The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . price in cases where the buyer has anticipatorily repudiated the contract or refused delivery); icL § 672.713 . . .
. . . . § 672.713, Fla. Stat. (2013); A & P Bakery Supply & Equip. Co. v. . . .
. . . . § 672.713, which calculates damages as “the difference between the market price at the time when the . . . Stat. § 672.713(1). . . . Given the facts of this ease, the appropriate remedy to Coalsales’ breach was the market remedy of § 672.713 . . .
. . . A damage award for breach of contract for the sale of goods is typically covered by section 672.713 of . . . Stat. § 672.713. . . . Stat. § 672.713(1); U.C.C. § 2-713(1); accord Weigert v. . . . In this case, however, the district court found that HGI failed to plead sufficiently section 672.713 . . .
. . . Stat. ch. 672.713 (1997). . . .
. . . Thus, a buyer complaining of non-delivery can proceed under either §§ 672.712 or 672.713. . . . Alternatively, a buyer may elect to proceed under § 672.713(1): “subject to the provisions of this chapter . . . the cover price is conclusively determined to be the fair market price of the goods, whereas under § 672.713 . . . Mayfair presented no evidence regarding market price whatsoever, so it cannot seek to recover under § 672.713 . . .
. . . While an aggrieved buyer may recover consequential damages for a seller’s breach of contract (sections 672.713 . . .
. . . Marbury, 82 Fla. 317, 90 So. 173 (1921); § 672.713(1), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .
. . . (1) cancellation — Section 672.612; (2) “cover” and damages for non-delivery — Sections 672.712 and 672.713 . . .
. . . identified to the contract; or (b) Recover damages for nondelivery as provided in this chapter (s. 672.713 . . .