Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 112.3187 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 112.3187 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 112.3187

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 112
PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 112.3187
112.3187 Adverse action against employee for disclosing information of specified nature prohibited; employee remedy and relief.
(1) SHORT TITLE.Sections 112.3187-112.31895 may be cited as the “Whistle-blower’s Act.”
(2) LEGISLATIVE INTENT.It is the intent of the Legislature to prevent agencies or independent contractors from taking retaliatory action against an employee who reports to an appropriate agency violations of law on the part of a public employer or independent contractor that create a substantial and specific danger to the public’s health, safety, or welfare. It is further the intent of the Legislature to prevent agencies or independent contractors from taking retaliatory action against any person who discloses information to an appropriate agency alleging improper use of governmental office, gross waste of funds, or any other abuse or gross neglect of duty on the part of an agency, public officer, or employee.
(3) DEFINITIONS.As used in this act, unless otherwise specified, the following words or terms shall have the meanings indicated:
(a) “Adverse personnel action” means the discharge, suspension, transfer, or demotion of any employee or the withholding of bonuses, the reduction in salary or benefits, or any other adverse action taken against an employee within the terms and conditions of employment by an agency or independent contractor.
(b) “Agency” means any state, regional, county, local, or municipal government entity, whether executive, judicial, or legislative; any official, officer, department, division, bureau, commission, authority, or political subdivision therein; or any public school, community college, or state university.
(c) “Employee” means a person who performs services for, and under the control and direction of, or contracts with, an agency or independent contractor for wages or other remuneration.
(d) “Gross mismanagement” means a continuous pattern of managerial abuses, wrongful or arbitrary and capricious actions, or fraudulent or criminal conduct which may have a substantial adverse economic impact.
(e) “Independent contractor” means a person, other than an agency, engaged in any business and who enters into a contract, including a provider agreement, with an agency.
(4) ACTIONS PROHIBITED.
(a) An agency or independent contractor shall not dismiss, discipline, or take any other adverse personnel action against an employee for disclosing information pursuant to the provisions of this section.
(b) An agency or independent contractor shall not take any adverse action that affects the rights or interests of a person in retaliation for the person’s disclosure of information under this section.
(c) The provisions of this subsection shall not be applicable when an employee or person discloses information known by the employee or person to be false.
(5) NATURE OF INFORMATION DISCLOSED.The information disclosed under this section must include:
(a) Any violation or suspected violation of any federal, state, or local law, rule, or regulation committed by an employee or agent of an agency or independent contractor which creates and presents a substantial and specific danger to the public’s health, safety, or welfare.
(b) Any act or suspected act of gross mismanagement, malfeasance, misfeasance, gross waste of public funds, suspected or actual Medicaid fraud or abuse, or gross neglect of duty committed by an employee or agent of an agency or independent contractor.
(6) TO WHOM INFORMATION DISCLOSED.The information disclosed under this section must be disclosed to any agency or federal government entity having the authority to investigate, police, manage, or otherwise remedy the violation or act, including, but not limited to, the Office of the Chief Inspector General, an agency inspector general or the employee designated as agency inspector general under s. 112.3189(1) or inspectors general under s. 20.055, the Florida Commission on Human Relations, and the whistle-blower’s hotline created under s. 112.3189. However, for disclosures concerning a local governmental entity, including any regional, county, or municipal entity, special district, community college district, or school district or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing, the information must be disclosed to a chief executive officer as defined in s. 447.203(9) or other appropriate local official.
(7) EMPLOYEES AND PERSONS PROTECTED.This section protects employees and persons who disclose information on their own initiative in a written and signed complaint; who are requested to participate in an investigation, hearing, or other inquiry conducted by any agency or federal government entity; who refuse to participate in any adverse action prohibited by this section; or who initiate a complaint through the whistle-blower’s hotline or the hotline of the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit of the Department of Legal Affairs; or employees who file any written complaint to their supervisory officials or employees who submit a complaint to the Chief Inspector General in the Executive Office of the Governor, to the employee designated as agency inspector general under s. 112.3189(1), or to the Florida Commission on Human Relations. The provisions of this section may not be used by a person while he or she is under the care, custody, or control of the state correctional system or, after release from the care, custody, or control of the state correctional system, with respect to circumstances that occurred during any period of incarceration. No remedy or other protection under ss. 112.3187-112.31895 applies to any person who has committed or intentionally participated in committing the violation or suspected violation for which protection under ss. 112.3187-112.31895 is being sought.
(8) REMEDIES.
(a) Any employee of or applicant for employment with any state agency, as the term “state agency” is defined in s. 216.011, who is discharged, disciplined, or subjected to other adverse personnel action, or denied employment, because he or she engaged in an activity protected by this section may file a complaint, which complaint must be made in accordance with s. 112.31895. Upon receipt of notice from the Florida Commission on Human Relations of termination of the investigation, the complainant may elect to pursue the administrative remedy available under s. 112.31895 or bring a civil action within 180 days after receipt of the notice.
(b) Within 60 days after the action prohibited by this section, any local public employee protected by this section may file a complaint with the appropriate local governmental authority, if that authority has established by ordinance an administrative procedure for handling such complaints or has contracted with the Division of Administrative Hearings under s. 120.65 to conduct hearings under this section. The administrative procedure created by ordinance must provide for the complaint to be heard by a panel of impartial persons appointed by the appropriate local governmental authority. Upon hearing the complaint, the panel must make findings of fact and conclusions of law for a final decision by the local governmental authority. Within 180 days after entry of a final decision by the local governmental authority, the public employee who filed the complaint may bring a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction. If the local governmental authority has not established an administrative procedure by ordinance or contract, a local public employee may, within 180 days after the action prohibited by this section, bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction. For the purpose of this paragraph, the term “local governmental authority” includes any regional, county, or municipal entity, special district, community college district, or school district or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing.
(c) Any other person protected by this section may, after exhausting all available contractual or administrative remedies, bring a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction within 180 days after the action prohibited by this section.
(9) RELIEF.In any action brought under this section, the relief must include the following:
(a) Reinstatement of the employee to the same position held before the adverse action was commenced, or to an equivalent position or reasonable front pay as alternative relief.
(b) Reinstatement of the employee’s full fringe benefits and seniority rights, as appropriate.
(c) Compensation, if appropriate, for lost wages, benefits, or other lost remuneration caused by the adverse action.
(d) Payment of reasonable costs, including attorney’s fees, to a substantially prevailing employee, or to the prevailing employer if the employee filed a frivolous action in bad faith.
(e) Issuance of an injunction, if appropriate, by a court of competent jurisdiction.
(f) Temporary reinstatement to the employee’s former position or to an equivalent position, pending the final outcome on the complaint, if an employee complains of being discharged in retaliation for a protected disclosure and if a court of competent jurisdiction or the Florida Commission on Human Relations, as applicable under s. 112.31895, determines that the disclosure was not made in bad faith or for a wrongful purpose or occurred after an agency’s initiation of a personnel action against the employee which includes documentation of the employee’s violation of a disciplinary standard or performance deficiency. This paragraph does not apply to an employee of a municipality.
(10) DEFENSES.It shall be an affirmative defense to any action brought pursuant to this section that the adverse action was predicated upon grounds other than, and would have been taken absent, the employee’s or person’s exercise of rights protected by this section.
(11) EXISTING RIGHTS.Sections 112.3187-112.31895 do not diminish the rights, privileges, or remedies of an employee under any other law or rule or under any collective bargaining agreement or employment contract; however, the election of remedies in s. 447.401 also applies to whistle-blower actions.
History.ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ch. 86-233; s. 1, ch. 91-285; s. 12, ch. 92-316; s. 1, ch. 93-57; s. 702, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 95-153; s. 15, ch. 96-410; s. 20, ch. 99-333; s. 2, ch. 2002-400; s. 37, ch. 2023-8.

