The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLIII
DOMESTIC RELATIONS

Chapter 753
SUPERVISED VISITATION

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 753

SUPERVISED VISITATION

753.01 Definitions.

753.02 Clearinghouse responsibilities and authority.

753.03 Standards for supervised visitation and supervised exchange programs.

753.04 Interim minimum standards for supervised visitation programs.

753.05 Referrals involving child sexual abuse.

753.01 Definitions.—As used in this chapter, the term:

(1) “Clearinghouse on Supervised Visitation” or “clearinghouse” means the entity within the Institute for Family Violence Studies in the School of Social Work of the Florida State University, which serves as a statewide resource on supervised visitation issues by providing technical assistance, training, and research.

(2) “Department” means the Department of Children and Families.

(3) “Exchange monitoring” means supervision of movement of a child from one parent to the other parent at the start of the visit and back to the first parent at the end of the visit.

(4) “Supervised visitation program” means a program created to offer structured contact between a parent or caregiver and one or more children in the presence of a third person responsible for observing and ensuring the safety of those involved. Supervised visitation programs may also include exchange monitoring of children who are participating in court-ordered visitation programs or exchange monitoring where there has been mutual consent between parties for the purposes of facilitating a visitation.

History.—s. 6, ch. 2007-109; s. 37, ch. 2008-61; s. 292, ch. 2014-19.

753.02 Clearinghouse responsibilities and authority.—

(1) The clearinghouse shall have the following responsibilities, subject to the availability of resources:

(a) To develop standards for supervised visitation programs in order to ensure both the quality of each program and the safety of children and families using program services.

(b) To serve as a clearinghouse on resources and research of supervised visitation programs.

(d) To compile a directory of state-supervised visitation programs containing referral information.

(e) To formulate a newsletter for supervised visitation programs.

(f) To organize workshops and conferences that address issues and concerns of supervised visitation programs.

(g) To compile data on the use of supervised visitation programs.

(2) The clearinghouse may apply for grants and accept private contributions.

History.—s. 7, ch. 2007-109.

753.03 Standards for supervised visitation and supervised exchange programs.—

(1) Within existing funds from the department, the clearinghouse shall develop standards for supervised visitation programs in order to ensure the safety and quality of each program. Standards must be uniform for all the programs and must address the purposes, policies, standards of practice, program content, security measures, qualifications of providers, training standards, credentials and background screening requirements of staff, information to be provided to the court, and data collection for supervised visitation programs.

(2) The clearinghouse shall use an advisory board to assist in developing the standards. The advisory board must include:

(a) Two members of the executive board of the state chapter of the Supervised Visitation Network, appointed by the president of the state chapter of the Supervised Visitation Network.

(b) A representative of the Office of the State Courts Administrator, appointed by the State Courts Administrator.

(d) A representative of a local law enforcement agency, appointed by the executive director of the Florida Sheriffs Association.

(e) A circuit court judge who presides over domestic violence proceedings, appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

(f) A circuit court judge who presides over dependency proceedings, appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

(g) Two representatives of a supervised visitation program, appointed by the director of the clearinghouse.

(h) A representative of the Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, appointed by the executive director of the office.

(3) The clearinghouse, in consultation with the advisory board, shall develop criteria and procedures for approving and rejecting certification applications for and monitoring compliance with the certification of a supervised visitation program. The clearinghouse shall recommend the process for phasing in the implementation of the standards and certification procedures and the criteria for distributing funds to eligible programs and designating the state entity that should certify and monitor the supervised visitation programs.

History.—s. 8, ch. 2007-109; s. 50, ch. 2011-213; s. 82, ch. 2012-5; s. 13, ch. 2020-6.

