The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 522
COMMISSION MERCHANTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 522.06

522.06 Produce commission merchant to furnish shipper duplicate sales account; shipper to have access to certain records; proviso.—All persons engaged in the business of selling any produce or other article on commission in this state shall, if the produce or other thing of value be shipped to them by any person from any place in the state, when the same is sold by them, issue in duplicate a sales account which shall prescribe the kind, quantity, quality and price received for the produce or article sold, and with check shall cause same to be delivered by mail or otherwise, within 7 days of such sale, to the party furnishing the produce or article for sale, and should such sale be unsatisfactory to the party furnishing said produce or article for sale, then at her or his request the commission house shall furnish to her or him, within 5 days, the name or names, and residences of the purchaser of said produce or article; she or he shall also have access to the original sales papers and books showing the name and address of the purchaser of the produce or article, to the commission house selling said produce or article, and every reasonable assistance extended to her or him to her or his satisfaction in the matter; provided, that the provisions of this section shall not apply to any consignment, or part thereof, sold at retail or in less quantity than original packages, nor to produce consigned to retail merchants, nor to lumber or naval stores.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 6921, 1915; RGS 4942; CGL 7029; s. 195, ch. 77-104; s. 700, ch. 97-103.

F.S. 522.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 522.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 522.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 522.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 522.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE MENDOZA, 597 B.R. 686 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . meaning of "domicile" for purposes of section 522 of the Bankruptcy Code. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 . . . Minick , 111 Fla. 469, 149 So. 483, 487-88 (1933)with 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 (16th ed. 2018 . . . Minick , 111 Fla. 469, 149 So. 483, 487-88 (1933) ; 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 (16th ed. 2018). . . .

IN RE KERN, L., 576 B.R. 817 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 2017)

. . . . § 522(b)(3)(A); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.06 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. . . .

IN RE ST. JAMES,, 560 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2016)

. . . , so long as the property is exempt in the law of the domiciliary state.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 . . .

HUDSON v., 94 F. Supp. 3d 59 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . Finally, Plaintiff cites to 103 DOC 522.07(b)(2). 103 DOC 522.06(b)(3) states that “[u]pon receipt of . . . II complaint, an Investigation Intake Form Shall be submitted to the Internal Affairs Unit.” 108 DOC 522.06 . . . This is sufficient to state a claim for violation of 103 DOC 522.06 and 522.07 that could support equitable . . . regulations and policies except that it is DENIED as to equitable relief sought for violations of 103 DOC 522.06 . . . Anderson, Bariamis, and Nano, as to Auguste’s claim for equitable relief for violations of 103 DOC 522.06 . . .

In A. RODY H., 468 B.R. 384 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2012)

. . . not permit an exemption to be taken on property located outside the state. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 . . .

In STANTON,, 457 B.R. 80 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2011)

. . . means actual residence coupled with a present intention to remain there. 4 CollieR on BANKRUPTCY ¶ 522.06 . . .

SCHOFIELD, v. CLARKE, F., 769 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D. Mass. 2011)

. . . supervise and control their subordinate defendant Saba when they allowed Saba to violate regulation 103 DOC 522.06 . . .

In J. NICKERSON,, 375 B.R. 869 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2007)

. . . . § 522(b)(3). . 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 (15th ed. rev.2007) (citations omitted). . . .

In URBAN, G. v., 375 B.R. 882 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2007)

. . . so long as the property is exempt under the law of the domiciliary state.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 . . .

In A. CHANDLER,, 362 B.R. 723 (Bankr. N.D. W. Va. 2007)

. . . . § 522, the terms "domicile” and "residence” are not synonymous. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 (Alan . . .

In URBAN,, 361 B.R. 910 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2007)

. . . the purposes of section 522, may be different from the law of the forum[.] 4 CollieR ON BanKruptCY, ¶ 522.06 . . . King, 3 CollieR on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 (15th ed. rev.2002). In re Morad, 323 B.R. at 823. . . . King, 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 (15th ed. rev.2002) (footnotes omitted). . . . .

E. MORAD, E. v., 323 B.R. 818 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2005)

. . . King, 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 (15th ed. rev.2002); see also DeNadai v. . . . King, 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 (15th ed. rev.2002). . . . King, 3 Cottier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 (15th ed. rev.2002) (footnotes omitted). . . .

In A. ARISPE,, 289 B.R. 245 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Collier 15th ed. on Bankruptcy, 522.06 (emphasis added). . . .

In M. MARSICO, Sr., 278 B.R. 1 (Bankr. D.N.H. 2002)

. . . In re Tomko, 87 B.R. 372, 374 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1988) (quoting 3 Collier on Bankruptcy para. 522.06, at 522 . . .

In F. SPARFVEN,, 265 B.R. 506 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2001)

. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.06, at 522-33-4 (15th ed. Supp. 2000). . . .

In T. WEZA, Jr., 248 B.R. 470 (Bankr. D.N.H. 2000)

. . . .”); King et al., Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 (15th rev. ed. 1998) (“If the debtor chooses the option . . .

In LEVY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUEBEC, v. LEVY,, 221 B.R. 559 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . Gilmer, 129 U.S. 315, 328-29, 9 S.Ct. 289, 293, 32 L.Ed. 690 (1889); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 . . . the entire 180-day period cannot claim any exemption under state law....” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 . . .

In G. BURNS,, 218 B.R. 897 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1998)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy ¶522.06. Residence is the. . . .

In M L BUSINESS MACHINE COMPANY, INC. J. JOBIN, v. OTIS, III,, 190 B.R. 111 (D. Colo. 1995)

. . . Code, a debt- or’s residence “may be nothing more than a place of sojourn.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 522.06 . . .

In A. SELTZER,, 185 B.R. 116 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 522.06 (15th ed.1995) (explaining 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(1)). . . .

In PEDERSON s, 105 B.R. 622 (Bankr. D. Colo. 1989)

. . . is the situs of the real property would then have the dominant interest. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 . . .

In H. TOMKO, t a C., 87 B.R. 372 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988)

. . . to return when he is absent and where he exercises his political rights. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 . . .

In D. DONDEY,, 50 B.R. 12 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 522.06 n. 8 (15th Ed.). . . .

In F. WHITE L. d b a, 18 B.R. 95 (Bankr. D. Vt. 1982)

. . . consists of an actual residence coupled with a present intention to remain there. 3 Collier 15th Edition § 522.06 . . .

In HAWKINS,, 15 B.R. 618 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1981)

. . . . § 522(b). 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 522.06, at page 522-24 (15th Ed.). . . .

THE JEWEL SHOP, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 173 Ct. Cl. 466 (Ct. Cl. 1965)

. . . excess profits tax by $3,570.05, and its excess profits tax by $22,948.97 — a total overpayment of $26,-522.06 . . .