The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.13

7.13 Miami-Dade County.—The boundary lines of Miami-Dade County are as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of township fifty-one south, range thirty-five east; thence east following the south line of township fifty-one south, across ranges thirty-five, thirty-six, thirty-seven, thirty-eight, thirty-nine and forty east, to the southwest corner of township fifty-one south, range forty-one east; thence north on the range line dividing ranges forty and forty-one east to the northwest corner of section thirty-one, township fifty-one south, range forty-one east; thence east on the north boundary of said section thirty-one and other sections to the waters of the Atlantic Ocean; thence easterly to the eastern boundary of the State of Florida; thence southward along the coast, including the waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the gulf stream within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to a point on the reefs of Florida immediately opposite the mouth of Broad Creek (a stream separating Cayo Lago from Old Rhodes Key); thence in a direct line through the middle of said stream to a point east of Mud Point, said point being located on the east line of the west one half of section seven, township fifty-nine south, range forty east, at a distance of two thousand three hundred feet, more or less, south of the northeast corner of the west one half of said section seven being a point on the existing Miami-Dade County boundary line as established by s. 7.13; thence run southerly along the east line of the west one half of said section seven, township fifty-nine south, range forty east, to a point two thousand feet, more or less, north of the south line of said section seven; thence run westerly along a line parallel to the south line of said section seven, through the open water midway between two islands lying in the west one half of said section seven to a point on the west line of section seven, township fifty-nine south, range forty east; thence run southerly for a distance of two thousand feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of said section seven; thence run southerly along the west line of section eighteen, township fifty-nine south, range forty east, to the southwest corner of said section eighteen; thence run in a southwesterly direction along a straight line to the southwest corner of section twenty-four, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east; thence run southerly along the east line of section twenty-six, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east, to the southeast corner of said section twenty-six; thence run southerly along the east line of section thirty-five, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east, to a point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with the north line of said section thirty-five and through the open water midway between Main and Short Key; thence run westerly along a line parallel to the north line of said section thirty-five, through the open water midway between Main and Short Key to a point on the west line of section thirty-five and a point on the east line of section thirty-four, township fifty-nine south, range thirty-nine east; thence run southwesterly in a straight line to the southwest corner of the southeast quarter of said section thirty-four and the northeast corner of the northwest quarter of section three, township sixty south, range thirty-nine east; thence run southerly along the east line of the northwest quarter of said section three to the southeast corner of the northwest quarter of said section three; thence run westerly along the south line of the northwest quarter of said section three to the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of said section three; thence run westerly to a point on the northerly bank of Manatee Creek at the easterly mouth of said Manatee Creek; thence run westerly meandering the northerly bank of Manatee Creek to the intersection thereof with the west right-of-way line of United States Highway No. 1, said right-of-way line being the east boundary of the Everglades National Park and said north bank of Manatee Creek being the southerly line of the mainland of the State of Florida and the existing boundary line between Miami-Dade County and Monroe County; thence along the mainland to the range line between ranges thirty-four and thirty-five east, thence due north on said range line to place of beginning. However, the boundary lines of Miami-Dade County shall not include the following: Begin at the northwest corner of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east, Miami-Dade County, Florida; thence, southerly following the west line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east to the intersection with a line which is two hundred and thirty feet south of and parallel to the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east; thence, easterly following the line which is two hundred and thirty feet south of and parallel to the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east, to the intersection with the west boundary line of the Town of Golden Beach; thence, northerly following the west boundary line of the Town of Golden Beach to the intersection with the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east; thence, westerly following the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east to the point of beginning.

History.—s. 1, Feb. 4, 1836; s. 1, ch. 1592, 1866; s. 1, ch. 1998, 1874; RS 53; GS 51; s. 1, ch. 5970, 1909; s. 1, ch. 6934, 1915; RGS 58; CGL 64; s. 1, ch. 61-16; s. 2, ch. 78-119; s. 2, ch. 2008-4.