753.04 Interim minimum standards for supervised visitation programs.—

(1) Until the standards for supervised visitation and supervised exchange programs are developed pursuant to this chapter and a certification and monitoring process is fully implemented, each supervised visitation program must have an agreement with the court and comply with the Minimum Standards for Supervised Visitation Programs Agreement adopted by the Supreme Court on November 17, 1999. Under this order, a supervised visitation program shall enter into an agreement with the circuit court or circuit courts within the geographic jurisdiction of the program attesting to the willingness of the program to comply with the Supreme Court’s standards.

(2) Until the standards for supervised visitation and supervised exchange programs are completed and a certification and monitoring process is fully implemented, a supervised visitation program may not receive grant funds for access and visitation under 42 U.S.C. s. 669b unless the program provides documentation to the state agency administering the grant verifying that the program has entered into an agreement with the circuit court as required under subsection (1). This subsection does not obligate the state agency administering the grant to certify a program’s compliance with the Minimum Standards for Supervised Visitation Programs Agreement.

History.—s. 9, ch. 2007-109.

753.05 Referrals involving child sexual abuse.—

(1) Any supervised visitation program that wishes to accept referrals involving child sexual abuse must have an agreement with the court and a current affidavit of compliance on file with the chief judge of the circuit in which the program is located affirming that the program has agreed to comply with the minimum standards contained in an administrative order issued by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court on November 17, 1999, and provided the program has a written agreement with the court and with the department that contains policies and guidelines specifically related to child sexual abuse.

(2) The agreement must include provisions for the following:

(a) Program staff who supervise visits or other contact must have specific training in child sexual abuse provided through the Clearinghouse on Supervised Visitation documented in personnel files.

(b) The program must have protocols for obtaining background material on the family prior to the initiation of services.

(c) The program must accept only those child sexual abuse referrals for which staff have the requisite background material, training, and security in place to safely monitor contact.

(d) The program must decline referrals of child sexual abuse cases when staff lack necessary training or education, when background material has not been received, or when lack of security may allow revictimization of the child.

(e) The program must suspend visits in cases when the child appears to be traumatized by the visits or when the individual visiting or having other contact engages in inappropriate behavior or violates program rules.

History.—s. 10, ch. 2007-109.

F.S. 753 on Google Scholar

F.S. 753 on Casetext

Amendments to 753

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 753

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 753.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . In re Sealed Case , 121 F.3d 729, 753 (CADC 1997) ("The President's ability to withhold information from . . .

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 753, 102 S.Ct. 2690. . . . Fitzgerald , 457 U.S. at 753, 102 S.Ct. 2690. . . . Id. , at 713, 94 S.Ct. 3090 ; see also In re Sealed Case , 121 F.3d 729, 753-757 (CADC 1997) ; cf. . . . Fitzgerald , 457 U.S. 731, 751-753, 102 S.Ct. 2690, 73 L.Ed.2d 349 (1982). . . . Fitzgerald , 457 U.S. at 752-753, 102 S.Ct. 2690. . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Women's Health Center, Inc. , 512 U.S. 753, 765, 114 S.Ct. 2516, 129 L.Ed.2d 593 (1994) ). . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Colorado , 530 U.S. 703, 753, n. 3, 120 S.Ct. 2480, 147 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000) (Scalia, J., dissenting) ( . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Mandel , 408 U.S. 753, 762, 92 S.Ct. 2576, 33 L.Ed.2d 683 (1972) (similar). . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Federal Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 378, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) (concurring opinion . . . Federal Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) ; Montejo v. . . . Federal Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010), where we overruled precedent . . . for self-defense in accordance with the particular needs and desires of their citizens. 561 U.S. at 753 . . .

K. KAHLER, v. KANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 753, 126 S.Ct. 2709. . . . formulation of legal insanity" and thus the irreducible "baseline for due process." 548 U.S. at 752-753 . . . Clark , 548 U.S. at 752-753, 126 S.Ct. 2709. . . . Id. , at 753, 126 S.Ct. 2709. . . . Id. , at 753-754, 126 S.Ct. 2709. . . .

INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, v. M. SULYMA, 140 S. Ct. 768 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Nellis , 809 F.2d 753, 754-755 (CA11 1987), with Brown v. . . .

