Cases from cite.case.law:

DAVIS, v. BRUHASPATI, INC. d b a G. E., 917 So. 2d 350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Gregory Carter, also known as Gary Carter, pumped gas costing $17.60 into the vehicle he was driving . . .

OUTDOOR MEDIA GROUP, INC. LLC, v. CITY OF BEAUMONT, 374 F. Supp. 2d 881 (C.D. Cal. 2005)

. . . Former Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 17.60 (“Chapter 17.60”); B. . . . Ordinance No. 856, repealing Chapter 17.60 of the Beaumont Municipal Code and adopting Ordinance Chapter . . . Ordinance No. 856 superceded Chapter 17.60. . . . For the court to declare Chapter 17.60 invalid and to enjoin its enforcement would be an idle judicial . . . To adjudicate the constitutionality of Chapter 17.60 would conflict with the Court’s holding in Church . . .

In MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO. INC., 283 F. Supp. 2d 838 (E.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . On November 27, 2002, MSC’s stock closed at $17.60 per share. . . .

WEIZEORICK, v. ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INCORPORATED, a, 337 F.3d 827 (7th Cir. 2003)

. . . $92,447.92, but with a provision that the amount would be adjusted by a per diem interest rate of $17.60 . . .

SUGARMAN, v. VILLAGE OF CHESTER,, 213 F. Supp. 2d 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . January 15 through the Fee Application Bergstein $240 per hour * 90.75 $21,780.00 Ullrich $215 per hour * 17.60 . . .

DRG FUNDING CORPORATION, v. SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,, 76 F.3d 1212 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

. . . . §§ 101 or 103. 24 CFR § 17.60(b). . . .

Z. MATEO, R. D. U. T. E. N. B. B. B. C. P. L. M. V. B. Q. v. M S KISO, In Co. S. A. Co. Co., 41 F.3d 1283 (9th Cir. 1994)

. . . accrued vacation time because they were entitled to, but did not receive, a subsistence allowance of $17.60 . . . Annex 2 of the Agreement reads simply, “[Djaily subsistence allowance whilst on paid leave — US$ 17.60 . . . the appellants’ argument involves an attempt to graft one part of the Agreement they like, viz., the $17.60 . . . , the appellants did not assert their dubious — and ultimately rejected — claim to the Agreement’s $17.60 . . . The appellants do not challenge the appellee's assertion that the Agreement's $17.60 per diem subsistence . . .

J. PARIS, v. BROWN,, 6 Vet. App. 75 (Vet. App. 1993)

. . . . § 17.60(f) (1993) (emphasis added). . . .

WORD OF FAITH WORLD OUTREACH CENTER CHURCH, INC. a G. v. MORALES,, 787 F. Supp. 689 (W.D. Tex. 1992)

. . . ’s Office asserts its authority to investigate and inspect documents under the auspices of Sections 17.60 . . . Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.60, 17.61 (Vernon’s 1992 Supp.). . . . Sections 17.60 and 17.61 of the DTPA give the Attorney General unfettered discretion to inquire into . . . Section 17.60 allows the Consumer Protection Division of the Office of the Attorney General to require . . . Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 17.60 (emphasis added). . . .

F. KNIGHT, Jr. S. T. D. S. S. Jr. L. Dr. W. Y. N. S. Dr. Jr. v. STATE ALABAMA M. Jr. S. Jr. B. H. J. P. Dr. D. III, F. A. A. Sr. A. G. A M W. Dr. A M Jr. W. M. H. B. L. A. R. C. Dr. V. Dr. E. B. F. W. Jr. W. T. Jr. R. R. E. W. A. C. J. D. Jr. T. B. Jr. O. H. Jr. T. Jr. E. G. Jr. S. H. Jr. B. Dr. A. UNITED STATES v. STATE OF ALABAMA A M a a a a a a a a a a, 787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Ala. 1991)

. . . 5.82, respectively, while doctoral level courses in engineering and nursing are both given weights of 17.60 . . . instruction costs for the school, whereas a student in a three-hour graduate course with a weight of 17.60 . . . Nursing, Health 2.74 5.82 17.60 5. Engineering/Architecture 2.07 5.46 17.60 6. . . . Science 1.29 5.36 17.60 9. Military Science 0.12 xx xx 10. Law xx 2.31 XX 11. . . .