F.S. 112.3187 on Google Scholar

F.S. 112.3187 on Casetext

Amendments to 112.3187


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 112.3187
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 112.3187.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BRADFORD, v. FLORIDA A M UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES,, 272 So. 3d 798 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . ." § 112.3187(2), Fla. Stat. (2018) (emphasis added); see also Kogan v. . . . direction of, or contracts with, an agency or independent contractor for wages or other remuneration." § 112.3187 . . . from dismissing, disciplining, or taking any other adverse personnel action against an employee. § 112.3187 . . . of these actions were "adverse personnel actions" within the meaning of the whistleblower statute. § 112.3187 . . .

SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, v. WOODFORD,, 270 So. 3d 481 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Woodford's complaint alleging whistle-blower retaliation in violation of section 112.3187, Florida Statutes . . . Section 112.3187(8) identifies three classes of persons who may file a whistle-blower complaint. . . . See § 112.3187(8)(a)-(c). Because Ms. . . . Woodford was the Chief Officer of Human Resources for the School Board, she falls within section 112.3187 . . . The contract is sufficient as long as hearings under section 112.3187(8)(b) are among the administrative . . . In the instant case, section 112.3187(8)(b), Florida Statutes (2017), provides in pertinent part: [A] . . .

NAZZAL, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 267 So. 3d 1094 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . . § 112.3187(4), Fla. Stat. . . . . § 112.3187(8), Fla. Stat. . . . or gross neglect of duty committed by an employee or agent of an agency or independent contractor. § 112.3187 . . . Lewis and Winokur, JJ., concur. §§ 112.3187 - 112.31895, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . See § 112.3187(10), Fla Stat. . . .

BEANBLOSSOM, v. BAY DISTRICT SCHOOLS,, 265 So. 3d 657 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . against Bay District Schools in December 2013, alleging in Count I a whistle-blower claim under section 112.3187 . . .

PRITZ, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF HERNANDO COUNTY,, 260 So. 3d 1117 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ethics provisions, and that the information set forth in his letter was disclosed pursuant to section 112.3187 . . . (5), Florida Statutes -a provision within Florida's Whistle-blower's Act ( sections 112.3187 - 112.31895 . . . to show that he had been "discharged"-a requirement to obtain temporary reinstatement under section 112.3187 . . . Section 112.3187(5) provides: The information disclosed under this section must include: (a) Any violation . . . Section 112.3187(3)(c) defines "adverse personnel action" to mean: the discharge, suspension, transfer . . .

