The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 122
STATE AND COUNTY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 122.21

122.21 Activation of division B.—Sections 122.21-122.24, 122.26 to 122.321, inclusive, shall control with respect to division B of this system and membership therein, and shall prescribe the method for activating such division.

History.—s. 2, ch. 57-382.

F.S. 122.21 on Google Scholar

F.S. 122.21 on Casetext

Amendments to 122.21

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 122.21

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 122.21.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, v. SCHNEIDER DOCK INTERMODAL FACILITY, INC., 374 F. Supp. 3d 897 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . . § 122.21(b) ("When a facility or activity is owned by one person but is operated by another person, . . .

COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE COALITION, NY NJ v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, R., 898 F.3d 173 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 122.21(r). Id. at 48,351-52; see also 40 C.F.R. §§ 122.43(a), 125.98(f). . . . But the Coalition argues that the Rule's permit application requirements at 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(r)(1)( . . . of section 122.21(r) confirm that it does not. . . . Section 122.21(r)(1)(ii)(E), for example, states that if a new unit at an existing facility increases . . . We therefore defer to that interpretation and decline to vacate 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(r)(1)(ii)(A). ii. . . .

COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE COALITION, NY NJ v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, R., 905 F.3d 49 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 122.21(r). Id. at 48,351 -52; see also 40 C.F.R. §§ 122.43(a), 125.98(f). . . . But the Coalition argues that the Rule's permit application requirements at 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(r)(1)( . . . of section 122.21(r) confirm that it does not. . . . Section 122.21(r)(1)(ii)(E), for example, states that if a new unit at an existing facility increases . . . We therefore defer to that interpretation and decline to vacate 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(r)(1)(ii)(A). ii. . . .

CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC. v. PRUITT, v. U. S. U. S. I,, 881 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2018)

. . . The discharger must apply for a permit under § 122.21 within 60 days of notice, unless permission for . . .

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, v. SHILOH GROUP, LLC,, 268 F. Supp. 3d 1029 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . . § 122.21(b) states that “[w]hen a facility or activity' is owned by one person but is operated by another . . .

FRIENDS OF MAHA ULEPU, INC. a i v. HAWAI I DAIRY FARMS, LLC, a LLC a LLC a, 224 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (D. Haw. 2016)

. . . permit application (which shall include whole effluent toxicity testing data as specified in 40 CFR § 122.21 . . .

AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION v. U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY U. S. s, 836 F.3d 963 (8th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 122.21(f), 123.25(a)(4). . . . Id. § 122.21(i); see id. § 122.23(d). . . .

PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, v. CRUISE TERMINALS OF AMERICA, LLC,, 216 F. Supp. 3d 1198 (W.D. Wash. 2015)

. . . . § 122.21(b). . . . one party and operated by another, it is the operator’s duty to obtain an NPDES permit. 40 C.F.R. § 122.21 . . . Therefore, we do not now decide whether the Port or CTA is the facility’s operator according to 40 C.F.R. § 122.21 . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 808 F.3d 556 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 122.21, 122.28(a)(2), 124.1-.21, 124.51-66. The permit here is a general permit. . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT, v. MCCARTHY,, 139 F. Supp. 3d 25 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . . §§ 122.21(i), 122.23(d). . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. ICG HAZARD, LLC,, 781 F.3d 281 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 122.21, and general permits, 40 C.F.R. § 122.28. . . .

In APPALACHIAN FUELS, LLC,, 521 B.R. 779 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2014)

. . . . § 122.21(a). . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(b) (“When a facility or activity is owned by one person but is operated by another . . .

ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION ON TOXICS v. AURORA ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, 765 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 122.21, 124.1-124.21, 124.51-124.66). . . .

SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN STEWARDS v. A G COAL CORPORATION,, 758 F.3d 560 (4th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 122.21. . . . Id. § 122.2 (defining “process wastewater”), 122.21(g)(7)(v)(B); part 122, Apps. . . . Id. § 122.21(g)(7)(vi)(B). . . . We begin by noting that the provision on which A & G relies — 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(g)(vi)(B) — applies . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(g)(7)(vi)(B), 9 Va. Admin. Code § 25-31-100(H)(7)(g). . . .

