The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . .”) §§ 330.30, 330.40, and 330.50, asking the trial court to set aside the jury’s verdict. . . .
. . . . § 330.40(1), CPL Article 730, and People v. . . . C.P.L. § 330.40(1). . . .
. . . . § 330.40(2)(a). . . .
. . . On June 3, 1997, Pressley moved to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL §§ 330.30, 330.40, and 330.50 . . .
. . . . §§ 210.40, 330.30(1), 330.40, and 330.50 to set aside the verdict on the ground that the evidence adduced . . .
. . . See CPL § 330.40(2)(a) & (e)-(f) (governing CPL § 330.30(3) motions); CPL § 440.30(4)(b) (governing CPL . . .
. . . Petitioner moved to set aside the verdict pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law §§ 330.30 and 330.40 . . .
. . . .”) §§ 330.30, 330.40 and 330.50, to set aside the jury verdict on a number of grounds that apparently . . .
. . . On March 31, 1982, Bentley filed a motion to set aside the verdict- pursuant to CPL §§ 330.30, 330.40 . . .
. . . 1969 Piper Navajo, 570 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), in which the district court declared section 330.40 . . . A petition for forfeiture of the aircraft was timely filed pursuant to sections 330.40 and 932.703(1) . . . Accordingly, the court found that section 330.40, “as it relates to the ‘Florida Contraband Forfeiture . . . Section 330.40, Florida Statutes (1989), provides in full: In the interests of the public welfare, it . . . had unapproved fuel tanks, was a felony of the third degree. § 330.40, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .
. . . County appeals an order of the trial court declaring the forfeiture provision contained in section 330.40 . . . In that Motion to Dismiss, .the parties challenged the constitutionality of FS 330.40. . . . [Emphasis added]. ****** By its amendment to section 330.40, the legislature has made a declaration that . . . This Court finds FS 330.40, as it relates to the “Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act” to be unreasonable . . . preempted this area of aviation regulation of planes with nonconforming fuel tanks so that section 330.40 . . .
. . . After the jury verdict, petitioner filed motions pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law §§ 330.30, 330.40 . . .
. . . fuel system installed in the nose section of his 1977 Piper Navajo airplane in violation of section 330.40 . . . Section 330.40 provides in pertinent part: [I]t is unlawful ... to install, maintain, or possess any . . . ; (4) the evidence was insufficient to support defendant’s conviction of a violation of section 330.40 . . . The conviction for the violation of section 330.40 is reversed. . . . This regulation, therefore, is not a regulation of the type referred to in section 330.40. . . .
. . . presentence motion, attorneys for petitioner argued to the trial court that pursuant to CPL §§ 330.30, 330.40 . . .
. . . Law (McKinney 1971) (CPL), and a hearing on his motion was held pursuant to CPL §330.40. . . . CPL § 330.40 provides that motions to set aside the verdict under CPL § 330.30 must be decided by hearing . . . CPL § 330.40(g). . . .
. . . .-55), for exemplifications and copies of papers ($330.40), deposition costs ($956.-80) and stenographic . . .
. . . However, Wis.Stats. (1963), Sec. 330.40 provides as follows: “An attempt to commence an action shall . . . The precise issue here is whether this action is saved by the provisions of Section 330.40 of the Wisconsin . . . presumably the defendant Decker, by his answer, contend that the action is not saved because Section 330.40 . . . summons must be delivered in time “to the sheriff or other proper officer of the county”; that Section 330.40 . . . service was actually made by the marshal on July 30, 1965, well within the sixty days provided in Section 330.40 . . .
. . . $7,500 already paid by order of the court, and also ordered that Nealon be reimbursed in the sum of $1,-330.40 . . .
. . . that the allowances asked are proper, I have only to order judgment for the petitioner for the sum of $330.40 . . .