GEHMAN, v. GRAVIS,, 39 Fla. Supp. 2d 126 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . He is a full time resident of the park and testified his bills have since averaged $17.60 a month. . . . He chose 1979, after the inflationary 70’s, as the base year and the $17.60, which Mr. . . . $89.09 12.2 $2.91 82 $105 -0-$105 $13 $96.62 14.1 $8.38 83 $135 -0-$135 $30 $100.24 28.5 $34.76 84 $135 $17.60 . . . $152.60 $17.60 $104.38 13.0 $48.22 85 $145 $17.60 $162.60 $10 $108.11 6.6 $54.49 86 $155 $17.60 $172.60 . . . $10 $112.13 6.2 $60.29 87 $165 $17.60 $182.60 $10 $113.92 5.8 $68.86 He is of the opinion that there . . .

CARLOCK, Co. T. I. C. E. v. PILLSBURY COMPANY, Co. HDF HDI WSC DWYER, Co. v. PILLSBURY COMPANY, Co. HDF HDI WSC, 719 F. Supp. 791 (D. Minn. 1989)

. . . 1985 1986 From Woodbridge From Tulare San Francisco 17.78 17.03 Seattle 17.78 17.22 Portland 18.16 17.60 . . .

KNOP, II, T. v. M. JOHNSON, Jr., 712 F. Supp. 571 (W.D. Mich. 1989)

. . . 86 Witness fee $ 30.00 Trial 6-3-86 Witness fee 30.00 Food 29.00 Trial 6-4-86 Witness fee 30.00 Food 17.60 . . . Witness fee 30.00 Food 3.31 Hotel 498.76 Total $668.67 Wilber Trial 6-5-86 Witness fee $ 30.00 Food 17.60 . . .

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF KING, v. R. PIERCE, t, 701 F. Supp. 844 (D.D.C. 1988)

. . . . § 17.60 et seq.” HACK then wrote directly to HUD’s headquarters in Washington. . . .

DILLARD, v. CRENSHAW COUNTY,, 649 F. Supp. 289 (M.D. Ala. 1986)

. . . This county has a population of approximately 119,761, 17.60% of whom are black. . . .

DILLARD, v. CRENSHAW COUNTY,, 640 F. Supp. 1347 (M.D. Ala. 1986)

. . . as follows: Total Black Percent Black County Population Population Population Calhoun 119,761 21,074 17.60% . . .

CAIN BULTMAN, INC. a v. MISS SAM, INC. a A. J., 409 So. 2d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . practical aspects of agreements for deeds, see The Florida Bar, 1 Florida Real Property Practice, §§ 17.59-17.60 . . .

In L. REYNOLDS, M., 17 B.R. 489 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1981)

. . . $8,596.55, which along with a finance charge of $3,438.49 calculated at an annual percentage rate of 17.60% . . . $7,330.00 and that this amount plus “present value” calculated at the contractual annual percentage rate of 17.60% . . . should be calculated at the annual percentage rate agreed to by the parties in the contract to wit: 17.60% . . . as to the appropriate compensation charge there is a presumption that the existing contract rate of 17.60% . . . the plan shall pay to GMAC the principal amount of the allowed claim plus the contract interest of 17.60% . . .

CITY OF PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS, v. UNITED STATES, 517 F. Supp. 987 (D.D.C. 1981)

. . . According to the 1980 Census statistics, Mexican-Americans accounted for 17.60% of the inhabitants of . . .

