The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 522
COMMISSION MERCHANTS

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 522

COMMISSION MERCHANTS

522.01 Fruit or produce brokers to make return of account sales.

522.02 Persons presumed to be doing business in state.

522.03 Liability of broker for loss by reason of delayed account sales; measure of damages.

522.04 Liability of broker in case of failure to return account sales.

522.05 Penalty for failure of commission merchant to make returns.

522.06 Produce commission merchant to furnish shipper duplicate sales account; shipper to have access to certain records; proviso.

522.07 Violation of regulations as to sale of produce on commissions.

522.01 Fruit or produce brokers to make return of account sales.—Any person doing in this state the business of fruit or produce broker or commission merchant, receiving pineapples in carlots or less, grown in this state for shipment or consignment, shall make return of all account sales showing the cost and expenses charged against the returns, together with the name and address of the purchaser, within 10 days of the sale.

History.—s. 1, ch. 6235, 1911; RGS 4938; CGL 7025.

522.02 Persons presumed to be doing business in state.—Any person maintaining an office or soliciting personally or by agent such business in this state shall be presumed to be doing business in this state.

History.—s. 2, ch. 6235, 1911; RGS 4939; CGL 7026.

522.03 Liability of broker for loss by reason of delayed account sales; measure of damages.—Any person doing the business of fruit or produce broker or commission merchant, receiving pineapples in carlots or less, grown in this state for shipment or consignment, and who has not returned an account sales showing the cost and expenses charged against the returns, also the name and address of the purchaser, within 10 days of the sale, shall be liable in damages for any loss by reason of delayed account sales. The loss a shipper or consignor may sustain on cars of pineapples consigned to the said person over what she or he could have obtained in other markets or by other agencies shall be considered a proximate damage from the delayed account sales. The measure of damages shall be the difference between the prevailing price in the general market at time of receipt by consignee and the price received for such cars or less, of pineapples consigned to said broker or commission merchant between the time the account sales were due and the time received.

History.—s. 4, ch. 6235, 1911; RGS 4940; CGL 7027; s. 699, ch. 97-103.

522.04 Liability of broker in case of failure to return account sales.—In any suit for accounting against any person, doing the business of fruit or produce broker or commission merchant receiving pineapples in carlots or less, grown in this state for shipment or consignment, and who has not returned an account sales showing the cost and expenses charged against the returns, with the name and address of the purchaser, within 10 days of the sale, such person shall be held accountable to the shipper or consignee of said carlots, or less, of fruit for the full market price at the time of the receipt by such person of the said shipment or consignment.

History.—s. 5, ch. 6235, 1911; RGS 4941; CGL 7028.

522.05 Penalty for failure of commission merchant to make returns.—Any person, or agent or servant of such person failing to comply with the provisions of s. 522.01 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.083.

History.—s. 3, ch. 6235, 1911; RGS 5666; CGL 7869; s. 496, ch. 71-136.

522.06 Produce commission merchant to furnish shipper duplicate sales account; shipper to have access to certain records; proviso.—All persons engaged in the business of selling any produce or other article on commission in this state shall, if the produce or other thing of value be shipped to them by any person from any place in the state, when the same is sold by them, issue in duplicate a sales account which shall prescribe the kind, quantity, quality and price received for the produce or article sold, and with check shall cause same to be delivered by mail or otherwise, within 7 days of such sale, to the party furnishing the produce or article for sale, and should such sale be unsatisfactory to the party furnishing said produce or article for sale, then at her or his request the commission house shall furnish to her or him, within 5 days, the name or names, and residences of the purchaser of said produce or article; she or he shall also have access to the original sales papers and books showing the name and address of the purchaser of the produce or article, to the commission house selling said produce or article, and every reasonable assistance extended to her or him to her or his satisfaction in the matter; provided, that the provisions of this section shall not apply to any consignment, or part thereof, sold at retail or in less quantity than original packages, nor to produce consigned to retail merchants, nor to lumber or naval stores.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 6921, 1915; RGS 4942; CGL 7029; s. 195, ch. 77-104; s. 700, ch. 97-103.