A. MCKEEVER v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 597 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 837 F.3d 753, 766-767 (C.A.7 2016) ; In re Craig , 131 F.3d 99, 105 (C.A.2 1997) ; In . . .

THOMPSON, v. HEBDON,, 140 S. Ct. 348 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Federal Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 359-360, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) ). . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . DOJ , 591 F.2d 753, 756 (D.C. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TAYLOR, v., 935 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 753, 755 (S.D. Tex. 2013). . . .

IN RE CORPORATE RESOURCE SERVICES, INC. S. v., 603 B.R. 888 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Servs., Inc ., 753 F.3d 72, 90 (2d Cir. 2014) ; Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency v. . . . Serv ., 753 F.3d at 90 )); United States v. . . .

DYROFF, v. ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC., 934 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Zuckerberg , 753 F.3d 1354, 1359-60 (D.C. . . .

DIVERSE POWER, INC. v. CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA,, 934 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . City Council of Augusta , 206 Ga. 753, 58 S.E.2d 823, 824-25 (1950) )). . . .

SCRIMO, v. LEE,, 935 F.3d 103 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Primo, 96 N.Y.2d 351, 356, 728 N.Y.S.2d 735, 753 N.E.2d 164 (2001). . . . Id. at 355, 728 N.Y.S.2d 735, 753 N.E.2d 164. . . . particularly acute" "countervailing risks of delay, prejudice and confusion," id. at 356, 728 N.Y.S.2d 735, 753 . . . .2d 164 ; so its admission "may not rest on mere suspicion or surmise," id. at 357, 728 N.Y.S.2d 735, 753 . . . analysis that governs the admissibility of all evidence," Primo, 96 N.Y.2d at 356, 728 N.Y.S.2d 735, 753 . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Saiz , 427 F.3d 745, 753 (10th Cir. 2005) (quoting Farmer , 511 U.S. at 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970 ). . . .

TURCO v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, NEW JERSEY,, 935 F.3d 155 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Women's Health Ctr., Inc. , 512 U.S. 753, 764, 114 S.Ct. 2516, 129 L.Ed.2d 593 (1994) ). . . . Id. at 715, 120 S.Ct. 2480 (citation omitted) (citing Madsen , 512 U.S. at 753, 114 S.Ct. 2516 ). . . .

BENTLEY, v. AUTOZONERS, LLC, LLC,, 935 F.3d 76 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Developers Diversified Realty Corp ., 753 F.3d 265, 271 (1st Cir. 2014) ("The extent of a worker's authority . . .

SAM K. v. SAUL,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 874 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . (R. 753). As such, he needed to build a "logical bridge" from the evidence to his conclusion. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CANO,, 934 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Osorio , 929 F.2d 753, 762 (1st Cir. 1991). . . .

S. BLEDSOE, v. VANDERBILT,, 934 F.3d 1112 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cooley, 895 F.3d 746, 753 (10th Cir. 2018) (observing that "the mere preparation of false evidence, as . . . See Warnick, 895 F.3d at 753 ; see also Fields, 740 F.3d at 1114 ("[T]he existence of a cause of action . . . Warnick, 895 F.3d at 753 (emphasis added) (quoting Bianchi v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MERRITT,, 934 F.3d 809 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012) (same); with United States v. . . .

HARVILLE, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, MISSISSIPPI,, 935 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Verizon Wireless Texas, LLC , 753 F.3d 165, 171 (5th Cir. 2014) (holding that ten months was too long . . .

UNITED STATES v. PAWLAK,, 935 F.3d 337 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 753 (S.D. . . .

DEJORIA, v. MAGHREB PETROLEUM EXPLORATION, S. A., 935 F.3d 381 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . ."); In re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Product Liability Litig. , 888 F.3d 753, 778 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CLARK,, 935 F.3d 558 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Siegel , 753 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2014), United States v. . . .

COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, v. F. MCGAHN II,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 116 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Sebelius , 753 F. . . .

IN RE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE S SUNDAY TICKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Jr. v. LLC LLC NFL LLC LLC LP LLC LLC NFL LP LLC LP LLC LP Co. LLC LP LLC, 933 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . See In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litig. , 686 F.3d at 753 (rejecting an argument that Illinois Brick did not . . .

IN RE M. STERLING,, 933 F.3d 828 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holley , 537 U.S. 280, 285, 123 S.Ct. 824, 154 L.Ed.2d 753 (2003) ("It is well established that traditional . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, INC. v. MANGAN, G. J., 933 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . FEC , 558 U.S. 310, 339, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010). . . .

LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DEERFIELD CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. J., 933 F.3d 806 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . App. 3d 441, 450, 257 Ill.Dec. 373, 753 N.E.2d 999 (2001) ). . . .

MARTINEAU, v. WIER, 934 F.3d 385 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cir. 1995) (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted); accord New Hampshire , 532 U.S. at 753 . . .

GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY v. CAPSCO INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, L. L. C., 934 F.3d 419 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Munoz , 924 F.3d 753, 760 n.3 (5th Cir. 2019). . . .

H. BURTON, v. KOHN LAW FIRM, S. C., 934 F.3d 572 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sinclair , 74 F.3d 753, 759 (7th Cir. 1996) (interpreting predecessor to Rule 807 ). . . .

DUPREE, v. FAY SERVICING, LLC, LLC,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 639 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Brink's, Inc., 102 F.3d 753, 754 (4th Cir. 1996) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ). . . .

PILLAR DYNASTY LLC, v. NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., 933 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc. , 80 F.3d 749, 753 (2d Cir. 1996) (while "[p]roof of actual confusion is . . .

MARKS JLF, a GWF, a GJH, a GJR, v. HUDSON, 933 F.3d 481 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kramer , 455 U.S. 745, 753-54, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982). . . .

PARENT PROFESSIONAL ADVOCACY LEAGUE M. W. a F. D. S. S. a S. Y. v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS J., 934 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1415(1 ) ); see also id. at 753-55. . . .

BRENDA L. v. SAUL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 858 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Barnhart, 360 F.3d 751, 753-754 (7th Cir. 2004). . . . Barnhart, 360 F.3d 751, 753-754 (7th Cir. 2004) ; Dixon v. . . .

O. CAMPOS, v. COOK COUNTY,, 932 F.3d 972 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Norton , 497 F.3d 742, 753 (7th Cir. 2007). . . . See Lewis , 523 U.S. at 845, 118 S.Ct. 1708 ; Belcher , 497 F.3d at 753 (7th Cir. 2007). . . .

CANT v. M. MOODY S. S., 933 F.3d 414 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Alexandria Women's Health Clinic , 506 U.S. 263, 269-74, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993) ; Scott . . . Bray , 506 U.S. at 270, 113 S.Ct. 753. . . .

WARREN, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,, 932 F.3d 378 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 753, 760-66 (5th Cir. 2018) (unpublished) (" Warren I "). . . .

UNITED STATES v. ESCALANTE,, 933 F.3d 395 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Delgado-Martinez , 564 F.3d 750, 753 (5th Cir. 2009) ). . . .

BREDA, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d b a, 934 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 752, 753 (9th Cir. 2018) (Mem.) . . .

JONES, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 831 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. , 753 F.2d 517, 519 (6th Cir. 1985), citing Allen v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. COLLIER,, 932 F.3d 1067 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Stephenson , 924 F.2d 753, 758 (8th Cir. 1991) ). . . .

ORDUNO, v. PIETRZAK, v., 932 F.3d 710 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holley , 537 U.S. 280, 285, 123 S.Ct. 824, 154 L.Ed.2d 753 (2003). . . .