G. GRIFFIN, v. DELOACH,, 259 So. 3d 929 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . the Putnam County Sheriff's Office (Sheriff's Office) on Griffin's claim brought pursuant to section 112.3187 . . . "To establish a prima facie claim for retaliation under Florida's Whistle-blower Act, sections 112.3187 . . .

V. O NEILL, v. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,, 341 F. Supp. 3d 1292 (M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 112.3187 (Count Two). See Doc. 4. . . . Stat. § 112.3187(2) ). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(5) - (8) ). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(5)(b) and (7). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(10). . . .

V. PEREZ ESCALONA, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,, 227 So. 3d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . terminated his employment, Perez Escalona sued the City under Florida’s Whistle-blower’s Act, section 112.3187 . . . conclusively established that Perez Escalona had failed to report his complaints in compliance with section 112.3187 . . . i.e., one authorized to receive, investigate and process a whistleblower’s complaint) under section 112.3187 . . .

UTTERBACK, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,, 219 So. 3d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Auth., 801 So.2d 122, 123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that section 112.3187(9)(f), Florida Statutes, . . .

STATE v. BRACEWELL, 220 So. 3d 1228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Dep’t. of Health, 89 So.3d 1079, 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (citing §§ 112.3187(8)(a); 112.31895, Fla. . . .

GREEN, v. IVEY,, 220 So. 3d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . §§ 112.3187-.31895, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . .

GRADDY, v. WAL- MART STORES EAST, LP,, 237 F. Supp. 3d 1223 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 112.3187(5)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .

WAGNER, v. LEE COUNTY,, 678 F. App'x 913 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . Stat. § 112.3187. . . . Stat. § 112.3187(3)(c) (providing that “adverse personnel action” includes discharge). . . . See id. § 112.3187(5)-(7). . . . Id. § 112.3187(5). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(7). . . .

KOGAN, v. ISRAEL,, 211 So. 3d 101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . enforcement officer, sued his employer, Scott Israel as Sheriff of Broward County (“BSO”), under section 112.3187 . . . See § 112.3187(2)-(7), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . rights or interests of a person for the employee’s or person’s disclosure of certain information. § 112.3187 . . . by any agency or federal government entity” are protected under the public Whistle-blower’s Act. § 112.3187 . . . or political subdivision therein; or any public school, community college, or state university.” § 112.3187 . . .

KING, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,, 226 F. Supp. 3d 1328 (M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . they violated her First Amendment rights and Florida’s Whistleblower Act for public employees, Section 112.3187 . . . Stat. § 112.3187(5). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(6). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(7). But if the disclosure is made pursuant to a “request! . . . Stat. § 112.3187(8). . . .

HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES PROJECT, v. SPV REALTY, LC,, 212 So. 3d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Office of State Attorney, 731 So.2d 829, 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (“The statutory language of § 112.3187 . . .

BRADSHAW, v. BOTT,, 205 So. 3d 815 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . sheriff employed by the Sheriff, Ric Bradshaw, filed a complaint alleging a single violation of section 112.3187 . . . The Act protects “employees and persons” who disclose protected information. § 112.3187(7), Fla. . . . We therefore conclude that section 112.3187(8)(b) governs the remedy in this case. . . . .” § 112.3187(8)(b), Fla. Stat. . . . GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur. . § 112.3187, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . .

RAY, v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE,, 664 F. App'x 816 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 112.3187(4)(a), and the Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. §§ 760.10(Z )(a). . . . Stat. §§ 112.3187(4), (5), (7). . . .

Mr. TRIGO, v. CITY OF DORAL,, 663 F. App'x 871 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 112.3187. Among other things, the Trigos alleged that Doral retaliated against J. . . .

IGWE, v. CITY OF MIAMI,, 208 So. 3d 150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . “the City”), disposing of Igwe’s retaliatory discharge claim, which was brought pursuant to section 112.3187 . . . Two such requirements, which are set forth in sections 112.3187(6) and 112.3187(7), are in dispute in . . . In fact, as our analysis of section 112.3187(7) reveals, the Act expressly protects such disclosures. . . . Thus, Igwe is a protected person under section 112.3187(7), as his disclosures to the City Commission . . . CONCLUSION Based on our finding that section 112.3187(7), when read in pari materia with the rest of . . .

CAROLLO, v. BORIA,, 833 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 112.3187 et seq.; and (3) violations of the City of Doral Municipal Charter. . . .

JOHNSON, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 190 So. 3d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . sixty-day right-to-amend period does not extend the sixty-day 'filing deadline required by section 112.3187 . . . Section 112.3187(8)(a), Florida Statutes (2014), states that any employee of a state agency “who is discharged . . . The statutes governing the Whistle-blower’s Act, sections 112.31895 and 112.3187, do not mention amendments . . . The Department cites to only section 112.3187, without pointing to a subsection, for support that the . . .

JULIAN, v. BAY COUNTY DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD,, 189 So. 3d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . the disputed issue of whether Appellee created administrative procedures by “ordinance” under section 112.3187 . . . and neither the parties nor we located any case law interpreting that term in the context of section 112.3187 . . . trial court that the school board policy Appellee had adopted qualifies as an ordinance under section 112.3187 . . .

