The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS

Chapter 283
PUBLIC PRINTING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 283.33

283.33 Printing of publications; lowest bidder awards.—

(1) Publications may be printed and prepared in-house, by another agency or the Legislature, or purchased on bid, whichever is more economical and practicable as determined by the agency. An agency may contract for binding separately when more economical or practicable, whether or not the remainder of the printing is done in-house. A vendor may subcontract for binding and still be considered a responsible vendor as defined in s. 287.012.

(2) All printing of publications that cost in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO and purchased by agencies shall be let upon contract to the vendor that submits the lowest responsive bid and that will furnish all materials used in printing. Such contract shall specify a definite term and a definite number of copies.

(3) Except as otherwise provided for in this chapter, a contract for printing of a publication shall be subject to, when applicable, the definitions in s. 287.012, and shall be considered a commodity for that purpose.

(4) The provisions of s. 946.515(4) shall not apply to purchases of printing.

History.—ss. 1, 6, ch. 83-252; s. 4, ch. 88-32; s. 7, ch. 90-268; ss. 5, 44, ch. 90-335; s. 1, ch. 95-420; s. 52, ch. 2001-61; s. 4, ch. 2002-207; s. 10, ch. 2011-4; s. 12, ch. 2013-154.

F.S. 283.33 on Google Scholar

F.S. 283.33 on Casetext

Amendments to 283.33

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 283.33

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 283.33.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WISCONSIN RESOURCES PROTECTION COUNCIL, v. FLAMBEAU MINING COMPANY,, 727 F.3d 700 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . the department may determine that a facility is in compliance with permit coverage required under s. 283.33 . . . , Stats, [part of the WPDES program], and will not be required to hold a separate permit under s. 283.33 . . .

WISCONSIN RESOURCES PROTECTION COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. FLAMBEAU MINING COMPANY,, 903 F. Supp. 2d 690 (W.D. Wis. 2012)

. . . . § 283.33,” the Department had decided in 1998 to regulate defendant’s storm water discharges “under . . . Stat. § 283.33. In 1994, the Department proposed storm water regulations at Wis. Admin. . . . Stat. § 283.33. . . .

In L. WYNN L. v., 378 B.R. 140 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2007)

. . . These expenses are broken down as follows: Mortgage $ 750 Electrieity/heat $ 283.33 Water $ 50 Telephone . . .

In M. CARRAWAY, CARTER, v. HOLLAND, M., 65 B.R. 51 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 1986)

. . . Contract of Sale and the balance, plus interest at the rate of 12% per annum, in 36 monthly payments of $283.33 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. RODGERS, 103 S. Ct. 2132 (U.S. 1983)

. . . addition, in 1973, the Service made an assessment against both Donald and Joerene in the amount of $283.33 . . . the Government could foreclose its lien on the proceeds from the sale of the property to collect the $283.33 . . . original); see also 649 F.2d, at 1132 (authorizing levy on proceeds in Ingram case to the extent of the $283.33 . . . Government, in addition to its lien for the individual debt of Donald Ingram, has a further lien for $283.33 . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODGERS, 461 U.S. 677 (U.S. 1983)

. . . addition, in 1973, the Service made an assessment against both Donald and Joerene in the amount of $283.33 . . . the Government could foreclose its lien on the proceeds from the sale of the property to collect the $283.33 . . . original); see also 649 F. 2d, at 1132 (authorizing levy on proceeds in Ingram case to the extent of the $283.33 . . . Government, in addition to its lien for the individual debt of Donald Ingram, has a further lien for $283.33 . . .

INGRAM A. v. CITY OF DALLAS DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING URBAN REHABILITATION,, 649 F.2d 1128 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . In 1973, an assessment was made in the amount of $283.33, plus interest, against both Donald Ingram and . . . may foreclose its tax lien on the proceeds from the sale of the homestead property to collect the $283.33 . . .

BENDER WELDING AND MACHINE COMPANY, INC. v. M V SOVEREIGN OPAL,, 415 F. Supp. 772 (S.D. Ala. 1976)

. . . $111.91 $70.00 $400.00 $581.91 Ravldutt Sharma $282.93 $166.60 $500.00 $949.53 Jaqir Singh $538.91 $283.33 . . .

R. v., 43 T.C. 890 (T.C. 1965)

. . . Stock— Garrow Land Co_ Stock — R & B Land Co_ $9,473.16 10,817.40 2,310.13 283.33 10,000.00 600.00 15,000.00 . . . 13,000.00 22,500.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 6,980.00 4,930.00 $283.33 14,903.31 12,"IiKU6 $9,473.16 10,817.40 . . . 2,829.60 169.78 4,244.40 3,678.48 2,149.56 5,093.28 1,643.84 1,975.06 1,394.99 $2,680.53 3,060.89 653.67 283.33 . . .

KILMER VILLAGE CORPORATION, KILMER VILLAGE PROJECT CORPORATION, KILMER VILLAGE PROJECT CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 139 Ct. Cl. 231 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . Probst the reasonable fee of $849, allocable $283.33 to each corporation, for such services. . . .

STETSON v. UNITED STATES, 155 F.2d 359 (9th Cir. 1946)

. . . Appellant received full payment of this amount and, in addition, received from the Company $283.33, making . . . In consideration of the $283.33, appellant, executed and delivered to the Company on January 9, 1943, . . . Stetson, in consideration of the payment to him of the sum of Two Hundred Eighty-Three & 33/100 DoEars ($283.33 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SQUARE FEET, ETC. IN CANADIAN PACIFIC BLDG. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 62 F. Supp. 115 (S.D.N.Y. 1945)

. . . 15, 1944, which was to expire April 30, 1945, and under which it paid an annual rental of $3400, or $283.33 . . .

STETSON v. AMERICAN HAWAIIAN S. S. CO., 63 F. Supp. 24 (S.D. Cal. 1945)

. . . port bonuses while on board the Steamship “Daniel Boone”, and in addition thereto the further sum of $283.33 . . . this release,” and then signed the release before a witness and received and acknowledged receipt of $283.33 . . .

E. v. W., 118 Fla. 293 (Fla. 1934)

. . . to pay Petty $850.00 balance in satisfaction of the mortgage and then executed three notes, one for $283.33 . . .

WOODBURY BLAIR v. THE UNITED STATES, 53 Ct. Cl. 457 (Ct. Cl. 1918)

. . . The plaintiff received $283.33 rent for said premises from other parties from June 15 to July 1, 1917 . . .

HOWLAND v. METROPOLITAN BANK, 228 F. 542 (S.D.N.Y. 1915)

. . . The bank rebated $283.33 interest, and then discounted the Company’s note for $25,000 due September 13 . . .

CITY OF PLATTSMOUTH v. NEW HAMPSHIRE SAV. BANK, 139 F. 631 (8th Cir. 1905)

. . . entered into contracts with the light company to furnish lights to the city at the monthly rental of $283.33 . . .