Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 871 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 871 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 871

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 871
DISTURBING RELIGIOUS AND OTHER ASSEMBLIES
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 871
CHAPTER 871
DISTURBING RELIGIOUS AND OTHER ASSEMBLIES
871.01 Disturbing schools and religious and other assemblies.
871.015 Unlawful protests.
871.02 Indictments or informations for disturbing assembly.
871.04 Advertising; religious discrimination; public places.
871.05 Interference with a sporting or entertainment event.
871.01 Disturbing schools and religious and other assemblies.
(1)(a) Whoever willfully and maliciously interrupts or disturbs any school or any assembly of people met for the worship of God, any assembly of people met for the purpose of acknowledging the death of an individual, or for any other lawful purpose commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(b) If a person commits a violation of paragraph (a) and in doing so makes a credible threat, as that term is defined in s. 784.048(1), he or she commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(c) If the penalty for a violation of this subsection is reclassified under s. 775.085, such a violation is considered a hate crime for purposes of the reporting requirements of s. 877.19.
(2) Whoever willfully interrupts or disturbs any assembly of people met for the purpose of acknowledging the death of an individual with a military funeral honors detail pursuant to 10 U.S.C. s. 1491 commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.ss. 19, 21, 22, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2627, 2629, 2630; GS 3547; s. 1, ch. 5719, 1907; RGS 5448; CGL 7591; s. 1130, ch. 71-136; s. 1, ch. 2006-264; s. 5, ch. 2023-24.
871.015 Unlawful protests.
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Funeral or burial” means a service or ceremony offered or provided in connection with the final disposition, memorialization, interment, entombment, or inurnment of human remains or cremated human remains.
(b) “Funeral procession” has the same meaning as provided in s. 316.1974.
(c) “Protest activities” means any action, including picketing, which is undertaken with the intent to interrupt or disturb a funeral or burial.
(2) A person may not knowingly engage in protest activities or knowingly cause protest activities to occur within 500 feet of the property line of a residence, cemetery, funeral home, house of worship, or other location during or within 1 hour before or 1 hour after the conducting of a funeral or burial at that place. This subsection does not prohibit protest activities that occur adjacent to that portion of a funeral procession which extends beyond 500 feet of the property line of the location of the funeral or burial.
(3) A person who violates this section commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.s. 1, ch. 2013-19; s. 166, ch. 2014-17.
871.02 Indictments or informations for disturbing assembly.The several grand juries of this state in their respective counties may return indictments or the several state attorneys of the state in their respective circuits may file information against all persons violating s. 871.01, and such indictments or informations, when filed with the clerk of the circuit court in the county where such offense is alleged to have been committed, shall be forthwith certified by the clerk to some court in the county having jurisdiction to try and determine such charge, and said court to which such indictment or information is certified shall proceed to try and determine such charge upon such indictment or information, the same as if affidavit had been made before such court charging the said offense.
History.ss. 2, 3, ch. 5719, 1907; RGS 5449; CGL 7592; s. 1404, ch. 97-102; s. 2, ch. 2006-264.
871.04 Advertising; religious discrimination; public places.
(1) Except where the context clearly requires a different meaning, the following terms shall have for the purposes of this section the meaning respectively ascribed to them:
(a) “Person” means any individual, partnership, association, corporation, or organized group of persons, whether incorporated or not.
(b) “Establishment” means any building or part thereof, including, without being limited to, public inns, hotels, motels, apartment hotels, any structure, enclosure, tract of land, and all improvements, appurtenances, and additions, bodies of water whether natural or artificial, and any other place of whatsoever nature to which the general public is or will be admitted, allowed, or invited on payment of a fee, free of charge, or otherwise.
(2) No person, directly or indirectly, for herself or himself or for another, shall publish, post, broadcast by any means, maintain, circularize, issue, display, transmit, or otherwise disseminate or place in any manner before the public with reference to an establishment any advertisement that the patronage of any person is not welcome, or is objectionable, or is not acceptable because of the person’s religion. No person shall cause or solicit another person to violate this section.
(3) This section shall not apply to any establishment which is private or limited to membership only, to any camp administered by any religious organization, group, or sect, admission to which is based on religious belief or affiliation, or to any gathering, meeting, or assembly held under the auspices of any religious organization, group, or sect.
(4) Any person or persons violating this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.ss. 1, 2, ch. 29845, 1955; s. 1132, ch. 71-136; s. 1406, ch. 97-102.
871.05 Interference with a sporting or entertainment event.
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Covered event” means an athletic competition or practice, including one conducted in a public venue, or a live artistic, theatrical, or other entertainment performance event. The duration of such event includes the period from the time when a venue is held open to the public for such an event until the end of the athletic competition or performance event.
(b) “Covered participant” means an umpire, officiating crew member, player, coach, manager, groundskeeper, or any artistic, theatrical, or other performer or sanctioned participant in a covered event. The term includes event operations and security employees working at a covered event.
(c) “Restricted area” means any area designated for use by players, coaches, officials, performers, or other personnel administering a covered event that is on, or adjacent to, the area of play or performance.
(2) A person may not:
(a) Intentionally touch or strike a covered participant during a covered event against the will of the covered participant, or intentionally cause bodily harm to a covered participant during a covered event; or
(b) Willfully enter or remain in a restricted area during a covered event without being authorized, licensed, or invited to enter or remain in such a restricted area.
(3) A person who:
(a) Violates subsection (2) commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or by a fine of not more than $2,500.
(b) Solicits another person to violate subsection (2) by offering money or any other thing of value to another to engage in specific conduct that constitutes such a violation commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(4) A person convicted of a violation of this section may not realize any profit or benefit, directly or indirectly, from committing such a violation. Any profit or benefit payable to or accruing to a person convicted of a violation of this section is subject to seizure and forfeiture as provided in the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act.
History.s. 1, ch. 2023-195.

