The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXI
LABOR

Chapter 441
EMPLOYEES TRUST BENEFIT PLANS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 441.01

441.01 Trust for employees.—A trust created by an employer as part of a stock bonus plan, pension plan, disability or death benefit plan, or profit sharing plan, for the exclusive benefit of some or all of his or her employees, to which contributions are made by such employer or employees, or both for the purpose of distributing to such employees the earnings or the principal, or both earnings and principal, of the fund so held in trust, shall not be deemed to be invalid as violating any existing law against perpetuities or suspension of the power of alienation of title to property; but such a trust may continue for such time as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes for which it may be created.

History.—s. 1, ch. 29948, 1955; s. 129, ch. 97-103.

F.S. 441.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 441.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 441.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 441.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 441.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SAUCEDO- CARRILLO v. UNITED STATES, 635 F. App'x 197 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . (citing former O.J.I. 309.01 (currently O.J.I. 441.01)) (emphasis added). . . . Kalbfell, 2003 WL 21505264, at *4 (citing O.J.I. 309.01 (now 441.01)). . . .

In W. GREGORY, L. J. III, v. W. L., 452 B.R. 895 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . claimed health care expenses for the standard deduction of $171 on line 24B, together with the sum of $441.01 . . .

In L. MOORE, Sr. L. MOORE, Sr. v. MID- PENN CONSUMER DISCOUNT CO., 117 B.R. 135 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1990)

. . . The $1,000 TILA recoupment claim reduces this claim still further to $441.01. . . . While the exact amount paid to Mid-Penn by the Debtor is unclear, it clearly exceeded $441.01. . . .

UNITED STATES v. H. RAMSDELL,, 450 F.2d 130 (10th Cir. 1971)

. . . He further testified that a tax deficiency would still exist for the years 1963 ($441.01) and 1965 ($1,622.96 . . .