Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 283 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 283 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 283

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS
Chapter 283
PUBLIC PRINTING
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 283
CHAPTER 283
PUBLIC PRINTING
283.30 Definitions.
283.31 Records of executive agency publications.
283.32 Recycled paper to be used by each agency; printing bids certifying use of recycled paper; percentage preference in awarding contracts.
283.33 Printing of publications; lowest bidder awards.
283.34 State officers not to have interests in printing contract.
283.35 Preference given printing within the state.
283.425 Acceptance for printing; penalty for defective printing.
283.43 Public information printing services.
283.55 Purging of publication mailing lists.
283.56 Preparation of agency publications.
283.58 Agency agreements with vendors for private publication of public information materials; free distribution to public.
283.30 Definitions.As used in this chapter, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the term:
(1) “Agency” means any official, officer, department, board, commission, division, bureau, section, district, office, authority, committee, or council, or any other unit of organization, however designated, of the executive branch of state government, and the Public Service Commission.
(2) “Department” means the Department of Management Services.
(3) “Duplicating” means the process of reproducing an image or images from an original to a final substrate through the electrophotographic, xerographic, laser, or offset process or any combination of these processes, by which an operator can make more than one copy without rehandling the original.
(4) “Printing” is the transfer of an image or images by the use of ink or similar substance from an original image to the final substrate through the process of letterpress, offset lithography, gravure, screen printing, or engraving. Printing shall include the process of and the materials used in binding. Printing shall also include duplicating when used to produce publications.
(5) “Public” means those entities and persons other than subordinate and functionally related or connected federal, state, or local governmental agencies.
(6) “Publication” means any document, whether produced for public or internal distribution.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 83-252; s. 30, ch. 84-254; s. 4, ch. 88-32; ss. 2, 44, ch. 90-335; s. 237, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 71, ch. 98-279; s. 9, ch. 2011-4.
283.31 Records of executive agency publications.Each agency shall maintain a record of any state publication, as defined in s. 257.015, the printing of which costs in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY THREE, at least part of which is paid for by state funds appropriated by the Legislature. Such record shall also contain the following: written justification of the need for such publication, purpose of such publication, legislative or administrative authority, sources of funding, frequency and number of issues, and reasons for deciding to have the publication printed in-house, by another agency or the Legislature, or purchased on bid. In addition, such record shall contain the comparative costs of alternative printing methods when such costs were a factor in deciding upon a method. The record of the corporation operating the correctional industry printing program shall include the cost of materials used, the cost of labor, the cost of overhead, the amount of profit made by the corporation for such printing, and whether the state agencies that contract with the corporation for printing are prudently determining the price paid for such printing.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 83-252; s. 31, ch. 84-254; ss. 1, 4, ch. 88-32; ss. 3, 44, ch. 90-335; s. 17, ch. 95-143; s. 16, ch. 99-333; s. 9, ch. 2006-111; s. 7, ch. 2015-117.
283.32 Recycled paper to be used by each agency; printing bids certifying use of recycled paper; percentage preference in awarding contracts.
(1) Each agency shall purchase, when economical, recycled paper if and when recycled paper can be obtained that is of adequate quality for the purposes of the agency.
(2) Each agency shall require a vendor that submits a bid for a contract for printing to certify in writing the percentage of recycled content of the material used for such printing. Such vendor may certify that the material contains no recycled content.
(3) Upon evaluation of bids for each printing contract, the agency shall identify the lowest responsive bid and any other responsive bids in which it has been certified that the materials used in printing contain at least the minimum percentage of recycled content that is set forth by the department. If no vendors offer materials for printing that contain the minimum prescribed recycled content, the contract shall be awarded to the responsible vendor that submits the lowest responsive bid.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 83-252; s. 4, ch. 88-32; ss. 4, 44, ch. 90-335; s. 72, ch. 98-279; s. 3, ch. 2002-207; s. 12, ch. 2010-151.