522.07 Violation of regulations as to sale of produce on commissions.—Any person violating any of the provisions of s. 522.06 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $500, or sentenced to the county jail for a period of not longer than 6 months.

History.—s. 3, ch. 6921, 1915; RGS 5667; CGL 7870.

F.S. 522 on Google Scholar

F.S. 522 on Casetext

Amendments to 522

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 522

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S522.05 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL PRODUCE COMMISSION MERCHANT MAKE RETURN - M: S

S522.07 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - VIOLATE REGS RE SALE PRODUCE ON COMMISSIONS - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . California , 283 U.S. 423, 451, 51 S.Ct. 522, 75 L.Ed. 1154 (1931) ("The United States may perform its . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Yankton Sioux Tribe , 522 U.S. 329, 118 S.Ct.789, 139 L.Ed.2d 773 (1998). . . . Yankton Sioux Tribe , 522 U.S., at 351, 118 S.Ct. 789. . . . Yankton Sioux Tribe , 522 U.S., at 344, 118 S.Ct. 789. . . . Yankton Sioux Tribe , 522 U. S., at 357, 118 S.Ct. 789. . . . Yankton Sioux , 522 U. S., at 356 [118 S.Ct. 789].... . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, 139 S.Ct. 2116, 204 L.Ed.2d 522 (2019). . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Offutt , 216 Va. 681, 684, 222 S.E.2d 522, 525 (1976). . . .

ANDRUS v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (U.S. 2020)

. . . circumstances, applying a heavy measure of deference to counsel's judgments.' " Wiggins , 539 U.S. at 521-522 . . . Id. , at 522, 123 S.Ct. 2527 ; see also Williams , 529 U.S. at 396, 120 S.Ct. 1495. . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 86, 408 P.3d at 522. "Put simply, the PRP horse left the barn decades ago." Ibid. . . . City of Tarrant , 522 U.S. 75, 81, 118 S.Ct. 481, 139 L.Ed.2d 433 (1997). . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Louisiana , 419 U.S. 522, 536, 95 S.Ct. 692, 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975). . . . Louisiana , 419 U.S. 522, 95 S.Ct. 692, 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975) ; Brandenburg v. . . . Louisiana , 419 U.S. 522, 95 S.Ct. 692, 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975) -another opinion by Justice White-that . . .

L. ALLEN, v. A. COOPER, III,, 140 S. Ct. 994 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Florida Bd. of Regents , 528 U.S. 62, 78, 120 S.Ct. 631, 145 L.Ed.2d 522 (2000). . . .

E. RODRIGUEZ, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 140 S. Ct. 713 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Frommert , 559 U.S. 506, 521-522, 130 S.Ct. 1640, 176 L.Ed.2d 469 (2010) ; Travelers Casualty & Surety . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 480 U.S. 522, 525-526, 107 S.Ct. 1391, 94 L.Ed.2d 533 (1987) (per curiam )). . . .

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. IBG LLC,, 140 S. Ct. 955 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-522 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

C. ROTKISKE, v. KLEMM,, 140 S. Ct. 355 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Ferbar Corp. of Cal. , 522 U.S. 192, 201, 118 S.Ct. 542, 139 L.Ed.2d 553 (1997) ). . . .

W. PAUL v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 342 (U.S. 2019)

. . . . ----, 139 S.Ct. 2116, 204 L.Ed.2d 522 (2019). . . .

UNITED STATES v. TAYLOR, v., 935 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kienast , 907 F.3d 522, 527-28 (7th Cir. 2018), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 139 S. . . .

BIRD, v. i DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DHS, R., 935 F.3d 738 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . County of Geauga , 103 F.3d 516, 518, 522 (6th Cir. 1997), where the Sixth Circuit quoted VHA 's assertion . . . See Kuhnle , 103 F.3d at 522 (explaining that a statute "does not become immunized from legal challenge . . . Although the courts used broader language in reaching their holdings, see Kuhnle , 103 F.3d at 522 ; . . . BMG Music Publ'g , 512 F.3d 522, 532 (9th Cir. 2008) ), the district court did not err in denying Bird . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Johnson , 708 F.3d 520, 522-23 (4th Cir. 2013) ; Keohane v. Jones , 328 F. . . .