SHAW, v. TOWN OF LAKE CLARKE SHORES,, 174 So. 3d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .” § 112.3187(2), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . an investigation, hearing, or other inquiry conducted by any agency or federal government entity.” § 112.3187 . . . or gross neglect of duty committed by an employee or agent of an agency or independent contractor. § 112.3187 . . . disclosure concerning a violation of law or act of gross mismanagement or other disclosure listed above. § 112.3187 . . .

RUSTOWICZ, v. NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT n k a, 174 So. 3d 414 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 112.3187(2)-(7), Fla. Stat. (2009); Rice-Lamar v. . . . The Written Complaint Requirement Section 112.3187(7) of the Whistleblower Act states: (7) Employees . . . 203(9) or other appropriate local official. § 112.3187(6), Fla. Stat. (2009) (emphasis added). . . . Sections 112.3187-112.31895, Florida Statutes (2013), is Florida’s Whistle-blower’s Act. . . . The section pertinent to this appeal is section 112.3187. . . . .

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, v. R. SMITH, 159 So. 3d 888 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . unequivocally waives sovereign immunity for the purposes of the “Remedies” and “Relief’ afforded by subsections 112.3187 . . . governmental office ... or any other abuse ... on the part of an agency, public officer, or employee.’ ” § 112.3187 . . .

KEARNS, v. FARMER ACQUISITION COMPANY d b a, 157 So. 3d 458 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .” § 112.3187(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014) (emphasis added). . . .

McSHEA, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY,, 58 F. Supp. 3d 1325 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 112.3187(8)(c), against the School Board (Count 10); Defamation against Defendant Gardner (Count . . . Stat. § 112.3187. . . . of Count 10 on the basis that McShea failed to comply with the “presuit requirements” set out in § 112.3187 . . . In support, the School Board first asserts that under § 112.3187(6), McShea was required to allege that . . . executive officer, which, in the school district context, is the school district’s superintendent. § 112.3187 . . .

FERNANDEZ, v. BAL HARBOUR VILLAGE,, 49 F. Supp. 3d 1144 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 112.3187(8)(b). . . . See § 112.3187(5)(b). . . .

MARCHETTI v. SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY,, 117 So. 3d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See §§ 112.3187-112.31895, Fla. Stat. (2012). They moved for Mrs. . . . Marchetti’s temporary reinstatement under section 112.3187(9)(f), which provides: (9) RELIEF — In any . . . Section 112.3187 is intended to “prevent agencies or independent contractors from taking retaliatory . . . Subsection 112.3187(9) sets forth the required relief in actions brought under the Act. . . . The statute separates “temporary reinstatement” in subsection 112.3187(9)(f) from the “[ijssuance of . . .

TURNER, v. INZER,, 521 F. App'x 762 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 112.3187, and gender discrimination and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights . . . Stat. § 112.3187(4), (5), (7). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(7). . . .

COMPETELLI, v. CITY OF BELLEAIR BLUFFS,, 113 So. 3d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Belleair Bluffs, sued the City for violation of Florida’s public employee whis-tleblower act, sections 112.3187 . . . If true, such retaliation may run afoul of section 112.3187: (4) ACTIONS PROHIBITED.— (a) An agency or . . . See § 112.3187(2), (4), (5). . . . See § 112.3187(2). Mr. . . . See § 112.3187(10) (“It shall be an affirmative defense to any action brought pursuant to this section . . .

CALDWELL, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS,, 121 So. 3d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . conduct the investigatory and fact-finding functions set forth in the Whistle-blower’s Act, sections 112.3187 . . . Elder Affairs retaliated against you in violation of the Florida Public “Whistle-blower’s Act (Act), §§ 112.3187 . . . Accordingly, the Commission lacks jurisdiction to investigate this claim. §§ 112.3187-112.31895, Florida . . . Section 112.3187, Florida Statutes, in turn, prohibits an employer from taking retaliatory action against . . . gross neglect of duty committed by an employee or agent of an agency or independent contractor.” § 112.3187 . . . .” § 112.3187(2), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . under the Act through either circuit court or the Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC). §§ 112.3187 . . . provides certain prerequisites to the filing of an action in either circuit court or with PERC. §§ 112.3187 . . . Accordingly, the Commission lacks jurisdiction to investigate this claim. §§ 112.3187-112.31895, Florida . . . This rule was promulgated under §§ 112.3187-.31895, Florida Statutes which means that Rule 60Y-5 was . . .

STANTON, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,, 129 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . jurisdiction to investigate the claim under Florida’s “Whistle-blower’s Act” (“the Act”) found in sections 112.3187 . . . allegations of retaliation based on appellant’s alleged disclosure, contrary to the provisions of section 112.3187 . . . unlawful behavior, possessed the necessary authority to investigate the matter, as mandated by section 112.3187 . . .