283.33 Printing of publications; lowest bidder awards.
(1) Publications may be printed and prepared in-house, by another agency or the Legislature, or purchased on bid, whichever is more economical and practicable as determined by the agency. An agency may contract for binding separately when more economical or practicable, whether or not the remainder of the printing is done in-house. A vendor may subcontract for binding and still be considered a responsible vendor as defined in s. 287.012.
(2) All printing of publications that cost in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO and purchased by agencies shall be let upon contract to the vendor that submits the lowest responsive bid and that will furnish all materials used in printing. Such contract shall specify a definite term and a definite number of copies.
(3) Except as otherwise provided for in this chapter, a contract for printing of a publication shall be subject to, when applicable, the definitions in s. 287.012, and shall be considered a commodity for that purpose.
(4) The provisions of s. 946.515(4) shall not apply to purchases of printing.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 83-252; s. 4, ch. 88-32; s. 7, ch. 90-268; ss. 5, 44, ch. 90-335; s. 1, ch. 95-420; s. 52, ch. 2001-61; s. 4, ch. 2002-207; s. 10, ch. 2011-4; s. 12, ch. 2013-154.
283.34 State officers not to have interests in printing contract.No member of the Legislature or other officer of this state may have an interest, directly or indirectly, in any printing contract as provided for in s. 283.33; however, nothing in this section prohibits a member of the Legislature from receiving such a contract when the member or his or her firm has submitted the lowest responsive bid for the contract.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 83-252; s. 4, ch. 88-32; ss. 6, 44, ch. 90-335; s. 200, ch. 95-148; s. 5, ch. 2002-207.
283.35 Preference given printing within the state.When awarding a contract to have materials printed, the agency, university, college, school district, or other political subdivision of this state awarding the contract shall grant a preference to the lowest responsible and responsive vendor having a principal place of business within this state. The preference shall be 5 percent if the lowest bid is submitted by a vendor whose principal place of business is located outside the state and if the printing can be performed in this state at a level of quality comparable to that obtainable from the vendor submitting the lowest bid located outside the state. As used in this section, the term “other political subdivision of this state” does not include counties or municipalities.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 83-252; s. 4, ch. 88-32; ss. 7, 44, ch. 90-335; s. 6, ch. 2002-207; s. 12, ch. 2012-32.
283.425 Acceptance for printing; penalty for defective printing.No printing may be accepted as in compliance with the contract when the printing is not of the grade of workmanship which is usually employed by professional printers on printing of such class, or when the printing is not of the full quantity or acceptable quality for which it has been contracted. If immediate necessity and lack of time to procure printing elsewhere compel the use of defective printing furnished by a contractor, it shall be accepted without approval, and one-half of the contract price thereon shall be deducted as liquidated damages for breach of contract. The agency which contracted for printing shall notify the contractor within a reasonable time after delivery of said printing as to acceptance or nonacceptance, and such reasonable time shall be specified in the contract. The contract shall also provide that a contractor has a reasonable time to correct any defects if delivery is made by a date specified in the contract, unless such a provision is not practicable because of time constraints.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 83-252; s. 4, ch. 88-32; ss. 8, 44, ch. 90-335.
283.43 Public information printing services.Any agency the authorized functions of which include public information programs is authorized to purchase, pursuant to this chapter and subject to its appropriation and any other limitations imposed by law, typesetting, printing, and media distribution services, when the purchase of such services would be less costly than the performance of the same services directly by the agency or when such services are beyond the production limitations established by agency guidelines.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 83-252; s. 4, ch. 88-32; ss. 9, 44, ch. 90-335; s. 11, ch. 2011-4.
283.55 Purging of publication mailing lists.
(1) By March 1 of each odd-numbered year, every agency shall survey the addresses on each of its publication mailing lists by providing each addressee the following form, which must also disclose whether the publication is available on the agency’s website:

  (Name of publication)  

Please choose one of the following options:

☐ I would like to receive this publication in hard copy format.

☐ I would like to receive this publication in electronic format. My e-mail address is:  .

☐ I do not wish to receive this publication.

Should your response to this survey not be received by April 30, your name will be automatically purged from our mailing list. Those addressees who respond shall be maintained or removed from such mailing list in accordance with the responses. Those addressees not responding by April 30 of such odd-numbered year shall be automatically purged from such mailing list. Agencies are prohibited from supplying addressees with postpaid response forms.

(2) The provisions of this section apply to any agency, except a state university or an agency the mailing list of which consists only of those persons registered with or licensed by the agency and the registration or license fee of which includes payment by the registrants or licensees as subscribers for the publication of the agency.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 83-252; s. 63, ch. 86-163; s. 4, ch. 88-32; s. 20, ch. 89-381; ss. 10, 44, ch. 90-335; s. 10, ch. 2006-111.
283.56 Preparation of agency publications.When economical and practicable, any publication produced for public distribution shall display the name of such publication on its spine, where such spine is glued to the cover and measures at least one-quarter inch in width.
History.s. 11, ch. 90-335.
283.58 Agency agreements with vendors for private publication of public information materials; free distribution to public.
(1) An agency may enter into agreements to secure the private publication of public information brochures, pamphlets, audiotapes, videotapes, and related materials for distribution without charge to the public and, in furtherance thereof, is authorized to:
(a) Enter into agreements with private vendors for the publication or production of such public information materials, by which the costs of publication or production will be borne in whole or in part by the vendor or the vendor agrees to provide additional compensation in return for the right of the vendor to select, sell, and place advertising that publicizes products or services related to and harmonious with the subject matter of the publication.
(b) Retain the right, by agreement, to approve all elements of any advertising placed in such public information materials, including the form and content thereof.
(2) Any public information materials produced pursuant to this section and containing advertising of any kind must include a statement providing that the inclusion of advertising in such material does not constitute an endorsement by the state or the agency of the products or services so advertised.
History.s. 26, ch. 90-335.

F.S. 283 on Google Scholar

F.S. 283 on Casetext

Amendments to 283


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 283
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 283.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . imprisonment" but that an offense requiring only a short trial would be another matter. 395 F.Supp.3d 283 . . . California , 283 U.S. 423, 451, 51 S.Ct. 522, 75 L.Ed. 1154 (1931) ("The United States may perform its . . . generally precludes federal courts from intervening in ongoing state criminal prosecutions. 395 F.Supp.3d 283 . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 9 Pet. 711, 734, 9 L.Ed. 283 (1835) ; e.g. , 1856 Treaty, Art. I, 11 Stat. 699. . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary , 651 F.2d 277, 283-284 (C.A.5 1981) ; EEOC v. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Ex parte Endo , 323 U.S. 283, 297-299, 65 S.Ct. 208, 89 L.Ed. 243 (1944). . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 283 U.S. 25, 26, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931). . . . United States , 283 U.S. 25, 26, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931). . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . California , 283 U.S. 359, 367, 51 S.Ct. 532, 75 L.Ed. 1117 (1931) ). . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Kuhn , 407 U.S. 258, 283-284, 92 S.Ct. 2099, 32 L.Ed.2d 728 (1972). . . .

BABB, v. WILKIE,, 140 S. Ct. 1168 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory , 554 U.S. 84, 102, 128 S.Ct. 2395, 171 L.Ed.2d 283 (2008). . . .

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE,, 140 S. Ct. 1205 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, 135 S.Ct. 9, 190 L.Ed.2d 283 (2014). . . .

CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY, v. FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., 140 S. Ct. 1081 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Kirby, Pty Ltd. , 543 U.S. 14, 31, 125 S.Ct. 385, 160 L.Ed.2d 283 (2004) ; see also 2 T. . . . Kirby, Pty Ltd. , 543 U.S. 14, 31, 125 S.Ct. 385, 160 L.Ed.2d 283 (2004). . . .

DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Saro , 24 F.3d 283, 291 (CADC 1994). . . .

E. RODRIGUEZ, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 140 S. Ct. 713 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Kirby, Pty Ltd. , 543 U.S. 14, 23, 125 S.Ct. 385, 160 L.Ed.2d 283 (2004) ; Hinderlider v. . . .