Dr. H. W. BERRY v. M. COOPER, 577 F.2d 322 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . Under a different measure, blacks are underrepresented by 31.28% on the traverse list and 17.60% on the . . .

In PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, In OPINION APPROVING PLAN OF REORGANIZATION, 458 F. Supp. 1234 (E.D. Pa. 1978)

. . . The tax claimant receives (subject to certain rounding principles) $26.40 in cash; $17.60 in Series D . . .

BALLARD, v. SPRADLEY, ADAMS, v. J. C. COMBS, G. S. FUNDAK, Jr. v. L. WAINWRIGHT, JENNINGS, Jr. v. G. S. FORTNER, M. R. L. HUTCHINS, v. COWARD, M. L. S. L. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, 557 F.2d 476 (5th Cir. 1977)

. . . Of this total, 2,079, or 17.60%, were filed in district courts within this circuit. . . .

COLEMAN MOTOR CO. a v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, 525 F.2d 1338 (3d Cir. 1975)

. . . 5.88 6.16 1965 51.86 22.15 15.26 6.56 4.32 6.41 1966 49.01 24.01 16.52 7.28 3.45 7.01 1967 50.50 20.73 17.60 . . .

PETROLEUM EXPLORATION, v. UNITED STATES, 404 F. Supp. 93 (N.D.W. Va. 1975)

. . . 20th trial that the representative wellhead price of natural gas in the Clay-Knox Field was 15.90 and 17.60 . . . record here made further shows that the Government’s suggested representative market price of 15.9 to' 17.60 . . .

PLASTIC MASTERS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 512 F.2d 449 (6th Cir. 1975)

. . . reimbursement: (1) May — $45.00 at overtime rates; (2) Hill-man- — either $20.80 or $22.00; (3) Maak— $17.60 . . .

LOCKETT v. HELLENIC SEA TRANSPORTS, LTD. FORD v. HELLENIC SEA TRANSPORTS, LTD., 60 F.R.D. 469 (E.D. Pa. 1973)

. . . , and the defendant is seeking reimbursement for a copy of that deposition in the modest amount of $17.60 . . . Under the circumstances, it is well within this Court’s discretion to allow the defendant its $17.60 . . .

HARRINGTON v. COLQUITT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION E. E. Jr. W., 460 F.2d 193 (5th Cir. 1972)

. . . of Moultrie not included in the school board’s plan was from 82.40 to 99.58% white and from .42 to 17.60% . . . Culbertson 99.58 Okapileo 86.92 Reedy Creek 82.40 Sunset 95.80 Funston 86.17 .42 69.4 30.6 13.08 70.5 29.5 17.60 . . .

L. LOWRY, v. WHITAKER CABLE CORPORATION,, 348 F. Supp. 202 (W.D. Mo. 1972)

. . . $15.36 23 $ 353.28 June 8, '68-May 7, '69 $1,965 $15.72 237 $3,725.64 May 8, '69-Jun. 23, '69 $2.20 $17.60 . . .

H L LAND COMPANY, a v. WARNER,, 258 So. 2d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . See §§ 3.6 and 17.60, Florida Real Property Practice I (2nd ed. 1971). . . .

IGLINSKY v. H. FINCH,, 314 F. Supp. 425 (W.D. La. 1970)

. . . per month ($35.00 per week), but was reduced pursuant to the statutory formula in the amount of only $17.60 . . .

GOLDLAWR, INCORPORATED v. J. SHUBERT, 290 F. Supp. 482 (E.D. Pa. 1968)

. . . from season to season, the average number of theatres operating in New York City was 33.35 of which 17.60 . . .

AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, BRISTOL- MYERS COMPANY v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, CHAS. PFIZER CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, OLIN MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORPORATION, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, UPJOHN COMPANY, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 363 F.2d 757 (6th Cir. 1966)

. . . Eventually we decided to come down and meet it and our current price is $17.60 less 2 percent or a net . . . The unit price secured from Pfizer on that order was $17.60. But Lederle bid $19.58. Mr. Duncan. . . . But I see here that your old price to the Government was $17.60, which you and the others seem to have . . . They did not get any bid for $17.60 anywhere to MMSA, if that is what you are talking about. . . . There is not a $17.60 bid on exhibit 21. On tablets, at least. Mr. Weeden. . . .

