Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 553.501 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 553.501 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 553.501

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 553
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 553.501
553.501 Short title.Sections 553.501-553.513 may be cited as the “Florida Americans With Disabilities Accessibility Implementation Act.”
History.s. 1, ch. 93-183.

F.S. 553.501 on Google Scholar

F.S. 553.501 on Casetext

Amendments to 553.501


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 553.501
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 553.501.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

HOEWISCHER, v. CEDAR BEND CLUB, INC., 877 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 553.501 et seq. . . .

MEYERS v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE,, 754 So. 2d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . the Florida Americans With Disabilities Accessibility Implementation Act (the Florida Act), Section 553.501 . . . provide a wheelchair ramp or other safe access for persons who use wheelchairs, as required by section 553.501 . . . Specifically, Appellants rely on section 553.501, Florida Statutes, et seq., the Florida Act, to support . . . “All new or altered buildings and facilities subject to ss. 553.501-553.513 which may be frequented in . . . , lived in, or worked in by the public shall comply with ss. 553.501-553.513.” § 553.504(1), Fla. . . .

C. LEONARD, IV, v. WAKULLA COUNTY,, 688 So. 2d 440 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . maintained because it did not comply with the requirements of the A.D.A. as incorporated in Florida Statute 553.501 . . . Because section 553.501 requires compliance with the A.D.A., appellant alleged that appellee was obligated . . .