F.S. 7.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.13

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.13

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.13.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE MAREMONT CORPORATION,, 601 B.R. 1 (Bankr. Del. 2019)

. . . .162 7.10 Headings...162 7.11 Governing Law...162 7.12 Settlors' Representative and Cooperation...163 7.13 . . . Asbestos Trust's expense, the TAC and/or the Trustee shall resolve their dispute pursuant to Section 7.13 . . . to the proposed action, the Trustee and/or the TAC shall resolve their dispute pursuant to Section 7.13 . . . Asbestos Trust's expense, the FCR and/or the Trustee shall resolve their dispute pursuant to Section 7.13 . . . to the proposed action, the Trustee and/or the FCR shall resolve their dispute pursuant to Section 7.13 . . .

HEART RANCH, LLC, v. BERNHARDT,, 365 F. Supp. 3d 105 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . § 7.13(l)(2). . . . See 36 C.F.R. § 7.13(l)(10)(xiii) (allowing "limited changes to the transportation events allocated to . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. UNITED HEALTH PROGRAMS OF AMERICA, INC. v., 350 F. Supp. 3d 199 (E.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . $119.95 per month and available until January 2013), $128.34 for a vision and dental plan (valued at $7.13 . . .

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 259 So. 3d 754 (Fla. 2018)

. . . Aggravated assault 784.021 8.2 Battery 784.03 8.3 Assault 784.011 8.1 Comments See See Instruction 7.13 . . . negligence 784.05(2) 8.9 Culpable negligence 784.05(1) 8.9 Assault 784.011 8.1 Comments See See Instruction 7.13 . . .

MAU v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE CO., 910 F.3d 388 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . And it says that AWS is an "affiliate" of Mau "as that term is defined in Section 7.13 of the [Agreement . . .

PROUT, v. C. VLADECK P. C. C. P. C. v. J. LLP,, 319 F. Supp. 3d 741 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . that Prout's potential damages under SOX (backpay plus unvested stock) would have been approximately $7.13 . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- SUBCHAPTER LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES, 238 So. 3d 164 (Fla. 2018)

. . . It also proposes amending rules 4-7.12 (Required Content); 4-7.13 (Deceptive and Inherently Misleading . . . Location [No Change] Referrals to Other Lawyers [No Change] Language of Advertisement [No Change] RULE 4-7.13 . . .

PAYAS, v. ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM SUNBELT, INC. d b a d b a d b a M. D. d b a M. D. M. D. M. D. M. D. USF, 238 So. 3d 887 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Padovano Florida Civil Practice § 7.13 at 246, 246 (2018 ed.). . . .

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 236 So. 3d 282 (Fla. 2018)

. . . See Instruction 7.13 for the § 782.065, Fla. . . . See Instruction 7.13 for the § 782.065, Fla. . . . See Instruction 7.13 for the § 782.065, Fla. . . . See Instruction 7.13 for the § 782.065, Fla. . . . See Instruction 7.13 for the § 782.065, Fla. . . .

HEART RANCH, LLC, v. ZINKE,, 285 F. Supp. 3d 135 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . . § 7.13(1)(10)(viii) ("The Superintendent may ... make limited changes to the transportation events . . .

CALIFORNIA FINANCIAL, LLC, v. PERDIDO LAND DEVELOPMENT CO. INC., 303 F. Supp. 3d 1306 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . Section 7.13 of the Contract provides that Defendants "agree[ ] herein to remediate the [dry cleaning . . . environmental conditions affecting the Property, "except for [Defendants'] obligations as set forth in Section 7.13 . . .

AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, v. FORT LEAVENWORTH FRONTIER HERITAGE COMMUNITIES, II, LLC,, 315 F.R.D. 601 (D. Kan. 2016)

. . . Specifically, Section 7.13 of the operating agreement, as relevant here, provides: No later than Closing . . . The Sublessor is a signatory to defendant’s operating agreement, but “as to the provision of Section 7.13 . . . Defendant also asserts that Section 7.13 of its operating agreement grants Sublessor complete control . . . For example, Section 7.13 sets out Sublessor's budget approval power. . . .

FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, v. SPARKS,, 200 F. Supp. 3d 1114 (D. Mont. 2016)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7.13 (1979). This specifically includes Records of Decision. . . .

NAVAJO NATION, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR USDOI B. O., 819 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 7.13(a)-(b). . . . [NAGPRA], the Federal land manager is referred to NAGPRA and its implementing regulations.”); Id. § 7.13 . . .

NAVAJO NATION, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR USDOI B. O., 819 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 7.13(a)-(b). . . . [NAGPRA], the Federal land manager is referred to NAGPRA and its implementing regulations.”); Id. § 7.13 . . .