TILLERY, Jr. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE,, 104 So. 3d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Appellee, the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ), under the Whistle-blower’s Act, sections 112.3187 . . . any other abuse or gross neglect of duty on the part of an agency, public officer, or employee.” § 112.3187 . . . gross neglect of duty committed by an employee or agent of an agency or independent contractor.” § 112.3187 . . . this section may file a complaint, which complaint must be made in accordance with § 112.31895.” § 112.3187 . . . See § 112.3187(6), Fla. Stat.; see also Fla. Admin. Code R. 60Y-5.001(6) (2011); Quintini v. . . .

QUINTINI, v. PANAMA CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 102 So. 3d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . chief executive officer of the Authority or “other appropriate local official” as required by section 112.3187 . . . framed by this appeal is whether HUD is an “other appropriate local official” for purposes of section 112.3187 . . . Section 112.3187(6) specifies “to whom information [must be] disclosed” in order to be protected under . . . This is consistent with the plain language of section 112.3187(6), which as noted above, unambiguously . . . ACT Corporation, there is nothing ambiguous about section 112.3187(6). . . .

CASTRO, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 903 F. Supp. 2d 1290 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 112.3187 (“FWA”). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(2). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(5)(a). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(6). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(5)(a). . . .

A. SCHNEBLY, v. YOUTH SERVICES, LLC,, 98 So. 3d 1270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See 112.3187(2), Fla. . . . The Act is codified at section 112.3187-31895, Florida Statutes (2002). . . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. UNLAWFUL RETALIATION, 95 So. 3d 106 (Fla. 2012)

. . . University, 989 So.2d 6 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (right to jury trial pursuant to the Whistle-blower Act, F.S. 112.3187 . . .

ROBINSON, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,, 89 So. 3d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . appeals an adverse final summary judgment of her civil complaint under the Whistle-blower’s Act, sections 112.3187 . . . under the Act through either circuit court or the Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC). §§ 112.3187 . . . provides certain prerequisites to the filing of an action in either circuit court or with PERC. §§ 112.3187 . . . the Office of the Governor within sixty days of the action that is the subject of the complaint. §§ 112.3187 . . . either to file a complaint with PERC within sixty days or to file a civil action within 180 days. §§ 112.3187 . . .

L. WILLIAMS, v. CITY OF MIAMI,, 87 So. 3d 91 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . civil rights Complaint against the City of Miami pursuant to the Florida Whistle-blower’s Act, section 112.3187 . . . court under the Whistle-blower’s Act, a plaintiff must first exhaust all administrative remedies. § 112.3187 . . . The Civil Service Board meets the requirement of section 112.3187(8)(b) as the panel before which the . . .

SMITH, v. PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC., 864 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (N.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . §§ 112.3187, et seq. (see Doc. 1-2). . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, v. SHAPIRO,, 68 So. 3d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . 509.092, Florida Statutes (2007), and Florida’s Public Sector Whistle-blower’s Act (FPWA), sections 112.3187 . . . To establish a prima facie claim for retaliation under Florida’s Whistle-blower Act, sections 112.3187 . . .

COUNTRY PLACE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. J. P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP., 51 So. 3d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . filed an action for wrongful discharge against the defendant under the Florida Whistleblower’s Act, §§ 112.3187 . . .

AULET, v. M. CASTRO f k a M., 44 So. 3d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Boynton Beach, 927 So.2d 1061, 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), the court treated the 180-day limit in section 112.3187 . . .

THOMAS, v. MIAMI DADE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST,, 369 F. App'x 19 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 112.3187. . . . Stat. § 112.3187(4). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(8)(b). . . .

UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, v. TURKIEWICZ,, 21 So. 3d 141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . president’s letter upholding his non-reappointment, as is required by the final sentence of section 112.3187 . . . Section 112.3187(8), Florida Statutes, identifies three classes of persons who may file a whistleblower . . . Section 112.3187(8)(a), Florida Statutes, is a pre-suit requirement. . . . Turkiewicz urges that the use of the word “may” in section 112.3187(8)(a) indicates that the filing of . . . MONACO, C.J., and TORPY, J., concur. . §§ 112.3187-.31895, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . .

M. PINTADO, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY HOUSING AGENCY,, 20 So. 3d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . based on his failure to file his lawsuit asserting a claim under the Whistle-blower’s Act (“Act”), § 112.3187 . . . Section 112.3187(8)(b) provides in pertinent part as follows: Within 180 days after entry of a final . . . Thus, if the 180-day period set forth in section 112.3187(8)(b) is mandatory, the trial court properly . . . (citing to § 112.3187(8)); Shuck v. . . . Mar. 1, 2007) (noting that a civil action under section 112.3187(8) must be filed within 180 days of . . .

KING, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, G. C. M., 650 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Stat. § 112.3187(7). A complaint made to the agency inspector general need not be in writing. . . . Stat. § 112.3187(7). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(7). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(7). . . . Stat. §§ 112.3187(5)(a) & (b). . . .

J. CROUCH, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 993 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . an offer of judgment after establishing that the appellant was not entitled to relief under sections 112.3187 . . .

FOX, v. CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, a, 984 So. 2d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 112.3187(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . . § 112.3187(8)(b), Fla. Stat.; Bridges v. . . . an employee within the terms and conditions of employment by an agency or independent contractor. § 112.3187 . . . By comparison, section 112.3187(9)(c) of the Whistle-blower’s Act permits a plaintiff to recover “[c] . . . Section 112.3187(8)(b), Florida Statutes, provides: Within 60 days after the action prohibited by this . . .