CITY OF TRINIDAD, COLORADO, v. HAMER, 140 S. Ct. 644 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Stephen HAMER No. 19-283 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

R. PESCI, v. BUDZ, LLC, LLC,, 935 F.3d 1159 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Andrews , 859 F.3d 264, 283-84 (4th Cir. 2017) (recognizing that "allocating scarce resources in an effective . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Hobart , 73 F.3d 283, 288 (10th Cir. 1996) ("[T]he lack of an appropriate remedy moots [the plaintiffs . . . Miller , 283 U.S. 96, 100, 51 S.Ct. 392, 75 L.Ed. 861 (1931) ("The [Fourteenth Amendment] guaranty does . . .

GUPTA, v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC,, 934 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gelber Grp., Inc. , 347 Ill.App.3d 243, 283 Ill.Dec. 61, 807 N.E.2d 666, 671 (2004) (citing RESTATEMENT . . . See Zabinsky, 347 Ill.App.3d 243, 283 Ill.Dec. 61, 807 N.E.2d at 671. . . .

BENTLEY, v. AUTOZONERS, LLC, LLC,, 935 F.3d 76 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 280, 283 (6th Cir. 2017). That question is not before us on this appeal. . . .

NEW YORK STATE CITIZENS COALITION FOR CHILDREN, v. J. POOLE,, 935 F.3d 56 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Doe , 536 U.S. 273, 283, 122 S.Ct. 2268, 153 L.Ed.2d 309 (2002) (emphasis added). . . . mere implication, but must be 'unambiguously conferred.' " Id. at 1388 (quoting Gonzaga , 536 U.S. at 283 . . . Co. of N.J. , 283 F.3d 429, 433 (2d Cir. 2002). . . .

WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR SEIDENBACH, INCORPORATED, v., 935 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Price Stern Sloan, Inc. , 283 F.3d 1064, 1069-70 (9th Cir. 2002) (rejecting the Ryan rule and stating . . .

UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON,, 934 F.3d 498 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . the court guessed that the government pursued the case for a reason the government never mentioned. 283 . . .

LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DEERFIELD CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. J., 933 F.3d 806 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Juhl , 283 Ill. App. 3d 376, 380, 218 Ill.Dec. 685, 669 N.E.2d 1211 (1996). . . .

DINAPLES, v. MRS BPO, LLC MRS BPO, LLC,, 934 F.3d 275 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Cty. of Passaic, 923 F.3d 283, 286 (3d Cir. 2019). A. . . .

CLARK, v. WARDEN,, 934 F.3d 483 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Parker , 712 F.3d 283, 295 (6th Cir. 2013) (explaining that a claim may be procedurally defaulted if . . .

SIEGEL, s s v. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC. HSBC USA, N. A. HBUS,, 933 F.3d 217 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . HSBC Holdings, PLC , 283 F. Supp. 3d 722, 733-34 (N.D. Ill. 2017). . . .

IN RE CUTULI v., 389 F. Supp. 3d 1051 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . ."); In re Yashaya , 403 B.R. 278, 283 (Bankr. . . .

J. DOHERTY, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 932 F.3d 978 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Madigan, 209 Ill.2d 520, 283 Ill.Dec. 895, 809 N.E.2d 88, 97 (2004) (alteration in original)). . . .

TEXAS, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION EEOC P. U. S., 933 F.3d 433 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Herman , 176 F.3d 283, 287 (5th Cir. 1999) )). Id. 5 U.S.C. § 704. Bennett v. . . .

HAIDAK, v. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS- AMHERST, 933 F.3d 56 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275, 283, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001) (holding that there is no private . . .

IN RE GOOGLE INC. COOKIE PLACEMENT CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION H., 934 F.3d 316 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Sales Practice Litig. , 148 F.3d 283, 323 (3d Cir. 1998). . . .

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BANK, A N. A. CDO CDO v. LANSUPPE FEEDER, LLC,, 933 F.3d 99 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 283 F.3d 429, 433 (2d Cir. 2002) ); and (iii) that the provisions allegedly violated did not contain . . .

IN RE DOBOS, s v., 603 B.R. 31 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . (In re Lopez) , 283 B.R. 22, 26 (9th Cir. . . .