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS, v., 933 F.3d 685 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . McClellan , 794 F.3d 743, 753 (7th Cir. 2015). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PINEDA- DUARTE,, 933 F.3d 519 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Babcock, 753 F.3d 587, 591 (6th Cir. 2014) (citing United States v. . . .

FORCE, A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F. N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. TZVI S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. v. FACEBOOK, INC., 934 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Zuckerberg , 753 F.3d 1354, 1359 (D.C. Cir. 2014) ; Ben Ezra, Weinstein, & Co., Inc. v. Am. . . . Zuckerberg , 753 F.3d 1354, 1359 (D.C. . . .

UNITED STATES v. FELDMAN,, 931 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . subject matter is what the materiality element has always done, see Prosser and Keeton on Torts § 108, at 753 . . . Prosser and Keeton on Torts § 108, at 753. . . . 1164 (same); accord Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 162(2) ; Prosser and Keaton on Torts § 108, at 753 . . . courts that decided Brown , Sorrells , and many similar cases, see Prosser and Keeton on Torts § 108, at 753 . . . Prosser and Keeton on Torts § 108, at 753; see also 1 Page on Contracts § 260, at 390 ("Such identity . . .

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION, 392 F. Supp. 3d 410 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Iroquois Mem'l Hosp., 622 F.3d 745, 753 (7th Cir. 2010) ("To be liable under § 2511(1)(c) or § 2511(1 . . .

R. THOMPSON A. v. JP MORGAN CHASE, N. A., 931 F.3d 109 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Dell Inc., 454 Mass. 192, 201, 908 N.E.2d 753 (2009) ; In re M3 Power Razor Sys. . . .

ALEXIS BAILLY VINEYARD, INC. a LLC, a v. HARRINGTON, s, 931 F.3d 774 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010), nevertheless held that the Farm . . .

CHRONIS, v. UNITED STATES, 932 F.3d 544 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 746 F.3d 753, 760 (7th Cir. 2014). . . . United States , 746 F.3d 753, 758-59 (7th Cir. 2014) (pro se claim filed using Form 95); see also https . . . United States , 746 F.3d 753, 760 (7th Cir. 2014) (elucidating the liberal standard for claims under . . .

WOODSTOCK VENTURES LC LLC, v. WOODSTOCK ROOTS, LLC, LLC d b a LLC, LLC, CHET- LP,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Magazines, Inc., 753 F.2d 14, 18 (2d Cir. 1985). . . .

POSADA, v. ACP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., 389 F. Supp. 3d 149 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Cliff Smith & Assocs., 50 Mass.App.Ct. 480, 738 N.E.2d 753, 764-65, 764 n.16, 765 n.19 (2000) (citing . . .

AL- BALUCHI a k a v. T. ESPER,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Councilman, 420 U.S. 738, 753-54, 95 S.Ct. 1300, 43 L.Ed.2d 591 (1975). . . .

RUIZ- CORTEZ, v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 931 F.3d 592 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 753(b) (describing when court reporters must transcribe court proceedings). . . .

COBA v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 932 F.3d 114 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . CTB, Inc. , 735 F.3d 750, 753-54 (8th Cir. 2013) ; Voelker v. Porsche Cars N. . . .

MARAMBO v. P. BARR,, 932 F.3d 650 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder, 647 F.3d 749, 753 (8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

DIXON, v. L. RYAN,, 932 F.3d 789 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . . §§ 13-753 to 754. . . .

TRACIE H. v. SAUL,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 990 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Berryhill , 753 F. App'x 393, 397 (7th Cir. 2018) ; Crespo v. . . .

IN RE BELMONTE, D. v. P. A., 931 F.3d 147 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Traverse (In re Traverse) , 753 F.3d 19, 29 (1st Cir. 2014) ("Just because the preserved mortgage entitles . . .

FACIANE, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA,, 931 F.3d 412 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pham , 753 F. App'x 336, 337 (5th Cir. 2019). . . .

PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION v. DEWINE, 931 F.3d 530 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Green Oak Twp. , 312 F.3d 736, 753 (6th Cir. 2002). . . . fees only if it "represents an unambiguous indication of probable success on the merits." 312 F.3d at 753 . . .

PETERSON, v. HEYMES,, 931 F.3d 546 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lucas , 753 F.3d 606, 615 (6th Cir. 2014) ; Bishop v. Hackel , 636 F.3d 757, 767 (6th Cir. 2011). . . . Robertson , 753 F.3d at 615 (emphasis in original). . . .

LOVELACE v. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, 931 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . McCrainey , 337 S.W.3d at 753 (quoting Wallace v. . . .

KOALA, v. KHOSLA,, 931 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . FEC , 558 U.S. 310, 352, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) (quoting Austin v. . . .

HEUTON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 930 F.3d 1015 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dist., 337 S.W.3d 746, 753 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011) ). . . .

HARTMAN v. THOMPSON, 931 F.3d 471 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lucas , 753 F.3d 606, 615 (6th. Cir. 2014). . . . Lucas , 753 F.3d 606, 615 (6th Cir. 2014). . . .

MATSON, v. SANDERSON FARMS, INC., 388 F. Supp. 3d 853 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Louis Cty. , 653 F.3d 745, 753-54 (8th Cir. 2011) (to state an interference claim, "the employee must . . .

ZACARIAS v. STANFORD INTERNATIONAL BANK, LIMITED, L. v. S. S. v. a a v. De v. S. v. L. v. S. C. v. WGH De De De La v. De De De v. a a De v., 931 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lehmann , 56 F.3d 750, 753 (7th Cir. 1995) ("[A] receiver does not have standing to sue on behalf of . . .

PRESQUE ISLE COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, v. HIGHMARK HEALTH, f k a f k a, 391 F. Supp. 3d 485 (W.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 753 A.2d 238, 242 (Pa. Super. 2000). . . .

IN RE A. STEWART, P., 603 B.R. 138 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 2019)

. . . In re Kallstrom , 298 B.R. 753, 761 (10th Cir. BAP 2003) ; In re Bates , 211 B.R. 338, 343 (Bankr. . . . Garner , 498 U.S. 279, 286, 111 S.Ct. 654, 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991) ; In re Kallstrom , 298 B.R. 753, 758 . . .

IN RE LICKING RIVER MINING, LLC, v. LLC,, 603 B.R. 336 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2019)

. . . See , e.g. , AutoStyle , 269 F.3d at 747-753 (affirming summary judgment dismissing recharacterization . . . AutoStyle , 269 F.3d at 753. . . .

IN RE GAULSH,, 602 B.R. 849 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . New York , 302 A.D.2d 70, 753 N.Y.S.2d 266, 269 (2002) (offset), leave to appeal denied , 1 N.Y.3d 501 . . .

TERESE F. v. SAUL,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 874 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Edidin , 845 F.2d 750, 753 (7th Cir.1988). See also Bingham v. . . .

CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 84 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Tax Analysts , 492 U.S. 136, 142, 109 S.Ct. 2841, 106 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989) ), aff'd , 753 F.3d 210 (D.C . . .

GRAVES, I. Y. M. Y. A. Y. v. A. LIOI L. Jr. I. Y. M. Y. A. Y. v. A. L. Jr., 930 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . to enforce a restraining order against her husband who later killed her daughters. 545 U.S. at 751, 753 . . . charge petitioner's ex-boyfriend with more serious crime); see also Town of Castle Rock , 545 U.S. at 753 . . . Id. at 753, 125 S.Ct. 2796. . . . Id. at 753-54, 125 S.Ct. 2796. . . .

M. RETFALVI, v. UNITED STATES, 930 F.3d 600 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 753 F.2d 33, 35 (6th Cir. 1984) ; Rowe v. United States , 583 F. . . .