In APPALACHIAN FUELS, LLC,, 493 B.R. 1 (B.A.P. 6th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 122.21(a). . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(b) (“When a facility or activity is owned by one person but is operated by another . . .

LAKE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 652 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 122.21), or general (covering “one or more categories or subcategories of discharges ... within a . . .

NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, v. BROWN,, 640 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . . §§ 122.21, 124.1-124.21, 124.51-124.66. . . .

WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INCORPORATED v. C. HUFFMAN,, 625 F.3d 159 (4th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 122.21(f)(4) (emphasis added). . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(b) (“When a facility or activity is owned by one person but is operated by another . . .

NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, v. BROWN,, 617 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . §§ 122.21, 124.1-124.21, 124.51-124.66. . . .

SERVICE OIL, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 590 F.3d 545 (8th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §§ 122.21(c)(1), 122.26(c). . . . storm water discharge permit before commencing construction violated 33 U.S.C. § 1318 and 40 C.F.R. § 122.21 . . . than the ninety days “before the date on which construction is to commence” prescribed in 40 C.F.R. § 122.21 . . . requirements); 44 Fed.Reg. 32,854, 32,-903, § 122.10(c) (Jun. 7, 1979); 48 Fed.Reg. 14,145, 14,159, § 122.21 . . . (c) (Apr. 1, 1983); 55 Fed.Reg. 47,990, 48,062, § 122.21(c) (Nov. 16, 1990). . . .

WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INC. v. C. HUFFMAN,, 651 F. Supp. 2d 512 (S.D.W. Va. 2009)

. . . . § 122.21(a). . . . Titled, “Who applies,” 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(b) provides “[w]hen a facility or activity is owned by one . . . number, ownership status, and status as Federal, State, private, public, or other entity.” 40 C.F.R. § 122.21 . . . that require the operator, rather than the owner of the property, to obtain the NPDES permit. 40 CFR § 122.21 . . .

WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INC. v. HUFFMAN,, 588 F. Supp. 2d 678 (N.D.W. Va. 2009)

. . . . § 122.21(a). . . . Here, the term “operator,” as it appears in 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(b), and when read in its statutory context . . . Section 122.21(a) states that any “person” discharging pollutants has the duty to obtain an NPDES permit . . . Thus, rather than creating an exception to that duty, § 122.21(b) merely clarifies who must actually . . . [to] submit a complete application” for an NPDES permit. 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(a). . . .

NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES Of v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, v. v., 537 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . . §§ 122.21, 124.1-124.21, 124.51-124.66. . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. LUCAS, Jr. M. E. Jr., 516 F.3d 316 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 122.21(b), providing, “When a facility or activity is owned by one person but is operated by another . . .

DOMINION ENERGY BRAYTON POINT, LLC, v. L. JOHNSON, In, 443 F.3d 12 (1st Cir. 2006)

. . . . §§ 122.21(d), 124.3. . . . .

SIERRA CLUB, HAWAII CHAPTER s s v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, 415 F. Supp. 2d 1119 (D. Haw. 2005)

. . . . §§ 122.21(d) and (e). See 40 C.F.R. §§ 122.21(d), (e). . . .

UNITED STATES v. ZENON,, 285 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D.P.R. 2003)

. . . date of a new permit (see § 124.15) if: (1) The permittee has submitted a timely application under § 122.21 . . . which is a complete (under § 122.21(e)) application for a new permit; and (2) The Regional Administrator . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER, a v. PACIFIC LUMBER COMPANY, a LLC, a a EPA, 266 F. Supp. 2d 1101 (N.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . . § 122.21(a)(1), and the EPA or state cannot issue a permit until the application is complete, id. § . . . 122.21(e)(1). . . .

SAVE THE VALLEY, INC. L. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, In A. In, 223 F. Supp. 2d 997 (S.D. Ind. 2002)

. . . . § 122.21(a). . . . Code § 5-2-2; 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(a). . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY U. S. L. U. S., 279 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . . §§ 122.21, 124.1-124.21, 124.51-124.66. . . .

