAN, v. CURRAN,, 933 F.3d 816 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . involve "a mutually enforcing effect that produces the deprivation of a single, identifiable human need." 711 . . . indifferent "to adverse conditions that deny 'the minimal civilized measure of life's necessities.' " Budd , 711 . . . See Budd , 711 F.3d at 843. Wathen points to Tesch v. . . .

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. FOWLKES PLUMBING, L. L. C., 934 F.3d 424 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Teton Corp. , 30 N.E.3d 711, 713 (Ind. 2015) ; Lexington Ins. Co. v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Botti , 711 F.3d 299, 308 (2d Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Neder v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WALKER,, 934 F.3d 375 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 2280, 198 L.Ed.2d 711 (2017), and cert. granted, judgment vacated , --- U.S. ----, 138 S. . . .

DUMONT, v. REILY FOODS COMPANY, 934 F.3d 35 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Nidek Co., 711 F.3d 1109, 1120 (9th Cir. 2013) (same). . . .

VALBRUNA SLATER STEEL CORPORATION, v. JOSLYN MANUFACTURING COMPANY,, 934 F.3d 553 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 9601(24) ; see also Navistar Int'l Transp. , 152 F.3d at 711 (assuming, based on parties' concessions . . .

BRENDA L. v. SAUL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 858 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Colvin , 795 F.3d 711, 720 (7th Cir. 2015) ; Johnson v. . . .

A. LAVITE, v. J. DUNSTAN,, 932 F.3d 1020 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Johnson , 457 F.3d 711, 716 (7th Cir. 2006). . . .

CHAVEZ, De E. De De De v. OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a, 933 F.3d 186 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 711. . . . when a sister trial court has clearly, unambiguously, and finally denied class action status," id. at 711 . . .

J. DOHERTY, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 932 F.3d 978 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gleicher , 393 Ill.App.3d 31, 331 Ill.Dec. 711, 911 N.E.2d 532, 537 (2009) (quoting Rein, 216 Ill.Dec . . .

TEXAS, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION EEOC P. U. S., 933 F.3d 433 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . EPA , 711 F.3d 844, 846 (8th Cir. 2013) (holding that language expressing an agency's position that speaks . . .

UNITED STATES v. HUNTER, 932 F.3d 610 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gorman , 613 F.3d 711, 717 (7th Cir. 2010) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRADO,, 933 F.3d 121 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Fisher , 711 F.3d 460, 465 (4th Cir. 2013), the Fourth Circuit found a defendant's guilty plea invalid . . .

UNITED STATES v. THIAM,, 934 F.3d 89 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Botti , 711 F.3d 299, 307-08 (2d Cir. 2013). McDonnell , 136 S. Ct. at 2361. Id. Id. at 2365. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ESCALANTE,, 933 F.3d 395 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rodriguez , 711 F.3d 541, 549 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), abrogated on other grounds by Esquivel-Quintana . . . serve as a predicate offense because it only required a three-year, not a four-year, age differential. 711 . . . punishment for similar recidivists may justify Supreme Court intervention yet again."); Rodriguez , 711 . . .

PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. BEACH MART, INC. L L, 932 F.3d 268 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 711, 727 (N.D. . . .

LONGORIA, v. HUNTER EXPRESS, LIMITED, 932 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Moore , 711 S.W.2d 622, 624 (Tex. 1986) (explaining that factual sufficiency of the evidence is the " . . . Pope , 711 S.W.2d at 624 (citing Pool v. Ford Motor Co. , 715 S.W.2d 629, 635 (Tex. 1986) ). . . .

ORDUNO, v. PIETRZAK, v., 932 F.3d 710 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 711 F.2d 570, 573 (4th Cir. 1983) (per curiam); United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS, v., 933 F.3d 685 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gorman , 613 F.3d 711, 717 (7th Cir. 2010). . . .

