Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE O. MCVICKER, S., 546 B.R. 46 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2016)

. . . the fresh start”); In re Kaufman, 68 B.R. 391, 393 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1986); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In J. FRANKLIN,, 506 B.R. 765 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.02[1], n. 5. . . . .

In LIKINS,, 505 B.R. 319 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2014)

. . . . § 522(b)(3) and K.S.A. 60-2312. . 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.02[3] at 522-18 (Alan N. . . .

In RIVERA,, 499 B.R. 175 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2013)

. . . Sommer, 4-522 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 (16th ed. 2013) citing H.R.Rep. . . .

In JEFFERIES, v. D., 468 B.R. 373 (9th Cir. Bankr. App. Panel 2012)

. . . . § 522(b); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 (Henry Somers & Alan Resnick eds., 15th ed. rev. 2009). . . .

In HERNANDEZ,, 473 B.R. 496 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2012)

. . . Sommer, 7 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 (16th ed. 2011) citing H.R.Rep. . . .

In WESTBY,, 473 B.R. 392 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2012)

. . . . § 522(b)(1). . 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02[1] (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. . . .

In HAMILTON,, 461 B.R. 878 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2011)

. . . rev. 2005) (listing those states that have opted out of the exemptions contained in § 522(d) and ¶ 522.02 . . .

In M. SCHAFER, C. v. M. In R. v., 455 B.R. 590 (B.A.P. 6th Cir. 2011)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02[4], at 522-20 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. . . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.02[4] (Alan R. Resnick & Henry J. . . .

In M. ANTONIE,, 432 B.R. 843 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2010)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.02[3], p. 522-18 (16th ed.2009). . . .

In CHANNON,, 424 B.R. 895 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2010)

. . . . rev.2005) (listing those states that have opted out of the exemptions contained in § 522(d) and ¶ 522.02 . . .

In PONTIUS,, 421 B.R. 814 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2009)

. . . Preemption of Bankruptcy-Only Exemptions, 6 Cardozo L.Rev. 583, 586 (1985); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In TINKESS In In, 459 B.R. 76 (Bankr. D. Alaska 2008)

. . . Id. at ¶ 522.02[1], p. 522-17 (citation omitted). . Id. at II 522.01, p.522-16 n. 3. . Ariz. . . . Sectional Analysis of HB 56, at p. 34. . 4 Collier on Bankruptcy at ¶ 522.02[4] p. 522-23, noting that . . .

In URBAN, G. v., 375 B.R. 882 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2007)

. . . has been adopted by a majority of states, including California and Montana. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In A. CHANDLER,, 362 B.R. 723 (Bankr. N.D. W. Va. 2007)

. . . .”); see also 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02[2] (“While this statement [in Owen] is dictum, it clearly . . .

In F. SALAYMEH F. v. LLC,, 361 B.R. 822 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . It appears that 34 states have elected to opt out. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02[1], n. 3 (15th ed . . .

In BENN, Jr. Jr. v. S. In v. S., 340 B.R. 905 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 1095a(d). 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02[3] (15th ed. rev.2005). . . .

In C. VICTOR,, 341 B.R. 775 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2006)

. . . . rev.2005) (listing those states that have opted out of the exemptions contained in § 522(d) and ¶ 522.02 . . .

In VIRISSIMO, In A., 332 B.R. 201 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2005)

. . . See generally, 4 Colliers on Bankruptcy ¶¶ 522.01-522.02[1] (2005); Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice . . .

In J. BIPPERT, Jr., 311 B.R. 456 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2004)

. . . exempt property under local law and non-bankruptcy federal law); see also 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

BRYSON v. SHUMWAY,, 308 F.3d 79 (1st Cir. 2002)

. . . He-M 522.02(a) (2002). . . .

In G. FARR, S C v. G., 278 B.R. 171 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2002)

. . . See also 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, ¶ 522.02[2], p. 522-14 (“Section 522(c) provides that exemptions . . .

BRYSON v. SHUMWAY,, 177 F. Supp. 2d 78 (D.N.H. 2001)

. . . He-M 522.02(a). . . .

In BENTLEY,, 245 B.R. 684 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2000)

. . . . # 23), at 3. . 4 Collier on Bankruptcy V 522.02[4] (Lawrence P. . . .

In ANDERSON,, 240 B.R. 254 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1999)

. . . King, 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02[1] at p. 522-12-13 (15th ed. rev.1998). . . .

In A. FRACASSO,, 210 B.R. 221 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1997)

. . . were limited to the exemptions available in the state of their domicile. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 522.02 . . . Id. at§ 522.02[1], . . . .

In SCOTT,, 199 B.R. 586 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1996)

. . . 522 is deemed “clear and unambiguous,” it must be interpreted literally); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In J. GORDON,, 199 B.R. 7 (Bankr. D. Md. 1996)

. . . King, 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.02 (15th ed. 1996). . . .

In H. SUMERELL D., 194 B.R. 818 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996)

. . . collection action or bankruptcy such that they become wards of the state. 3 Collier on BANKRUPTCY ¶ 522.02 . . .

In H. GERNAT, Sr. A. E. J. J. D. v. BELFORD, 192 B.R. 601 (D. Conn. 1996)

. . . state of his or her domicile as well an non-bankruptcy federal exemptions. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In A. MADDOX, TOWER LOAN OF MISSISSIPPI, INC. v. A. MADDOX, Jr. J. Jr., 15 F.3d 1347 (5th Cir. 1994)

. . . .) ¶ 522.02 (listing opt-out states). . . . .

In A. MADDOX, TOWER LOAN OF MISSISSIPPI, INC. v. A. MADDOX, Jr. J. Jr., 15 F.3d 1347 (5th Cir. 1994)

. . . V 522.02 (listing opt-out states). . . . .

In L. GLASS, D. HITT, v. L. GLASS,, 164 B.R. 759 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1994)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.02, at 522-11. . . .

In H. HUEBNER, H. HUEBNER, v. FARMERS STATE BANK, GRAFTON, IOWA,, 986 F.2d 1222 (8th Cir. 1993)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02, at 522-11 (15th ed. 1992). . . .

In H. HUEBNER, H. HUEBNER, v. FARMERS STATE BANK, GRAFTON, IOWA,, 986 F.2d 1222 (8th Cir. 1993)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy If 522.02, at 522-11 (15th ed. 1992). . . .

In WALKER, WALKER, v. G. M. MATHER,, 959 F.2d 894 (10th Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 522(b)(1); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 522.02, (15th ed. 1991). . . .

In WALKER, WALKER, v. G. M. MATHER,, 959 F.2d 894 (10th Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 522(b)(1); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy-11 522.02, (15th ed. 1991). . . .

In B. STONE, In ALBRIGHT, In HAYES,, 119 B.R. 222 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 1990)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy, Vol. 3, § 522.02, p. 522-10. . . .

In E. PETERSON, D. ARMSTRONG, E. v. E. PETERSON,, 111 B.R. 935 (8th Cir. 1990)

. . . scheme and limited residents to the exemptions provided for under state law. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In E. PETERSON, D. ARMSTRONG, E. v. E. PETERSON,, 897 F.2d 935 (8th Cir. 1990)

. . . scheme and limited residents to the exemptions provided for under state law. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In DIXON FORD MOTOR CREDIT CORP. v. DIXON A., 885 F.2d 327 (6th Cir. 1989)

. . . See generally, 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02, at 522-10 to 522-14 (15th ed. 1988). . . .

In DIXON FORD MOTOR CREDIT CORP. v. DIXON A., 885 F.2d 327 (6th Cir. 1989)

. . . See generally, 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02, at 522-10 to 522-14 (15th ed. 1988). . . .

In THOMPSON ABBOTSFORD STATE BANK, 867 F.2d 416 (7th Cir. 1989)

. . . Nuckolls, 780 F.2d 408, 414 (4th Cir.1985) (concurring opinion); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, ¶ 522.02 . . .

In THOMPSON ABBOTSFORD STATE BANK, 867 F.2d 416 (7th Cir. 1989)

. . . 522.02, at p. 522-11 n. 4a. . . .

In TOWNSEND, Jr. a k a Jr., 90 B.R. 498 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . creditor objecting to confirmation is South Atlantic Production Credit Association owed a total of $906,-522.02 . . .

In ONDRAS,, 846 F.2d 33 (7th Cir. 1988)

. . . including Indiana, have elected to opt-out of the federal exemption scheme. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In ONDRAS,, 846 F.2d 33 (7th Cir. 1988)

. . . including Indiana, have elected to opt-out of the federal exemption scheme. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In LIMING, a k a CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF ENID, OKLAHOMA, v. LIMING,, 797 F.2d 895 (10th Cir. 1986)

. . . debtor must choose between the state and federal provisions when claiming an exemption, see 3 Collier U 522.02 . . .

In RICHARDS,, 57 B.R. 662 (Bankr. D. Nev. 1986)

. . . Levine, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.02 at 522-11 (15th Ed.1985). . . .

In E. GIBBONS,, 52 B.R. 861 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1985)

. . . certain situations, to elect federal exemptions as a matter of state law. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 522.02 . . .

In JONES W. MILLER,, 768 F.2d 923 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . A substantial majority of the states, thirty-six at last count, 3 Collier ¶ 522.02 at 522-12 n. 4a, have . . .

In JONES W. MILLER,, 768 F.2d 923 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . A substantial majority of the states, thirty-six at last count, 3 Collier II 522.02 at 522-12 n. 4a, . . .

In B. WILLIS T. B. WILLIS T. v. BORG- WARNER ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,, 48 B.R. 295 (S.D. Tex. 1985)

. . . See generally 3 Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 522.02, .09 (15th ed. 1984). . . .

In A. REID, D. d b a FIRST BANK OF CATOOSA, v. A. REID D. d b a D. Co., 757 F.2d 230 (10th Cir. 1985)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy fi 522.02, at 522-11 (1984). . . .

In A. REID, D. d b a FIRST BANK OF CATOOSA, v. A. REID D. d b a D. Co., 757 F.2d 230 (10th Cir. 1985)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02, at 522-11 (1984). . . .

HINKSON, v. D. PFLEIDERER, v. STATE OF COLORADO,, 729 F.2d 697 (10th Cir. 1984)

. . . .1982); Matter of Cannady, 653 F.2d 210, 214 (5th Cir.1981); See generally 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 at 522-11 n. 4a. . . . .

HINKSON, v. D. PFLEIDERER, v. STATE OF COLORADO,, 729 F.2d 697 (10th Cir. 1984)

. . . .1982); Matter of Cannady, 653 F.2d 210, 214 (5th Cir.1981); See generally 3 Collier on Bankruptcy 11 522.02 . . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 at 522-11 n. 4a. . . . .

In BUREN, T. E. HILDEBRAND III, XIII, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 725 F.2d 1080 (6th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 24 (repealed 1978); see also 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 (15th ed. 1979 & Supp. 1983). . . .

In BUREN, T. E. HILDEBRAND III, XIII, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 725 F.2d 1080 (6th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 24 (repealed 1978); see also 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 (15th ed. 1979 & Supp. 1983). . . .

In GOFF GOFF v. TAYLOR,, 706 F.2d 574 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . See In re McManus, 681 F.2d 353 (5th Cir.1982), 3 Collier on Bankruptcy 1Jj[ 522.02, at 522-11 to -12 . . .

In GOFF GOFF v. TAYLOR,, 706 F.2d 574 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . See In re McManus, 681 F.2d 353 (5th Cir.1982), 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶¶ 522.02, at 522-11 to -12, . . .

In D. TERRITO, FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY W. v. D. TERRITO, P. C., 28 B.R. 315 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . is inconsistent with § 522 of the Code it no longer has any application. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In S. WATERS, Jr., 22 B.R. 387 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . Bkrtcy.D.Mass.1980); Comments to the Advisory Committee Notes on Rule 403; 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In ENGLAND ENGLAND v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BONHAM,, 22 B.R. 389 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . . - (Bkrtcy.N.D.Tex.1982); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 (15th ed. 1981); 1 Norton Bankruptcy Law . . .

In R. ROBERTS, J. AUBURN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, v. R. ROBERTS, J. S., 22 B.R. 215 (Bankr. D. Me. 1982)

. . . . § 522(b); see 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 (15th ed. 1982). . . .

In A. MUCELLI a k a A. P. C. M. D. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE S. N. A. v. A. MUCELLI a k a A. P. C. M. D., 21 B.R. 601 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1982)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02, p. 522-11 (15th ed. 1981). It is so ordered. . . .

In DARKE R. LYNN, v. DARKE P. C., 18 B.R. 510 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1982)

. . . in Rule 403 is inconsistent with the Code and, therefore, not applicable. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 . . .

In WARD, Jr. SAFEWAY FINANCE CO. INC. OF GEORGIA, v. WARD, Jr. In HARRIS, f k a SAFEWAY FINANCE CO. INC. OF GEORGIA, v. HARRIS, In SMALLWOOD, Jr. SAFEWAY FINANCE CO. INC. OF GEORGIA, v. SMALLWOOD, Jr. In DAVENPORT, SUNAMERICA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, v. DAVENPORT,, 14 B.R. 549 (S.D. Ga. 1981)

. . . not selectively choose those exemptions which most suit his needs.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, ¶ 522.02 . . .

In N. CANNADY, N. CANNADY, v. B. WILSON,, 653 F.2d 210 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.02 at 522-12 (15th ed. 1980). . . .

In C. BRENTS- PICKELL L. In MARKS A. A. In DIXON In DEWEY In LANGFORD, 12 B.R. 352 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. 1981)

. . . Indeed, fourteen or more states have done so. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.02, n.4a at 522-11 (15th . . .

In CARSTENS In HANSEN, 8 B.R. 524 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 1981)

. . . .- 3 Collier on Bankruptcy (15th ed. 1979), § 522.02. . . .

In CRUMP, 2 B.R. 222 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1980)

. . . .) ¶ 522.02, n. 5. . . .

GLOBE, 10 F. Cas. 480 (N.D.N.Y. 1850)

. . . action on which the present action is founded, and that a judgment was recovered therein for the sum of $522.02 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)