TEXAS OIL GAS ASSOCIATION Co. CA Co. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY M. RAILROAD COMMISSION v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 161 F.3d 923 (5th Cir. 1998)

. . . . §§ 122.21(m)(1), 125.30-125.32. . . .

In J. DUNN, L. DUNN, v. J. DUNN,, 225 B.R. 393 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1998)

. . . Their home also contains two separate phone lines which cost them $122.21 in May 1998 to operate. . . .

NEWTON COUNTY WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION, v. ROGERS,, 141 F.3d 803 (8th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 122.21(b). . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. MARTIN, C. v. Co. Co. Co., 71 F. Supp. 2d 1268 (N.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . . § 122.21 ("When a facility or activity is owned by one person but is operated by another person, it . . .

ACKELS, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY K., 7 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 122.21, 122.62, 124.3, 124.-10. . . .

GAS APPLIANCE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 998 F.2d 1041 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

. . . In its cost/benefit analysis, DOE calculated energy loss to be 122.21 Btu/h (2.47 W/sq ft) with 3.5-inch . . .

FRIENDS OF SAKONNET, v. DUTRA, Q. L. C. R. I. E. O NEIL, Jr. v. Q. L. C. R. I. INC. R. F. L. P. a. k. a. E., 738 F. Supp. 623 (D.R.I. 1990)

. . . . §§ 122.21(a) and 122.44(m). . . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY M. U. S. Co., 859 F.2d 156 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 122.21(p) (“[applicants shall keep records of all data used to complete permit applications and any . . . The regulation cross-references 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(e) (1987), which defines a "complete” application. . . .

McCLELLAN ECOLOGICAL SEEPAGE SITUATION MESS v. WEINBERGER,, 707 F. Supp. 1182 (E.D. Cal. 1988)

. . . Section 122.21(g)(7)(ii) requires industrial permit applicants (such as McClellan) to report quantitative . . .

MANASOTA- INC. v. M. THOMAS,, 799 F.2d 687 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 122.21(a). . . . determination” by the submission of an evidentiary hearing request from "[a]ny interested person.” 40 C.F.R. § 122.21 . . . C.F.R. §§ 6.604(a), 122.29(c)(1), and 122.21(k)(3). . . .

UNITED STATES v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, 626 F. Supp. 1405 (W.D. Wash. 1985)

. . . 174.15 158.32 142.49 126.66 102.91 1981 164.98 151.23 137.49 123.74 103.11 1982 158.88 146.66 134.44 122.21 . . .

KITLUTSISTI, v. ARCO ALASKA, INC. a a a, 592 F. Supp. 832 (D. Alaska 1984)

. . . . § 122.21, 124.3(a). Second, any application must be a “sufficient” application. . . .

LEGAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION, INC. v. HODEL,, 586 F. Supp. 1163 (E.D. Tenn. 1984)

. . . . § 122.21(d)(2) (1983)). . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. v. M. GORSUCH, U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. v. M. GORSUCH, U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. v. M. DIETRICH,, 713 F.2d 802 (D.C. Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 122.21(c) (1982). . . .

CASCO BANK TRUST COMPANY, u w v. UNITED STATES, 406 F. Supp. 247 (D. Me. 1975)

. . . . -0-122.21 295.92 Taxable income .... -0--0- III The Claimed Section 612(c) Charitable Deduction Section . . .

In STANDARD GAS ELECTRIC CO., 26 F. Supp. 636 (D. Del. 1939)

. . . The accountants request $17,500 plus expenses of $122.21. The valuation expert asks • for $2,500. . . . They ask for an allowance of $17,500 and expenses of $122.21. . . .

DAVID M. SELLS v. THE UNITED STATES, 36 Ct. Cl. 94 (Ct. Cl. 1901)

. . . $58.04, to which should be added, if the claimant is entitled to recover, the sum of $64.17, or in all $122.21 . . . of one day for every 20 miles, if the claimant is entitled to recover, would be $936.83, less the $122.21 . . .