INDIANA PETROLEUM MARKETERS AND CONVENIENCE STORE ASSOCIATION, v. COOK,, 808 F.3d 318 (7th Cir. 2015)

. . . Association seizes on the “except as otherwise authorized” language and points to sections 7.1-3-4-3 and 7.13 . . .

IN RE MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f k a, 539 B.R. 676 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Tribune-Bankruptcy, would be 7.17%, and the weighted average mean, for reasons addressed below, would be 7.13% . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. BEDFORD CMBS ACQUISITIONS LLC, v. STS LP, LLC, LLC, Co., 626 F. App'x 341 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . The first sentence of Section 7.13 of the Pooling Agreement provides: In the event a Pooled Certificate . . . First, that same first sentence of Section 7.13 refers to a “Pooled Certificate becoming] a Defaulted . . . Second, the first paragraph of Section 7.13 concludes by specifying “that if the related Pooled Certificate . . .

D. SEARCY v. FLORIDA BAR, 140 F. Supp. 3d 1290 (N.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . Rule 4-7.13 prohibits “deceptive and inherently misleading” advertisements, defines that term, and, in . . . Rule 4-7.13(b)(2), gives as a specific example of prohibited material “references to past results unless . . . They also initially asserted that Rule 4-7.13 is unconstitutionally vague. . . . Florida Bar Rule 4-7.13 (emphasis added). . . . Florida Bar Rule 4-7.13, Comment (emphasis added). . . .

IN RE TRANS- INDUSTRIES, INC. J. v. S., 538 B.R. 323 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2015)

. . . Id. at 4-5 (citing Ex. 5 (Jan. 11, 2004 Prototype Plan) at §§ 7.1(c), 7.13. . . . Section 7.13 of the Jan. 11, 2004 Prototype Plan provides in its entirety: The Employer agrees to indemnify . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. JOHNSON,, 122 F. Supp. 3d 272 (M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . Here, the odds ratios were 6.0 for Highway 49, 7.13 for Highway 70, and 6.5 for Highway 87. . . . 10.17% 7.13% Vehicle Equipment 21 7.42% 8.08% ■ Vehicle Registration 23 9.87% ' 7.68% Total 251 (Id. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR BIENNIAL PETITION, 167 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 2015)

. . . or-placing the lawyer-on the inactive-list-f&r incapacity not related to misconduct as provided in rule 3-7.13 . . .

ESTATE OF HEENAN, HEENAN, v. CITY OF MADISON In, 111 F. Supp. 3d 929 (W.D. Wis. 2015)

. . . Schwartz, Section 1983 Litigation: Claims and Defenses § 7.13[C] (4th ed.2015); see also Thomas v. . . .

IN RE MORTGAGE FUND LLC, L. v. LLC,, 527 B.R. 351 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . In addition, LSA § 7.13 required that R.E. . . . However,' LSA § 7.13 exempted transfers designated as “Permitted Dispositions,” which LSA § 1.1 defined . . . LSA § 7.13 required that R.E. . . . In addition, the bankruptcy court properly found that LSA § 7.13’s restrictions did not apply to the . . . LSA § 7.13 exempted transfers designated as “Permitted Dispositions,” which' LSA § 1.1 defined as “a . . .

IN RE OPUS EAST, LLC L. LLC, v. LLC, a A f b o f b o P. VII, L. P. VIII, L. P. P. LLC M. LLC LLC P. C. LLC LLC LLC LLC AE, 528 B.R. 30 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . P-100 at § 8.8, P-101 at §§ 2.1, 2.3 & 7.13, P-102 at §§ 2.1, 2.4 & 7.12; JPTO at § IV, ¶¶23, 24, 44 . . .

UNITED STATES v. RICHARDSON,, 597 F. App'x 328 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions 7.13. . . . .

In POLYURETHANE FOAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 86 F. Supp. 3d 769 (N.D. Ohio 2015)

. . . (Id. at § 7.13.) There is no real dispute that FXI continued Foamex’s turnkey business. . . .