F.S. 871 on Google Scholar

F.S. 871 on Casetext

Amendments to 871


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 871
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S871.01 - DISTURBING PEACE - SCHOOL RELIGIOUS OR LAWFUL ASSEMBLY - M: S
S871.01 2 - DISTURBING PEACE - INTERRUPT MILITARY FUNERAL HONORS DETAIL - M: F
S871.015 3 - DISTURBING PEACE - UNLAWFUL PROTEST FUNERAL BURIAL W/ 500 FT PROP - M: F
S871.03 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REPEALED 2010-63 - M: S
S871.04 - CIVIL RIGHTS - ADVERTISE RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION - M: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 871 (Rep. Livingston). . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 39, 40, 42, id. , at 871-872; Buster v. Wright , 135 F. 947, 949-950, 953-954 (C.A.8 1905). . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Casey , 505 U.S. at 871, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (plurality opinion). . . . Casey , 505 U.S. at 851, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (opinion of the Court); id., at 871, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (plurality . . . Casey , 505 U.S. at 871, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (plurality opinion) (emphasis added). . . . Id., at 871, 112 S.Ct. 2791. * To arrive at today's result, rules must be brushed aside and shortcuts . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . J. 871, 878-879 (2005) ; Yoo, Calabresi, & Nee, The Unitary Executive During the Third Half-Century, . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Mullinix , 159 Ark. 310, 251 S.W. 871 (1923), the Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed the imposition of . . .

J. THOLE, v. U. S. BANK N. A, 140 S. Ct. 1615 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Bogert, Law of Trusts and Trustees § 871 (June 2019 update) (Bogert & Bogert) (listing cases). . . .

JOHNSON, v. KISER,, 140 S. Ct. 2802 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-871. Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 487 F.3d 871, 877 (CA Fed. 2007) )). . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Louisiana , 449 U.S. 871, 101 S.Ct. 209, 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980) ; Hodges v. . . .

HOLGUIN- HERNANDEZ, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 762 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Autery , 555 F.3d 864, 868-871 (C.A.9 2009) ; United States v. . . .

ELHADY, v. H. KABLE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Sessions , 871 F.3d 459, 468 (6th Cir. 2017) (added security burdens imposed by placement on the Selectee . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n , 497 U.S. 871, 889, 110 S.Ct. 3177, 111 L.Ed.2d 695 (1990) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. TAYLOR, v., 935 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Williams , 871 F.3d 1197, 1203 (11th Cir. 2017) (citation omitted). . . .

F. SHARPE, v. UNITED STATES,, 935 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 993 F.2d 871, 873 (Fed. Cir. 1993). . . .

PANAH, v. CHAPPELL,, 935 F.3d 657 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ozmint, 661 F.3d 783, 871-72 (4th Cir. 2011), the Fourth Circuit held that the petitioner was prejudiced . . .

NICHOLSON J. H. a J. N. G. a v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES a a, 935 F.3d 685 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gelhaus , 871 F.3d 998, 1011 (9th Cir. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S. . . . as with Plaintiffs' citations, some of these cases were decided after the incident, e.g. , Gelhaus , 871 . . .

RAWA, A. W. Jr. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, v., 934 F.3d 862 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . In re Genetically Modified Rice Litig. , 764 F.3d 864, 871 (8th Cir. 2014). . . .

WOLFINGTON, v. RECONSTRUCTIVE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES II PC, a k a, 935 F.3d 187 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Bartle , 871 F.2d 331, 340 (3d Cir. 1989). Id. Zimmerman v. . . . Rose , 871 F.2d at 340. Bruni , 824 F.3d at 360 n.9 (quoting In re Rockefeller Ctr. Props., Inc. . . . Rose , 871 F.2d at 342. . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Smith , 253 U.S. 221, 230-31, 40 S.Ct. 495, 64 L.Ed. 871 (1920) (holding a provision of the Ohio Constitution . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . McLeod , 871 F.2d 1151, 1156 (1st Cir. 1989) ; see Cannon v. . . . Racher , 871 F.3d at 1169. . . . See Racher , 871 F.3d at 1169. . . . See Racher , 871 F.3d at 1171-72. . . . Racher , 871 F.3d at 1168 (quotations omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEGAY,, 934 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Houser , 130 F.3d 867, 871-72 (9th Cir. 1997) ("Malice aforethought does not require an element of willfulness . . . Id . at 871. . . . regard to its consequences,' " was not error because they were "functionally equivalent." 130 F.3d at 871 . . .

KOH, v. USTICH,, 933 F.3d 836 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Huerta , 239 F.3d 865, 871 (7th Cir. 2001). Regarding Mr. . . .

KELSAY, v. ERNST,, 933 F.3d 975 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Flandreau , 669 F.3d 867, 871-72 (8th Cir. 2012) ; Johnson v. . . . above her head in frustration while standing ten to fifteen feet away from the officer. 669 F.3d at 871 . . . Id. at 871. First, the plaintiff posed no threat to the safety of the officers or others. Id. . . . bottle violation); Shannon , 616 F.3d at 863 n.4 (interfering with official acts); Montoya , 669 F.3d at 871 . . .

J. BAUWENS, v. REVCON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., 935 F.3d 534 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 871 F.3d 934, 939-40 (9th Cir. 2017) (adopting principles of agency law); Bloemker v. . . .

ADAM AND EVE JONESBORO, LLC, v. PERRIN, In, 933 F.3d 951 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 515 F.3d 867, 871 (8th Cir. 2008). . . .

MARTINEAU, v. WIER, 934 F.3d 385 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States Steel Corp. , 871 F.3d 1174 (11th Cir. 2017) (en banc); Ah Quin v. . . . Slater , 871 F.3d at 1185-86. . . . Slater , 871 F.3d at 1186. . . . Slater , 871 F.3d at 1187. . . . on notice of her duty to disclose even pending legal claims, let alone as-yet-unfiled legal claims. 871 . . .

ODDO, v. BIMBO BAKERIES U. S. A. INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 466 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Resch, 785 F.3d at 870, 871 n.2, 875. . . .

JANJUA, v. NEUFELD, USCIS T. USCIS K. U. S. U. S. P. U. S., 933 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Coos Bay , 871 F.3d 1032, 1041 (9th Cir. 2017) (reciting the four conditions). . . . See Oyeniran , 672 F.3d at 806 ; Howard , 871 F.3d at 1041 (quoting and applying Oyeniran 's test); Medina-Lara . . .

LAVALLEE, v. MED- SOLUTIONS, LLC,, 932 F.3d 1049 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Credit Control, LLC , 871 F.3d 1255 (11th Cir. 2017), supports its position that a message can qualify . . .

C. S. MCCROSSAN INC. v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 932 F.3d 1142 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 761 F.3d 867, 871-72 (8th Cir. 2014), citing Thommes , 641 N.W.2d at 880. . . . Co. , 850 F.3d 866, 871 (7th Cir. 2017) (adopting Stop & Shop 's definition); Stanford Univ. . . . Telamon , 850 F.3d at 871 (consultant was corporation's authorized representative where, despite a lack . . .

J. DOHERTY, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 932 F.3d 978 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Mesirow Realty Dev., Inc., 178 Ill.2d 496, 227 Ill.Dec. 389, 687 N.E.2d 871, 874-75 (1997) (a voluntary . . .

BERGAMATTO, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NYSA ILA PENSION FUND, 933 F.3d 257 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . . & Affiliates , 871 F.3d 239, 245 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Fleisher , 679 F.3d at 121 ). . . . Co. , 871 F.2d 1134, 1138 (D.C. . . .

KELLER LOGISTICS GROUP, INC. v. NAVISTAR, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 774 (N.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , 230 F.3d 868, 871 (6th Cir. 2000). . . . Rogers , 230 F.3d at 871. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DANIELS,, 932 F.3d 1120 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ruiz, 412 F.3d 871, 881 (8th Cir. 2005) ). Daniels argues that under United States v. . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. MIZUNO,, 933 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . First Fire & Casualty Insurance of Hawai'i, Inc. , 118 Hawai'i 123, 185 P.3d 871 (2008). . . .

SIMMONS, v. SAFEWAY, INC. d b a a, 388 F. Supp. 3d 1305 (W.D. Wash. 2019)

. . . National Wildlife Federation , 497 U.S. 871, 888-89, 110 S.Ct. 3177, 111 L.Ed.2d 695 (1990). B. . . .

DALTON, v. NPC INTERNATIONAL, INC., 932 F.3d 693 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Aitkin Cty. , 871 F.3d 572, 577 (8th Cir. 2017). Relying on Steger v. . . . Id. at 871. . . . Id. at 871. . . .

IN RE J. WELSCH,, 602 B.R. 682 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Robins Co., Inc. , 860 F.2d 871 (8th Cir. 1988) (concluding district court could require counsel to appear . . .

CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, a v. WELLS FARGO CO. N. A., 931 F.3d 1274 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Snook , 859 F.2d at 871. The City failed to satisfy that burden. . . . Snook , 859 F.2d at 871 ; see also Reflectone , 862 F.2d at 844 (holding that the nonmovant was not entitled . . .

UNITED STATES v. HENNESSEE,, 932 F.3d 437 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Paige , 634 F.3d 871, 873 (6th Cir. 2011) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DEL CARPIO FRESCAS,, 932 F.3d 324 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 871 F.3d 1321, 1338 (11th Cir. 2017) (noting Molina-Martinez 's "prediction is not, however . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. LLC,, 931 F.3d 339 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 871-74. In January 2018, Petitioners sought review of the ITS. Sierra Club v. U.S. . . .

CALZONE, v. T. OLSON,, 931 F.3d 722 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Calzone , 866 F.3d at 871. . . . Calzone , 866 F.3d at 871. . . . highways and in minimizing damage to the highways from overweight vehicles," Calzone , 866 F.3d at 871 . . .

TRACIE H. v. SAUL,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 990 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Berryhill , 911 F.3d 866, 871 (7th Cir. 2018) ; Shideler v. . . . While an ALJ may not play doctor, McHenry , 911 F.3d at 871, the plaintiff is mistaken that the ALJ did . . .

UNITED STATES v. VARGAS- MOLINA,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 809 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . INS , 296 F.3d 871, 877, 884-85 (9th Cir. 2002) (citing Jacinto v. . . . I.N.S. , 296 F.3d 871, 884-85 (2002) ). . . .

IN RE CANNON,, 931 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 871 F.3d 1215, 1222 (11th Cir. 2017) (resting, on a long line of case authority, its . . .

UNITED STATES v. SANCHEZ- HERNANDEZ,, 931 F.3d 408 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 871 F.3d 1321, 1338 (11th Cir. 2017) ( Molina-Martinez 's "prediction [of what will normally . . .

PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION v. DEWINE, 931 F.3d 530 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region , 122 Ohio St.3d 361, 911 N.E.2d 871, 877-79 (2009). . . .

WEST, v. CITY OF CALDWELL, 931 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . County of Orange , 871 F.3d 901, 911 (9th Cir. 2017). . . . Sharp , 871 F.3d at 911. The dissent also cites United States v. . . . See Sharp , 871 F.3d at 911 ("[T]he prior precedent must be 'controlling'-from the Ninth Circuit or Supreme . . . See Sharp , 871 F.3d at 912 (explaining that "the obviousness principle has real limits when it comes . . .

STATE BY AND THROUGH TENNESSEE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE,, 931 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Chastain , 871 S.W.2d 661, 664 (Tenn. 1994) ; Tennessee v. Heath , 806 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tenn. Ct. . . .

KOALA, v. KHOSLA,, 931 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Comm'n of Md. , 535 U.S. 635, 645, 122 S.Ct. 1753, 152 L.Ed.2d 871 (2002) (alteration in original) (quoting . . .

KHRAPUNOV, v. PROSYANKIN, 931 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . First Nat'l Bank of Atlanta , 628 F.2d 871, 873 (5th Cir. 1980) (raising sua sponte the issue of whether . . .

UNITED STATES v. IWAI,, 930 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Video, Inc. , 475 U.S. 868, 875, 106 S.Ct. 1610, 89 L.Ed.2d 871 (1986). . . .

GRAHAM, Jr. v. ARCTIC ZONE ICEPLEX, LLC,, 930 F.3d 926 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Trans. , 871 F.3d 495, 505 (7th Cir. 2017) (citation omitted). . . .

IN RE T. HAMMOUD,, 931 F.3d 1032 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 869, 871 (11th Cir. 2007). . . . United States , 871 F.3d 1215, 1222-25 (11th Cir. 2017). . . .

J. UCCARDI, v. LAZER SPOT, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 911 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Dorethy , 871 F.3d 555, 559 (7th Cir. 2017). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. GOODRIDGE,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 159 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Snyder , 871 F.3d 1122, 1127 (10th Cir. 2017) ); see also United States v. . . . United States , 871 F.3d 72, 80 (1st Cir. 2017). . . . Moore , 871 F.3d at 82 ; see also id. . . . Cross , 892 F.3d at 295 (quoting Snyder , 871 F.3d at 1127 ). . . .

WEEKS, a. k. a. v. UNITED STATES, 930 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States, 871 F.3d 1215, 1222 (11th Cir. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 139 S. . . . Beeman, 871 F.3d at 1224. B. . . . See Beeman, 871 F.3d at 1222. . . . Beeman, 871 F.3d at 1224 & nn. 4-5. . . . Beeman, 871 F.3d at 1219. Samuel Johnson was decided on June 26, 2015. Mr. . . .

HERNANDEZ- GARCIA, v. P. BARR,, 930 F.3d 915 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sessions, 900 F.3d 871, 875 (7th Cir. 2018) (emphasis added). . . .

BIGSBY, Jr. v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 336 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Sols., Inc., 55 Cal.4th 1185, 151 Cal.Rptr.3d 827, 292 P.3d 871, 875 (2013) ("[O]rdinarily, the statute . . .

CORBETT, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 930 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 866, 871 (11th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 819, 133 S. Ct. 161, 184 L.Ed.2d 33 (2012). . . .

IN RE BIG DOG II, LLC,, 602 B.R. 64 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Fla. 2008) (citing, In re Dixie Broad., Inc. 871 F.2d 1023, 1026 (11th Cir. 1989) ; See also, e.g., In . . .

UNITED STATES v. T. HERMAN,, 930 F.3d 872 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Drew , 200 F.3d 871, 880 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (more needed); United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SIHAI CHENG,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 141 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Spencer, 871 F.3d 117, 129 (1st Cir. 2017). . . .

VENCKIENE, v. UNITED STATES, 929 F.3d 843 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lithuania , Application No. 871/02 (European Court of Human Rights 2009) http://en.efhr.eu/2010/02/11 . . .

INDIVIOR INC. UK RB Rx, LLC, v. DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES, S. A. Dr. s UT, USA, UK RB v. LLC,, 930 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . reference disclose each and every element of the claimed invention, see, e.g. , In re Smith Int'l, Inc. , 871 . . .

S. R. NEHAD K. R. v. N. BROWDER, 929 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gelhaus , 871 F.3d 998, 1017 (9th Cir. 2017) (denying summary judgment where decedent was holding toy . . .

TRIBUE, v. UNITED STATES, 929 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 871 F.3d 1215 (11th Cir. 2017), the district court ruled that Tribue failed to prove . . . See Beeman , 871 F.3d at 1221. . . . Beeman , 871 F.3d at 1221-22 (citing "a long line of authority holding that a § 2255 movant 'bears the . . . See Beeman , 871 F.3d at 1221. B. . . . Beeman , 871 F.3d at 1221. Bryant v. . . .

HICKS, v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 252 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State , 871 So. 2d 298, 299 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) ("Appellant's entry of a plea, plea colloquy, and other . . .

WILLIAMS, v. UTAH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS B. C. K. s A., 928 F.3d 1209 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Comm'n of Md. , 535 U.S. 635, 645, 122 S.Ct. 1753, 152 L.Ed.2d 871 (2002) (brackets and internal quotation . . .

WESTECH AEROSOL CORPORATION, v. COMPANY, GTA- NHT,, 927 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 1400(b). 871 F.3d 1355, 1360 (Fed. . . . defendant has a regular and established place of business physically located within the judicial district. 871 . . . See Cray , 871 F.3d at 1360, 1364-67. . . .

FOX v. AMAZON. COM, INC., 930 F.3d 415 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Uggla , 535 S.W.3d 864, 871 (Tenn. 2017). . . .

UNITED STATES v. FLORES,, 929 F.3d 443 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ross , 475 F.3d 871, 873 (7th Cir. 2007) ; United States v. . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. J. TRUMP, T. K., 929 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Comm'n of Md. , 535 U.S. 635, 647, 122 S.Ct. 1753, 152 L.Ed.2d 871 (2002) )). . . .

MALDEN TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LLC,, 386 F. Supp. 3d 96 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Seaman, 821 F.2d 871, 877 (1st Cir. 1987), abrogated on other grounds by Jett v. Dallas Indep. Sch. . . .

KOLCRAFT ENTERPRISES, INC. v. GRACO CHILDREN S PRODUCTS, INC., 927 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Matal , 871 F.3d 1367, 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2017) ; Price v. Symsek, 988 F.2d 1187, 1194 (Fed. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MYERS, 928 F.3d 763 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Myers , 896 F.3d at 866-871. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PETROSKE, 928 F.3d 767 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States, 790 F. 3d 867, 871 (8th Cir. 2015) ). . . .

STERNGOLD DENTAL, LLC, v. HDI GLOBAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 929 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 449 Mass. 621, 871 N.E.2d 418, 425 (2007) ), so too every item . . .

MCGEHEE, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 386 F. Supp. 3d 80 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . A.R. 404, 451, 467, 494, 519, 581, 645, 650, 789, 835, 848, 860, 866, 871, 1141, 1147, 1161). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HEARTLAND HOSPICE, INC., 386 F. Supp. 3d 884 (N.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . Sessions , 871 F.3d 459, 469 (6th Cir. 2017) ). . . .

L. KISOR, v. WILKIE,, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (U.S. 2019)

. . . McCoy , 562 U.S. 195, 208-210, 131 S.Ct. 871, 178 L.Ed.2d 716 (2011) ; Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BENDER, v., 927 F.3d 1031 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Parker , 871 F.3d 590, 607 (8th Cir. 2017). . . .

FOOD MARKETING INSTITUTE, v. ARGUS LEADER MEDIA,, 139 S. Ct. 2356 (U.S. 2019)

. . . NRC , 975 F.2d 871, 879-880 (CADC 1992) (en banc); see also id., at 880-882 (Randolph, J., concurring . . . NRC , 975 F.2d 871, 876 (CADC 1992) (en banc) (collecting cases). . . .

DENNIS, v. J. A. TERRIS,, 927 F.3d 955 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 871(a) (1960), commuted Schick's executive-imposed sentence to life imprisonment on the condition . . .

REHAIF, v. UNITED STATES, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Pruner , 606 F.2d 871, 874 (CA9 1979). . . . Pruner , 606 F.2d 871, 873-874 (CA9 1979). . . .

RIVERA, v. STATE, 274 So. 3d 537 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State, 38 So. 3d 871, 872 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (citing Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-16, 94 S. . . . State , 38 So. 3d 871, 872 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ). . . .

ACBEL POLYTECH, INC. EMC v. FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., 928 F.3d 110 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Transamerica Delaval, Inc., 476 U.S. 858, 871-75, 106 S.Ct. 2295, 90 L.Ed.2d 865 (1986) ("When a product . . . Transamerica Delaval, Inc., 476 U.S. 858, 871-72, 106 S.Ct. 2295, 90 L.Ed.2d 865 (1986) (explaining, . . .

CHARLTON, v. UNITED STATES, 389 F. Supp. 3d 107 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . United States, 871 F.3d 72, 78 (1st Cir. 2017) (quoting Rodriguez v. . . . review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable." 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) ; see also Moore, 871 . . .

G. MCDONOUGH, v. SMITH,, 139 S. Ct. 2149 (U.S. 2019)

. . . have resolved in the plaintiff's favor. 512 U.S. at 484, 114 S.Ct. 2364 ; Prosser & Keeton § 119, at 871 . . . Restatement (Second) of Torts § 653 ; see also Dobbs § 586, at 388-389; Prosser & Keeton § 119, at 871 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SANCHEZ- HERNANDEZ,, 927 F.3d 851 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States, 871 F.3d 1321, 1338 (11th Cir. 2017) (Molina-Martinez's "prediction [of what will normally . . .

J. BOWLES, v. ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, L. L. C., 927 F.3d 878 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . WD-40 Co. , 871 F.3d 344, 348 (5th Cir. 2017) ). . . . (alteration in original) (quoting IQ Prod. , 871 F.3d at 348 ). . . . (quoting IQ Prod. , 871 F.3d at 348 ). Our concern in this appeal relates only to step one. . . .

WINKLER, v. PARRIS,, 927 F.3d 462 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Houk , 871 F.3d 390, 406 (6th Cir. 2017). III. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARIAS- QUIJADA, a k a, 926 F.3d 1257 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Scott , 901 F.2d 871, 873 (10th Cir. 1990). . . . Scott , 901 F.2d 871, 873 (10th Cir. 1990). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PSZENICZNY,, 384 F. Supp. 3d 353 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 867, 871 (D. Ariz. 2018). . . . Supp. 3d at 871 (citations omitted). In United States v. . . .

KARNOSKI D. L. K. G. s v. J. TRUMP, M. In J. M. U. S. K. J. M. U. S. K. v. D. L., 926 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 871 F.2d 863, 865 (9th Cir. 1989). . . .

MARTINEZ, v. K. MCALEENAN, U. S. DHS US D. U. S. P., 385 F. Supp. 3d 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . finally served him and his counsel with a Notice of Intent/ Decision to Reinstate the Prior Order (Form I-871 . . . emphasis added), "[s]erve the top portion of the notice of intent/decision to reinstate prior order (I-871 . . . statement from the subject of the reinstatement, "complete[ ] and sign[ ] the top portion [of Form I-871 . . . detention is fully authorized by the May 13, Notice of Intent/Decision to Reinstate Prior Order (I-871 . . .

PEREZ CRUZ, v. P. BARR,, 926 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . County of Orange , 871 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 2017), held that Summers does not provide "the categorical . . .

DUGUID, v. FACEBOOK, INC., 926 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Campbell-Ewald Co. , 768 F.3d 871, 876 (9th Cir. 2014), aff'd , --- U.S. ----, 136 S. . . .

CLARK, v. CLARK,, 926 F.3d 972 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of New Ulm, 455 F.3d 871, 877 (8th Cir. 2006) ). . . .