VIEIRA, v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC LLC LLC, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1117 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Nidek Co., Ltd. , 711 F.3d 1109, 1120 (9th Cir. 2013). . . . Remington Arms Co. , 24 Cal App.3d 711, 734, 101 Cal.Rptr. 314 (1972) ; see also Mazza v. Am. . . .

PAEZ, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 931 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Brown, 526 F.3d 691, 711-13 (11th Cir. 2008), vacated on other grounds, 556 U.S. 1150, 129 S. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MATHIS, a k a a k a a k a D- v. a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a v. a k a a k a K. a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a a k a, 932 F.3d 242 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Graham , 711 F.3d 445, 453 (4th Cir. 2013). . . .

L. CRUMP, v. M. SAUL,, 932 F.3d 567 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Colvin , 795 F.3d 711, 719-20 (7th Cir. 2015), but when combined with the ALJ's disregard of the highly . . .

BRAKEBILL v. JAEGER,, 932 F.3d 671 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Reed, 502 U.S. 279, 288-89, 112 S.Ct. 698, 116 L.Ed.2d 711 (1992) ). . . .

FORCE, A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F. N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. TZVI S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. v. FACEBOOK, INC., 934 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Alvarez-Machain , 542 U.S. 692, 711 n.9, 124 S.Ct. 2739, 159 L.Ed.2d 718 (2004) ). . . .

IN RE L. VENANZIO, J. v. U. S., 602 B.R. 921 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . City of Philadelphia, 558 B.R. 711 (E.D. Pa. 2016). . . .

CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, a v. WELLS FARGO CO. N. A., 931 F.3d 1274 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pierce , 711 F.2d 421, 425 (1st Cir. 1983) ). . . .

CHRONIS, v. UNITED STATES, 932 F.3d 544 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 711 F.3d 828, 833-35 (7th Cir. 2013) (considering whether to equitably toll the statute . . .

AL- BALUCHI a k a v. T. ESPER,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Wright, 430 U.S. 651, 664, 97 S.Ct. 1401, 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977), and that it "comes into play only after . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. LLC,, 931 F.3d 339 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 711; see J.A. 1172. . . . J.A. 711 ("Wow, is that a different read."). . . .

IN RE BROWN,, 932 F.3d 162 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Alvarez-Machain , 542 U.S. 692, 711 n.9, 124 S.Ct. 2739, 159 L.Ed.2d 718 (2004) ("[W]hen the legislature . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOE,, 932 F.3d 279 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Calton , 900 F.3d at 711, 713. . . .

TRACIE H. v. SAUL,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 990 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Colvin , 795 F.3d 711, 720 (7th Cir. 2015) ; Dornseif v. . . .

DEXTER, a k a v. DEALOGIC, LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 233 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Teamwork, Inc., 434 Mass. 761, 752 N.E.2d 700, 711 (2001). . . . Chief Justice for Admin. & Mgmt. of Trial Court, 448 Mass. 15, 858 N.E.2d 699, 711 (2006) ). . . .

P. J. BY THROUGH MR. MRS. W. J. L. G. MR. MRS. L. G. M. L. MR. MRS. J. L. Mr. v. CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, 931 F.3d 156 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Carey , 711 F.2d 1136, 1146 (2d Cir. 1983) (suggesting the district court is best situated to decide . . .

HUPP R. H. a v. COOK C. R., 931 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Yengel , 711 F.3d 392, 396 (4th Cir. 2013). . . . This rule is subject to "narrow and well-delineated" exceptions, Yengel , 711 F.3d at 396, one of which . . . See Yengel , 711 F.3d at 398 (finding no exigency when officer was informed that there was a grenade . . . Yengel , 711 F.3d at 396. It would convert exigency from an exception to the rule. IV. . . .

F. EDMISTON, v. LOUISIANA SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER,, 931 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Stephens , 623 So.2d 711, 714-15 (La. . . .

D. HIGGINS, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., 931 F.3d 664 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Jacksonville, 711 F.3d 883, 889 & n.8 (8th Cir. 2013). . . . Schwan's Home Serv., Inc., 711 F.3d 911, 916 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting that an accommodation is unreasonable . . .