IN RE JUAREZ, v., 603 B.R. 610 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Second, the Creditors' interpretation of § 1129(b) creates a conflict between that section and §§ 522 . . . Pa. 2014) ("Property allowed as exempt, however, is retained because of section 522, independently of . . . Section 522(k) specifically provides that exempted property "is not liable for payment of any administrative . . . expense[,]" with certain exceptions not applicable here. § 522(k). . . . holding that exempt funds are only liable for administrative expenses under two narrow exceptions to § 522 . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. JOHNSON,, 934 F.3d 716 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gagnon , 470 U.S. 522, 526, 105 S.Ct. 1482, 84 L.Ed.2d 486 (1985) (per curiam) (quoting Snyder v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. ADAMS,, 934 F.3d 720 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Reed , 744 F.3d 519, 522 (7th Cir. 2014). . . .

SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR v. BRISTOL EXCAVATING, INC., 935 F.3d 122 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 480 U.S. 522, 525-26, 107 S.Ct. 1391, 94 L.Ed.2d 533 (1987) (per curiam). . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 2116, 2131, 204 L.Ed.2d 522 (2019) (Alito, J., concurring in the judgment) ("[I]t would be freakish . . . Khan , 522 U.S. 3, 118 S.Ct. 275, 139 L.Ed.2d 199 (1997) (overruling prior precedent whose unsoundness . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wise , 522 F.3d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 2008) ("The Supreme Court has held that state officials lack standing . . . Donelon , 522 F.3d at 567-68 (quoting Rogers v. Brockette , 588 F.2d 1057, 1065 (5th Cir. 1979) ). . . . Id. at 762 ; see also Donelon , 522 F.3d at 568 (determining official has no "personal stake" in the . . .

UNITED STATES v. CUEVAS- LOPEZ,, 934 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Garcia-Sanchez , 916 F.3d 522, 526 (5th Cir. 2019). Maj. Op. 1067-68. . . . Garcia-Sanchez , that court held that it does. 916 F.3d 522, 526 (5th Cir. 2019). . . .

CHEMEHUEVI INDIAN TRIBE, v. MCMAHON,, 934 F.3d 1076 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . , it subsequently recognized the existence of the Chemehuevi Reservation in the Parker Dam Act, ch. 522 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STAHLMAN,, 934 F.3d 1199 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ellisor, 522 F.3d 1255, 1277 n.34 (11th Cir. 2008) (internal quotations omitted). . . .

S. BLEDSOE, v. VANDERBILT,, 934 F.3d 1112 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Fletcher, 522 U.S. 118, 127, 118 S.Ct. 502, 139 L.Ed.2d 471 (1997) (emphasis added) (quoting Malley v . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. of Sacramento Cty. , 11 Cal. 3d 574, 581-82, 114 Cal.Rptr. 106, 522 P.2d 666 (1974). . . . Hurtado , 11 Cal. 3d at 579, 114 Cal.Rptr. 106, 522 P.2d 666. . . . Superior Court , 11 Cal.3d 574, 114 Cal.Rptr. 106, 522 P.2d 666 (1974). . . .

NALPROPION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC., 934 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . T-Mobile USA, Inc. , 522 F.3d 1299, 1306 (Fed. . . .

UNITED STATES v. G. WAGUESPACK,, 935 F.3d 322 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lucio , 428 F.3d 519, 522 (5th Cir. 2005) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PAWLAK,, 935 F.3d 337 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kienast , 907 F.3d 522, 528-29 (7th Cir. 2018) ; United States v. . . .

LILLY, v. CITY OF NEW YORK NYPD No. NYPD No., 934 F.3d 222 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . See Arbor Hill, 522 F.3d at 186 ; see also Hensley , 461 U.S. at 429-30, 103 S.Ct. 1933. 487 F.2d 161 . . . Arbor Hill, 522 F.3d at 186 n.3 (citing Johnson , 488 F.2d at 717-19 ). 461 U.S. 424, 103 S.Ct. 1933, . . . Arbor Hill, 522 F.3d at 188 (internal citation omitted). Id. . . . See Arbor Hill, 522 F.3d at 188 ("After Hensley and Blum, circuit courts struggled with the nettlesome . . . Arbor Hill , 522 F.3d at 190. Lilly , 2017 WL 3493249, at *5. Arbor Hill , 522 F.3d at 190. . . .