RUBENSTEIN P. A. v. FLORIDA BAR K., 72 F. Supp. 3d 1298 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . Rule 4-7.13, Rules Reg. Fla. Bar (2013) (the “Rules”). . . . Rule 4-7.13(b)(2). . . . the prior opinion, the Florida Bar Board of Governors issued guidelines on interpretation of Rule 4-7.13 . . . Rule 4-7.13 on its own terms restricts only “deceptive or inherently misleading advertisements,” implying . . . The Bar is ENJOINED from enforcing Rules 4-7.13 and 4-7.14 as restated in the Guidelines to completely . . .

RUBENSTEIN P. A. v. FLORIDA BAR K., 69 F. Supp. 3d 1331 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . require the inclusion of more information than most types of advertising in order to comply with Rules 4r-7.13 . . . the prior opinion, the Florida Bar Board of Governors issued guidelines on interpretation of Rule 4 — 7.13 . . . results guidelines adopted by The Florida Bar Board of Governors and therefore do not comply with Rule 4-7.13 . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. TSARNAEV,, 53 F. Supp. 3d 443 (D. Mass. 2014)

. . . Joost, 94 F.3d 640, at *8 (1st Cir.1996) (table) (no violation where absolute disparity was 7.13%); Hafen . . .

VEASEY, v. PERRY,, 71 F. Supp. 3d 627 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Senate Rules 7.08, 7.13 (2011). . Senate Rule 7.13 (2011). . . . .

MERIT CONSTRUCTION ALLIANCE v. CITY OF QUINCY,, 759 F.3d 122 (1st Cir. 2014)

. . . see id. 7.04(l)(b)(l)-(4); wage rates, see id. 7.04(l)(b)(5); recordkeeping, see id. 7.04(l)(b)(23), 7.13 . . .

WESTERN HOME TRANSPORT, INC. v. HEXCO, LLC d b a HC, 28 F. Supp. 3d 959 (D.N.D. 2014)

. . . Allan Farnsworth, Farnsworth on Contracts § 7.13 (3d ed.2004). .One pre-Fink case would suggest that . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR BIENNIAL REPORT, 140 So. 3d 541 (Fla. 2014)

. . . who have retired, resigned, been disbarred, or been classified as inactive members pursuant to rule 3-7.13 . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. DAVIDSON KEMPNER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, LLC, STS LP, CMBS LLC, Co., 32 F. Supp. 3d 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Pursuant to section 7.13 of the Pooling Agreement, the Directing Securityholder has an assignable option . . . defaulted security as determined by the trustee in accordance with the procedures outlined in section 7.13 . . . See id. § 7.13. . Id. . Id. . Id. . See Comply ¶ 15. . See id. . Id. ¶ 16. . See id. ¶ 17. . . . .

YATES, MJG- S. MJG- MJG- Ed MJG- MJG- D. LLC W. F. MJG- MJG- J. MJG- J. MJG- LLC MJG- LLC MJG- L. L. F. LLC MJG- S. MJG- J. MJG- MJG- MJG- v. MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE EQUITY, LLC M. L. RBC LLC. K. C. C. S. A. S. N. Jr. O. S. M. A. B. W. III B., 744 F.3d 874 (4th Cir. 2014)

. . . The price of MuniMae shares dropped an additional 22.416%, to $7.13 per share, on January 30, again on . . .

IN RE J. C. HOUSEHOLDER LAND TRUST, 502 B.R. 602 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Background The Debtor owns 7.13 acres of land in Plant City, Florida, consisting of a 30,420 square-foot . . .

BELIZE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED, v. GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE,, 5 F. Supp. 3d 25 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . Ghandi (“Ghandi Deck”), Ex. 8 ¶ 7.13 (Notice of Arbitration) [Dkt. # 15-10]. . . .

IN RE J. C. HOUSEHOLDER LAND TRUST, 501 B.R. 441 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . The Property The Debtor’s real estate business consists of a 7.13-acre parcel of land in Plant City, . . .

GONZALEZ, s v. SEARS HOLDING COMPANY a k a s, 980 F. Supp. 2d 170 (D.P.R. 2013)

. . . See ECF Nos. 35-1, ¶¶ 10-11; 51-1, ¶¶ 1.10-1.11, 1.13-1.14, 7.13-7.15, 10-11; 63-1, ¶¶ 1.10-1.11.1.13 . . . -1.14, 7.13-7.15. . . . See ECF Nos. 51-1, ¶¶ 1.7, 1.9, 1.12, 1.14-1.15, 7.13-7.14, 7.16-7.17; 63-1, ¶¶ 1.7, 1.9, 1.12, 1.14- . . . 1.15, 7.13-7.14, 7.16-7.17. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. ERICKSON, 962 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . Civil Jury Instr. 7.12 & 7.13 (2009). 2. . . .

FLOYD, a v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 959 F. Supp. 2d 540 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Id. (6/12/08 at 7.13-8.10). . Id. (6/12/08 at 12.10-13.28). . Id. (11/8/08 at 13.09-14.36). . . . .

MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. PATRIARCH PARTNERS VIII, LLC, a LD LLC, a, 950 F. Supp. 2d 568 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . See PX-5 at § 7.13(a). . . . DX-239 § 7.13. . . . PX-5 §§ 12.1,11, 7.13(a)-(b). . . . PX-5 § 7.13(a) & (b). . . . See PX-5 §§ 1.1, 7.13(b). . . .

SURMODICS, INC. v. SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE,, 940 F. Supp. 2d 938 (D. Minn. 2013)

. . . See Agreement § 7.13(b). . . . See Agreement § 7.13(c). . . . Agreement § 7.13(d)(i). . . . Agreement § 7.13(d) © (2). . . . And § 7.13 further provides that “[a]ll payments to be made by Brookwood pursuant to this Section 7.13 . . .

J. DENNISON, v. MONY LIFE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES,, 710 F.3d 741 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . Allan Farnsworth, Farnsworth on Contracts § 7.13, pp. 329-30 (3d ed. 2004); Restatement (Second) of Contracts . . .

In MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f k a v. N. A., 486 B.R. 596 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Collateral Agreement § 7.13 (Duker Aff. Exh. H). . Collateral Agreement § 4.03. . . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- SUBCHAPTER LAWYER ADVERTISING RULES, 108 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 2013)

. . . The Bar suggests numbering the new rules 4-7.1 through 4-7.13. . . . cases, we number the new rules as follows: 4-7.11 (Application of Rules); 4-7.12 (Required Content); 4-7.13 . . . Second, we modify proposed new rule 4-7.13(b)(10) regarding the use of a judicial, executive, or legislative . . . RULE 4-7.13 DECEPTIVE AND INHERENTLY MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENTS A lawyer may not engage in deceptive or . . . firm name, because it is misleading where the law firm employs no associates in violation of rule 4-7.13 . . .

NEUROAXIS NEUROSURGICAL ASSOCIATES, PC, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE COMPANY, PC, v. PC, v., 919 F. Supp. 2d 345 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . the plaintiff argues that Aetna is barred from relying on any Plan’s anti-assignment clause because § 7.13 . . . Section 7.13 states that [Aetna] shall recognize all valid assignments by Plan Members of Plan benefits . . . Accordingly, Neuroaxis must raise Aetna’s purported failure to comply with § 7.13 of the 2003 Settlement . . . Agreement with the “Compliance Dispute Facilitator,” and may not rely on § 7.13 in litigation before . . .

FRANCO, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., 289 F.R.D. 121 (D.N.J. 2013)

. . . See NJ.A.C. 11:21-7.13. . . . .

In PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, LLC, H., 690 F.3d 161 (3d Cir. 2012)

. . . See Plan §§ 5.04, 7.09, 7.11, 7.13 (establishing the distribution account, and detailing powers and duties . . .

In PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, LLC, H., 690 F.3d 161 (3d Cir. 2012)

. . . See Plan §§ 5.04, 7.09, 7.11, 7.13 (establishing the distribution account, and detailing powers and duties . . .

CHESEMORE, v. ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, INC. A. H. I. B. A. LLC, 886 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (W.D. Wis. 2012)

. . . AHI then assigned 92.87% of the promissory note from the Trachte ESOP to AH Transition, and 7.13% to . . .

In MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE EQUITY, LLC, SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 876 F. Supp. 2d 616 (D. Md. 2012)

. . . The price of MuniMae shares fell further, to $7.13 per share. Compl. ¶¶ 44, 241. F. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR BIANNUAL REPORT, 101 So. 3d 807 (Fla. 2012)

. . . Supreme Court of Florida); 3-7.9 (Consent Judgment); 3-7.10 (Reinstatement and Readmission Procedures); 3-7.13 . . . placing the lawyer on the inactive list for incapacity not related to misconduct as provided in rule 3-7.13 . . . RULE 3-7.13. INCAPACITY NOT RELATED TO MISCONDUCT (a)[No Change] (b) Applicable Rules of Procedure. . . .

WYOMING, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR v. v., 674 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 7.13(l)(2) (2000). . . .

UNITED STATES a a Nu a v. CITY OF NEW YORK, A, 847 F. Supp. 2d 395 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Tables A-7-A-7.13; note potential discrepancy between Table A-8 Part 1 entries for average earnings adjusted . . .

BAZILE, v. CITY OF HOUSTON,, 858 F. Supp. 2d 718 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . the 157 firefighters promoted to captain based on the January exam; and a mean score of 73.35, with a 7.13 . . .

MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. PATRIARCH PARTNERS VIII, LLC, a LD LLC, a, 842 F. Supp. 2d 682 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Notes (1) be rated at least Baa3 by Moody’s and BBB-by Standard & Poor’s as contemplated by Section 7.13 . . . stating that Patriarch, and not MBIA, prepared the “sources and uses” chart and that under Section 7.13 . . . MBIA disputes this conclusion and contends that the parties did not intend to incorporate Section 7.13 . . . The Defendants claim that this condition, and specifically the words “as contemplated by Section 7.13 . . . As a result, MBIA alleged that, pursuant to Section 7.13(b)(4) of the Indenture, the unrated portion . . .

MAHNKE, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY,, 821 F. Supp. 2d 125 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . See also Instruction 7.13, “Pedestrian’s Duty When Crossing Streets” ("Before attempting • to cross a . . .

CANDYCE MARTIN IRREVOCABLE TRUST, v. UNITED STATES, 822 F. Supp. 2d 968 (N.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . Goodyear 1997 Irrevocable Trust and Candyce Martin 1999 Irrevocable Trust having partnership interests of 7.13% . . .

FRANCO, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., 818 F. Supp. 2d 792 (D.N.J. 2011)

. . . . § 11:21-7.13. . . .

PEC MINERALS LP, v. CHEVRON U. S. A., 439 F. App'x 413 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . Anderson, Hemingway Oil and Gas Law and Taxation at § 7.13(D), 395-97. . . .

In CRESCENT RESOURCES, LLC, v. E., 463 B.R. 423 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . relevant plan language in the court’s Order Granting the Motion to Dismiss, first discussing Section 7.13 . . .

LABORATORY SKIN CARE, INC. v. LIMITED BRANDS, INC. LLC,, 757 F. Supp. 2d 431 (D. Del. 2010)

. . . LR 7.13(c)(2). . . .

WILSON, Jr. v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 730 F. Supp. 2d 140 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . . § 7.13(c)(6), for the redaction of employee names. Mr. Wilson does not contest this exemption. . . .

BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 607 F.3d 570 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . and other modifications reduced the “direct wetland impacts” of the proposed Stillwater project from 7.13 . . . result of these and other changes, the “direct wetland impacts” of the proposed site were reduced from 7.13 . . .

BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 620 F.3d 936 (9th Cir. 2010)

A. BURNS, v. ORTHOTEK INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN AND TRUST, D. LLC, D. D. Jr., 695 F. Supp. 2d 859 (N.D. Ind. 2010)

. . . See § 7.13 Designation of Beneficiary; Qualified Election, ORT 1.0118 [Exh. Ato DE 38, p. 68 of 96], . . .

FENDI ADELE S. R. L. S. R. L. v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORP. v. BC, d b a LLC,, 689 F. Supp. 2d 585 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . a)(2) fluctuated from a low of 4 percent per annum to a high of 10 percent, averaging approximately 7.13 . . . Here, the average underpayment rate from 1993 to 2008 (approximately 7.13 percent per annum, see supra . . . The general underpayment rate, which averaged approximately 7.13 percent per annum during the prejudgment . . . non-corporate underpayment rate for the disgorgement period, rounded to the nearest hundredth of a percent, is 7.13 . . .

HEMI GROUP, LLC, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 559 U.S. 1 (U.S. 2010)

. . . James, Law of Torts §7.13, p. 584 (1956) (explaining that, ordinarily, “all intended consequences” of . . .

WELLS FARGO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, v. UNITED STATES,, 91 Fed. Cl. 35 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . (PX1014 at 11508, Cal-trans Lot 1, 7.12%; PX1014 at 11534, Cal-trans Lot 2, 7.13%; PX829 at 37385, NJT . . .

WYOMING a k a a k a A. a k a a k a a k a A. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR a k a a k a a k a s Of, 587 F.3d 1245 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 7.13(0(2) (2000). . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR, 24 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Referee); 3-7.7 (Procedures Before Supreme Court of Florida); 3-7.11 (General Rules of Procedure); 3-7.13 . . . RULE 3-7.13 INCAPACITY NOT RELATED TO MISCONDUCT (a) Proceedings Without Adjudication of Incompetence-or . . .

CAROLINA ACQUISITION, LLC, v. DOUBLE BILLED, LLC,, 627 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . ¶¶ 3.4(b), 3.8, 7.13), which they should have known about; made representations about safety and seaworthiness . . .

LPP MORTGAGE, LTD. v. SUGARMAN,, 565 F.3d 28 (1st Cir. 2009)

. . . See 2 Farnsworth on Contracts § 7.13 (detailing importance of course of dealing and performance in contract . . .

NOVONEURON INC. a v. ADDICTION RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. a, 326 F. App'x 505 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . The ambiguity in the contract is further apparent when reading Section 7.13 to the Agreement, which indicates . . . Section 7.13 would make little sense if it was construed to mean that the Agreement could be enforced . . . In light of the apparent inconsistencies between Sections 7.6 and 7.13 and courts’ obligation to give . . .

WHITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. a a v. MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. a LLC, a, 633 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Section 7.13 of the MSA expressly provides that during the term of the Agreement, Martin Marietta shall . . .

In CUTTER, II, II, v. v., 398 B.R. 6 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008)

. . . shall be made to the beneficiaries of the trust subject to the limitation in Paragraph 6.[] Paragraph 7.13 . . . Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraphs 5.00 and 7.13, Paragraph 8.00 purports to prohibit Debtor . . . of Paragraph 8.00 are substantially inconsistent with the provisions of Paragraphs 5.00, 7.00, and 7.13 . . . See ¶ 7.13 of the Trust. . . . Under paragraph 7.13, he had the power to invade the Trust corpus for “emergencies related to [his] health . . .

J. THABAULT, v. CHAIT, LLP LLP,, 541 F.3d 512 (3d Cir. 2008)

. . . The District Court denied this request and adopted New Jersey Model Civil Charge 7.13 entitled “Proximate . . .

J. KRAUSS S. v. OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC. N. Y., 517 F.3d 614 (2d Cir. 2008)

. . . Code § ll:21-7.13(a) (defining “reasonable and customary” charges for small business health plans as . . .

T. SKRETVEDT, v. E. I. DuPONT DE NEMOURS COMPANY INCORPORATED, a, 260 F. App'x 531 (3d Cir. 2008)

. . . Those interest rates are: 9.54% for 1995, 6.89% for 1996, 7.34% for 1997, 7.13% for 1998, 5.59% for 1999 . . .

B. THOMPSON, v. FLORIDA BAR,, 526 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Thompson alleges that the Florida Bar has violated Rule 3-7.13 by not following its mandated procedures . . . concerning an attorney who is impaired or incompetent, see Complaint at ¶ 60, but Rule 3-7.13, by its . . .

THE FUND FOR ANIMALS, v. NORTON,, 512 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . . §§ 7.13(l)(3)(ii), 7.13(l)(4)(vii), 7.21(a)(3)(h), 7.21(a)(4)(vii), 7.22(g)(3)(ii). . . .

DELGADO, v. M. DENNEHY,, 503 F. Supp. 2d 411 (D. Mass. 2007)

. . . Joost, 94 F.3d 640, 1996 WL 480215 (1st Cir.1996) (table) (absolute disparity of 7.13% found permissible . . .

