The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . assessment within "60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . Section 193.122(1), Florida Statutes (2014), makes only the VAB responsible for making the final certification . . .
. . . As required by section 193.122(3), Florida Statutes (2010), the property appraiser re-certified the tax . . . decision, the property appraiser filed an original action in the circuit court pursuant to sections 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . evidence proving the date on which the taxes and penalties were “certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . . The version of section 193.122(2) applicable to this case stated: After the first certification of the . . . Under section 193.122(2), a property appraiser must, after first completing any necessary extensions, . . . certify the tax rolls “upon satisfying himself or herself that all property is properly taxed.” § 193.122 . . . (2);” A tax lien is not a tax assessment, and it is not certified for collection under section 193.122 . . .
. . . See §§ 193.122(1)-(3); 197.322(1)-(2); 197.323(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .
. . . such actions to be filed within 60 days after the assessment is “certified for collection under si 193.122 . . . A tax lien is not a tax 'assessment, and it is not certified for collection under section 193.122(2). . . . Section 193.122 has nothing to do with tax liens.' . . . lien after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . . issues of fact as to whether the property appraiser complied with the notice requirements in section 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . See §§ 193.122(l)-(3); 197.322(l)-(2); 197.323(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s.193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . . an assessment roll subsequent to certification of that roll to the tax collector pursuant to section 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . . court, however, accepted Mastroianni’s argument that the time for filing was controlled by section 193.122 . . . these facts, the circuit court filings were untimely under section 194.171(2) but timely under section 193.122 . . . Section 193.122(4) sets out the time limits within which the property appraiser may appeal a decision . . . This interpretation gives a field of operation to both statutory sections and avoids rendering section 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . One week later, as required by section 193.122(3), the property appraiser recerti-fied the tax rolls . . . Thus, Walker recognized the interrelationship of sections 197.323, 193.122, and 194.171(2). . . . The property appraiser then recertified the entire tax rolls as set forth in section 193.122(3). . . . See § 193.122(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . That case involved the 1981 version of section 193.122 and section 194.171. . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under § 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under section 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment “after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . . Section 193.122(2) required the property appraiser to certify the tax rolls and “within 1 week thereafter . . .
. . . after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under section 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . DCA 1994), that a property appraiser’s failure to adhere strictly to the notice provisions in section 193.122 . . . Section 193.122(2), Florida Statutes (1991) provides: After the first certification of the tax rolls . . . 233, ever began, on a rationale that applies with equal or greater force here: In drafting section 193.122 . . . Moriarty, 575 So.2d 1307, 1310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (holds that the notice requirements of section 193.122 . . . also supply notice of the date of the certification to any taxpayer who requests one in writing.” § 193.122 . . .
. . . and extension of the tax roll for 1990 in the Office of the Property Appraiser as required by section 193.122 . . . Section 193.122(2) provides as follows: [U]pon satisfying himself that all property is properly taxed . . . the 60-day period begins to run from the certification of the tax roll for collection under section 193.122 . . . In drafting section 193.122(2), the Legislature went to considerable lengths to ensure, as far as practical . . . Moriarty, 575 So.2d 1307, 1310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (holds that the notice requirements of section 193.122 . . .
. . . , as property appraiser of Palm Beach County, initially certified the tax rolls pursuant to section 193.122 . . . On March 13, 1992, as required by section 193.122(3), Florida Statutes, petitioner recertified the tax . . . the sixty day filing period commences to run at the time of the initial certification under section 193.122 . . . petitioner contends, or whether it commences to run at the time of the recertification under section 193.122 . . . The recertification of the rolls under section 193.122(3) has no bearing on the time limits of section . . .
. . . Section 193.122(4), Florida Statutes (1989) discusses appeals of value adjustment board decisions and . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under § 193.122 . . .
. . . The property appraiser then recer-tified the entire tax rolls as set forth in section 193.122(3). . . . Section 193.122 provides in part as follows: (emphasis added) (1) The property appraisal adjustment board . . . Respondent contends that the notice requirements of section 193.122(2), Florida Statutes, do not comport . . . Furthermore, section 193.122(2), Florida Statutes provides a means whereby a taxpayer can receive actual . . .
. . . affirmatively demonstrate that his complaint was timely filed, well within the limitation imposed by section 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under § 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under § 193.122 . . .
. . . “appeal” may be brought is governed not by § 194.171(2), admittedly a statute of nonclaim, but by § 193.122 . . . Fla. 1987), the Third District distinguished between the two aformentioned statutes, specifying that 193.122 . . . Court concludes that the Property Appraiser’s counterclaim is governed not by § 194.171(2), but by § 193.122 . . . Compare § 193.122(4), Florida Statutes (1987) (“An appeal of a property appraisal adjustment board decision . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . certification violated Bystrom’s “mandatory duty to certify the tax roll in accordance with section 193.122 . . . At the time material to this appeal, section 193.122(2), Florida Statutes (1979), required that: After . . . lawsuit under section 194.-032(6)(a)(l) or (2), and falls within the time limitations set by section 193.122 . . . We note that section 193.122 states that “upon satisfying himself that all property is properly taxed . . . Thus, Bystrom had the mandatory duty to certify the tax rolls in accordance with section 193.122, Florida . . .
. . . when it (PAAB) certified that assessment to the Dade County Property Appraiser pursuant to Section 193.122 . . .
. . . the department requested that the appraiser appeal the board’s decisions in accordance with sections 193.122 . . .
. . . On the first point, we construe Section 193.122(1) and (4), Florida Statutes (1981) as requiring that . . . Section 193.122(1) and (4), Florida Statutes (1981) provides in pertinent part: (1) The property appraisal . . .
. . . thereafter, the Appraiser also certified the tax roll containing the exemption in accordance with section 193.122 . . .
. . . after sixty days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . Pursuant to section 193.122(2), Florida Statutes (1981), the assessment was certified for collection . . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under § 193.122 . . .
. . . was apparently filed before the tax assessment had been certified for collection pursuant to section 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . . Section 193.122(1), Florida Statutes (1979) requires that this certification be performed only “after . . .
. . . tax assessment after sixty days from the date the assessment roll is certified for collection under § 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment roll is certified for collection under section 193.122 . . .
. . . assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment roll is certified for collection under section 193.122 . . .
. . . entered April 8, 1974 denying petition for a rehearing which directly upheld the validity of Section 193.122 . . . Appellants herein filed a motion for summary judgment attacking the constitutionality of Section 193.122 . . . Section 193.122(1), F.S., as amended, is facially valid but was given an unconstitutional application . . .
. . . the plaintiff, and, when the roll was certified by the assessor on 13 October 1971, as required by § 193.122 . . . 60 days from 13 October 1971 — the date the tax roll was certified by the tax assessor under F.S. § 193.122 . . . suit is instituted within sixty days from the time the assessment roll is certified as provided in § 193.122 . . .
. . . The only support appellee has for this argument is Section 193.122(1), F.S.1970, F.S.A., which became . . . Section 193.122(1), F.S.1970, F.S.A., refers to certification by the Board of Tax Adjustment, and allows . . . However, the certification by the tax assessor, as provided in Section 193.122(2), is the event which . . . It refers to Section 193.122(1), whereas the Session Law (Section 30, Chap. 70-243) makes reference to . . . Section 193.122(2). . . .
. . . 193.381, relating to certification) and has consolidated those statutes in a section now codified as §193.122 . . . The exclusion of tax assessments in arbitration from the certification process by §193.122 was therefore . . .