UNITED STATES v. W. HARNEY,, 934 F.3d 502 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kienast , 907 F.3d 522, 530-31 (7th Cir. 2018). United States v. . . .

IN RE J. SHENK, Sr. J. Sr. v. U. S., 603 B.R. 671 (Bankr. N.D. N.Y. 2019)

. . . See generally, In re Turturo , 522 B.R. 419, 426 n. 16 (Bankr. . . .

GRAHAM v. ST. LOUIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT O P. O. K., 933 F.3d 1007 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gibbs, 923 F.3d 518, 522 (8th Cir. 2019) (quoting Mallak v. . . . Id. at 522-23 (quoting Berry v. Doss, 900 F.3d 1017, 1021 (8th Cir. 2018) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ- MARTINEZ, v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v., 933 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 564 U.S. 522, 131 S.Ct. 2685, 180 L.Ed.2d 519 (2011) : Is a defendant who enters into . . .

IN RE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE S SUNDAY TICKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Jr. v. LLC LLC NFL LLC LLC LP LLC LLC NFL LP LLC LP LLC LP Co. LLC LP LLC, 933 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Khan , 522 U.S. 3, 10, 118 S.Ct. 275, 139 L.Ed.2d 199 (1997). . . .

EFFEX CAPITAL, LLC, v. NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION,, 933 F.3d 882 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. , 522 U.S. 479, 492, 118 S.Ct. 927, 140 L.Ed.2d 1 (1998) (quoting Ass'n . . .

IN RE DEEPWATER HORIZON v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. M. a v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. v. BP v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. In v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. M. a v. v. Jr. Sr. M. a v. L. L. C. v. Jr. Sr. v. BP v. v. Jr. Sr. In v. L. L. C., 934 F.3d 434 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 522, 523-24 (5th Cir. 2014). . . .

J. BAUWENS, v. REVCON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., 935 F.3d 534 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ferbar Corp. of Cal., Inc. , 522 U.S. 192, 195, 118 S.Ct. 542, 139 L.Ed.2d 553 (1997). . . . Bay Area Laundry, 522 U.S. at 202, 118 S.Ct. 542. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 522 U.S. 52, 57, 118 S.Ct. 469, 139 L.Ed.2d 352 (1997) (stating, in construing § 666, . . . United States , 522 U.S. at 56, 118 S.Ct. 469 (stating that § 666 has "expansive, unqualified language . . . United States , 522 U.S. at 56, 118 S.Ct. 469. . . . United States , 522 U.S. at 58, 118 S.Ct. 469 (collecting cases evidencing split). . . . United States , 522 U.S. at 58, 118 S.Ct. 469. . . .

J. AVENA, v. CHAPPELL,, 932 F.3d 1237 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 522-23, 123 S.Ct. 2527. . . . See Wiggins , 539 U.S. at 522-23, 123 S.Ct. 2527 ; see also Apelt v. . . . Wiggins , 539 U.S. at 522-23, 123 S.Ct. 2527. . . .

AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, N. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 932 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . . §§ 221 -522. . . .

PILLAR DYNASTY LLC, v. NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., 933 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 522. . . . App'x 522-23. While a motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. . . .

T. SCHMITT v. LAROSE,, 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 521, 522-23 (6th Cir. 2017) ("Because Martinez had [state mandamus relief] available to him, no . . .

A. JALUDI, v. CITIGROUP, 933 F.3d 246 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . NewOak Capital Mkts., LLC , 645 F.3d 522, 526 (2d Cir. 2011). . . .

IN RE N. JAFFE,, 932 F.3d 602 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Section 522(b)(1) of the United States Bankruptcy Code states that a "debtor may exempt from property . . . the entirety or joint tenant is exempt from process under applicable nonbankruptcy law. 11 U.S.C. § 522 . . . lien Jaffe filed a motion in the bankruptcy court arguing the property was exempt under 11 U.S.C. § 522 . . . See 11 U.S.C. § 522(f). . . . Section 522(b)(3)(B) begins broadly by stating it exempts "any interest in property." . . .