HEUTON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 930 F.3d 1015 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dynamics Corp., 968 F.2d 707, 711 (8th Cir. 1992). . . . See Aetna, 968 F.2d at 711. . . .

UNITED STATES v. IWAI,, 930 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 711, 712 (9th Cir. 2012) ("No facts indicated that essential evidence would imminently be destroyed . . .

W. EATON, v. PACHECO,, 931 F.3d 1009 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wilson , 817 F.3d 703, 711 (10th Cir. 2016). . . .

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ACRES, PERMANENT OVERLAY EASEMENT FOR ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR ACRES IN MILFORD AND WESTFALL TOWNSHIPS, PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS a c o L. P., 931 F.3d 237 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Kimbell Foods, Inc., 440 U.S. 715, 99 S.Ct. 1448, 59 L.Ed.2d 711 (1979). . . . Kimbell Foods, Inc. , 440 U.S. 715, 727, 99 S.Ct. 1448, 59 L.Ed.2d 711 (1979) (quoting United States . . .

UNITED STATES v. MCKOWN,, 930 F.3d 721 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 711, 713 (10th Cir. 2017) ("All circuits that have confronted this issue have so held."). . . .

DE LA FUENTE, v. PADILLA,, 930 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Reed , 502 U.S. 279, 289, 112 S.Ct. 698, 116 L.Ed.2d 711 (1992), but, if the burden is minimal, the law . . .

UNITED STATES v. ANSTICE,, 930 F.3d 907 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Johnson , 765 F.3d 702, 711 (7th Cir. 2014). Johnson provides a good example. . . . See Johnson , 765 F.3d at 711. That did not happen here. . . .

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CHICAGO TRUST COMPANY, THE BABY FOLD,, 930 F.3d 910 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hilliard , 2018 IL App (5th) 180214 ¶47, 426 Ill.Dec. 711, 116 N.E.3d 1011. . . .

L. KEEN, v. C. HELSON, LLC, N. A. N. A. J. P. N. A., 930 F.3d 799 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . LLC , 736 F.3d 711, 719 (6th Cir. 2013) (per curiam) (citing In re Carter , 553 F.3d 979, 985-86 & n.5 . . .

DUFFNER, v. CITY OF ST. PETERS, MISSOURI, a, 930 F.3d 973 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . EPA , 711 F.3d 844, 867 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting Pub. Water Supply Dist. No. 10 v. . . .

BORCHENKO v. L OREAL USA, INC., 389 F. Supp. 3d 769 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Nidek Co. , 711 F.3d 1109, 1120 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing In re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis Leads Prods . . .

M. CROCE, v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY Jr., 930 F.3d 787 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . R. 32-3 (Article at 5) (Page ID #711). Then Statement 10 reads: "Still, some of the research Dr. . . .

E. JACOB, MD, v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 1024 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Corp., S.A., et al., 711 F.2d 989, 995 (11th Cir. 1983). . . . Quality Foods, 711 F.2d at 994-95. . . . Quality Foods, 711 F.2d at 994-95. . . .

CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 84 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Election Comm'n , 711 F.3d 180, 188 (D.C. Cir. 2013). . . .

MANNING v. CALDWELL, s FOR CITY OF ROANOKE s, 930 F.3d 264 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wright , 430 U.S. 651, 667, 97 S.Ct. 1401, 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977). . . . Wright , 430 U.S. 651, 667, 97 S.Ct. 1401, 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977) ; Marshall v. . . . Wright , 430 U.S. 651, 664, 97 S.Ct. 1401, 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977). . . .

VUGO, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 931 F.3d 42 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Rhode Island , 517 U.S. 484, 523, 116 S.Ct. 1495, 134 L.Ed.2d 711 (1996) (Thomas, J. , concurring), or . . .