B. O NEAL, v. FLORIDA A M UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR FLORIDA A M UNIVERSITY,, 989 So. 2d 6 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Weekly D795, D796 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 19, 2008) (“[Sjection 112.3187(9)(c) of the Whistle-blower’s Act . . . & Mechanical University in the action she brought under the Florida Whistle-blower’s Act, sections 112.3187 . . . lost wages, benefits, or other lost remuneration caused' by” her allegedly retaliatory discharge. § 112.3187 . . . appropriate, for lost wages, benefits, or other lost remuneration caused by the adverse action.” § 112.3187 . . . appropriate, for lost wages, benefits, or other lost remuneration caused by the adverse action.” § 112.3187 . . .

ALLEN, v. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY,, 981 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 112.3187(1), (7), Fla. Stat. (2001). FIU fired Ms. Allen effective February 9, 2002. . . . See id. § 112.3187(8)(a). Ms. . . . Id. § 112.3187(8)(a). That is the procedure Ms. Allen followed in this case. . . . Id. § 112.3187(8)(a). The Commission had jurisdiction to consider Ms. . . . Id. § 112.3187(8)(a). . . .

FEDOLFI, v. BANYAN AIR SERVICES, INC., 258 F. App'x 274 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 112.3187. No reversible error has been shown; we affirm. . . .

KHAN, v. FERNANDEZ- RUNDLE,, 287 F. App'x 50 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 112.3187. . . .

PINTANDO, v. MIAMI- DADE HOUSING AGENCY,, 501 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 112.3187; (2) Florida’s Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. . . .

WHITE, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY,, 636 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 112.3187 (Count XI). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(8)(b). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(8). . . . Stat. § 112.3187 (Count XI) is therefore dismissed. . . . Stat. § 112.3187(7). The FWA is to be liberally construed. Fla. Dep't of Educ. v. . . .

M. VILA, v. J. PADR N,, 484 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 112.3187. . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, v. GARRISON,, 954 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . In this action brought under Florida’s Public “Whistle-blower’s Act,” sections 112.3187-112.31895, Florida . . .

ANDERSON, v. CITY OF CRYSTAL RIVER, FLORIDA,, 219 F. App'x 901 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 1983 and the Florida Whistle-blower Act, Florida Statutes § 112.3187, and for recision of his prior . . .

BROWNE, v. CITY OF MIAMI,, 948 So. 2d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The Act itself provides in section 112.3187(8)(b): Within 60 days after the action prohibited by this . . . The Civil Service Board meets the requirement of section 112.3187(8)(b) as the panel before whom the . . .

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, v. H. WITT,, 939 So. 2d 315 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 112.3187(4)-(5), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . See § 112.3187(7), Fla. Stat. . . . favor of the City on the whistle-blower claim as a consequence of Witt’s failure to comply with section 112.3187 . . . The jury was thus instructed that section 112.3187(7)’s “notice” requirement had already been resolved . . .

BROWARD COUNTY, a v. MEIKLEJOHN,, 936 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . §§ 112.3187-.31895, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

GARCETTI v. CEBALLOS, 547 U.S. 410 (U.S. 2006)

. . . . §112.3187 (2003); Haw. Rev. Stat. §378-61 (1993); Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §61.101 (West 2005); Mass. . . .

BRIDGES, v. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,, 927 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 112.3187(8)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that if the employer has not esr tablished administrative . . .

Z. BARTHLOW, v. B. JETT,, 930 So. 2d 739 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . filed an action for wrongful discharge against Jett under the Florida Whistle-blower’s Act, sections 112.3187 . . .

WALKER, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, a, 925 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . his employer, the Florida Department of Veterans Affairs, violated the Whistle-blower’s Act, sections 112.3187 . . . Under section 112.3187(7), as it applies to this case, a protected disclosure requires an employee’s . . . The invoices do not qualify as a “written and signed complaint” within the meaning of section 112.3187 . . .

J. CROUCH, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,, 913 So. 2d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 112.3187(7), Florida Statutes (2001), protects, in relevant part, “employees who file any written . . . the trial court’s directed verdict because Crouch did not disclose information as required by section 112.3187 . . .

ROSA, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILIES,, 915 So. 2d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . did not constitute a whistle-blower complaint because it did not satisfy the requirements of section 112.3187 . . . Under section 112.3187(5), to be protected, the information disclosed must include either: (a) Any violation . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, v. PATTERSON,, 925 So. 2d 337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See §§ 112.3187-31895, Fla. Stat. (2002). In the discovery stage of the proceedings, Mr. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EDISON COMMUNITY COLLEGE, FLORIDA,, 421 F.3d 1190 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 112.3187-112.31895. . . .

GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT v. UNITED STATES WILSON, 545 U.S. 409 (U.S. 2005)

. . . . § 112.3187(8)(a) (2003) (180-day limitations period); Hughes Aircraft Co., supra, at 1035 (California . . . . §§ 112.3187(8)(a), 448.103 (2003) (whistle-blower actions); Ga. . . .