YARBROUGH, v. DECATUR HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 931 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Doe, 536 U.S. 273, 283-84, 122 S. Ct. 2268, 2275, 153 L.Ed.2d 309 (2002). . . .

GGNSC LOUISVILLE HILLCREEK, LLC GGNSC LLC GGNSC LLC, v. ESTATE OF C. BRAMER, BY AND THROUGH A. BRAMER, A., 932 F.3d 480 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gibbs-Inman Co. , 283 Ky. 107, 140 S.W.2d 806, 809 (Ct. . . .

VIRNETX INC. v. APPLE INC., 931 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Napier Shipping Co. , 166 U.S. 280, 283-284, 17 S.Ct. 572, 41 L.Ed. 1004 (1897) ). . . .

CAMPBELL, H. C. H. v. UNITED STATES,, 932 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . that can be discharged pursuant to section 363(f)"), with In re Trans World Airlines, Inc. , 322 F.3d 283 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. GAUDET,, 933 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Al-Zubaidy, 283 F.3d 804, 809 (6th Cir. 2002) (opining that evidence of "what actually happened" is relevant . . .

UNITED STATES v. PORTER,, 933 F.3d 226 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Newsome , 420 U.S. 283, 288, 95 S.Ct. 886, 43 L.Ed.2d 196 (1975). . . .

UNITED STATES v. ABREU- GARC A, a k a a, a k a P a k a P, 933 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Chiaradio, 684 F.3d 265, 283 (1st Cir. 2012) ). . . .

AYESTAS, v. DAVIS,, 933 F.3d 384 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . REV. 283, 353 (2008) (citation omitted). . . .

IN RE WASHINGTON, v. N. A., 602 B.R. 710 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rojas (In re Steinacher) , 283 B.R. 768, 772 (9th Cir. BAP 2002) ; see also Drummond v. . . .

J. GILLIAM, C. Ad v. SEALEY, E. C. T. A. Sr. C. T. A. WTVD LLC J. C. Ad v. C. T. A. E. C. T. A. Sr. WTVD LLC, 932 F.3d 216 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . . ----, 808 S.E.2d 280, 283 (2017) ("The doctrine of collateral estoppel means simply that when an issue . . . Wilmore , 407 F.3d 274, 283-84 (4th Cir. 2005) (holding that officer's alleged fabrication of evidence . . .

OWENS, v. PARRIS,, 932 F.3d 456 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Parker , 712 F.3d 283, 303-04 (6th Cir. 2013). . . .

GREAT AMERICAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WINDERMERE BAPTIST CONFERENCE CENTER, INC., 931 F.3d 771 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Smith , 427 S.W.3d 269, 283 (Mo. Ct. . . . See Walden , 427 S.W.3d at 283 (denying coverage because the "use of the vehicle [did not] creat[e] . . . .

UNITED STATES v. DEL CARPIO FRESCAS,, 932 F.3d 324 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Newsome , 420 U.S. 283, 293, 95 S.Ct. 886, 43 L.Ed.2d 196 (1975). And it created myriad anomalies. . . . See Henderson , 568 U.S. at 283 n.1, 133 S.Ct. 1121 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (noting hurdle 4 pertains . . .

GENETIC VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC. v. LABOKLIN GMBH CO. KG,, 933 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Fiore , 571 U.S. 277, 283 n.6, 134 S.Ct. 1115, 188 L.Ed.2d 12 (2014). . . .

DILLON BOILER SERVICES, CO. INC. v. SOUNDVIEW VERMONT HOLDINGS, LLC,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 187 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . United States , 196 U.S. 283, 295, 25 S.Ct. 243, 49 L.Ed. 482 (1905). 1. . . .

GORSS MOTELS, INC. a a E G, a a v. SAFEMARK SYSTEMS, LP,, 931 F.3d 1094 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 281, 283, 3 L.Ed. 101 (1809) (Marshall, C.J.). . . . Compare Yeaton , 9 U.S. at 283 (forbidding post-repeal enforcement of pre-repeal liabilities "unless . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. LLC,, 931 F.3d 339 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . West Virginia; and • 703.0 acres of known use spring staging/fall swarming habitat, which consists of 283 . . .