P. NEIMARK, v. RONAI RONAI, LLP,, 500 F. Supp. 2d 338 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . see Shapiro & Son Bedspread, 764 F.2d at 74 n. 5 (citing Beacon Looms, 552 F.Supp. 1305; 2 Nimmer § 7.13 . . . ruling empties that statutory requirement of any content, and thus, is to be disfavored. 2 Nimmer § 7.13 . . . See, e.g., 2 Nimmer § 7.13[B][3] at 7-127 to 7-128 ("If such omission was deliberate, it must be immediately . . .

CAMPBELL, v. JOHNSON, t, 465 F. Supp. 2d 597 (E.D. Va. 2006)

. . . Per DOP 866-7.13, an inmate must first attempt to resolve any issues informally. . . . See DOP 866-7.13. . . .

WACHTEL, v. HEALTH NET, INC. v., 239 F.R.D. 81 (D.N.J. 2006)

. . . . § 11:21-7.13(a). . . . N.J.A.C. § 11:21-7.13(a)(2). . This is a disputed issue on the merits. . . .

HALLIBURTON COMPANY BENEFITS COMMITTEE, In Co. v. GRAVES M. a, 463 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . serving on the Board of Directors of [Halliburton] who are designated by [Dresser] pursuant to Section 7.13 . . . commencing at the Effective Time (the “Three Year Period”) to enforce the provisions of Sections 7.09 and 7.13 . . . third-party beneficiaries, certain directors are entitled “to enforce the provisions of Sections 7.09 and 7.13 . . .

In ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., 348 B.R. 136 (D. Del. 2006)

. . . Trustees...........................203 7.12 Manner of Payment under the Plan..........................203 7.13 . . . AWI (as the case may be), by check drawn on a domestic bank or by wire transfer from a domestic bank. 7.13 . . .

GASKINS, v. M. JOHNSON,, 443 F. Supp. 2d 800 (E.D. Va. 2006)

. . . Per DOP 866-7.13, an inmate must first attempt to resolve any issues informally. . . . See DOP 866-7.13. . . .

ELLIOTT FRANTZ, INC. v. INGERSOLL- RAND COMPANY, 457 F.3d 312 (3d Cir. 2006)

. . . Allan Farnsworth, Contracts §§ 7.12, 7.13 at 461-76 (4th ed.2004). . . .

GOLDBLATT v. ENGLANDER COMMUNICATIONS, L. L. C., 431 F. Supp. 2d 420 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Agreement, § 7.13. . . . .

ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO. v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF GENERAL EMPLOYEES TRUST FUND Co., 175 F. App'x 118 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . district court reasoned correctly that the arbitration permitted by the Trust Indenture, in Section 7.13 . . . The district court was correct that Section 7.13 applies only to the other part of the dispute—the part . . . objection and because the delinquent contributions claim was properly arbitrated pursuant to Section 7.13 . . . arbitration (albeit along with a claim on a different matter that was arbitrable but not covered by Section 7.13 . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. MATTHEWS,, 440 F.3d 818 (6th Cir. 2006)

. . . The instruction given by the district court is similar to Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 7.13 . . .

In STONEPATH GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 397 F. Supp. 2d 575 (E.D. Pa. 2005)

. . . As a result, the previously reported 2003 profit of $7.13 million would be replaced by a loss of $670,000 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR, 916 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 2005)

. . . who have retired, resigned, been disbarred, or been classified as inactive members pursuant to rule 3-7.13 . . .

FUND FOR ANIMALS, v. NORTON, v., 390 F. Supp. 2d 12 (D.D.C. 2005)

. . . . §§ 7.13, 7.21, 7.22). . . .

HOLDEN, v. DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP,, 390 F. Supp. 2d 752 (N.D. Ill. 2005)

. . . moved to stay the action, or in the alternative, for dismissal, and to compel arbitration pursuant to § 7.13 . . . Section 7.13 of the SPA provides in relevant part that: (a)(i) Any controversy or claim arising out of . . . (D.E. 95, Ex. 1 (SPA § 7.13) (the “Arbitration Clause”).) . . . The Arbitration Agreement modifies the arbitration procedures set forth in § 7.13 of the SPA. . . .

BRANDAID MARKETING CORPORATION. v. S. S. v., 418 F. Supp. 2d 329 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . (Tr. at 52; JPTO ¶ 7.13; DX 32; see also DX 31.) . . .

In CO- INVESTMENT, L. P. v. Co., 319 B.R. 495 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . LJM2 Plan, § 7.13. . . .