UNITED STATES v. ELDRED, 933 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Kienast , 907 F.3d 522, 528 (7th Cir. 2018) (noting that "whether the magistrate judge lacked authority . . . Kienast , 907 F.3d 522, 526-29 (7th Cir. 2018) ; United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRADO,, 933 F.3d 121 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Gaudin , 515 U.S. 506, 522-23, 115 S.Ct. 2310, 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995), that an "element of the offense . . .

IN RE DOBOS, s v., 603 B.R. 31 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . She sought avoidance of the bail bondsmen's lien under § 522(f). Ms. . . .

ASSOCIATION OF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS AGCO CNH LLC v. BURGUM, s, 932 F.3d 727 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bowers, 358 U.S. 522, 528, 79 S.Ct. 437, 3 L.Ed.2d 480 (1959) (noting that, in the Equal Protection Clause . . .

DOGAN, v. BARAK,, 932 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Allen , 466 U.S. 522, 529, 104 S.Ct. 1970, 80 L.Ed.2d 565 (1984) ). . . .

K. W. P. By v. KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS In In, 931 F.3d 813 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Servs ., 583 F.3d 522, 531 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). . . .

CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL PENSION FUND,, 932 F.3d 91 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 480 U.S. 522, 526, 107 S.Ct. 1391, 94 L.Ed.2d 533 (1987) (per curiam). . . .

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS, v., 933 F.3d 685 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Taylor , 522 F.3d 731, 732-33 (7th Cir. 2008). . . . Taylor , 522 F.3d at 732-33. . . .

FLORES, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 353 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . City of New York, 996 F.2d 522, 532 (2d Cir. 1993) ; see also Scotto v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MATHIS, a k a a k a a k a D- v. a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a v. a k a a k a K. a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a a k a, 932 F.3d 242 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 522 U.S. 52, 65, 118 S.Ct. 469, 139 L.Ed.2d 352 (1997) ). . . . Salinas , 522 U.S. at 63-64, 118 S.Ct. 469. . . .

FORCE, A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F. N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. TZVI S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. v. FACEBOOK, INC., 934 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Raytheon Aircraft Co. , 522 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2008), which was decided prior to the Supreme Court's . . . here whether the presumption against extraterritoriality is "simply ... not implicated," Blazevska , 522 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DEL CARPIO FRESCAS,, 932 F.3d 324 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gaudin , 515 U.S. 506, 522-23, 115 S.Ct. 2310, 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995). . . .

POSADA, v. ACP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., 389 F. Supp. 3d 149 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Co., 444 Mass. 34, 825 N.E.2d 522, 530 (2005) (as applied to claim under Chapter 151B); see also Rodriguez-Vives . . .

AL- BALUCHI a k a v. T. ESPER,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Trump, et al., 927 F.3d 522, 530-31 (D.C. Cir. 2019) ); see also Boumediene v. . . .

IN RE SCHATZ, v., 602 B.R. 411 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2019)

. . . See 11 U.S.C. § 522(c)(4). . . . (citing 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(1) ). . . . See 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(A) ). . . . See 11 U.S.C. § 522(c)(4). . . . Protection of Exempt Property Under § 522(c) Our analysis starts with the text of § 522(c) : "property . . .

JUSTICE NETWORK INC. v. CRAIGHEAD COUNTY In s, 931 F.3d 753 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . judicial capacity is not immune from actions under § 1983 seeking prospective injunctive relief. 466 U.S. 522 . . .

S. WILSON, v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., 932 F.3d 513 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rivera , 272 F.3d 519, 522 (7th Cir. 2001). Wilson's limitations clock for Dr. . . .

DEXTER, a k a v. DEALOGIC, LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 233 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Coca-Cola Co., 522 F.3d 168, 180 (1st Cir. 2008) (quoting Faragher v. . . .