COASTAL CREEK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. FLA TRUST SERVICES LLC,, 275 So. 3d 836 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Londono , 130 So. 3d 711, 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ; Aventura Mgmt., LLC , 105 So. 3d at 637. . . . Londono , 130 So. 3d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013), and Aventura Management, LLC v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ELAM,, 930 F.3d 406 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Santora , 711 F.2d 41, 42 (5th Cir. 1983). . . .

PHILLIPS, v. V. SPENCER,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 136 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLP , 68 A.3d 697, 711 (D.C. 2013) ("[W]e need not decide here whether . . .

ACUITY, A v. REX, LLC LLC EVAC EMS,, 929 F.3d 995 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . EPA , 711 F.3d 844, 861 (8th Cir. 2013). . . .

ABC SOILS, INC. v. DRS POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC., 386 F. Supp. 3d 107 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Autoridad de Energia Electrica, 755 F.3d 711, 718 (1st Cir. 2014) (internal citations and quotations . . .

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. J. TRUMP, D. M., 930 F.3d 209 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ass'n , 895 F.2d 711, 713 (11th Cir. 1990) (per curiam); Fed. R. App. . . .

LLOYD S SYNDICATE v. FLOATEC LLC,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 835 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 711, 715 (S.D. Tex. 2017) ; see Penton v. Hotho , 601 So. 2d 762, 767 (La. . . . Offshore Painting Contractors, Inc. , 711 F.2d 602 (5th Cir. 1983) ). . . .

WILLIAMSON, v. BREVARD COUNTY,, 928 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Ed. of Ewing Twp., 330 U.S. 1, 15, 67 S.Ct. 504, 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) (incorporating the clause . . .

ROE, v. HOTCHKISS SCHOOL,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 165 (D. Conn. 2019)

. . . Trading Corp. , 711 F.3d 353, 359 (2d Cir. 2013) ; see also York v. . . . Roe, as this Court must, Cohen , 711 F.3d at 359, the Court finds that Richard Roe has alleged enough . . .

EVANS, v. SANDY CITY, a R. P. C. C. J. E. I- XX,, 928 F.3d 1171 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484, 529, 116 S.Ct. 1495, 134 L.Ed.2d 711 (1996) (O'Connor, J., concurring). . . .

PAJAK, v. ROHM HAAS COMPANY, LLC, Co., 387 F. Supp. 3d 138 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Polaroid Corp., 381 Mass. 545, 413 N.E.2d 711, 713-14 (1980) (internal quotation marks omitted) (second . . .

FORTUNE SOCIETY, v. SANDCASTLE TOWERS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP. LLC, LLC, E M LLC,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 145 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . . ¶ 107, ECF No. 94-2; Ex. 10, ECF No. 94-5 at 711. Ms. . . .

IN RE CUBIC ENERGY, INC. A. III v., 603 B.R. 743 (Bankr. Del. 2019)

. . . Ernst Enters., Inc ., 711 F.2d 138, 139 (9th Cir. 1983). D.I. 13, ¶¶ 39-49. . . . Karabu Corp ., 196 B.R. 711, 715 (Bankr. D. Del. 1996) ). D.I. 13, ¶ 57; D.I. 21, ¶ 28. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SMITH,, 928 F.3d 1215 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Thomas, 705 F.2d 709, 711-12 (4th Cir. 1983) (affirming the admissibility of prior recorded testimony . . .

A. ZADEH v. ROBINSON,, 928 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . See discussion infra Section III. 204 F.3d at 639. 248 F.3d at 482. 568 F.3d at 200. 482 U.S. at 711, . . .

TEXAS, L. L. C. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 929 F.3d 205 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . MacKay , 763 F.2d 711, 714 (5th Cir. 1985), that "[n]onparties who reside outside the territorial jurisdiction . . .

J. CUNNINGHAM, v. WAWA, INC., 387 F. Supp. 3d 529 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Life Ins., 762 F.3d 711, 722 (8th Cir. 2014) (surcharge is available); Gearlds v. Entergy Servs. . . .