TRACEY- MEDDOFF, v. J. ALTMAN HAIR BEAUTY CENTRE, INC., 899 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . issue was whether individual liability existed under Florida’s public sector whistleblower act, section 112.3187 . . . As the court explained, the pertinent part of the 1993 text of section 112.3187 was: (2) LEGISLATIVE . . . Id. at 1130-31 (quoting § 112.3187(2), (3)) (emphasis in original). . . . Id. at 1131 n. 2 (quoting § 112.3187(9)). . . . The remedies available under section 448.103(2) are similar to those available under section 112.3187 . . .

DAUSMAN, v. HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT,, 898 So. 2d 213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . he sought to . amend his complaint to allege a violation of the public sector whistle blower act, § 112.3187 . . .

WHITE, v. PURDUE PHARMA, INC., 369 F. Supp. 2d 1335 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 112.3187 (emphasis added). . . .

GUESS, v. CITY OF MIRAMAR,, 889 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . chief for the City of Miramar, filed a Whistle-blower’s Act claim against the City pursuant to section 112.3187 . . .

TAYLOR, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION, 878 So. 2d 421 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . That the requirement to elect a remedy also applies to whistleblower actions is made clear in section 112.3187 . . . Subsection (11) of that statute states: Sections 112.3187-112.31895 do not diminish the rights, privileges . . . PERC has previously decided two cases in which it applied section 112.3187(11) to bar a whistle-blower . . .

P. ROLAND, v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY, LLC f k a a, 873 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See §§ 112.3187 and 448.102, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . . . Plaintiff also alleged a violation of section 112.3187, Florida Statutes (2000). . . . It is not clear to us that Section 112.3187 applies to the plaintiff, but that question is not before . . .

STATE, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS, 867 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Florida Department of Transportation,” on the authority of the Florida Whistle-blower’s Act, sections 112.3187 . . . See §§ 112.3187-112.31895, Fla. Stat. . . .

PINO, v. THE CITY OF MIAMI, a, 315 F. Supp. 2d 1230 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . Amended Complaint, Pino sues the Defendants for violation of Florida’s Whistle-blower’s Act, Section 112.3187 . . . Stat. § 112.3187(8)(b) (emphasis added). . . . Civil Service Board, as set forth in Section 36(a) of the Miami Charter, meets the requirements of § 112.3187 . . . criminal complaint with the State Attorney’s Office does not meet the statutory criteria of Section 112.3187 . . .

Dr. CALDWELL, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES BROWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE,, 858 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . complaint with the Commission alleging that her termination violated the Whistle-blower’s Act, sections 112.3187 . . . This limitation is reflected in section 112.3187(8)(a) which indicates that the remedy for a whistle-blower . . . 112.3189(1) (setting investigative procedures upon the disclosure of “information as described in s. 112.3187 . . . a state agency under section 216.011 is not inconsistent with the definition of “agency” in section 112.3187 . . . contained in section 112.3187 of the Whistle-blower’s Act; that definition is broader than the section . . .

RICE- LAMAR, v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a, 853 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Lamar) against the City of Fort Lauderdale (City) pursuant to the Florida Whistleblower Act, section 112.3187 . . . various state claims, including a whistleblower claim pursuant to the Florida Whistleblower Act, section 112.3187 . . . Florida’s Whistleblower statute, section 112.3187(2), Florida Statutes, prevents agencies from taking . . . internal communications did not rise to the level necessary to constitute a disclosure under section 112.3187 . . . Section 112.3187(6) directs that for disclosures concerning a local governmental entity, the information . . .

DAHL, v. ECKERD FAMILY YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC. a d b a, 843 So. 2d 956 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . complaint, finding that Dahl’s exclusive remedy was Florida’s public-sector whistleblower act, sections 112.3187 . . . public-sector act’s period of 180 days from the time the prohibited action (i.e., termination) was taken, § 112.3187 . . . See § 112.3187(2). . . . under any other law or rule or under any collective bargaining agreement or employment contract.” §§ 112.3187 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS, 842 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . temporary reinstatement of Mavis Georgalis to her position of employment with DOT pursuant to section 112.3187 . . . Commission on Human Relations (FCHR) failed to follow the statutory notice requirements of section 112.3187 . . . Section 112.3187(4), Florida Statutes. . . . Section 112.3187(9)(f) provides for temporary reinstatement of an employee who alleges a violation of . . . Section 112.3187(2), Florida Statutes. . . .

ALLOCCO, v. CITY OF CORAL GABLES, A A, 221 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Stat. § 112.3187, because that claim is time-barred. . . . Stat. § 112.3187(2). . . . Stat. § 112.3187(8). . . . Stat. § 112.3187. See Fairbanks v. . . . Stat. § 112.3187. The plaintiffs argue that the period for bringing their suit under Fla. . . .

AMADOR, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF REGENTS FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY,, 830 So. 2d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . He also sued FIU for violation of Florida’s Whistle-Blower’s Act, § 112.3187, Florida Statutes (1997) . . . an employee within the terms and conditions of employment by an agency or independent contractor.” § 112.3187 . . . Id. § 112.3187(9). . . .