IN RE RAYNOR, v. P., 602 B.R. 703 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp ., 544 U.S. 280, 283, 287-88, 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005) ). . . .

IN RE CANNON,, 931 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 283 (table) (11th Cir.) (unpublished), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 998, 124 S. . . .

PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION v. DEWINE, 931 F.3d 530 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Visionworks of Am., Inc. , 819 F.3d 277, 283 (6th Cir. 2016). . . .

U. S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. MONEX CREDIT COMPANY, 931 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Knolls Atomic Power Lab. , 554 U.S. 84, 91-92, 128 S.Ct. 2395, 171 L.Ed.2d 283 (2008). . . .

K. T. v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., 931 F.3d 1041 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 385, 392-93, 160 L.Ed.2d 283 (2004) (emphasis omitted). This one is. See Doe v. . . .

F. EDMISTON, v. LOUISIANA SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER,, 931 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Tangipahoa Parish Council-President Gov't , 279 F.3d 273, 283 (5th Cir. 2002) ; see also Ferguson v. . . .

DJERF, v. L. RYAN,, 931 F.3d 870 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dretke , 542 U.S. 274, 283-88, 124 S.Ct. 2562, 159 L.Ed.2d 384 (2004) ; Penry v. . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION BY A. JAMES, v. QUINCY BIOSCIENCE HOLDING COMPANY, INC. LLC, d b a LLC,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 211 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 283, 320 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) ("An individual's degree of participation in business affairs is probative . . .

DOBBINS, v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 1260 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State, 684 So. 2d 283, 284 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). . . .

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ACRES, PERMANENT OVERLAY EASEMENT FOR ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR ACRES IN MILFORD AND WESTFALL TOWNSHIPS, PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS a c o L. P., 931 F.3d 237 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 457 U.S. 273, 283-84, 102 S.Ct. 2432, 73 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982) (noting that federal common . . .

NANTUME, v. P. BARR,, 931 F.3d 35 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Lynch, 795 F.3d 283, 286 (1st Cir. 2015). . . .

J. UCCARDI, v. LAZER SPOT, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 911 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Napolitano, 283 F.R.D. 400, 404 (N.D.Ill., 2012). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. GOODRIDGE,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 159 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Nos. 282, 283.) . . .

ERWIN HYMER GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 930 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 283 F.3d 1364, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2002). . . .

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CHICAGO TRUST COMPANY, THE BABY FOLD,, 930 F.3d 910 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. , 283 Ill. App. 3d 630, 219 Ill.Dec. 62, 670 N.E.2d 740 (1996). . . .

ANDERSON v. GHALY,, 930 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Doe , 536 U.S. 273, 283, 122 S.Ct. 2268, 153 L.Ed.2d 309 (2002) (emphasis omitted). . . .

MOLINA, v. PENNSYLVANIA SOCIAL SERVICE UNION,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 469 (M.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Aladdin's Castle, Inc., 455 U.S. 283, 289, 102 S.Ct. 1070, 71 L.Ed.2d 152 (1982). . . . Bledsoe, 829 F.3d 273, 283 n.4 (3d Cir. 2016) ). . . . Supp. 3d 283, 299 (W.D. . . .

M. CROCE, v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY Jr., 930 F.3d 787 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Safety , 103 N.E.3d 283, 296-97 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017) ; Sabino , 56 N.E.3d at 380 ; Holley v. . . .

CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 84 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Agric. , 455 F.3d 283, 287 (D.C. . . .

GIBSON, Ca v. SCE GROUP, INC. d b a d b a s,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Co. , 87 N.Y.2d 308, 639 N.Y.S.2d 283, 662 N.E.2d 763, 771 (N.Y. 1995) (finding that the statute did . . .