IN RE S. ANTONUCCI, v. S., 602 B.R. 618 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Provident," and together with the Debtor, the "Parties") in the amount of $7,391,404.88 pursuant to § 522 . . . In his Schedule C, the Debtor stated that he was claiming state and federal exemptions pursuant to § 522 . . . the Debtor filed the Lien Avoidance Motion, seeking to avoid Provident's judicial lien pursuant to § 522 . . . The Debtor, in response, argued that his exemptions are unconditional and "forever exempted" under § 522 . . . The Debtor argued in response that § 522(c) and the United States Supreme Court's decision in Law v. . . .

P. J. BY THROUGH MR. MRS. W. J. L. G. MR. MRS. L. G. M. L. MR. MRS. J. L. Mr. v. CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, 931 F.3d 156 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Khan , 522 U.S. 3, 20, 118 S.Ct. 275, 139 L.Ed.2d 199 (1997) ("[I]t is [the Supreme] Court's prerogative . . .

FACIANE, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA,, 931 F.3d 412 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 522. . . . See Miller , 475 F.3d at 522 ; Kennedy , 954 F.2d at 1120-21. . . . explaining that a claim may accrue before administrative proceedings have begun); Miller , 475 F.3d at 522 . . .

Z. J. a BY AND THROUGH Je JONES, v. KANSAS CITY BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS,, 931 F.3d 672 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Servs ., 583 F.3d 522, 534-35 (8th Cir. 2009) ). . . .

WEST, v. CITY OF CALDWELL, 931 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Osage , 235 F.3d 518, 521, 522 n.2 (10th Cir. 2000). . . .

In MATTER OF BENJAMIN, v., 932 F.3d 293 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Salfi , 422 U.S. 749, 760 n.7, 95 S.Ct. 2457, 45 L.Ed.2d 522 (1975). . . .

F. EDMISTON, v. LOUISIANA SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER,, 931 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Regents , 528 U.S. 62, 67, 120 S.Ct. 631, 145 L.Ed.2d 522 (2000) (holding that the ADEA did not . . .

THOMPSON Z. T. G. T. III, S. T. T. T. v. DILL, 930 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Long , 779 F.3d 522, 524 (8th Cir. 2015) ). There is an exception to this rule. . . .

OBASI INVESTMENT LTD Wu v. TIBET PHARMACEUTICALS, INC Yu Z. L. III Co. L. L. P. L. III,, 931 F.3d 179 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 480 U.S. 522, 526, 107 S.Ct. 1391, 94 L.Ed.2d 533 (1987) (per curiam). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MYERS,, 930 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Barker , 407 U.S. at 522, 92 S.Ct. 2182. . . .

BIGSBY, Jr. v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 336 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . City of New York, 996 F.2d 522, 532 (2d Cir. 1993). II. . . .

CORBETT, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 930 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Browning, 522 F.3d 1153, 1161 (11th Cir. 2008). . . . State Conference of N.A.A.C.P., 522 F.3d at 1161 ; see also Bowen, 233 F.3d at 1340 (observing that a . . . "substantially increase[d] the likelihood" that he would be unionized against his will); Browning, 522 . . .

ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY AFFILIATED PLANS, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 22 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Shalala, 522 U.S. 448, 460, 118 S.Ct. 909, 139 L.Ed.2d 895 (1998) ); see also PDK Labs. Inc. v. . . . See Bennett, 4 F.Supp.3d at 9 (quoting Regions Hosp. , 522 U.S. at 460, 118 S.Ct. 909 ). . . . United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525-26, 107 S.Ct. 1391, 94 L.Ed.2d 533 (1987). . . .

F. WORTHY, D. Co. v. CITY OF PHENIX CITY, ALABAMA,, 930 F.3d 1206 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Browning , 522 F.3d 1153, 1162 (11th Cir. 2008) (noting that the Supreme Court has "voiced its hesitance . . . United States , 522 U.S. 93, 99, 118 S.Ct. 488, 139 L.Ed.2d 450 (1997). . . . See Hudson , 522 U.S. at 99, 118 S.Ct. 488 ("Even in those cases where the legislature has indicated . . . a sanction criminal, as deterrence may serve civil as well as criminal goals.' " (quoting Hudson , 522 . . . is alone 'insufficient to render the money penalties ... criminally punitive.' " (quoting Hudson , 522 . . .

