The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 672.712, which provides: (1) After a breach within the preceding section the buyer may “cover” by . . . Stat. § 672.712. . . . lower-sulfur coal is not the kind of “expenses saved” contemplated in the cover remedy formula of § 672.712 . . .
. . . Section 672.712 provides for cover. . . . Thus, a buyer complaining of non-delivery can proceed under either §§ 672.712 or 672.713. . . . Section 672.712(2) provides the measure of damages: The buyer may recover from the seller as damages . . . That leaves Section 672.712 as the only remedy. . . . Section 672.712(2) provides that the measure of damages is the difference between the contract price . . .
. . . See Uniform Commercial Code, § 672.712, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .
. . . correct that “cover” is a very specific term and refers to the purchase of substitute goods, see § 672.712 . . .
. . . Stat. 672.712(2) and not consequential damages. . . .
. . . Florida Statute, § 672.712(1) (1983) provides: “(1) After a breach within the preceding section the buyer . . .
. . . remedies include, (1) cancellation — Section 672.612; (2) “cover” and damages for non-delivery — Sections 672.712 . . .
. . . In computing the measure of damages, we look to section 672.712, Florida Statutes (1979), which allows . . .
. . . .-711 and 672.712 for loading on the UEL-EN, but by the time the UELEN reached the loading berth, the . . . U.C.C. § 2-712, F.S.A. .§ 672.712. . . .
. . . only his deposit on the contract, the trial court should have allowed Goodell “cover” under Section 672.712 . . . First, we think Goodell presented an unrebutted prima facie case for “cover” under Section 672.712 which . . .