HENRY, a v. HULETT,, 930 F.3d 836 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . privacy in the inside of his body rendered unreasonable a compelled surgery to obtain evidence. 470 U.S. 753 . . .

GOLAN v. FREEEATS. COM, INC. AIC LLC, R., 930 F.3d 950 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holley , 537 U.S. 280, 285, 123 S.Ct. 824, 154 L.Ed.2d 753 (2003) ; Dan B. . . .

WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, v. BERNHARDT,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1225 (D. Or. 2019)

. . . Babbitt , 529 U.S. 728, 733, 120 S.Ct. 1815, 146 L.Ed.2d 753 (2000) (quoting 48 Stat. 1269). . . .

IN RE FRICKS, TG LLC, v., 603 B.R. 506 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Bratcher (In re Bratcher) , 281 B.R. 753, 759 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2002). . . .

UNITED STATES v. RANKIN,, 929 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Olive , 804 F.3d at 753 ; see Appellant Br. at 10; Reply Br. at 1. . . . Olive , 804 F.3d at 753. It does more than merely "track the language of the statute." . . .

UNITED STATES v. STRUBBERG,, 929 F.3d 969 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . contact with minors without prior written permission of the probation office); Bender , 566 F.3d at 753 . . .

FUSARO, v. R. COGAN, C. J. A. J. Jr., 930 F.3d 241 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 340, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) (rejecting argument that, . . .

UNITED STATES v. PEREZ,, 929 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Colon-Arreola , 753 F.3d 841 (9th Cir. 2014). . . . Colon-Arreola , 753 F.3d at 844 (citing Ortega-Mendez v. . . . Colon-Arreola , 753 F.3d at 844-45 (footnote omitted). . . . section 243(c)(2), section 243(d) "requires proof of an element that § 242 does not," Colon-Arreola , 753 . . . Colon-Arreola , 753 F.3d at 844-45 (footnote omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. GURULE,, 929 F.3d 1214 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Tinnie, 629 F.3d 749, 753 (7th Cir. 2011) (observing "it is irrelevant that" the officer "decided to . . .

OVERBEY v. MAYOR OF BALTIMORE UC MPA D. C. s E. W., 930 F.3d 215 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 339, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) ("The right of citizens to . . .

PRIME RATE PREMIUM FINANCE CORPORATION, INC. v. E. LARSON, A., 930 F.3d 759 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 753 F.2d 862, 866-67 (11th Cir. 1984) (per curiam). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PEREZ,, 932 F.3d 782 (9th Cir. 2019)

UNITED STATES v. GURULE,, 935 F.3d 878 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Tinnie , 629 F.3d 749, 753 (7th Cir. 2011) (observing "it is irrelevant that" the officer "decided to . . .

UNITED STATES v. SHIPP,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 300 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Ct. 753, 199 L.Ed.2d 616 (2018), and cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S. . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,, 928 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Alumni Research Found. , 753 F.3d 1258, 1262 (Fed. Cir. 2014) )); see also Momenta Pharm., Inc. v. . . . or that it otherwise plans to take any action that would implicate the patent"); Consumer Watchdog , 753 . . . See 35 U.S.C. § 141 ; see also Consumer Watchdog , 753 F.3d at 1261 (recognizing that "where Congress . . . manufacture or sell products in the market involving the patented technology, see Consumer Watchdog , 753 . . . Alumni Research Found. , 753 F.3d 1258, 1262 (Fed. Cir. 2014). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DANIELS,, 930 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Williams , 985 F.2d 749, 753 (5th Cir. 1993) ). . . .

EUROPA EYE WEAR CORP. v. KAIZEN ADVISORS, LLC AO v. LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 228 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Z-Teca Rests., L.P. , 254 F.3d 753, 757 (8th Cir. 2001) (holding that a third party may be bound by a . . .

S. CANNON, v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 802 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Melton , 44 Cal.3d 713, 244 Cal.Rptr. 867, 750 P.2d 741, 753-54 (1988) ("Well-conceived judicial humor . . .