TAYLOR, v. GRUBBS v. LT. SCDC SCDC DOE, DOE, AI v. SCDC LT MR C, 930 F.3d 611 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 537 U.S. 522, 527, 123 S.Ct. 1072, 155 L.Ed.2d 88 (2003) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SIHAI CHENG,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 141 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . United States, 537 U.S. 522, 525, 123 S.Ct. 1072, 155 L.Ed.2d 88 (2003) ). . . .

CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 84 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . FERC , 522 F.3d 378, 390 (D.C. . . .

CHACOTY, v. POMPEO, U. S., 392 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Vilsack , 563 F.3d 519, 522 (D.C. . . .

MANNING v. CALDWELL, s FOR CITY OF ROANOKE s, 930 F.3d 264 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Beatrice Pocahontas Coal Co. , 67 F.3d 517, 522 n.8 (4th Cir. 1995) ("The normal rule of course is that . . .

B. SULLIVAN, v. DUMONT,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 161 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Pfizer , 522 F.3d 55, 61 n. 2 (1st Cir. 2008). . . .

ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, v. ORLAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,, 929 F.3d 865 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Maleng , 522 F.3d 874, 890 (9th Cir. 2008) ( Fisher applies when "the potential anti-competitive effect . . .

UNITED STATES v. MILLS,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 528 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522, 526, 538, 95 S.Ct. 692, 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975) ; Berghuis v. . . .

F. MAY, v. SEGOVIA,, 929 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Salfi , 422 U.S. 749, 764, 95 S.Ct. 2457, 45 L.Ed.2d 522 (1975) )). . . . Johnson , 385 F.3d 503, 522 (5th Cir. 2004) ). . . .

INDIVIOR INC. UK RB Rx, LLC, v. DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES, S. A. Dr. s UT, USA, UK RB v. LLC,, 930 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . T-Mobile USA, Inc. , 522 F.3d 1299, 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2008). . . .

RICHARDSON, v. THOMAS,, 930 F.3d 587 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . North Carolina, 522 U.S. 1056, 118 S.Ct. 710, 139 L.Ed.2d 652 (1998). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MILLS,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 895 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 522, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968). . . . Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522, 526, 538, 95 S.Ct. 692, 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975) ; Berghuis v. . . .

PIER CRUISE EXPERTS, a v. REVELEX CORPORATION, a, 929 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Honeywell, Inc ., 460 So. 2d 521, 522 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1984), Ace Formal Wear v. . . .

CURRY- MALCOLM, v. ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 189 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Dist. , 26 A.D.3d 336, 337, 809 N.Y.S.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006). . . .

RUSH, v. SAUL,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 957 (D.N.M. 2019)

. . . AR 522-93. She was represented by William S. Rode of Michael D. Armstrong & Associates. . . . AR 492, 522, 816. . . .

IN RE J. TRUMP, D. H., 928 F.3d 360 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . capacity as a landowner" and its "well-founded desire to preserve its sovereign territory," id. at 519, 522 . . .

FORREST, v. PARRY, PHM PHM I- IV, 930 F.3d 93 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Georgia-Pacific Corp. , 126 F.3d 506, 522 (3d Cir. 1997) ; see also Selkridge v. . . .

ROXX ALLISON LTD. v. JEWELERS INC., 385 F. Supp. 3d 377 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . McFadden Oil Corp., 71 N.Y.2d 460, 527 N.Y.S.2d 195, 522 N.E.2d 40, 43 (1988). . . .

REINALT- THOMAS CORPORATION, d b a v. MAVIS TIRE SUPPLY, LLC,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 1261 (N.D. Ga. 2019)

. . . Axiom Worldwide, Inc. , 522 F.3d 1211, 1218 (11th Cir. 2008). . . .

CRUZ v. P. BARR, U. S., 929 F.3d 304 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Griffith , 522 F.3d 607, 610 (5th Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BULUC,, 930 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Campbell , 52 F.3d 521, 522 (5th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS,, 930 F.3d 44 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 522, 524 (10th Cir. 2012) (Gorsuch, J .) . . .