MANNING v. CALDWELL, s FOR CITY OF ROANOKE s, 930 F.3d 264 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Op. at 283-84. I am not comforted. . . . Op. at 283 (emphasis added). . . . Op. at 283, not only mischaracterizes Virginia law, but threatens to change the character of criminal . . . Op. at 283, affecting only Virginia's purportedly unique scheme. Id. at 283-84, n.20. . . . Op. at 283 (noting that "Virginia's statutory scheme may nominally penalize 'possession' or 'consumption . . .

GRAVES, I. Y. M. Y. A. Y. v. A. LIOI L. Jr. I. Y. M. Y. A. Y. v. A. L. Jr., 930 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 269, 283. . . .

SHOCKLEY, v. PRIMELENDING, a, 929 F.3d 1012 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Loan Auth. of Mo. , 497 S.W.3d 283, 287 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). Missouri law governs this case. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BUTT,, 930 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Dallas , 826 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir. 2016) (citation omitted). III. . . .

MURPHY, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 59 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . § 2000e-3(a) (emphases added); see Fogleman, 283 F.3d at 571. " 'Discrimination' [here] refers to the . . . Fogleman, 283 F.3d at 571. . . . Supp. 2d at 35 (quoting Fogleman, 283 F.3d at 571 ). . . . Mercy Hosp., Inc., 283 F.3d 561, 571 (3d Cir. 2002) (holding that plaintiff states a retaliation claim . . . "discriminate against any individual because such individual has [engaged in protected activity]." 283 . . .

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, v. P. BARR, R., 929 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sessions , 888 F.3d 272, 283-87 (7th Cir.), vacated in part on other grounds , No. 17-2991, 2018 WL 4268817 . . .

FUSARO, v. R. COGAN, C. J. A. J. Jr., 930 F.3d 241 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . California , 283 U.S. 359, 368, 51 S.Ct. 532, 75 L.Ed. 1117 (1931) ). . . .

SHULMAN v. CHAITMAN LLP LLP,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Airbnb, Inc. , 283 F. Supp. 3d 174, 178 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (citing Morrison , 547 F.3d at 170 ). . . . Red Cab Co. , 303 U.S. 283, 290, 58 S.Ct. 586, 82 L.Ed. 845 (1938) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PAYANO,, 930 F.3d 186 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Rosa , 399 F.3d 283, 292-93 (3d Cir. 2005) (holding "repeated acquiescence" to an erroneous jury instruction . . .

ROXX ALLISON LTD. v. JEWELERS INC., 385 F. Supp. 3d 377 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Rauland-Borg Corp., 20 N.Y.2d 377, 283 N.Y.S.2d 34, 229 N.E.2d 604, 607 (1967) ). . . .

REINALT- THOMAS CORPORATION, d b a v. MAVIS TIRE SUPPLY, LLC,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 1261 (N.D. Ga. 2019)

. . . It points to various sources, one identifying 283 businesses in thirty-nine states and another pointing . . .

KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, Gu, v. J. TRUMP,, 928 F.3d 226 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Knight , 465 U.S. 271, 283, 104 S.Ct. 1058, 79 L.Ed.2d 299 (1984) (a plaintiff has "no constitutional . . .

EUROPA EYE WEAR CORP. v. KAIZEN ADVISORS, LLC AO v. LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 228 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 280, 283 (D. Mass. 2018) ; see also Alt. . . . Supp. 3d at 283 ; see also Alt. Marine , 571 U.S. at 63-64, 134 S.Ct. 568. . . . Supp. 3d 283, 287 (D. Mass. 2014). . . . Supp. 3d at 283. . . .

M. D. BY NEXT FRIEND R. STUKENBERG Z. H. B. S. A. A. M. J. S. J. H. V. J. L. H. C. C. H. C. A. R. v. ABBOTT, Jr., 929 F.3d 272 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 283. each PMC child prior to their aging out of care. . . . Id. at 283. benefits for which they are eligible upon aging out. Id. at 285. . . . Id. at 283. children unrepresented in pending cases. Id. at 285. . . . Id. at 283. . . . Id. at 283. health status. Id. at 286. . . .

