Cases from cite.case.law:

M. M. a v. STATE, 187 So. 3d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . He was convicted of criminal trespass in violation of Texas Penal Code Annotated section 30.05(a) (West . . . In order for this' court to hold that appellant’s action did not amount to criminal trespass under § 30.05 . . .

JORNALEROS DE LAS PALMAS, v. CITY OF LEAGUE CITY, W., 945 F. Supp. 2d 779 (S.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . arresting day laborers for violations of Texas Transportation Code § 552.007(a) and Texas Penal Code § 30.05 . . . owners along the FM 518 corridor in order to enforce the state criminal trespass law, Texas Penal Code § 30.05 . . . solicitation under Texas Transportation Code § 552.007(a) and trespassing under Texas Penal Code § 30.05 . . . Plaintiff does not challenge the constitutionality of Texas Penal Code § 30.05(a). . . . does not even ask it to enjoin, enforcement of a legitimate penal statute such as Texas Penal Code § 30.05 . . .

RACK ROOM SHOES, SKIZ LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 856 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . windbreakers, and similar articles, knitted or crocheted, other than those of heading 6104 Subheading: 30.05 . . .

In OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUNDS GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION, 838 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (D. Colo. 2012)

. . . As an example, Plaintiffs in the AMT-Free case allege that a minimum of 30.05% of the Fund’s assets were . . . 2008, Defendants represented investments in illiquid securities were limited to 1.91% when in fact 30.05% . . .

PENA, v. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS,, 726 F. Supp. 2d 675 (W.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . of Texas Penal Code § 88.03; (2) criminal trespass of a building in violation of Texas Penal Code § 30.05 . . . Texas Penal Code section 30.05 provides that “(a) A person commits an offense if the person enters or . . . Penal Code § 30.05(a). . . . Id. § 30.05(b)(2). . . .

In PARKER, v. d b a, 419 B.R. 474 (M.D. Ala. 2009)

. . . The total hours billed for the brief is 30.05 (26.95 hours for Poston, and 3.1 hours for Blakeney). . . .

KELLEMS, v. J. ASTRUE,, 611 F. Supp. 2d 639 (N.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . Commissioner suggested that the fee award under § 2412 should be limited to $4,466.33 for 30.05 attorney . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. v. NEW HORIZONT, INC., 254 F.R.D. 227 (E.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . .19, 2005) (following Ameristar Jet, rejecting Quality Aero, and citing 7 Moore’s Federal Practice § 30.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MENDEZ- GUERRA,, 269 F. App'x 383 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . A person commits criminal trespass under Texas Penal Code § 30.05 “if he enters or remains on property . . .

In NORONHA,, 382 B.R. 363 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2007)

. . . Presumably, the Debtor was referring to Kentucky Rule of Civil Procedure 30.05, which provides a means . . .

W. BLANTON, TDCJ No. v. QUARTERMAN,, 489 F. Supp. 2d 621 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . . § 30.05(a)(Vernon Supp. 2006). . . .

ASSOCIATION OF FAITH- BASED ORGANIZATIONS, v. E. BABLITCH,, 454 F. Supp. 2d 812 (W.D. Wis. 2006)

. . . ADM 30.05(11) provides: The charitable organization shall have a policy and procedure of nondiscrimination . . . charitable organization must submit a written assurance that it complies with the requirements of ADM 30.05 . . . participate in SECC notwithstanding website statements which set forth policies inconsistent with ADM 30.05 . . . MEMORANDUM Plaintiff contends that the application of ADM 30.05(11) to exclude religious charitable organizations . . . Defendants maintain that ADM 30.05(11) as applied to religious charities is a reasonable, viewpoint neutral . . .

In ENRON CORP. L. P. v., 349 B.R. 115 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice-Civil, § 30.05[l][e] (Lexis 2006)). . . . Moore et ah, Moore’s Federal Practice-Civil, § 30.05[l][c] (Lexis 2006) (citing Tri-Star Pictures, Inc . . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice-Civil, § 30.05[l][e] (Lexis 2006); see also Export-Import Bank . . .

NOEL, v. GRAHAM, 192 F. App'x 538 (7th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § HSS 30.05(4) (1981). . . .

EVOY, v. CRST VAN EXPEDITED, INC., 430 F. Supp. 2d 775 (N.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . See IPI 30.04.01 (loss of normal life); 30.05 (pain and suffering); 30.06 (medical expenses); 30.07 ( . . .

CALHOUN, v. RAMSEY,, 408 F.3d 375 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . CMS Policy 30.05. . . .

In KEATY, Sr. A. v. Sr., 397 F.3d 264 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Manual, Federal Praotice and Procedure, §§ 30.04, 30.05 (1996) and Restatement . . .

In KEATY, Sr. A. v. Sr., 397 F.3d 264 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Manual, Federal Practice and Procedure, §§ 30.04, 30.05 (1996) and Restatement . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN, 276 F.3d 211 (6th Cir. 2002)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 30.05 at 30-40 (1987). . . .

D. SORENSON v. CONCANNON,, 161 F. Supp. 2d 1164 (D. Or. 2001)

. . . state; 5.5 federal) 1995: $ 53,960.55 (202.96 state; 109.29 federal) 1996: $ 14,943.78 (55.8 state; 30.05 . . .

VOLVO TRADEMARK HOLDING AKTIEBOLAGET, a a a v. AIS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, a CLM a a d b a a, 162 F. Supp. 2d 465 (W.D.N.C. 2001)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Competition, § 30.05, at 30-18 to 19. . . .

GIRALDI, v. BARTLETT,, 108 F. Supp. 2d 321 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . New York Penal Law § 30.05, which was in effect at the time of the trial, provided that: 1. . . . Penal Law § 30.05 (McKinney 1975). . . . Under § 30.05, the State must prove that “the defendant was in fact criminally responsible in that he . . . In instructing the jury, the trial judge (in 1975) initially read the provisions of § 30.05 to the jury . . . In 1984, § 30.05 was repealed. Its equivalent, N.Y. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MONTAGUE,, 75 F. Supp. 2d 670 (S.D. Tex. 1999)

. . . . § 30.05 (1994). . . .

M. HERMAN, v. COLLIS FOODS, INC., 176 F.3d 912 (6th Cir. 1999)

. . . HaNdbook § 30.05(a). . . . Handbook § 30.05(c). B. . . . HANDBOOK § 30.05(c). . . .

WALLER v. L. SPEARS, 61 F. Supp. 2d 574 (E.D. Tex. 1999)

. . . Penal Code § 30.05(2)(B). . . .

RYANS v. GRESHAM,, 6 F. Supp. 2d 595 (E.D. Tex. 1998)

. . . Because Naomi Ryans again did not depart, Lyons arrested her for trespassing under Section 30.05 of the . . . Penal Code Ann. .§ 30.05 (West 1994 & Supp.1998). . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. BAILEY,, 111 F.3d 1229 (5th Cir. 1997)

. . . Penal Code § 30.05, are: (1) a person (2) without effective consent (3) enters or remains on the property . . .

ELLIS, S. v. WAL- MART STORES, INC., 952 F. Supp. 1513 (M.D. Ala. 1996)

. . . Earnings 09/04/93 to 09/17/93 24.72 $168.27 09/18/93 to 10/01/93 14.42 $ 90.30 10/02/93 to 10/15/93 30.05 . . .

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND, INC. v. LOOMPANICS ENTERPRISES, INC. d b a, 936 F. Supp. 1232 (D. Md. 1996)

. . . McCarthy § 30.05. . . .

UNITED STATES v. JAIN, 93 F.3d 436 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . O’Malley, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions ¶ 30.05 (4th ed.1990), the court instructed the jury . . .

WASHINGTON, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT d b a STM d b a STM MORTGAGE COMPANY, v. METRIC REALTY SERVICES, L. P., 953 F. Supp. 762 (N.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . . § 30.05 (Vernon 1994). . . .

FAIR v. CITY OF GALVESTON, 915 F. Supp. 873 (S.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . A comparison between section 24-9 of the Galveston Code and section 30.05 of the Texas Penal Code reveals . . . By its plain terms, section 30.05 does not apply to a person who “enters or remains on property or in . . . Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 30.05(a) (Vernon 1994); Johnson v. . . . The Court accordingly finds that section 24-9 was not preempted by section 30.05 of the Texas Penal Code . . . See Tex.Penal.Code § 30.05. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. ANDREWS, UNITED STATES v. ANDREWS,, 75 F.3d 552 (9th Cir. 1996)

. . . .”); see also Joshua Dressier, Understanding Criminal Law § 30.05, at 426 (1987) (remarking that in the . . .

In EAGLE- PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. TRANSICOIL, INC. v. BLUE DOVE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, K-, 190 B.R. 557 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1995)

. . . . * * * * * * 30.05 Notwithstanding the execution and delivery of this Lease, it is specifically agreed . . .

JOHNSON, v. CITY OF DALLAS, TX,, 61 F.3d 442 (5th Cir. 1995)

. . . Texas Penal Code § 30.05. . . .

STATE TEXAS v. J. CARLEY, 885 F. Supp. 940 (W.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . The Texas criminal trespass statute is set forth in Section 30.05 of the Texas Penal Code. . . . Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 30.05(a) (Vernon 1994). . . .

In M. BERR, M. BERR, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 172 B.R. 299 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1994)

. . . Moore’s Manual: Federal Practice and Procedure, § 30.05[5] at 30-106 ("Moore's Manual"). . . . But see Moore's Manual § 30.05[5] at 30-105 (noting that this rule has not been uniformly accepted by . . .

JOHNSON, v. CITY OF DALLAS,, 860 F. Supp. 344 (N.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . . § 30.05 Criminal Trespass (a) A person commits an offense if he enters or remains on property or in . . .

In R. TERIO, R. TERIO, v. M. TERIO P. C., 158 B.R. 907 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . 480 U.S. 948, 107 S.Ct. 1608, 94 L.Ed.2d 794 (1987); see 3 Moore, Federal Practice and Procedure § 30.05 . . .

LEDESMA LEDESMA, a v. DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., 818 F. Supp. 983 (N.D. Tex. 1993)

. . . Shortly thereafter, LEDESMA was arrested and charged with criminal trespass under § 30.05 of the Texas . . . the facts pled in Plaintiffs Amended Complaint establish an apparent violation of Texas Penal Code § 30.05 . . . further concludes that six month old notice is not too remote to be considered effective notice under § 30.05 . . . its property and had a duty and right to report her apparent trespass pursuant to Texas Penal Code § 30.05 . . . Also, the facts that are plead establish an apparent trespass pursuant to Texas Penal Code § 30.05 and . . .

UNITED STATES v. EASTLAND,, 989 F.2d 760 (5th Cir. 1993)

. . . Penal Code § 30.05. . . .

R. MARTIN, v. THOMAS, K. L. L. L., 973 F.2d 449 (5th Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 30.05(a) (West 1989). . See also, Strauch v. . . .

B. WEBB, v. LUJAN,, 960 F.2d 89 (9th Cir. 1992)

. . . As explained by 1 American Law of Mining § 30.05[2] (1984) (footnotes omitted): A lode deposit is a mineralized . . .

AZUL PACIFICO, INC. a v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a, 740 F. Supp. 772 (C.D. Cal. 1990)

. . . . § 30.05. . . .

TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES, 495 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1990)

. . . . §§30.01-30.05 (1989 and Supp. 1990) (defining burglary to include theft from coin-operated vending . . .

MORGAN, v. CITY OF DeSOTO, TEXAS,, 900 F.2d 811 (5th Cir. 1990)

. . . Code, which at the time of their arrest provided as follows: § 30.05 Criminal Trespass (a) A person . . . Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 30.05 (Vernon 1989) (amended 1989). . . . Loitering and littering are prohibited by law and will be prosecuted under § 30.05 of the Texas Penal . . . Violators will be prosecuted under 30.05 of the Texas Penal Code. . . . Texas Penal Code Ann. § 30.05(b)(2)(C) (Vernon 1989); Bain v. . . .

COWAN, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 728 F. Supp. 87 (D. Conn. 1990)

. . . co cn> ^ bo OX Ox CO CO rf*. p ^-3 bx OX ox sr tr ^ I xn o S3 Stage IV (to Sept. 21, 1987) Garrison: 30.05 . . .

v., 13 Ct. Int'l Trade 487 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . in the levels-of-trade, which resulted in the reduction of the weighted-average dumping margins from 30.05 . . .

AMERICAN PERMAC, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 714 F. Supp. 1244 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . in the levels-of-trade, which resulted in the reduction of the weighted-average dumping margins from 30.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FLORES,, 875 F.2d 1110 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . The different types of burglary under Texas law are now defined at §§ 30.01-30.05 of the Texas Penal . . . Tex.Penal Code Ann. §§ 30.-01-30.05 (Vernon 1979). . . . .

NORTHERN ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER v. LUJAN, Jr., 872 F.2d 901 (9th Cir. 1989)

. . . Rocky Mt.Min.L.Inst., American Law of Mining, § 30.05[5] (1988 ed.). . . . Id. at § 30.05[5], The government or private individuals can contest an unpatented claim, whereas a contest . . .

UNITED STATES v. LEONARD,, 868 F.2d 1393 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . . §§ 30.01 — 30.05 (Vernon 1989). . . . .

HARVEY INDUSTRIES, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRONIC, ELECTRICAL, SALARIED MACHINE AND FURNITURE WORKERS, AFL- CIO LOCAL FW,, 715 F. Supp. 171 (E.D. Tex. 1989)

. . . . § 151 et seq, and that is also unlawful pursuant to Texas Penal Code § 30.05 (criminal trespass) and . . .

AMERICAN PERMAC, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 703 F. Supp. 97 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . is largely responsible for the ITA’s determination of sales at less-than-fair value at the rate of 30.05 . . .

v., 12 Ct. Int'l Trade 1134 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . is largely responsible for the ITA’s determination of sales at less-than-fair value at the rate of 30.05 . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a v. W. R. GRACE COMPANY,, 691 F. Supp. 87 (N.D. Ill. 1988)

. . . However in addition the court in Martin added elements of damages, I.P.I. 30.02, 30.05, and 30.06. . . .

In IMF SALES ASSOCIATES, INC. IMF SALES ASSOCIATES, INC. v. RACAL- VADIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., 94 B.R. 223 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1988)

. . . Moore, A Vestel Moore’s Manual: Federal Practice and Procedure § 30.05(1) n. 14 (1987). . . .

AMERICAN PERMAC, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 831 F.2d 269 (Fed. Cir. 1987)

. . . The final margin calculation for the covered Boewe imports was 30.05 percent. 50 Fed.Reg. 1256. . . .

K. WESEMAN, v. MEEKER COUNTY,, 659 F. Supp. 1571 (D. Minn. 1987)

. . . Juv.Ct.P. 30.05. Id. at 400-401. . . .

In RYAN, M. STERN, v. CONTINENTAL ASSURANCE COMPANY,, 70 B.R. 509 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1987)

. . . Norton, Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 30.05 (1981). . . .

AMERICAN PERMAC, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 656 F. Supp. 1228 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)

. . . The final margin calculation for the covered Boewe imports was 30.05 percent. 50 Fed.Reg. 1256. . . .

v., 10 Ct. Int'l Trade 719 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)

. . . The final margin calculation for the covered Boewe imports was 30.05 percent. 50 Fed. Reg. 1256. . . .

AMERICAN PERMAC, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 642 F. Supp. 1187 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)

. . . the United States between July 1, 1979 and June 30, 1980 was dumped at a weighted average margin of 30.05 . . . As noted above, the weighted average margin calculated for Boewe equipment was 30.05 percent. . . .

v., 10 Ct. Int'l Trade 535 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)

. . . the United States between July 1, 1979 and June 30, 1980 was dumped at a weighted average margin of 30.05 . . . As noted above, the weighted average margin calculated for Boewe equipment was 30.05 percent. . . .

PACIFICORP, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Co., 795 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . Fox, Federal Regulation of Energy, § 30.05, at 759 (1983). . . .

BODZIN, v. CITY OF DALLAS,, 768 F.2d 722 (5th Cir. 1985)

. . . Tex.Penal Code § 30.05(a) (Vernon Supp. 1985). . . .

In AGENT ORANGE PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION, 611 F. Supp. 1296 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . Fiorito testified that 30.05 hours of review of scientific literature was not compensated. . . .

BONIFAY, v. E. DICKSON R., 459 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Boyer, Florida Real Estate Transactions § 30.05 (1984). . . . . Id. § 30.05. . . . .

J. BETHEL, A. A. A. A. v. W. JANIS,, 597 F. Supp. 56 (D.S.D. 1984)

. . . South Dakota Pattern Jury Instructions, Civil, § 30.05. . . .

Dr. I. THOMAS, v. SAMS, As, 734 F.2d 185 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 30.05. . Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 15.01, 31.04(a). . Simmons v. . . .

In WENNER, ERICKSON, v. WENNER, R. K. S. KRJ, a R. L., 39 B.R. 288 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 1984)

. . . Norton Law and Bankruptcy Practice, § 30.05, part 30, p. 11 (1981); H.Rep. 95-595, p. 370, U.S.Code Cong . . .

In EURO- SWISS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, VARON, v. TRIMBLE, MARSHALL GOLDMAN, P. C., 33 B.R. 872 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . Belize Airways, 12 B.R. 387, 7 B.C.D. 1044 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla.1981); Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 30.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. HYLTON,, 710 F.2d 1106 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . Section 30.05 of the Texas Penal Code states: (a) A person commits an offense if he enters or remains . . . V.T.C.A., Penal Code tit. 7, § 30.05. . . . .

In HARDWAY RESTAURANT, INC. d b a a HARDWAY RESTAURANT, INC. v. ONCE UPON A STOVE, INC. N K, 31 B.R. 322 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . See also Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 30.05 (1981), where Professor Norton appears to limit . . .

In MINTON GROUP, INC. TURNER, v. EMMONS WILSON, INC. F. K. B. D., 28 B.R. 774 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . This point was explained in 2 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 30.05 at page 11: Code § 544(a)(3) . . .

RONSON, v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION OF STATE OF NEW YORK,, 551 F. Supp. 450 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)

. . . Penal Law § 30.05 (McKinney 1975), the court charged the jury: You should know at this point that an . . . individual who: (a) has no mental disease or defect that arises to the level established by Section 30.05 . . .

In PHILLIPS, Jr. W. NOYES, v. PHILLIPS, Jr. L., 21 B.R. 565 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1982)

. . . See 2 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, § 30.05 (W. Norton ed. 1981). . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. HYLTON, 558 F. Supp. 872 (S.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . accurate and properly alleged the elements of criminal trespass pursuant to Tex.Penal Code Ann. tit. 7 § 30.05 . . . Section 30.05 provides: (a) A person commits an offense if he enters or remains on property or in a building . . .

In RELATED ASBESTOS CASES, 543 F. Supp. 1142 (N.D. Cal. 1982)

. . . Civ.R. 30.05 provides: Rule 30.05. Submission to witness— Changes — Signing. . . .

H. ELLIS v. UNITED STATES, 610 F.2d 760 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . United States, 177 Ct.Cl. 848 (1966); Davis, Administrative Law § 30.05 (1972). Cf. Udall v. . . .

LeROY H. ELLIS v. THE UNITED STATES, 222 Ct. Cl. 65 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . United States, 177 Ct.Cl. 848 (1966); Davis, Administrative Law § 30.05 (1972). Cf. Udall v. . . .

RONSON, v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION OF STATE OF NEW YORK,, 604 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1979)

. . . Under New York Penal Law § 30.05 A person is not criminally responsible for conduct if at the time of . . . of mental disease or defect of the defendant excluding criminal responsibility pursuant to section 30.05 . . .

YOUNG, v. FIDELITY UNION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 597 F.2d 705 (10th Cir. 1979)

. . . Charlotte Meier Young, the plaintiff and present appellant, dated November 18,1974, in the amount of $30.05 . . . The policy actually issued called for a monthly premium in the amount of $30.05. . . .

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS v. D. ANDRUS COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS v. D. ANDRUS, 594 F.2d 872 (1st Cir. 1979)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 30.05 (1958 & 1970 Supp.). . . .

RONSON, v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION OF STATE OF NEW YORK,, 463 F. Supp. 97 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . of mental disease or defect of the defendant excluding criminal responsibility pursuant to section 30.05 . . .

O CONNELL, v. SOUTHWORTH, F. Jr., 422 F. Supp. 182 (D.R.I. 1976)

. . . INCOME Contraband $ 397.28 Commission (tele-coke) 2673.69 Donations (Christmas) 500.00 Other Inc one 30.05 . . .

TODD, W. III, W. IV, v. UNITED STATES, 384 F. Supp. 1284 (M.D. Fla. 1974)

. . . fog, temperature 44, dew point 43, the wind from 040 degrees magnetic at 5 knots, altimeter setting 30.05 . . .

AMERICAN NURSING HOME ASSOCIATION, v. COST OF LIVING COUNCIL, 497 F.2d 909 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . See generally Davis, Administrative Law, § 30.05 (1958). . . .

LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 483 F.2d 623 (5th Cir. 1973)

. . . See 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 30.05. . . .

ANDERSON, v. STATE, 276 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1973)

. . . Upton, 1955, 60 N.M. 205, 290 P.2d 440; New York, § 30.05 Penal Law 1965; North Carolina, State v. . . .

HANLY v. G. KLEINDIENST,, 471 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1972)

. . . United States, 307 U.S. 125, 146, 59 S.Ct. 754, 83 L.Ed. 1147 (1939); 4 Davis §§ 29.01, 30.05 (1958). . . .

UNITED STATES v. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES v. E. BALES, Jr. UNITED STATES v. BEEMAN, UNITED STATES v. A. SAVIDGE,, 462 F.2d 724 (10th Cir. 1972)

. . . See the discussion of Professor Moore, 8 Moore’s Federal Practice 30-11, § 30.05 in which the author . . .

BOROUGH OF BETHEL PARK, v. STANS, G. FULTON, No. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, No., 449 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1971)

. . . denied, 394 U.S. 929, 89 S.Ct. 1187, 22 L.Ed.2d 455 (1969); Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 30.05 . . .

BLAKE, v. UNITED STATES, 407 F.2d 908 (5th Cir. 1969)

. . . Penal L., § 30.05 (McKinney’s Consol. Laws, e. 40, 1967); Commonwealth v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, W. UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, Lo- Je, a UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, W., 307 F. Supp. 34 (M.D. Fla. 1968)

. . . assess taxes upon the property platted as streets; Boyer, Florida Real Estate Transactions, Section 30.05 . . .

STURM, v. CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY, E., 395 F.2d 446 (9th Cir. 1967)

. . . See also Davis, Administrative Law § 7.16, § 30.05 (1958, 1965 Supp.). . . .

L. GORE v. MARITIME OVERSEAS CORPORATION L. GORE v. CLEARWATER SHIPPING CORP. v. MARITIME OVERSEAS CORPORATION L. GORE v. MARINE CARRIERS CORPORATION v. MARITIME OVERSEAS CORPORATION L. GORE v. MARINE CARRIERS CORPORATION v. MARITIME OVERSEAS CORPORATION L. GORE V. WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORPORATION v. MARITIME OVERSEAS CORPORATION L. GORE v. VENORE TRANSPORTATION CO., 256 F. Supp. 104 (E.D. Pa. 1966)

. . . .) ¶ 30.05; 26A C.J.S. Depositions § 68, p. 393. . . .