CHICAGO COPPER CHEMICAL COMPANY, a v. APEX MINING COMPANY, a L., 226 F. Supp. 941 (E.D. Mo. 1964)

. . . The same ore with up to 3 % iron content would have cost $17.60 ($15.50 plus $2.10 premium) under the . . .

R. J. Co. v., 45 Cust. Ct. 590 (Cust. Ct. 1960)

. . . term is defined in Section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, of the said merchandise is $17.60 . . . merchandise here in question, and that such value for the involved item at the time of exportation was $17.60 . . .

SEALRIGHT- OSWEGO FALLS CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 143 Ct. Cl. 438 (Ct. Cl. 1958)

. . . Paperboard Required Per 1,000 Units Square Feet of Paperboard Required Per 1,000 Units Product 2.71 17.60 . . .

A. EATON, C. v. BOARD OF MANAGERS OF JAMES WALKER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, a A. H. E. D. T., 164 F. Supp. 191 (E.D.N.C. 1958)

. . . In 1955 the hospital’s per diem cost was $16.40, and in 1956 it was $17.60 not including depreciation . . .

MAXAN DRESS CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 115 F. Supp. 439 (Ct. Cl. 1953)

. . . Laborer .. 44 .40 per hour. 17.60 1,104.00 The wages paid to the bookkeeper, Phyllis McCarthy, and to . . .

PORTER, r, OPA, v. REEL, 159 F.2d 287 (4th Cir. 1946)

. . . ceiling price as follows: “Tractor with rubber tires $1,003.50 Swinging draw bar 3.25 Power take-off 17.60 . . .

UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO., 67 F. Supp. 397 (D.D.C. 1946)

. . . .; and of seconds of the same dimension, $17.60 per M sq. ft. . . .

UNITED STATES HOFFMAN MACHINERY CORPORATION v. LAUCHLI, 150 F.2d 301 (8th Cir. 1945)

. . . The sales price was $880 and sales tax of $17.60, making a total of $897.60. . . .

AMBROSIA BREWING CO. v. BOWLES,, 147 F.2d 550 (Emer. Ct. App. 1944)

. . . competitors for what it claimed to be similar beers, established for “Ambrosia Supreme” a maximum price of $17.60 . . . On August 14, 1943, complainant filed its application for approval of the maximum price of $17.60 per . . .

O. v., 36 B.T.A. 859 (B.T.A. 1937)

. . . also paid for his account $169. for medical services rendered to him, $24 for hospitalization and $17.60 . . .

UNITED STATES v. JUN, 48 F.2d 593 (10th Cir. 1931)

. . . and (6) “under Section 600 of the Eevenue Act of 1918, ,as amended by the Eevenue Act of 1926,” for $17.60 . . .

CARSON v. HURT, 250 F. 30 (5th Cir. 1918)

. . . The audit statement shows a payment on July 22, 1907, of $17.60,, which does not appear in the daybook . . .

COOK v. ROBINSON, 3 Alaska Fed. 805 (9th Cir. 1912)

. . . through an understanding between the parties the bank took the dust, and, when weighed, allowed Robinson $17.60 . . .

COOK v. ROBINSON, 194 F. 753 (9th Cir. 1912)

. . . through an understanding between the parties the bank took the dust, and, when weighed, allowed Robinson $17.60 . . . agreement with Robinson to take his gold dust, the same to be clean, and allow him at the rate of $17.60 . . .

J. H. M. P. J. Co., 33 Fla. 655 (Fla. 1894)

. . . was still due; and sold to Gfraziano $18.30 worth, and it is still due;, and sold goods to Marco, $17.60 . . .