BOARD OF REGENTS OF STATE C. J. S. B. L. v. E. SNYDER,, 826 So. 2d 382 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . admits that he has no state or federal statutory claim under Florida’s Whistle-Blower Act, section 112.3187 . . .

PEREZ, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 297 F.3d 1255 (11th Cir. 2002)

. . . Stat. chs. 112.3187-112.31895 ("Whistle-Blowers Act”) and Fla. . . .

LUSTER, v. WEST PALM BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 801 So. 2d 122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . She claimed the entitlement to reinstatement pending trial, pursuant to section 112.3187(9)(f), Florida . . . Appellant moved for reinstatement pursuant to section 112.3187(9)(f), which provides: Temporary reinstatement . . . See § 112.3187(9)(f), Fla. Stat. . . .

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, v. H. WITT,, 789 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The remaining claim submitted to the jury was brought under Florida’s Whistle-Blower Act, sections 112.3187 . . . Section 112.3187(10) provides as follows: Defenses. — It shall be an affirmative defense to any action . . .

A. BRUNO, v. A. E. HANDY ASSOCIATES, INC., 787 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . as a motion for temporary injunction but substance concerned temporary reinstatement under section 112.3187 . . .

IRVEN, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 790 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 2001)

. . . Petitioner filed an action under the Whistle Blower’s Act, sections 112.3187-112.31895, Florida Statutes . . . of ... misfeasance ... or gross neglect of duty committed by an employee or agent of an agency.” § 112.3187 . . . See § 112.3187(5), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . The Act provides in part: 112.3187 Adverse action against employee for disclosing information of specified . . . or gross neglect of duty committed by an employee or agent of an agency or independent contractor. § 112.3187 . . .

MACUBA, v. DEBOER,, 193 F.3d 1316 (11th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 112.3187 (West 1992). In their answers, the defendants denied liability. . . . Ann. § 112.3187(4)(a), (b). . . . Id. § 112.3187(8)(c). . . . .

C. LINDAMOOD, v. OFFICE OF STATE ATTORNEY, NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA,, 731 So. 2d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . as an assistant state attorney, after she sued the Office of the State Attorney pursuant to section 112.3187 . . . Lindamood pending the conclusion of our investigation into her claim of retaliation,” citing § 112.3187 . . . Section 112.3187 applies to this case. . . . This specifically includes, but is not limited to, the Office of the Public Counsel. § 112.3187(6). . . . Adverse action includes, but is not limited to, discharge. § 112.3187(3)(c). . . .

DINEHART v. TOWN OF PALM BEACH,, 728 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . by ordinance and Appellants failed to exhaust their administrative remedies as required by section 112.3187 . . . heard “by a panel of impartial persons appointed by the appropriate local governmental authority.” § 112.3187 . . . Section 112.3187(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), provides, in part: Within 60 days after the action prohibited . . . Under the statute, the trial court lacks jurisdiction. § 112.3187(8)(b), Fla. . . . Section 112.3187(8)(b) provides that the local panel must make findings for a final decision by the local . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, v. IRVEN,, 724 So. 2d 698 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . 25, 1994, and subsequently filed her “whistle-blower’s” civil action complaint pursuant to section 112.3187 . . . Whether section 112.3187, Florida Statutes (1993), the “Whistle-Blower’s Act,” waives sovereign immunity . . . Whether Irven’s internal memoranda constituted whistle-blowing under section 112.3187, Florida Statutes . . . Whether Irven’s election of remedies under section 112.3187(11) and section 447.401, Florida Statutes . . . regard to the first issue raised by HRS, it is clear to us that the “Whistle-Blower’s Act,” sections 112.3187 . . .

Dr. SUSSAN, v. NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY,, 723 So. 2d 933 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Edenfield, 609 So.2d 27 (Fla.1992), which addresses section 112.3187, Florida Statutes (1989), the Public . . . Section 112.3187(2), specifically provides that the legislature intended that the Public Whistle Blower . . .

WALLACE, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 41 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . . § 2000e (West 1997) (“Title VII”); the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (“FCRA”); and Sections 112.3187 . . . Counts III, IV, V, and VI are state law claims for violation of the FCRA, Sections 112.3187 and 448.102 . . . Act, Florida Statute § 112.3187. . . . Fla.Stat. § 112.3187(7). . . . Id. at § 112.3187(10). . . .

CITY OF MIAMI, v. DEL RIO,, 723 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . pursuant to a jury verdict, finding the City liable to Jesus Del Rio [the employee] under sections 112.3187 . . . The Act itself provides in section 112.3187(8)(b): “Within 60 days after the action prohibited by this . . . [the Board], as set forth in section 36(a), Miami, Fla., Charter, meets the requirements of section 112.3187 . . . instant situation as the administrative boards involved therein did not meet the requirements of section 112.3187 . . . The intent of the Act is as set forth in section 112.3187(2), Florida Statutes (1993): “It is the intent . . .

WELD, v. SOUTHEASTERN COMPANIES, INC. A, 10 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . . § 112.3187 (the Whistle-Blower's Statute), absent specific legislative intent to the contrary). . . . .