R. OBERDORF A. v. AMAZON. COM INC. a, 930 F.3d 136 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . (citing Musser , 562 A.2d at 283 ). . . . Id. reporter's note g (citing Musser , 562 A.2d at 283 ). . . . Id. at 283. . . . Musser , 562 A.2d at 283. Id. JA267. . . .

PEOPLE v. DEBT RESOLVE, INC., 387 F. Supp. 3d 358 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Medical Billers Network, Inc. , 543 F.Supp.2d 283, 320 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DINKINS,, 928 F.3d 349 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Watson , 283 N.C. 383, 196 S.E.2d 212, 213-14 (1973) (holding that sufficient force existed to support . . .

IN RE M. THORPE,, 602 B.R. 906 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Weidner, 729 F.3d 280, 283 (3d Cir. 2013) (citing Orson, Inc. v. . . .

RAULERSON, Jr. v. WARDEN,, 928 F.3d 987 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't. of Health , 497 U.S. 261, 283, 110 S.Ct. 2841, 111 L.Ed.2d 224 (1990) (noting that the "more stringent . . .

FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. FEDNAT HOLDING COMPANY, 928 F.3d 718 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Walden , 571 U.S. at 283, 290, 134 S.Ct. 1115 (internal quotation marks omitted); Burlington Indus . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v., 385 F. Supp. 3d 138 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . United States, 283 U.S. 25, 27, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, v. NEW YORK,, 139 S. Ct. 2551 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Locomotive Engineers , 482 U.S. at 283, 107 S.Ct. 2360. . . . Id., at 282-283, 107 S.Ct. 2360. . . .

INTERIOR GLASS SYSTEMS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 927 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Commissioner , 283 U.S. 589, 595, 597-98, 51 S.Ct. 608, 75 L.Ed. 1289 (1931) ; Franceschi v. . . .

TENNESSEE WINE AND SPIRITS RETAILERS ASSOCIATION, v. F. THOMAS,, 139 S. Ct. 2449 (U.S. 2019)

. . . that the State could enforce it " 'unconfined by traditional Commerce Clause limitations.' " Id. , at 283 . . . Missouri , 91 U.S. 275, 278, 282-283, 23 L.Ed. 347 (1876) (state law requiring payment of license tax . . .

FLORIDA HOLDING LLC, v. LAUDERHILL LENDING, LLC LLC,, 275 So. 3d 183 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Sunshine Wireless Co., Inc ., 654 So. 2d 283, 284 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (quoting Swift Indep. . . .

ELBIT SYSTEMS LAND AND LTD. LLC, v. HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC,, 927 F.3d 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . . §§ 283 (injunctions), 284 (damages). . . .

In S. S. BODY ARMOR I. INC. f k a f k a DHB v. CARTER LEDYARD MILBURN LLP,, 927 F.3d 763 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Agent Actions , 148 F.3d 283 (3d Cir. 1998) (Scirica, J.) ] factors, and any other factors that are useful . . .

KRAVITZ, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, La n v., 382 F. Supp. 3d 393 (D. Md. 2019)

. . . Owens-Corning-Fiberglas Corp. , 4 F.3d 276, 283 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding that district court's introduction . . .

GLOBAL FORCE ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. ANTHEM SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT CORP. LLC,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 576 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . Fiore, 571 U.S. 277, 283, 134 S.Ct. 1115, 188 L.Ed.2d 12 (2014), and, thus, in order for this Court to . . .

THE DUTRA GROUP, v. BATTERTON, 139 S. Ct. 2275 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Kirby, Pty Ltd. , 543 U.S. 14, 25, 125 S.Ct. 385, 160 L.Ed.2d 283 (2004) (internal quotation marks omitted . . .

NUCOR CORPORATION, USA LLC, AK v. UNITED STATES, Co., 927 F.3d 1243 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . terms, among others, of "giving an equivalent or substitute of equal value" and "remuneration," id. at 283 . . .

G. MCDONOUGH, v. SMITH,, 139 S. Ct. 2149 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Oliver , 510 U.S. 266, 283, 114 S.Ct. 807, 127 L.Ed.2d 114 (1994) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment . . .